Greenhouse Effect video compilations - By global warming Videos

global warming Videos

Watching: Greenhouse Effect video compilations

The Greenhouse Effect
Posted by: life is candy-full :) ? ~

Video duration: 387 seconds
Global video hits: 343235

vid was from: http://www.3media.co .uk/ thanks to 3media b friendly to our earth! thats a vid clip i used for my project i think its gud! so i post this out.....

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Yes ?
By: Victor Joao Hansen. on 15 Apr 13, 21:19:40
Yes ?

There is no ' ...
By: g1geo1g. on 14 Apr 13, 17:26:46
There is no 'radiative greenhouse effect' . All? atmospheres are thermodynamic. Shame on you.

good ?
By: madhav dewan. on 14 Apr 13, 12:23:47
good ?

agw what a load? of ...
By: utubespaamdetector. on 08 Apr 13, 18:37:25
agw what a load? of old shit.

Carbon induced ...
By: mc838783. on 30 Mar 13, 06:31:28
Carbon induced global? warming is POPPYCOCK

There is no such ...
By: g1geo1g. on 22 Mar 13, 19:43:03
There is no such thing as a radiative 'greenhouse effect'. Ask if you want to? know why

If you are taken in ...
By: g1geo1g. on 16 Mar 13, 22:42:02
If you are taken in by? the above video, then you have learned nothing

This was? my ...
By: haseokpark12. on 14 Mar 13, 20:53:52
This was? my homework

That should be? ' ...
By: g1geo1g. on 19 Feb 13, 20:31:05
That should be? 'deflected by the Earth's magnetic field'

Radiation has no ...
By: g1geo1g. on 19 Feb 13, 20:28:26
Radiation has no net charge, so it is not deflected by a magnetic field. The solar wind is composed of charged particles, protons and electrons. These are? deflected by the solar wind and form the aurora's where they fluoresce with the atmosphere. Most of the solar spectrum is 'thermal' as it is the result of the photospheric temperature. It can all become heat transferred upon absorption. Therefore all absorbed radiation is heat.

Radiative gases are ...
By: g1geo1g. on 18 Feb 13, 21:48:36
Radiative gases are the ONLY WAY the atmosphere can directly lose heat to space. Why would anyone think they could keep heat in? The true greenhouse gases are? nitrogen and oxygen that are meta stable and DO NOT RADIATE THE ENERGY INTO SPACE.

crbhawk1, you know ...
By: g1geo1g. on 18 Feb 13, 20:44:46
crbhawk1, you know very? little about radiative physics!

Stop vetting? ...
By: g1geo1g. on 18 Feb 13, 20:43:27
Stop vetting? comments!

I listen to people ...
By: 00WhiteBlade. on 18 Feb 13, 05:09:45
I listen to people talk about global warming as I snuggle under two blankets in southwest? florida with 30 degree weather, an I just laaaaaaaaauuuuuugh

Well, he didn't ...
By: cbrhawk1. on 17 Feb 13, 15:26:05
Well, he didn't explain the greenhouse effect correctly. He said "heat comes in and is reflected" which is incorrect. The? shorter, higher energy wavelengths of light penetrate our magnetic field and atmosphere and hit the ground, much of it being visible light. When the light hits the ground, it loses energy and turns into longer wavelengths, which are represented as heat. This is what gets trapped by the Greenhouse Effect. no reason to be alarmed because global warming is an European scam.

"Wow, the stupidity ...
By: cbrhawk1. on 17 Feb 13, 15:22:03
"Wow, the stupidity of this video are appalling!" as GWB would say. First of all, it is not heat from the Sun that reaches the Earth since our magnetic field blocks much of that. Most of our heat comes from shortwave radiation which reflects off of the surface, turning into longwave radiation? (heat). Secondly, in his pie chart, he does not list Water Vapor, which is far, far more abundant than CO2. "Sea level will raise by up to 5 meters." "Day after tomorrow" Picard_doublefacepalm.gif

This is one of the ...
By: MegaSunshineandrain. on 15 Feb 13, 22:27:41
This is one of the best little? videos regarding the green house effects. Why does it not have millions of views?

So many profoundly? ...
By: g1geo1g. on 15 Feb 13, 20:47:24
So many profoundly? incorrect statements in this video. The vertical thermal profile IOC the atmosphere is set by GRAVITY. Look up 'lapse rate'. It's a consequence of gravitational containment. Gravity is the reason the atmosphere is here.

poor quality ?
By: randomcitizen21. on 07 Feb 13, 22:31:54
poor quality ?

homework? completed ...
By: beany118118. on 29 Jan 13, 21:50:55
homework? completed! :D

logging old growth ...
By: phantomscolts1. on 20 Jan 13, 23:19:42
logging old growth and storing their carbon in the form of lumber and replanting which are far more? aggressive at carbon storage ... in fact you fools are doing the exact opposite at this point in time .. allowing the harvest of the younger more aggressive carbon storing trees and allowing the older trees which produce as much as they store which is a total stalemate if you objective is carbon storage..

Before an accurate ...
By: phantomscolts1. on 20 Jan 13, 23:04:33
Before an accurate assumption can be obtained more information must be on the table namely radiation the basic key to life on the surface of the planet balanced by the protective shield which regulates the amount of GOOD and BAD radiation into the biosphere.There is missing? information of the cause and effect of burning radioactive material in our biosphere until then everything is based on an inaccurate premise with a common conclusion.erratic weather,seismic,activity,and magnetic disturbances

this is not spam it ...
By: phantomscolts1. on 20 Jan 13, 23:02:31
this is not spam it is fact.. 40 % OZONE loss Rt. after nuclear power planet. Japan?? Earthquake 4/11By JOHN HEILPRIN, Associated Press John Heilprin, Associated Press...look it up!!?

excellant.........?
By: raju kosgi. on 10 Jan 13, 04:12:45
excellant.........?

good? but scary..
By: aysha reshma. on 09 Jan 13, 14:28:59
good? but scary..

Green House Effect Tutorial 2012 By Mika Lishauna
Posted by: ??? FAST HEALTHY HAIR GROWTH ???

Video duration: 612 seconds
Global video hits: 12333

PLEASE READ??? ? Our Website: http://realqueens.ne t/ ? Our Social Network: http://realqueens.ni ng.com/ ? Our Online Store: http://realqueens.ne t/shop-now ...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Do you think it ...
By: Irocc smooth. on 11 Apr 13, 10:41:08
Do you think it would? be alright to use jamacian castor oil on your scalp? Do you have to use butters or can you just use any oil alone to do the green house effect?

how often do I do? ...
By: cinnaminss. on 07 Apr 13, 04:54:48
how often do I do? this?

i thought u have to ...
By: cinnaminss. on 07 Apr 13, 04:53:32
i thought u have to put? a lot of oil the other day I did it oil was everywhere never again will I put alot! I'll deff put a quarter size next time!

If I use a styling ...
By: shansp8s. on 19 Mar 13, 01:07:52
If I use a styling product that is not all natural and do not wash it out at? night can I still do the greenhouse effect?

no mildew!??
By: Keisha Charmaine. on 23 Feb 13, 18:59:57
no mildew!??

This is the LOC ...
By: sharonrichardson17. on 07 Feb 13, 04:00:59
This is the LOC method just a different? name

Do u "have" 2 rinse ...
By: SuperNewAttitude. on 04 Feb 13, 11:50:33
Do u "have" 2 rinse ur hair in the morning after doing? the GHE at night?

Is there any other ...
By: slaughtertangela. on 02 Feb 13, 18:20:48
Is there any other mixtures and cobanations you could make?

hi, thank you very ...
By: Zin Jeffrey. on 21 Jan 13, 06:13:35
hi, thank you very much for the video i'm interested in trying the GHE challenge, my only question is what is the oil and where can i find? that oil, or how to make it? thank you

ok this may be a ...
By: Teresa Wooten. on 24 Nov 12, 16:45:29
ok this may be a dumb question but I? workout and sweat pretty good so could I still do this without having to wash my hair everyday and could i use my coconut oil?

I found your ...
By: Naturealcurl. on 07 Nov 12, 18:02:46
I found your channel through another youtuber who was doing the green house challenge. I have been doing the GHE for 1 week and my? hair feels so soft and moisturerized. I will continue to try this in hopes of seeing any kind of growth because the last 5 months my hair? hasnt grown at all not even an inch.If I see even 1/4 of and inch in a month or even in 2 months I will know for sure this is working for me. 3 more weeks to go I will update who ever wants to know:)

im so glad i found ...
By: shadadyl. on 07 Nov 12, 04:57:13
im so glad i found this video ive been so frustrated with my hair journey? maybe this will help ...blessings

DOES THIS WORK FOR ...
By: KONCIETEDXATTRACTIVE. on 30 Oct 12, 21:05:17
DOES THIS WORK FOR MEN? TO?

Pls can you tell? ...
By: khandie7. on 27 Oct 12, 11:06:18
Pls can you tell? me why you no longer use just oil , because I have been using oil and now I see you have changed it to the LOC method, is it better to add a cream? Thank you for all your great videos and keep up the excellent work .

Hi, I am? confused ...
By: khandie7. on 27 Oct 12, 10:58:32
Hi, I am? confused in your previous videos, you used just oil. This is now the Loc method . Liquid, oil , cream.

can the green house ...
By: catwoman40281. on 25 Oct 12, 23:16:33
can the green house effect work? if you somke cigarettes

Waitt, This Is The ...
By: OderaaXoXo Morah. on 18 Oct 12, 21:44:23
Waitt, This Is The Greenhouse? Effect?

I'm starting my ...
By: Mstootiefruity. on 09 Oct 12, 20:31:23
I'm starting my challenge today hope to have healthier looking hair by my birthday...LOL and then some...? THANKS

This seems that it ...
By: kdsmith3575. on 07 Oct 12, 05:50:02
This seems that it works excellent for natural hairstyles being able to twist and braid your hair at night. How do you recommend doing the GHE for relaxed short hair if you roll or wrap your hair every night and are not? trying to transition. My hair is only about 3-4 inches (a grown out pixie) and if I put oil/water on it 4-5 days a week I don't think it would style properly. I roll my hair every night.

What the hell has ...
By: Laura Tew. on 06 Oct 12, 01:27:49
What the hell has this got to do with the greenhouse effect? lol?

THANK YOU THANK YOU ...
By: CutieBird1000. on 30 Sep 12, 23:31:31
THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU oh and did I say THANK YOU! for the update on the ghe I am 6mo post relaxer and am so excited while on my hhj. Is their anyway that you would be doing a updated video on transitioning tips? During these past 6mos I have been taking care of my hair and ghe is one of my staple processes. Just yesterday someone was commenting on how much healthier my hair is? looking. Thank you for all you and your husband do haircare tips inspiration, encouragement ect.

Check out your ...
By: Yasmin Aden. on 30 Sep 12, 21:13:38
Check out your website for more deets! I'm def going to try? this to help with my dry ends. Question: do you use other products on your hair during the week? Or does the oil, water, butter take the place of leave-ins/moisturizers in your regimen?

I've been doing the ...
By: OutSpokenMo. on 30 Sep 12, 03:56:58
I've been doing the GHE for a month now and when I started my hair was CBL and my hair was always breaking off from split? ends and I wasn't retaining length at all, I didn't know why and I never thought about Buttering and Sealing my hair every night. Now my hair is almost near my armpit! My hair has never been this long. I just do twist when i'm doing the GHE and I take them out 4 a twistout. Thank you so much for posting your vids. I really appreciate you for taking your time to do these vids.

Hi Mika! I have a ...
By: YoJaYe. on 29 Sep 12, 04:29:40
Hi Mika! I have a question. I? use oils on my ends a lot but not always my whole head because I oil my scalp often. In the mornings I oil my scalp and put a little oil on my ends to seal in moisture then at night I just wrap my hair up for the GHE not adding any more oi. When I wake in the morning my hair is really damp and drys so soft. Is it ok to continue doing it this way?

The Greenhouse Effect
Posted by: NASA Earth Observatory

Video duration: 209 seconds
Global video hits: 20374

The temperature of earth has been relatively constant over time. This is possible because as the planet absorbs solar radiation, it also emits longwave radia...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Greenhouse gase? ...
By: Thibaut Tagnon. on 08 May 13, 22:39:29
Greenhouse gase? WILL destroy our world we have to take action! Nice video NASA

No such thing as ...
By: Billy Athens. on 29 Apr 13, 05:19:27
No such thing as greenhouse Gases!? Gases are evenly mixed, Without the greenhouse gas religion there hoax false to pieces. Scam! NO LAYERS,CONVECTION!!!!!!

but but but... what ...
By: roninpainbringer. on 18 Feb 13, 01:33:45
but but but... what about? that retarted experiment in 1909 by wood that "proves"(BWAHAHAHAHA) that the greenhouse effect doesnt exist(BWAHAHAHAHA) morans.

You should not be ...
By: 1000frolly. on 15 Feb 13, 12:10:56
You should not be trying? to indoctrinate? / push guilt onto children with this non-scientific tosh. For instance; just where is your evidence that our CO2 is dangerously warming the planet???

the greenhouse ...
By: TOMBOI50. on 23 Jan 13, 22:01:20
the greenhouse effect is 100% natural and life on earth would not exist, the enhanced greenhouse effect that is caused by humans is very bad because we are warming the temp? of the earth by an alarming rate and could eventualy cause a mass extinction. also we are are in a mass extinction now apparently.

My HomeWork now ...
By: yazeed tamimi. on 04 Dec 12, 13:57:50
My HomeWork now done !! ?

One of the better, ...
By: LEGnewTube. on 12 Oct 12, 22:30:35
One of the better, easier to understand videos on Youtube explaining this! Thankyou?

thank you so? much!
By: Clark Vincent Enriquez. on 15 Sep 12, 08:56:11
thank you so? much!

Now? my homework... ...
By: XtendOrange. on 13 Aug 12, 09:20:47
Now? my homework... Done!

For all animals/ ...
By: Teppo S�rkk�. on 17 Jun 12, 04:46:47
For all animals/nature and humans to have good living conditions permanently, we need a global? system that supports All Life Equally. To establish an Equality-based system All humans have to continuously lose Self-Interest and live according to what is Best For All Equally. There are courses with which a person can support oneself and others in the change. I recommend all to find and read the websites of 'Equal Money System', 'Desteni I Process' and 'Desteni'.

A Climate Minute - The Greenhouse Effect
Posted by: Centrist Party

Video duration: 100 seconds
Global video hits: 63521

The 'Greenhouse Effect' discovered in 1824 by Joseph Fourier is what keeps the earth from being a frozen ball in space. Without greenhouse gases (GHG's) the ...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

There is no ...
By: johndaddyo444. on 30 Apr 13, 06:17:12
There is no question CO2 and warming are correlated. The question is about causality. Doesn't it seem far more reasonable to recognize warming drives the sustainable levels of CO2, and that even when one has 7000 ppmv of CO2 in the atmosphere, nature finds surface cooling quite easy to achieve? In? fact, during every major glaciation, the one recurring phenomenon was that temperatures began to plummet as soon as CO2 peaked. So forgive me for not taking you up on an offer to study Archer further.

I haven't read all ...
By: johndaddyo444. on 30 Apr 13, 06:12:31
I haven't read all of Archer's work -- only those papers pertaining to the theory of anthropogenic forcing of climate. Of those handful, co-authored by such notorious AGW Warmists as Pierrehumbert, Rahmstorf, and Schmidt, there isn't a single paper which lays out a coherent physical theory of exactly how CO2 is supposed to provide any measurable influence on climate. All they have is an assumption, backed up by a model created specifically to? support the assumption.

Please let go of ...
By: johndaddyo444. on 30 Apr 13, 05:56:43
Please let go of the blanket/coat analogies - I'm sure you're knowledgeable enough to understand how they fail. However, let's take your late night naked walk in winter snow, and ask if you would rather tough it out for an hour, or put on a coat that remains chilled to -60 C no matter how much? heat your body generates? Would you wear the freezing coat? Even though it's colder than the freezing night air?

So you are saying ...
By: uscentrist. on 29 Apr 13, 10:04:44
So you are saying that if you walk outside at night, in the snow, in winter, with no clothes on, and the temp is freezing, for an hour, you will remain just as warm as if you had clothes on. I don't supposed you've tried this experiment? BTW, being familiar or knowing David Archer exists, does not mean you understand what he said,? and quoting science papers that do not disprove what you think they disprove does not mean your right about your opinion of the well established science.

Schuster (1906), ...
By: johndaddyo444. on 29 Apr 13, 04:43:02
Schuster (1906), Schwarzchild (1914), Essenhigh (1964), Spencer & Braswell (2008, 2011), Gerlich? & Tscheuschner (2007, 2009). All peer-reviewed scientists who blow the hole out of AGW pseudo-science. There are many, many others. Like 31,000 scientists so mad about AGW nonsense that they signed a petition asking the US gov't to refrain from making ANY policy based on AGW pseudo-science. Scientists don't go in for signing petitions, so they must really be hopping mad, and damn sure they're right

So tell me again ...
By: johndaddyo444. on 29 Apr 13, 04:27:46
So tell me again about Ozone "holes" and the pseudo-science linking them to CFCs and? lauded by a few non-atmospheric chemists in Stockholm, who were heavily influenced by prevailing political opinions, and the once great science flowing out of American academia.

Total "ozone- ...
By: johndaddyo444. on 29 Apr 13, 04:23:42
Total "ozone-destroying" CFC production peaked at 1.2 Million tonnes in 1987-88, then fell dramatically in response to the Montreal protocol (1987). Altogether, we have a crude estimate of 35 Million tonnes of CFCs emitted (1950 - 2010). That represents a layer of pure CFC gas that would? spread out and cover the surface of the planet to a thickness of 10 microns - half the thickness of a fine (flaxen) human hair. With a molecular weight of 120.9 g/mol (4 times heavier than air), CFCs do fall.

Sorry, A mel. Not ...
By: johndaddyo444. on 29 Apr 13, 04:02:05
Sorry, A mel. Not only is AGW a massive political fraud, but so is the alleged ozone hole. An active Sun caused the ozone thinning in the late 20thC, and a diminishing Sun has allowed it to "return to normal" in the early 21stC. Rowland, Crutzen, and Molina should have their Nobel prizes confiscated for the nonsensical? conjecture regarding CFCs, which were never emitted in sufficient amounts to measure as a constituent in Earth's atmosphere, and which never "drifted up" into the stratosphere!

AGW theory does not ...
By: johndaddyo444. on 29 Apr 13, 03:56:39
AGW theory does not rest on any? known physical explanation. The "evidence" for CO2 warming consists entirely of conjecture and false climate models created to "measure" the effect of adding CO2 to the atmosphere. The problem? Mankind did not put CO2 in the atmosphere - it only added to the CO2 that was already there. About 34ppmv in total (500 GTOE), which can only contribute (at most) +0.38C from the dawn of the industrial age until 2013. UAH mean global temp anomaly 2011= +0.13C, 2012= +0.16C.

Sorry, uscentrist. ...
By: johndaddyo444. on 29 Apr 13, 03:48:35
Sorry, uscentrist. Even the blanket description fails. Would anyone argue that an astronaut's space suit "traps heat" to keep him warm? On the contrary, the suit must work hard to keep the astronaut COOL. Would anyone in their right mind argue that a "blanket" kept at -60 C works to keep the planet warm? Keep in mind that your hypothetical blanket sits between the surface varying from -55 C to +55 C, depending on latitude, and the stratosphere - which warms steadily with altitude as CO2? depletes

I'm familiar with ...
By: johndaddyo444. on 29 Apr 13, 03:38:36
I'm familiar with Archer. I'm also familiar with the false theory CO2 causes more WV to remain in the atmosphere, adding to the initial (too small to measure) GH warming by CO2. Unfortunately, AGW is a political activist (pseudo-scientific) myth that has no basis in physics. Read Gerlich & Tscheuschner (2007, 2009). Or read Schuster (1906) or Schwarzchild (1914) who refuted Arrhenius. Or read Essenhigh (1964), who refuted Revelle. Spencer? & Braswell (2008, 2011) easily dispatch Hansen's folly.

Actually you are ...
By: uscentrist. on 28 Apr 13, 13:19:54
Actually you are right and wrong. You are? correct that 'greenhouse effect' is not the best description of the effect. You are incorrect regarding the speakers (myself) description. I clearly say "works like a blanket around the earth by trapping heat radiated off the surface of the planet", which is a better description, though still not covering the complexities of the vertical column, it is a relatively accurate depiction of the effect.

If you really want ...
By: uscentrist. on 28 Apr 13, 10:46:57
If you really want to understand how the climate system can warm more that 1.15C for a doubling? of CO2, do an internet search for: david archer climate lectures understanding the forecast uchicago

thanks but a little ...
By: mehatepeoplewhofake. on 13 Apr 13, 19:41:23
thanks but a little late my presentation came already,? its ok but i did really good on it.

H2O, CO2, CH4, N2O ...
By: uscentrist. on 12 Apr 13, 18:53:08
H2O, CO2, CH4, N2O and various CFC's. Go to ossfoundation.us and you can see some more detail in the ghg? pages.

Slight amendment - ...
By: johndaddyo444. on 12 Apr 13, 11:38:07
Slight amendment - I should have said mankind's consumption of fossil fuels has added only 0.14% to the 3.5% GH effect estimated by IPCC and atmospheric physicists. WV produces 96.5% of Earth's GH effect, which is estimated by most scientists at +33? C. Therefore, 400ppm of CO2 generates no more than 0.035 x 33 = +1.15 C. Hard to imagine how "doubling" CO2 (to 560ppm) would cause more than +1.15 C, isn't it? IPCC says +3.25 C because their political pseudo-science assumes WV feedback is positive.

The mechanism for ...
By: johndaddyo444. on 12 Apr 13, 11:30:22
The mechanism for excessive Venus surface temperature comes from conduction (heating from below), retrograde rotation, and slow rotation velocity (planet orbits Sun 1X before fully rotating). The atmosphere is too dense (92 times that of Earth) to allow more than 10% of TOA TSI to the surface, so Earth actually has? greater surface insolation than Venus. And since upper atmosphere (96% CO2) has a cold layer colder than any part of Earth's atmosphere (-175 C at 100 km), then AGW theory is busted.

Yes that is true ...
By: ryanforeally. on 12 Apr 13, 03:35:22
Yes that is true but the only thing is that its not referred to as global warming anymore since its not JUST warming, its changing. hence the phrase climate? change. Eventually it will be so bad that summer is winter, winter is spring, and spring is double winter

Carbon induced ...
By: mc838783. on 30 Mar 13, 06:34:51
Carbon induced global warming? is POPPYCOCK

Great response! ...
By: mphello. on 11 Mar 13, 06:20:16
Great response! Keep up the great? comments! :)

the greenhouse ...
By: mehatepeoplewhofake. on 16 Feb 13, 14:53:57
the greenhouse effect traps heat with what kind of gases please someone? respond.

Thank you? so much, ...
By: harrypottermaniac08. on 24 Jan 13, 21:09:40
Thank you? so much, this really helped me study for my Science Exam! :D

AGW is nonsense: ...
By: johndaddyo444. on 09 Dec 12, 07:25:15
AGW is nonsense: 1958 CO2 315ppm, MGTA -0.021? C 1998 CO2 365ppm, MGTA +0.529 C, delta CO2 +50ppm, delta MGTA +0.55 C 2012 CO2 405ppm, MGTA +0.412 C, delta CO2 +40ppm, delta MGTA -0.117 C Why does +50ppm = +0.55C, while +40ppm = -0.117 C? (HadCRUT3v data) Satellites (UAH AMSU data) show MGTA (mean global temperature anomaly) has dropped no less than -0.2 C from 1998 to 2012. That's not how AGW is supposed to work. The theory is busted.

The speaker in this ...
By: johndaddyo444. on 09 Dec 12, 07:17:28
The speaker in this video improperly describes the greenhouse effect, which isn't really analogous to a greenhouse at all (there are no glass walls or glass ceiling encapsulating the? atmosphere -- that is, earth's atmosphere cannot "trap" heat). No matter, the discussion surrounding Greenhouse Gases is also misleading, because it does not mention the fact that there are only two GHGs that matter: H2O and CO2. H2O causes 99.86% of earth's GH effect, while CO2 causes the other 0.14%.

Green House Effect Video for Kids
Posted by: makemegenius

Video duration: 190 seconds
Global video hits: 26227

Visit www.makemegenius.com for free science videos.

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Why did you say ...
By: Joseph Hall. on 13 May 13, 18:19:48
Why did you say Fiat? 500s are bad? THEY ARE AMAZING!!!

Thank you? for ...
By: makemegenius. on 10 May 13, 00:34:59
Thank you? for watching this...check our website too.

Thank you for ...
By: makemegenius. on 10 May 13, 00:34:48
Thank you for watching this...check our website? too.

Thank you for ...
By: makemegenius. on 10 May 13, 00:34:41
Thank you for watching this...check our website? too.

Thank you for ...
By: makemegenius. on 10 May 13, 00:34:31
Thank you for watching this...check our website too.?

Thank you for ...
By: makemegenius. on 10 May 13, 00:34:24
Thank you for watching this...check? our website too.

Thanks for ...
By: makemegenius. on 10 May 13, 00:33:47
Thanks for appreciation.It? means a lot for us.

Thank? you
By: Holliemay17. on 07 May 13, 15:30:37
Thank? you

cool?
By: Azalia Zulfikar. on 03 May 13, 12:44:03
cool?

Vd?
By: becka Flores. on 24 Apr 13, 02:01:32
Vd?

Thank you ! Thank? ...
By: SabciaGraal. on 26 Mar 13, 21:20:36
Thank you ! Thank? you ! It's perfect for my project - it is short and have lots od information.

I get it now,I hope ...
By: snsd9vl. on 25 Mar 13, 20:19:07
I get it now,I hope I will get a good result for my? test.

why did it cut off? ...
By: XDskullcandy. on 06 Mar 13, 21:26:47
why did it cut off? at the end? :(

Haha it's so cute, ...
By: lilcosmicme. on 25 Feb 13, 13:39:58
Haha it's so cute, bet it'll help? I'm my test tomorrow.

The sun is at a the ...
By: gorgepucas. on 07 Jan 13, 14:25:28
The sun is at a the peak? of a 12 year cycle,12 years from now it will be at its low. CO2 makes up .043% of the earths atmosphere (or around that). It will never get much higher than that because CO2 is attracted to water in the air and readily combines with water forming a weak carbonic acid. I measured the rain drops outside on PH strips and it shows around 5.6....any number under 7 is acidic...just one of 100's of scientific reasons CO2 could never heat our Earth's atmosphere.

stupid yet weird, i ...
By: ScratchTheRobot. on 04 Dec 12, 20:43:04
stupid yet weird, i have seen this before in class? >:P

Thanks for? ...
By: makemegenius. on 28 Nov 12, 01:26:47
Thanks for? appreciation.

Thank you so much ...
By: Ayman B. on 25 Nov 12, 20:21:12
Thank you so much for? posting this video. I had a test about this and i am pretty sure i am gunna pass bcuz of this video :)

Thanks for ...
By: makemegenius. on 07 Nov 12, 10:17:55
Thanks for appreciation, we? love it.

Loved it! I had a ...
By: Maha Ashraf. on 07 Nov 12, 05:11:04
Loved it! I had a project about Global Warming.. I was searching? and searching for facts...They were all hard to understand..but not yours..Thank you! :)

They say. it is all ...
By: makemegenius. on 29 Oct 12, 21:48:25
They say. it is all in the brain..?

shitty?
By: EdwardJETSON. on 29 Oct 12, 18:57:55
shitty?

It? is very basic.
By: makemegenius. on 21 Oct 12, 16:18:53
It? is very basic.

hey what animation ...
By: kilaz lesliet. on 21 Oct 12, 16:01:49
hey what animation program do you? use?

Green House Effect Explained & Tutorial
Posted by: Meeka Jael

Video duration: 1984 seconds
Global video hits: 49355

Latest comments made on this video:

Thanks for ...
By: VisionForum1. on 11 Feb 12, 03:09:44
Thanks for answering? all those questions.

i tried this for a ...
By: innerbeauty24. on 16 Nov 11, 18:22:11
i tried this for a week and what I like about it was it helped my dry and dirty scalp, will try again for a longer time? but I will not be loosing out the large braids everyday, will wear a wig thanks for the method

Hi..Just wanted to ...
By: Alisha Gray. on 25 Oct 11, 08:45:37
Hi..Just wanted to say that I have been trying this for the past month, and am already seeing results! It really does? work for both moisture and growth...even dry scalp. Wonderful.

:)?
By: Meeka Jael. on 24 Oct 11, 18:28:23
:)?

I'm going to try to ...
By: stanethia. on 19 Oct 11, 03:40:40
I'm going to try to do this at least once a week! Just to try it! And I LOVE castor oil!? It does well for my hair!

Are you not ...
By: NaturalAtiya. on 07 Aug 11, 13:48:40
Are you not supposed to apply the oil directly to the? scalp?

question this means ...
By: LoveChrissiPoo. on 21 Jun 11, 03:30:30
question this means no co washing or water? rinsing

i think you can.. ...
By: RelxedNSassy. on 20 Apr 11, 07:26:41
i think you can..its nothing harmful or chemical about doing an GHE..so yes i would say its? safe for children

Upon washing & DC ...
By: QueenEyeCee. on 11 Apr 11, 06:47:05
Upon washing & DC your hair, can one apply a leave in? conditioner prior to applying the oil to do the greenhouse effect???

I'm so in? on this ...
By: missdiva4071. on 31 Mar 11, 23:24:42
I'm so in? on this challenge. I would love to reach my goal bra strap length by June.

I am going to start ...
By: Sheen Queen. on 30 Mar 11, 19:26:46
I am going to start this on the weekend when? I wash my hair!!! Love your videos!

when wearing ...
By: dymeshawty. on 28 Mar 11, 02:53:44
when wearing straight hair do u add a lil oil then wrap? it up then do the GHE???...how would i incorporate the oil for straight hair really??

Thank you for this ...
By: 1krzypraz. on 26 Mar 11, 22:20:35
Thank you for this tutorial, it explained my? questions!

Can you do? this On ...
By: MIsszNita. on 26 Mar 11, 13:02:12
Can you do? this On kids ?

One more question. ...
By: lush4real. on 26 Mar 11, 06:15:33
One more question. Do you think your pregnancy had a factor in growing your hair? I ask because it is said that the enhanced blood circulation through? the body increases hair growth during and after pregnancy. IDK because I have never been preggers :-)

I will have braids ...
By: lush4real. on 26 Mar 11, 06:09:37
I will have braids,? can i just use a natural astringent like witch hazel instead of washing?

thank you, this? is ...
By: datsexiepana. on 26 Mar 11, 03:50:55
thank you, this? is just what I needed! :]

very informative ...
By: bluntlyill. on 26 Mar 11, 02:50:43
very informative and straight? to the point. thanks.

will doing this ...
By: MySkiesAreBlue24. on 26 Mar 11, 02:01:32
will doing this with a weave cause? rottening underneath?

This makes alot of ...
By: Kiyomoto1713. on 26 Mar 11, 00:47:00
This makes alot of sense, the GHE because I notice that my? hair grows faster in the summer months when it is very hot and I notice my hair is growing because I will get an of itching feeling.

Excellent video and ...
By: rhollandnyc. on 26 Mar 11, 00:21:58
Excellent video and you have done your research! I have been doing GHE since Nov. 2010 and have started groups on Hairlista and recommended that the ladies do the GHE and all have given positive testimonials! It assist with moisture and growth! I find that it is best done with protective styles, e.g., if you're wearing your hair flat ironed then do not do the GHE. ?

Thank u so much cuz ...
By: Jazlynn87. on 25 Mar 11, 23:59:00
Thank u so much cuz I was? lost I posted I need help doin gh wrong LOL

Every women that is ...
By: TheFashionableChic. on 25 Mar 11, 22:40:28
Every women that is participating in this challenge should send you a before and after picture of their hair, so when you? do the results video, you can make a compilation of all of your subbies and yourself...to show and prove the GHE works.

MeekJael you are ...
By: TheFashionableChic. on 25 Mar 11, 22:38:31
MeekJael you are awesome. I appreciate you taking the time out to make this informative video....This information is vital to many women all over the world and trying to grow their hair. I cant wait for? the summer results. :)

Really nice video! ...
By: Loica12. on 25 Mar 11, 21:59:39
Really nice video! I did the GHE yesterday and? my new growth never felt so soft!!! Thank you very much!!!

Green house Effect and Global warming
Posted by: feuvince8

Video duration: 204 seconds
Global video hits: 164130

Green house Effect and Global warming.

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Our understanding ...
By: 588rtx. on 18 May 13, 13:47:42
Our understanding of the greenhouse effect, the origin of global warming in current times, dates back to the work of the French scientist Fourier in the early part of the nineteenth century. Energy reaches the earth from the sun in the shape of sunlight; it is absorbed and is radiated back into space as infrared glow. When Fourier calculated the differential between? the energy coming in and that going out as infrared radiation, he found that the planet should, in theory, be frozen.

There is a solution ...
By: Leonard Red. on 05 May 13, 13:36:41
There is a solution to global warming, if we react fast enough. It is explained on a book called -->The Present

worst? vid ever b
By: mollykibs. on 01 May 13, 02:00:34
worst? vid ever b

Please,someone ...
By: Dinura Widanapathirange. on 24 Mar 13, 02:23:17
Please,someone answer my question.If the Co(2) absorbs the heat from the? earths surface, why when the Co(2) levels increase, why doesnt the earth cool then? Please answer it.

so BORIN? -_-
By: Michael Cao. on 06 Mar 13, 01:22:06
so BORIN? -_-

why you keep ...
By: akocanonymous. on 31 Jan 13, 12:52:47
why you keep pausing for a long? time

This was really ...
By: Julia Foodman. on 25 Jan 13, 01:56:27
This was really helpful for studying for a science test... except? the 15 second breaks in between each phrase drove me crazy. But thanks!!

THE ILLUMINATI 1%? ...
By: CONDUIT99PERCENT. on 14 Dec 12, 11:31:43
THE ILLUMINATI 1%? GLOBALIST AND AL GORE KNEW THAT CAR CARBON SMOG IN URBAN AREAS SHIELD CITIES FROM THE CANCER AND EYE CATARACT PRODUCING ULTRA VIOLET RAYS. THE BIG ARCTIC OZONE HOLE IN THE NORTH POLE ALLOWS THE HEAT FROM THE EARTH TO ESCAPE EASILY TO THE OUTER SPACE. THIS IS THE REASON WHY THE ILLUMINATI GLOBALIST ELITE ENACTED LAWS TO BAN CFCS? IN AEROSOL PROPELLANTS. THESE SATANISTS WANTED TO DESTROY EARTH' S WATER CYCLE TO PRODUCE DRAUGHTS SO THEY CAN CONTROL MANKIND WITH HOARDED WATER.

i made? it playlist ...
By: ddsaw11. on 06 Dec 12, 03:21:17
i made? it playlist called shit

TEacher made me ...
By: sometimecool1. on 04 Dec 12, 15:51:48
TEacher made me watch this lame?

the earth. The sun ...
By: dylandog112. on 02 Dec 12, 02:17:29
the earth. The sun is over 360,000 times larger than the Earth. It is over 90 million miles? away from us, yet can easily blind us just by looking at it for a while. The sun is over 40 million degrees F. A lead block would melt in less than half a second if it came within 2 million miles of the sun.

This is byist. The ...
By: dylandog112. on 02 Dec 12, 02:13:02
This is byist. The video says that us cutting down forest areas can increase Co2. This is untrue. We exhale Co2, thus meaning they exhale oxygen. Or in other words, they don't remove carbon dioxide, they just store it? in the form of nutrience. Carbon dioxide weighs 152% more than oxygen. So it stays mostly on the ground. Also, we have national forests that cannot legally be cut down. I live in the San Bernardino mountains, where there are countless pines. In addition, it is the sun that heats th

The? video is nice, ...
By: John Andrew. on 25 Nov 12, 12:04:21
The? video is nice, but the pauses between the windows are way too long

forget? global ...
By: Jason Taylor. on 20 Nov 12, 20:02:30
forget? global warming. I'm going to burry and plastic bag in the ground and wait for it to grow into a plastic tree.

Thank? you!
By: cacaosunrise. on 29 Oct 12, 14:17:34
Thank? you!

By far the most ...
By: johnI82QB4IP. on 26 Oct 12, 13:02:19
By far the most abundant gas responsible for the vast majority of the greenhouse effect is water vapor. This is an unambiguous observation- saying we have 'drastically increased the amount of greenhouse gases' is just scientifically illiterate. Co2 fluctuations were never observed to drive climate- the exact opposite is the case; fluctuations? in temps drive fluctuations in CO2 8-900 years later- scientists have know this for many years- but this junk's still floating out there

At least you won't ...
By: cr4yv3n. on 28 Aug 12, 09:23:08
At least you won't be retarded like 90% of global warming deniers here. You should be thankful for that.?

You believe humans ...
By: Lennart Plugge. on 17 Jul 12, 19:01:14
You believe humans caused global warming? Btw,, global WARMING is a wrong term since we've had colder winters and? summers for the past few years where I live. Its climate change :)

the tippingpoint of ...
By: Aanthanur DC. on 17 Jun 12, 10:06:31
the tippingpoint of crazyness, to believe in a conspiracy involving 1000's of scientists around the world as? well as the most famous scientific institutions and Universities around the world.

The Tipping Point ...
By: Andrew Anthony Angus. on 17 Jun 12, 10:00:11
The Tipping Point of Deception..? Human Induced Global Warming.

For all animals/ ...
By: Teppo S�rkk�. on 17 Jun 12, 04:43:32
For all animals/nature and humans to have good living conditions permanently, we need a global system that supports All Life Equally. To establish an Equality-based system All humans have to continuously lose Self-Interest and live according to what is Best For All Equally. There are courses with which a person can support oneself and others in the change. I recommend all to find and? read the websites of 'Equal Money System', 'Desteni I Process' and 'Desteni'.

thats? what you ...
By: Aanthanur DC. on 17 Jun 12, 02:46:53
thats? what you believe, but science has shown that you are wrong.

Climategate is real ...
By: Andrew Anthony Angus. on 17 Jun 12, 02:14:36
Climategate is real..... Human-induced global warming is not real !?

or was always ...
By: Aanthanur DC. on 16 Jun 12, 15:36:31
or was always called climate change and global warming. scientific papers published in te? 1930 already spoke of Climate Change, others called it Global warming.

Green House Effect EASY TO UNDERSTAND
Posted by: axo7ga

Video duration: 85 seconds
Global video hits: 220306

This is the way the Greenhouse effect works! Understandable and quick.

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Yeah....sure thing ...
By: examinerize. on 05 Apr 13, 13:14:27
Yeah....sure thing if You with "global" mean the globe of Venus,? I agree..... NOT on Earth though. Plant a tree and be cool!

Chyeah, right.... ...
By: examinerize. on 05 Apr 13, 13:12:19
Chyeah, right....same nonsense that implies that human activity could affect the climate.....please! Read some biology for Gods sake! If CO2 is a problem.....just go ahead and plant some more trees! And, while? on the subject of nonsense.....what about the statement from the stupide that even farts can cause a climate catastrophy??? Lord..........

Thats nonsense ?
By: pfortsa. on 04 Apr 13, 21:12:19
Thats nonsense ?

Because mercury ...
By: mc838783. on 30 Mar 13, 06:43:07
Because mercury doesn't have an atmosphere at all.... And Venus's atmosphere is 93? times denser than earths atmosphere.

Carbon induced ...
By: mc838783. on 30 Mar 13, 06:39:28
Carbon induced global warming is POPPYCOCK. CO2 only absorbs certain frequencies of light, and the existing CO2 in the atmosphere? at the moment is absorbing almost all of that frequency. Adding more CO2 has very very little or no effect on temperature as the extra CO2 molecules are doing nothing.

It is good? but its ...
By: Aanre Dash. on 25 Feb 13, 05:19:11
It is good? but its picture clarity is very less........good

Point is that CO2 ...
By: TheTerrorUforgot .. on 19 Feb 13, 01:43:33
Point is that CO2 is a factor in global? warming, clearly.

Well...could it ...
By: examinerize. on 18 Feb 13, 21:38:44
Well...could it possible be due to the fact that Venus�atmosphere contains 96,5 % CO2 vs Earth�s 380 ppm (0,038%) at a atmospheric pressure that is 90 times the Earth�s atmospheric pressure at ground level...? And if You Think it is so much of a problematic factor, that CO......well... just quit breathing for some time!! Have You ever looked inti Biology? Do You know, that green plants need CO2?? Or....just what is Your Point, if any? Scientific? Or plain superstitious?

Well...tell Your ...
By: examinerize. on 18 Feb 13, 21:30:01
Well...tell Your teacher that if we humans refrain from? breathing, then the green house affect "problem" will be solved!

Very help? ful ...
By: jamie j v. on 31 Jan 13, 18:55:16
Very help? ful thanks

My teacher gave me ...
By: Wail Obeid. on 21 Jan 13, 20:58:32
My teacher gave me a project to find a good video that explains green house effect n thanks to u I found one?

PEOPLE RIDE? HORSES ...
By: DJparty002. on 28 Dec 12, 01:36:40
PEOPLE RIDE? HORSES AND WALK LOL

Thankyou so much my ...
By: Maria Istafanos. on 17 Dec 12, 18:28:29
Thankyou so much my global perspectives teacher gave me this assignment to get 3 sources for the greenhouse affect and it has to be simple and easy to understand although it has to have many details and i just? started today and it is due tomorrow so... THANKYOU i just have to complete one sentence and then I'M DONE!!! WOOT WOOT!!

WTF i've been ...
By: DarinaK29. on 04 Dec 12, 15:06:37
WTF i've been trying to understand this for years now, and I think I just did. THANK YOU?

If CO2 isn't a ...
By: TheTerrorUforgot .. on 14 Oct 12, 00:48:30
If CO2 isn't a factor in global warming then why is Venus so much hotter? than Mercury?

SHEEEP?
By: myvidspwn. on 05 Aug 12, 08:51:50
SHEEEP?

For all animals/ ...
By: Teppo S�rkk�. on 17 Jun 12, 04:42:23
For all animals/nature and humans to have good living conditions permanently, we need a global system that supports All Life Equally. To establish an Equality-based system All humans have to continuously lose Self-Interest and live according to what is Best For All Equally. There are courses with which a person can support oneself and others? in the change. I recommend all to find and read the websites of 'Equal Money System', 'Desteni I Process' and 'Desteni'.

wakarimashita!!! ...
By: shichi chan. on 26 May 12, 05:16:06
wakarimashita!!! finally i can understand ?

H2O? is >100X more ...
By: johndaddyo444. on 18 May 12, 14:21:06
H2O? is >100X more powerful than CO2 in keeping the Earth warm at night. This "easy to understand" video is completely wrong - both from a scientific view point, and from an educational view point. It doesn't simplify the true green house effect in an accurate manner. It works by solar heating of earth's surface + water vapor in the atmosphere during the day; water vapor absorbs lots of energy, while CO2 absorbs a tiny amount. The warm water vapor keeps the surface from rapid cooling at night.

The urban heat ...
By: johndaddyo444. on 18 May 12, 14:09:53
The urban heat island effect cannot significantly change? GLOBAL temps. Density of 5,000 persons per sq.km raises temp ~0.5C (0.9F). Density of 10,000/sq.km raises temp about 1.5C (2.7F). The most densely populated city (Mumbai, India at 20,000 per sq.km) sees temps est. at +5 C (+9 F). 6.7 Billion at 10,000 per sq.km = 670,000 sq.km at +1.5 C. Avg (1.5x0.67+0.0x509)/510 = +0.002C -- this is not a measurable difference! Perhaps when world population = 1 Trillion, then we'll impact global temp?

Isn't it ...
By: johndaddyo444. on 18 May 12, 13:47:33
Isn't it interesting to see how many AGW fanatics will mark reasonable questions and relevant comments posted here as "spam"? That's how you can know which side is arguing from scientific fact and reason, and which side is arguing using emotion and bullying tactics. There is no credible scientific evidence that mankind? has impacted global climate. Local climate - yes. The urban heat island effect is real, adding a few degrees to temperatures in our major cities of over 1,000,000.

Those scientists ...
By: johndaddyo444. on 18 May 12, 13:40:23
Those scientists Oreskes counted have billions of dollars in funding on the line -- if they wrote anything contrary to AGW nonsense, then their funding sources would find someone else to enrich. The Oreskes statistic has been quoted by every quack and? pseudo-scientific political activist and journalist since 2004, and it was "updated" by Doran's poll in 2009. In Doran's poll, 90% of scientists failed to reply, which means they either don't believe AGW, or don't want to be counted as AGW nuts.

ikeikeforty, ...
By: johndaddyo444. on 18 May 12, 13:27:19
ikeikeforty, demkomusic can't give you the source for his 97% statistic, but I can: it is from the leftist Naomi Oreskes, a science historian (whatever that is) who knows nothing about science, and a whole lot about how to gin up bogus statistics. She took a single online database of recent scientific papers on climate change, and allegedly counted the number of papers (not scientists) who "did not discredit"? AGW theory. Meanwhile, the OISM petition was signed by over 30,000 scientists.

And your conception ...
By: johndaddyo444. on 18 May 12, 13:19:02
And your conception that "thousands" of scientists "peer-reviewed" the? IPCC reports is completely wrong! Most scientists who have contributed to portions of the IPCC reports acknowledge that the IPCC? was created to produce evidence of AGW. The IPCC is a POLITICAL organization, started under the United Nations, which operates to advance the concept of one world government (that's the U.N.'s charter, look it up). Many scientists have seen their work perverted by politicians in the Summary.

Greenhouse Effect: Climate Control and Global Warming
Posted by: greenplanetfilms

Video duration: 301 seconds
Global video hits: 37271

Global warming has suddenly become the hottest environmental issue, and this program clearly explains the science of the greenhouse effect and the evidence t...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

That bright thing ...
By: Danny P. on 26 Apr 13, 15:12:27
That bright thing outside in the sky will not last forever. The sun is over half way through its lifespan, So be nice? to eachother, Dont take life for granted.

The fact that you ...
By: funkydunky29. on 06 Feb 13, 08:37:27
The fact that you measured the pH of raindrops in your backyard and? they were acidic does is not evidence that CO2 is not a greenhouse gas. CO2, CO, methane, nitrous oxide and lots of other gasses released as "pollution" act as greenhouse gasses, meaning that they trap and retain heat. We are currently spewing around 375 billion tons of CO2 annually, and hundreds of tons of methane and other gasses as well at the same time that the earths forests are being clear-cut. This will have an effect.

really wrong- Go ...
By: tasker41. on 31 Jan 13, 07:25:25
really wrong- Go back to? school and learn something

The sun is at a the ...
By: gorgepucas. on 10 Jan 13, 10:18:01
The sun is at a the peak of a 12 year cycle,12 years from now it will be at its low. CO2 makes up .043% of the earths atmosphere (or around that). It will never get much higher than that because CO2 is attracted to water? in the air and readily combines with water forming a weak carbonic acid. I measured the rain drops outside on PH strips and it shows around 5.6....any number under 7 is acidic...just one of 100's of scientific reasons CO2 could never heat our Earth's atmosphere.

i saw this on a ...
By: ScratchTheRobot. on 05 Dec 12, 22:35:58
i saw this on a macbook? in school this morning/afternoon :)

No, it doesn't.?
By: MrBlack2283c. on 29 Aug 12, 09:10:00
No, it doesn't.?

This? is a stupid ...
By: MrBlack2283c. on 29 Aug 12, 09:09:33
This? is a stupid statement.

i'm sorry but your ...
By: Lanthana. on 27 Jul 12, 02:45:47
i'm sorry but your argument doesn't stand to reason. IF that? was the case then there would be scientific/peer reviewed literature on the subject and there isn't.... wow, the level of misinformation in these comments is staggering.

not true. the? IPCC ...
By: Lanthana. on 27 Jul 12, 02:43:07
not true. the? IPCC said that there has been steady warming and that the warming in the past 50 years is "unequivocal". We have an increase of about 1 deg F and that about 50% of that can be directly attributed to mankind's industrial activity through the measurement of increased CO2 which is now at over 400 ppm (pre-industrial is 280 ppm) Please do your research.

you're missing the ...
By: Lanthana. on 27 Jul 12, 02:39:09
you're missing the point.... watch? it again?

wow?
By: rheetkd selfdefence. on 21 Jun 12, 00:02:39
wow?

wow?
By: rheetkd selfdefence. on 21 Jun 12, 00:02:32
wow?

For all animals/ ...
By: Teppo S�rkk�. on 17 Jun 12, 04:45:15
For all animals/nature and humans to have good living conditions permanently, we need a global system that supports All Life Equally.? To establish an Equality-based system All humans have to continuously lose Self-Interest and live according to what is Best For All Equally. There are courses with which a person can support oneself and others in the change. I recommend all to find and read the websites of 'Equal Money System', 'Desteni I Process' and 'Desteni'.

99.9% of the global ...
By: Andrew Anthony Angus. on 19 Apr 12, 02:09:33
99.9% of the global warming comes from the? sun

how many people? ...
By: DatBoiLui. on 15 Mar 12, 18:39:38
how many people? have actually donated money?

The IPCC itself ...
By: ridgeraiser. on 08 Mar 12, 15:33:16
The IPCC itself says that there has been no dramatic warming of the past 150 years!!!!!!!! Take a?? look on the right/real report!

/watch?v= ...
By: evilmeerkat007. on 10 Dec 11, 01:41:37
/watch?v=Z7XxUzRTHpA?

Thanks, this really ...
By: Kate Searle. on 01 Nov 11, 06:46:33
Thanks, this really helped me with my? science assignment :)

"and that job is to ...
By: TheRealArchAngel. on 31 Oct 11, 15:27:41
"and that job is to make smoke sceens between the sun and the planet earth " Earth's magnetic field deflects the bulk of the Suns up to 7500f solar wind After the thermosphere asorbing 700f, the menosphere drops to -255F, with the Stratosphere being 140f at the top and 32f at the bottom..the upper Troposphere is 32f Heat at the surface is a combination of heat from core of planet with amplification of heat generated in water & ground by Uva/uvb rays CLimate is regulated? by Earth's Core,not sun

"just because there ...
By: TheRealArchAngel. on 31 Oct 11, 15:21:25
"just because there are other ways for there to be CO2 peaks does not? mean that we are not part of the cause now." Yes Try ffilling 1 tank wioth air with 390ppn co2 in air and another tank with 900ppm co2 in air then bombard them with a infared light aray 9leds like on remote control) to see in Co2 generates heat in air from infared light(hint:no) TThen bombard the 2 tankswith ultraviolet light(UVA/UVB stuff suncreen protect you from) to see if 900ppm makes air hotter then 390ppm air(hint:no)

"we don't even know ...
By: TheRealArchAngel. on 31 Oct 11, 15:17:20
"we don't even know what a? cloud really is " Water vapor at "dew"point in the 32f upper troposhere after humidity laden air from the evaporation/percipitation cycle has reached that height from the Surface Of Course since Environut Wackos thump on 17th century and proven wrong "green house Gas Theory" thought in Physics instead of Evaporation/Percipitation thought in Meterology and Thermalhayline thought in Oceanagraphy as the means that heat is distributed in ocean and air it can be confuse

HAIKU I hatch! ...
By: StephanieLisaTara. on 20 Sep 11, 16:11:35
HAIKU I hatch! Crawl! And swim! Oh how I love my? sweet life, But?why's the sea warm? ?A Green Sea Turtle

Ukropan - just ...
By: Paul Sibert. on 22 May 11, 21:14:35
Ukropan - just because there are other ways for there to be CO2 peaks does not mean? that we are not part of the cause now. Those who advocate ignoring climte change evidence are human ostriches sticking their heads in the sand

...Advanced ...
By: polliwantscrack. on 25 Apr 11, 20:14:15
...Advanced Technology?? we don't even know what a cloud really is nevertheless get a decent forecast. You dont think GO GREEN isnt in any industry? fool! every business tries to product their shit with a green slogan. Look at spaghetti light bulbs. Ugh dumbasses

While it's true ...
By: bottleddissent. on 21 Jan 11, 20:53:27
While it's true that there have been other warm peaks in earth's history, that doesn't mean that the warming now isn't related to human activity. Using our advanced knowledge of our climate, it's hard to imagine that increased release of greenhouse gases isn't contributing to expedited warming. I'm not sure how anyone can claim "global warming" is a profitable, climate scientists? are not rolling in money and most industries are avoiding making climate-conscious decisions for financial reasons.

Greenhouse effect and baggy method
Posted by: crest smile

Video duration: 226 seconds
Global video hits: 8143

This video is a tutorial on how i do my greenhouse/baggy method. The greenhouse effect is used to stimulate hair growth by the use of body heat and oils appl...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Hello! I am mixed ...
By: LiliSings12. on 13 Apr 13, 18:32:01
Hello! I am mixed so my hair is close to your type, but when I did this for? the first time yesterday I put the oil in my hair after damping it and then braided it in sections and tied it up and then I put a plastic bag on my head and wrapped it up and covered that with a bonnet and then a beanie and when I woke up there wasn't a steam effect on the plastic bag. Does that mean? it isn't working??

Just a note, with ...
By: IAMUNIQUEINHIM. on 13 Apr 13, 12:48:44
Just a note, with the Green House Effect, the? oil is to be used on the lengths of your hair only, not the scalp. The purpose of the Green House Effect (GHE) is to allow your own scalp to create its own natural serbum. Some people who use oils on their scalp will get accessive buildup which in turns cause the scalp to clog up and create dandruff or other scalp issues.

@Ameh1 thanx!?
By: crest smile. on 06 Mar 13, 04:43:01
@Ameh1 thanx!?

cute af?
By: Ameh1. on 06 Mar 13, 04:39:09
cute af?

@Arielororo? aww! ...
By: crest smile. on 02 Jan 13, 00:36:03
@Arielororo? aww! thank you very much.

*lovely ?
By: Toni Jones. on 30 Dec 12, 09:04:05
*lovely ?

Thanks? for the ...
By: Toni Jones. on 30 Dec 12, 09:03:38
Thanks? for the information. You have lively skin btw.

@ALLthingsGLiTTz? ...
By: crest smile. on 25 Nov 12, 22:48:23
@ALLthingsGLiTTz? absolutely!

The plastic bag ...
By: ALLthingsGLiTTz. on 25 Nov 12, 22:05:06
The plastic bag traps in heat, the bonette and other things such? as a scarf and hats ect are to give yu added heat

was wondering if ...
By: Diggamatic1. on 20 Nov 12, 03:45:30
was wondering if you noticed any side effects from this method...I did? I will post a Video response about it.

@avidbeyblader11 i ...
By: crest smile. on 04 Nov 12, 01:26:58
@avidbeyblader11 i do it over night or ill leave it in through the day if im gonna be home with no plans. i may di this 3 days out of the week. ive been slacking lately now that my hair is longer and im more lazy,? but ive stated doing it more here lately. im on a mission for waist length so this really have helped with growth for me.

how many times a ...
By: avidbeyblader11. on 02 Nov 12, 17:03:18
how many times a week do? you do this and how long do you leave it on?

Have? you followed ...
By: crest smile. on 31 May 12, 14:08:42
Have? you followed through with doing it 2x's a week? How were your results?

this is great im ...
By: jrysfnst21. on 05 Apr 12, 06:27:44
this is great im sooo gonna do this at least 2xs? a week that when i co wash i could use an inch of growth in a month forsure thanx for this video :)

anytime! thanks for ...
By: crest smile. on 01 Feb 12, 02:22:57
anytime! thanks for watching?

Lol? ok thanks
By: mrsengerman. on 01 Feb 12, 01:41:45
Lol? ok thanks

I do wash and go's? ...
By: crest smile. on 01 Feb 12, 01:17:40
I do wash and go's? in the mornings. Thanks for asking questions I love it!

LOL yes you wash it ...
By: crest smile. on 01 Feb 12, 01:17:04
LOL yes you wash it out in the mornings? and start fresh with your wash n go. Thats the only style i can do so thats what my routine is.

And do u? wash it ...
By: mrsengerman. on 31 Jan 12, 22:22:58
And do u? wash it out in the morning? Sorry for asking so much questions

Ok sounds good I ...
By: mrsengerman. on 31 Jan 12, 22:20:56
Ok sounds good I will give it a try, another question how do u normally style ur hair? in the morning?

washed or? just wet ...
By: crest smile. on 31 Jan 12, 21:21:40
washed or? just wet or it could be just damp. I personally like to do it after i cowash at night 3 x a week.

3- 4 times a week. ...
By: crest smile. on 31 Jan 12, 21:20:46
3- 4 times a week. I dont always use? conditioner bc you can over condition and the hair can become very weak and mushy.

how? often do you ...
By: LilMrsCole10. on 31 Jan 12, 20:57:24
how? often do you do this?

Do u do this? on ...
By: mrsengerman. on 29 Jan 12, 20:45:59
Do u do this? on wet n washed hair?

Let me know how it ...
By: crest smile. on 29 Jan 12, 20:32:06
Let me know how it goes for ya! Thnx? for watching :)

The Greenhouse Effect-Hommocks Earth Science Department
Posted by: metfan869

Video duration: 285 seconds
Global video hits: 2605

The Greenhouse Effect.

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Lecture 5 - The Greenhouse Effect
Posted by: The University of Chicago

Video duration: 2577 seconds
Global video hits: 3939

This 10-week course for non-science majors focuses on a single problem: assessing the risk of human-caused climate change. The story ranges from physics to c...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

...It was nice? ...
By: Quercuspalustris50. on 22 Jun 12, 06:19:35
...It was nice? talking to you. Be well and safe. See ya...

I would say that ...
By: Quercuspalustris50. on 22 Jun 12, 06:18:14
I would say that instead of your "Not sure how to repair a roof, but give me money" analogy, it's more like a "There's a hole in our boat and the only thing to stop it, is to fill it with dollar bills". They know they have to plug the hole or the ship will probably sink, but? they haven't figured out the best way to divide up the money between the passengers, to stuff it in the hole. If they delay, it makes stuffing the money harder and more expensive. Well, I'm gonna move on to the next one

...government ...
By: Quercuspalustris50. on 22 Jun 12, 06:10:02
...government regulation don't have to get involved in the question, "What do we do bout it?" They can keep kicking the can down the road. Then we probably have other greedy people thinking, "How can we profit from carbon taxes?, etc..", so if the guys that fear regulation don't get up? to the negotiating table, the carbon tax people are going to take advantage. That's what politicians do - they take any advantage they can.

...to fight Seitz's ...
By: Quercuspalustris50. on 22 Jun 12, 06:00:19
...to fight Seitz's old enemy: communism. So for several decades now, instead of trying to find a good method to solve the problem that balances free markets and regulation, Seitz's ideological descendents have been stirring up doubt about the science using the same strategic PR that they perfected when it came to 'Cap and Trade', the Ozone problem, Star Wars, and the relationship btw cigarette smoking and cancer.? But as long as the disinformation propaganda persists, those that fear...

Yeah, I have no ...
By: Quercuspalustris50. on 22 Jun 12, 05:48:48
Yeah, I have no idea how? to make a carbon tax work, or if it will work, etc... But that's the discussion that should be taking place. The big scientific pieces of the puzzle are solved, regarding the question, "Are we causing a change?" (There are still lots of smaller unknowns, that will take years to figure out.) And there is this huge disconnect between what the scientists know as fact and what the public believes that's been forged by Fred Seitz, and his pals in the 90's, in an effort..

Part 8: Or in ...
By: Quercuspalustris50. on 22 Jun 12, 05:30:51
Part 8: Or in other words, if we shut off the lights for 6.15 years, then run my 'Monkton Model' starting at 2018, the concentration of CO2 will be 792 at 2100 (I'm pushing my curve to the right along the x axis by 6.15 years, relative to the original curve, to make 792ppm hit the year? 2100).

Part 7: So I'll ...
By: Quercuspalustris50. on 22 Jun 12, 05:30:14
Part 7: So I'll plug 792ppm into my model and find the number of years it takes to get there by solving for x: 792=0.06x^2+390. It turns out x = 81.85? years. So taking exponential growth into account, we would have to sit in the dark for 88 minus 81.85 years, which equals 6.15 years to reduce the temp by 1 degree F by 2100.

Part 6: . So the ...
By: Quercuspalustris50. on 22 Jun 12, 05:29:23
Part 6: . So the question then becomes, how many years in my 'Monckton Model' does it take to reach not 390+468ppm, but 390+468-66ppm. In essence, I'm trying to find a concentration that is 66ppm less than the 2100 predicted concentration (according to Monckton), because for every 66ppm I shave off, I'm shaving off 1 degree of warming (according to Monckton logic). So 390+468-66ppm equals 792ppm. ?

Part 5: He also ...
By: Quercuspalustris50. on 22 Jun 12, 05:28:38
Part 5: He also said the addition of 7T tons correlates with 7 degrees F warming and made the simple linear assumption that on could divide 7T by 7 degrees and conclude that for every ton of CO2 added the earth would heat 1 degree F. So using Monckton's logic, an addition of 468ppm CO2 makes it 7 degrees hotter, thus dividing 468ppm by 7? degrees, one could conclude that we're warming the earth by 1 degree for every 66ppm.

Now, just for the ...
By: Quercuspalustris50. on 22 Jun 12, 05:27:01
Now, just for the sake of fun and laughs, lets assume all of Monckton's flawed assumptions are correct. So we're spitting out 30B tons of CO2 per year which translates to 2ppm per year, thus every 15B tons ups the total atmospheric concentration by 1ppm. He said we'd add 468ppm by? 2100, and because to him 1ppm represents 15B tons, this addition to the atmosphere would mean that 15 times 468 = 7,020B tons or 7T tons of CO2 would be added.

Part 3:There is a ...
By: Quercuspalustris50. on 22 Jun 12, 05:26:25
Part 3:There is a price for 'super easy' though: the model is too conservative at first, and too dramatic at the end, but I'm just trying to demonstrate the idea of exponential growth, not trying to construct a real, working model. So we know that at 2012, x=0? and y=390, so it follows that 390=m(0)^2+b, thus b=390. So now we know b. Now lets plug the other coordinates in to find m: 390+468=m88^2+390. Thus, solving for m, we get the number 0.06. So our super easy 'Monckton Model' is y=0.06x^2+390

Part 2: First I ...
By: Quercuspalustris50. on 22 Jun 12, 05:24:53
Part 2: First I constructed an exponential curve that fit two sets of coordinates (0,390) and (88,(390+468)), where 0 is the year 2012 and 88 is the year 2100 (get it? 2100 minus 2012 = 88 years), and 390 is our current atmospheric CO2 concentration in ppm, while, according to Monckton's figures, (390+468)? is the concentration in 2100, because he said we'd be adding 468ppm by 2100. I went with a parabola in my model of the form y=mx^2+b because it's super easy to work with.

OK, I finally have ...
By: Quercuspalustris50. on 22 Jun 12, 05:23:46
OK, I finally have an answer to your question about how many years in the dark we would have to? sit to shave off 1 degree F, using Monckton's assumptions, but taking into account the exponential growth of emissions that he does not in his final step. It took a while to find an algebraic method, which I wanted to use as I find most people can understand algebra, but when it gets to areas under curves, it's easy to loose 95% of the audience.

NOT THAT SIMPLE ...
By: shawso7. on 21 Jun 12, 04:50:14
NOT THAT SIMPLE You're absolutely correct & that's why Anthropogenic Climate? Change proponents shouldn't present "solutions" as simple. Matter of fact the ongoing debate over a viable solution hasn't even been resolved yet & already they want a "Carbon Tax"? "Yeah not sure how to repair your roof yet or if it can be but start giving me money now anyway." Flawed reasoning or opportunity for greed & control? Hmm. My previous illustration concerning immediate loss of life is still relevant. Peace.

NOT THAT SIMPLE?
By: shawso7. on 21 Jun 12, 04:39:46
NOT THAT SIMPLE?

But don't worry, ...
By: Quercuspalustris50. on 21 Jun 12, 04:13:33
But don't worry, we're not going to cut the cord all at once and leave people in the dark. If you look at Lazzard's Levelized Cost of Energy paper, the cheapest way to 'make' energy, is through efficiency: SuperTherm paint on homes and commercial building, Energy Star a/c, appliances, windows, etc. We've actually reduced America's emissions this year by replacing coal with nat.gas. It would be nice to see more nat. gas vehicles or even hybrids if for no other? reason than to avoid oil wars

Blackouts are a ...
By: Quercuspalustris50. on 21 Jun 12, 03:54:55
Blackouts are a definite problem as the earth heats up on the surface. The water used to regulate coal fire plants becomes hotter too, making the plant less efficient (i.e. less power being produced). Coal fire plants already spend something like 44 days down, per plant, per year, and when they go down, they go down? suddenly, making it hard on the grid. Wind, on the other hand, spends less days down than coal plants, per year, per farm, and when it does go down, it does so gradually.

Sorry, I don't have ...
By: Quercuspalustris50. on 21 Jun 12, 03:47:01
Sorry, I don't have an answer for you presently regarding the number of years of no emissions it would take,? currently, to avoid 1 degree F of warming. I know it takes a while for the system to react to a change, so even if we stopped everything today, I believe I've heard the earth will still warm around 1 degree C over the next century, though don't quote me on that - just an approximate time and temp magnitude.

Sorry, I implied ...
By: Quercuspalustris50. on 21 Jun 12, 03:39:08
Sorry, I implied that an alternate calculation could be made using Monckton's ideas and that he had just one flaw in his rational. His other flaws were assumptions that 1) putting 30B tons of CO2 always translates to an addition? of 2ppm/year; it's not that simple; 2) the number of degrees of warming is perfectly coupled to the amount of CO2 we've emitted in a simple linear relationship that's quantized annually; it's not that simple. Thus a calculation cannot be made: his model is way too simple

SAVING LIFE? Not? ...
By: shawso7. on 20 Jun 12, 21:22:43
SAVING LIFE? Not? sure if I agree but lets go with it. What's the correct amount of YEARS? How long do you think the entire Earth has to be without manmade CO2 emissions from cars, energy plants, factories, etc? Was he half wrong,15yrs? Is it really only 10% of what he suggested,3.3yrs? How about only 1yr? Have you ever suffered LONG TERM black out? Although the effects from such action may still NOT STOP WARMING, it'll definitely cause worldwide civil unrest & kill millions in less than a month.

......instead of a ...
By: Quercuspalustris50. on 20 Jun 12, 21:19:17
......instead of a carbon? tax.

And we don't just ...
By: Quercuspalustris50. on 20 Jun 12, 21:18:47
And we don't just want to do a clean transition just? to avoid the temp rise: Right now we are using 40% of our clean water just to regulate temperatures of coal fire and nuclear power plants. Imagine if we double the number of coal fire power plants at some point and double the amount of fresh water they use. We would then be paying a lot more money for water than what we are used to (because we have to spend more money cleaning/extracting). In essence we would be paying a water 'tax'....

Because a few years ...
By: Quercuspalustris50. on 20 Jun 12, 21:14:59
Because a few years from now we might be putting 3ppm CO2 per year into the atmosphere, then 4ppm? per year after a few years, then 5, then 6, etc., the more we do to transition to clean energy right now, and make it a mainstay in our energy infrastructure, the more we avoid exponential growth of atmospheric CO2 and the less likely we'll see the dramatic 468ppm addition Monckton was talking about in the video.

If we (erroneously) ...
By: Quercuspalustris50. on 20 Jun 12, 21:07:08
If we (erroneously) use the 30B tons CO2 per year flat rate, and project that out to the year 2100, then we would get? the (erroneous) figure of 176ppm CO2 added to the atmosphere (between 2012 and 2100; i.e. 88 years), or in other words an addition of 2,640B tons of CO2. That wrong. So you see you can't apply a flat rate of production to a calculation of a system that is dictated by exponential growth. Monckton understands algebra, but what he really needs to solve the problem is calculus.

Ok, I watched the ...
By: Quercuspalustris50. on 20 Jun 12, 20:52:36
Ok, I watched the video, but unfortunately I found a flaw in Monckton's rational: He's trying to apply today's rate of man made CO2 production to an accumulative figure that relies on exponential growth for it to be true. He's using? a flat rate (today's rate) in his calculation, when he should be using an exponentially growing rate. It makes his 33 years per 1 degree F too large.

Green house effect and Global Warming (Meritnation.com)
Posted by: MeritNation

Video duration: 121 seconds
Global video hits: 38590

Visit http://www.meritnati on.com for more videos for your class! The video describes the phenomenon called Greenhouse Effect. The glass house in the video is...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

a very simple and ...
By: Paddy Sarkar. on 11 May 13, 05:53:21
a very simple and nice explanation. Good one. Those of you who have commented on the accent...i think u guys don't even deserve to study more...just remain school dropouts, that will work for you.....blo*&($# y? racists....

wait wait.. carbon ...
By: Keck Camille. on 13 Apr 13, 02:40:55
wait wait.. carbon dioxide, water vapour and what?? nitrous oxide??

Lovely accent. now ...
By: Freedomspy26. on 12 Apr 13, 15:51:34
Lovely accent. now i cant do my? work -.- fudge..

cnt understand!!!!! ...
By: jolynne smiles. on 12 Apr 13, 15:09:20
cnt understand!!!!!!!!!!!!?

why no? subtitle??? ...
By: Noor Hakim. on 12 Apr 13, 08:16:21
why no? subtitle???????

God..?
By: Joshua Foo. on 12 Apr 13, 05:09:06
God..?

Ikr. lol. Thks a ...
By: vocaltechh. on 12 Apr 13, 03:48:01
Ikr. lol. Thks a lot Mr kai?

thx for? yr accent ...
By: Ryan Yeo. on 12 Apr 13, 02:44:31
thx for? yr accent bro =.= how am i suppose to do my HBL with your wonderful accent

nice talking bro,,, ...
By: Muhammad Abdullah. on 12 Apr 13, 01:10:49
nice talking bro,,,,i know ur indian.... i have to watch this? for HBL...omgoshhhh

I love how this ...
By: Glaborifec. on 07 Mar 13, 03:04:35
I love how this dumbass uses a nuclear plant to? try and explain Carbon Dioxide.

Awesome yarr..... ...
By: Aanre Dash. on 25 Feb 13, 05:22:24
Awesome yarr.....must try it.......?

hes? not chinese ...
By: taytay22love. on 23 Feb 13, 02:40:21
hes? not chinese first of all and you didnt even spell it the right way.

stupid chineis? man
By: dustin messenger. on 09 Jan 13, 14:41:30
stupid chineis? man

Awesome? video
By: Rohit Grover. on 03 Jan 13, 09:21:36
Awesome? video

plants? and hair ...
By: Nami Roronoa. on 26 Oct 12, 02:27:45
plants? and hair are not the same....so i dont think that it will work the same........

i dont understand ...
By: Fredzke eben. on 25 Oct 12, 18:11:22
i dont understand the language ?

Totally wrong. ...
By: seaplaneguy1. on 14 Jul 12, 01:22:39
Totally wrong. Greenhouse is a convection limiting device. Earth is not. Once the height to extinction is below 63 miles (~50 ppm) more CO2 CANNOT "trap" more heat. Those frequencies are extinguished. The Height to extinction. is 40 ft at? 380 ppm and in in the convective layer from ground to ~ 500 ft. CO2 CANNOT change temperature of earth. Sorry. The theory is wrong. You have a perpetual motion machine. Earth is not a greenhouse.

play.google.com/ ...
By: ???? ?????. on 01 Jul 12, 00:49:00
play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=air.eco.plaster.master game about? the ozone holes

indian english!! ...
By: Farhanislamic. on 24 Jun 12, 05:52:24
indian english!! hard for me? 2 understand..hahahh

For all animals/ ...
By: Teppo S�rkk�. on 17 Jun 12, 04:48:10
For all animals/nature and humans to have good living conditions permanently, we need a? global system that supports All Life Equally. To establish an Equality-based system All humans have to continuously lose Self-Interest and live according to what is Best For All Equally. There are courses with which a person can support oneself and others in the change. I recommend all to find and read the websites of 'Equal Money System', 'Desteni I Process' and 'Desteni'.

There are active ...
By: Hank Justice. on 16 Apr 12, 23:43:27
There are active volcanoes under the ice in Antarctica. Twelve new ones, very? active, were just discovered NE of Antarctica also.

Uh, scientifically ...
By: Hank Justice. on 16 Apr 12, 23:41:00
Uh, scientifically sickening. Like taking castor? oil. The greenhouse gets warm because of lack of convection. So, increasing CO2 inside a greenhouse does not raise the temperature. The CO2 molecule does emit radiation in a time invariant manner as quickly as it absorbs. But before it can absorb the IR, it has to be at the ground state. There are so relatively few molecules soon all are excited and no more absorption of IR can take place. PS Please read this with a Bomby accent.

What franKruleR ...
By: 275hammy. on 11 Apr 12, 21:16:50
What franKruleR said.?

2012=End of? NWO ...
By: Ganseblumchen12. on 05 Apr 12, 12:46:32
2012=End of? NWO They're desperate right now. They? will FAIL. Everybody who has above IQ level of 85 knows that this Global Warming is a Hoax. Those globalists are playing with Chemtrails/HAARP/Weather Modification Weapon (go to dutchsinse youtube or read Iron Mountain Report) to create tornadoes, floods, earthquakes..etc. People need to stop being gullible and start reading government documents. WAKE UP!!

What is the Greenhouse Effect?
Posted by: Climate Central

Video duration: 156 seconds
Global video hits: 2922

An ordinary greenhouse keeps plants warm in winter without using a heater. It works because the Sun's rays shine through the glass walls and roof, warming th...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Global Warming , Green House Effect , Ozone Layer Video for Kids
Posted by: www.makemegenius.com

Video duration: 304 seconds
Global video hits: 31030

Visit http://www.makemegen ius.com for free science videos for kids.

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Thanks? for ...
By: makemegenius. on 07 May 13, 04:37:43
Thanks? for appreciation.?

Thanks? for ...
By: makemegenius. on 07 May 13, 04:37:35
Thanks? for appreciation.?

Thanks?? for ...
By: makemegenius. on 07 May 13, 04:36:46
Thanks?? for appreciation.

i dont get why ...
By: SkAr194. on 06 May 13, 19:52:15
i dont get why people watch these videos and then blast it with negativity because they're too stupid to understand concepts in environmental sciences...if you think global warming isn't true? then why watch videos on global warming...that's just stupid -_-

*there At least ...
By: Hal Emmerich. on 28 Apr 13, 18:44:52
*there At least learn how to spell before saying? something stupid you fucking idiot.

green house effect ...
By: b34113411. on 10 Apr 13, 07:16:16
green house effect is fucking bullshit the global warming is real but the global warming have been exaggerated the recent study shows that global warming and green? house gas are rising, but they do not have direct relations, there was a medieval warm period,which people can plant fruit and crops around the world due? to the climate change the global warming is caused by the heating sunevidence shows that the ice in venus and mars are starting to melt,proofs that the whole solar system is heating

green house effect ...
By: b34113411. on 10 Apr 13, 07:14:57
green house effect is fucking bullshit the global warming is real but the global warming have been exaggerated the recent study shows that global warming and green house gas are rising, but they do not have direct relations, there was a medieval warm period,which people can plant fruit and crops around the world due? to the climate change the global warming is caused by the heating sun evidence shows that the ice in venus and mars are starting to melt,proofs that the whole solar system is heating

Wtf no top? comment?
By: Whyrweherereally. on 20 Mar 13, 06:49:05
Wtf no top? comment?

What's up with ...
By: MamooYanyan. on 03 Mar 13, 17:12:57
What's up with allThe punching? Trying to find a video to show my students, but too bad they? are all presented inappropriately so far.

Propaganda for ...
By: MrWhatwhathuh. on 22 Feb 13, 14:36:51
Propaganda for children and dumb adults. Co2 doesn't cause? global warming, will become self evident when you freeze your Assz off.

Wrong. Not 18 ...
By: listen2meokidoki. on 21 Feb 13, 13:27:50
Wrong. Not 18 degrees but minus 18 degrees! Obviously? this isnt meant for children, rather dumb adults.

Explaination*?
By: Annalise Styles. on 21 Feb 13, 05:57:38
Explaination*?

Really good? ...
By: Annalise Styles. on 21 Feb 13, 05:56:37
Really good? explains toon but the lack of words like "the" annoyed me! Thanks though (:

This is just ...
By: pclose9. on 20 Feb 13, 17:21:05
This is just another one of their excuses to trample all over our us constitution, ? yes their tramping on you're freedom and you don't even know it, WAKE UP!

Their is? no such ...
By: pclose9. on 20 Feb 13, 17:05:34
Their is? no such thing as global warming!

Ohh!, the only ...
By: pclose9. on 20 Feb 13, 17:02:02
Ohh!, the only thing? green about this whole movement is the green of money, their real agenda is to put the US under the rule of a one world government and that is all nothing else!

this stuff is all ...
By: Riad Sankari. on 20 Feb 13, 16:10:03
this stuff is all real and if we dont protect the earth in the future we wont have any earth and theyre will be nowhere for us to live and that will be the end of allof life on earth and the whole cause of it will be because we humans did not protect it we should be planting more trees destroying factories and replacing them with trees us humans did not have to invent cars horses were fast enough so in? the next 100 years or so the whole earth might not be there

Children? don't ...
By: pclose9. on 17 Feb 13, 16:21:39
Children? don't believe this, global warming is all lies.

bullshit!, bullshit ...
By: pclose9. on 17 Feb 13, 16:18:53
bullshit!, bullshit!?

terrible video.... ...
By: Aanthanur DC. on 28 Jan 13, 19:08:57
terrible video.... you punch people in the face for a childrens show? really? and actually increasing CO2 levels leads to more IR radiation going to space. the contrary to what you claimed, not that it makes a difference, the rest was pretty simple but atleast not wrong. but the you lost me at the FCF, CFC's are phased out, we use alternatives that are not destrying the ozon? layer. so no need to scare kids.. and the use of CFC using AC's or friges was not the problem, theyr disposal was.

I'm sorry for? ...
By: bigwave2001. on 15 Dec 12, 20:40:38
I'm sorry for? acting like a stupid

Good job, keep it ...
By: OfficialTrailers333. on 18 Nov 12, 13:58:33
Good job, keep it up. Salute to you ,at? least we don't have to waste time for looking for science videos for kids. It is one stop place makemegenius website.Thanks

water? is also life ...
By: mithilag. on 24 Oct 12, 07:23:26
water? is also life. but i'm sure you wouldn't appreciate flooding

Nice conceptual ...
By: BhiwaniJungle. on 30 Sep 12, 02:01:50
Nice conceptual teaching for? kids.

CO2 is life. ...
By: seaplaneguy1. on 13 Aug 12, 01:24:55
CO2 is life. Without it, there is no life. Plants like 1200 ppm, not 380 ppm. How would someone live on 1/3 the amount of "food" needed? Plants are starving. This is wrong. Think of it like a water filter. ? Once the water is clean, MORE filter cannot make the water cleaner. CO2 "cleans" certain frequencies and warms the air. As it gets thicker, it just does the job earlier. More CO2 cannot trap more heat once the "filter" cleans it. That Height is around 40 ft. CO2 is NOT an problem.

James Hansen: The Runaway Greenhouse Effect
Posted by: ClimateState

Video duration: 311 seconds
Global video hits: 9279

"The Oceans will begin to boil..." http://pubs.giss.nas a.gov/authors/jhanse n.html His Book: Storms of My Grandchildren: The Truth About the Coming Climate Ca...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

I don't understand. ...
By: XKS99. on 28 Apr 13, 18:37:19
I don't understand. If the carbon dioxide concentrations in the past were as much as ten times what they are now, why haven't the oceans boiled already? How is it that glaciation and ice ages occurred during those high carbon epochs? Because the sun's output? was lower? But then how did the CO2 level know to come down as the sun's output increased? Could it be there are negative feedbacks the alarmists haven't accounted for?

27? You under- ...
By: theElasticJesuz .. on 07 Mar 13, 21:21:18
27? You under-estimate the power of the dark side. I've been locking horns with these idiots (no other word will suffice for those who refuse to acknowledge facts) for the past 6 years And most of them are here, within the first 90 seconds of this vid? - watch?v=HkpdkK6qhW4

Couldn't happen to ...
By: PimpPancreas. on 12 Dec 12, 23:30:57
Couldn't happen to a better species. ?

Or, it could be ...
By: Vinsense2009. on 07 Nov 12, 16:06:04
Or, it could be that most persons don't think the Oceans? will boil anytime soon.

Most of you people ...
By: Antiks72. on 04 Nov 12, 15:48:34
Most of you people don't know it,? but James Hansen is also a Breton Necromancer.

Science is NOT ...
By: seaplaneguy1. on 21 Aug 12, 22:42:50
Science is NOT about trust, but a method that uses repeatable facts. How many degrees or fame you have does not matter. Clearly you have a religious view of AGW theory. I just look at the facts. The fact is data was taken by the best scientists of their day going back to 1805. To discard this data is fraud. Any real scientist REQUIRES ALL data, otherwise they call fraud. Funny how you don't? care that data was removed. Scientists do care and require it or they toss the paper.

Read the book " ...
By: seaplaneguy1. on 20 Aug 12, 19:25:22
Read the book "three felonies a day" and you will realize that with 60 million laws, most people commit a felony every day on average. Therefore every body knowingly or unknowingly is? conspiring. The data shows these cycle. Deal with it. The 280 ppm notion is made up. Even "deniers" miss this fact. When the CO2 starts to turn down in 5-10 years this AGW fraud will be over completely.

I state the facts ...
By: seaplaneguy1. on 20 Aug 12, 19:19:24
I state the facts and you say I am misleading. Any junior? High school kids who has taken a science class knows that you ALWAYS show ALL data even if you think they are "outliers" and inaccurate. Hansen and Mann don't. This alone tells you they don't do science. This is basic. How many people know that CO2 goes in 70-90 year cycles? Why? The data is hidden. Whole truth, nothing but the truth so help you... Wake up.

Measurements going ...
By: seaplaneguy1. on 13 Aug 12, 01:13:27
Measurements going back to 1805 showed concentrations going up to 440-550ppm on a 70-90? cycle. They then drop down to 280 ppm. In 1940's they were at 440 ppm, and then dropped to 300 ppm in 1958 when Keeling started the fraud. Ice core data shaves off the peaks producing a false 280 ppm view. We are in an upturn leading to a peak, which will turn down in 5-10 years even with human CO2 adding. Humans are less than 3%. Look at the graph up and down. How? Game over.

Georg Beck, 180 of ...
By: seaplaneguy1. on 13 Aug 12, 01:07:43
Georg Beck, 180 of co2. Published. He is a German scientist. He takes ALL the data measured since 1805 and does what real scientists do, not cherry pick for predetermined results. Anybody who has read about Keeling should know he discarded most of the chemical measured data and made up a false average to match the 1958? CO2 levels coming off of Mauna Loa. Total fraud. Wake up. NOT science.

Your right, there ...
By: seaplaneguy1. on 13 Aug 12, 01:04:42
Your right, there are others, but? all are down wind of volcanoes, but Mauna Loa is taken as the prime lab. They are measuring the up turn I am talking about, not any AGW nonsense. Just wait when CO2 turns down...game over. When scientist understand what causes La Nina and La Nino, which they do not, then we can start to talk climate. They know nothing. Spencer just said that on the radio recently. Claims made by AGW have not come true. Learn to recognize a fraud when it hits you.

Wrong? No, the ...
By: seaplaneguy1. on 11 Aug 12, 19:59:57
Wrong? No, the data shows that it goes up and down. It was up to 440 ppm in 1940's, it went down to 300 or so and then started up when Keeling starting his Mauna Loa lab in? 1958. The ice core data was spliced, but it was 80 years older (fraud). Keeling falsified the 280 ppm number. The real 200 year average is around 350 ppm, not 280 ppm. Ice core data eliminates the ups and down and leads one to a wrong conclusion. CO2 is due to magnetic fields on sun, moon and earth. CO2=good.

You are WRONG! I ...
By: Viracocha711. on 11 Aug 12, 17:56:12
You are WRONG! I have already shown you your mistakes. Take care.?

This is where you ...
By: seaplaneguy1. on 11 Aug 12, 17:50:09
This is where you have bought into the fraud the Keeling of Maunt Loa fame put on us. He cheery picked the data and then mated current reading to ice core data that only a chemistry trick and a very poor poxy. CO2 levels go up and down. In 5-10 years at around 440 ppm they should start dropping again. Game over. Hurry, get the tax before the con falls all apart. AGW is false. ? Data fraud is everywhere. Climategate? Need I say more. Hide the decline. Splice in data to prove your beliefs

Ya, und? What is ...
By: seaplaneguy1. on 11 Aug 12, 17:44:42
Ya, und? What is your point? Again, you like to end the discussion because you don't have any facts or ideas. You only parrot what you Professor vomits. You don't think. You are being conned by the AGW pro tax control freaks. My engine technology could get 80-90%,? perhaps 100% of the carbon out of your life. Why don't you find me someone who has the money and do something positive in your basement...

What experimental ...
By: seaplaneguy1. on 11 Aug 12, 17:41:19
What experimental physics? The concentrations in the 280-2000 ppm is normal and well within range of a healthy planet. 1200 ppm would be idea, actually. Water ppm goes from 200 - 40,000 ppm, and what happens? World burns up? No, the height to extinction drops and heat is absorbs lower to the ground, which in turn make stronger convection currents. When? the height is lower than 500 ft it is well mixed and therefore DOES NOT change total energy trapping. AGW is wrong.

Wrong, Georg Beck ...
By: seaplaneguy1. on 11 Aug 12, 16:47:07
Wrong, Georg Beck showed in his research that many of scientist of note MEASURED CO2 levels going back to 1805. Levels up to 440-550 ppm were in 70-90 year cycles. Sorry, the data shows a cycle and YOU don't know? what you are talking about. Keeling just cherry picked data and eliminated data higher than 280 ppm to make up his ice core + Mauna Loa fraud curve. This is where the fraud of CO2 being 280 ppm. Wake up.

I am not saying ...
By: Viracocha711. on 11 Aug 12, 10:41:55
I am not saying this to be an A-hole but you don't know what you are? talking about at all! CO2 does not rise & fall on a 70yr cycle...YES, CO2 has been above 440ppm in the distant past but humans were not on the planet & almost every life form was different at those times...Life that evolved to live in those conditions. YES, scientist today understand the CO2 cycle EXTREMELY WELL & if you read the science you would see HOW they know it so well. If you need help feel free to PM me. Take care.

CO2 is an ...
By: dojmike. on 10 Aug 12, 07:19:58
CO2 is an atmosphere nutrient and not a pollutant. Instead of trying to dismantle our country economically (the true goal of the global warming demagogues), why not pressure Brazil and other tropical countries to stop decimating the rainforests. This would truly help keep the CO2 in check and would produce more oxygen for us to breathe and to run our internal combustion engines, thereby allowing the USA? to keep feeding and protecting the world.

If that is "science ...
By: seaplaneguy1. on 10 Aug 12, 01:48:19
If that is "science" you are a joke. Fact is CO2 goes up and down in 70-90 year cycles. The low was in 1959 when Keeling did his? splice of Mauna Loa data to ice core data, that required a 80 year "move" of the data. Total fraud. This entire fraud is not science. Why are there not CO2 data point all over the world? The measurement is a joke. BTW, any scientist ALWAYS provides ALL the data, not just what they think is right. Wrong again.

You make a? better ...
By: briansmobile1. on 09 Aug 12, 18:19:50
You make a? better case than? this guy does! Well done.

And, a greenhouse ...
By: docdavidb. on 09 Aug 12, 17:34:39
And, a greenhouse does not have to melt to trap enough heat for life inside the greenhouse to be extinguished. Farming greenhouses have systems to? move heat from inside to outside, otherwise the crops, in some conditions, would be cooked.

See Wikipedia for ...
By: docdavidb. on 09 Aug 12, 17:27:31
See Wikipedia for greenhouse effect. Your references inappropriately mix open and closed systems. The earth's surface is an open system, receiving heat from the sun and radiating some of that heat back to space. A runaway effect would be if components in the atmosphere are skewed such that not enough heat is allowed to radiate to space, causing warming, melting? more ice which releases more greenhouse gases, thus trapping more heat. And so on.

Please explain " ...
By: briansmobile1. on 09 Aug 12, 16:13:39
Please explain "runaway greenhouse effect" mentioned at 1:20. I'm familiar with viscous cycles, but I'm also familiar with conservation of energy, greenhouses, and limits such as terminal velocity. We don't have greenhouses as used in the farming purpose that are MELTING THEMSELVES TO THE GROUND. A greenhouse? has the ability to trap heat. It DOES NOT have the ability to increase heat or CREATE heat exponentially. It can't trap heat in a "run away" sense.

Greenhouse Effect
Posted by: veppie0

Video duration: 107 seconds
Global video hits: 100646

A simple animation of the greenhouse effect.

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

there many substanc ...
By: Smartass012. on 12 Jul 12, 20:35:15
there many substanc,es that bond with carbon dyoxicide.hemuglobin for one.zinc.&many more maybe we could filter for polotion or a spunge for green hous gas,es.less trie make a? spunge in chemistery class

For all animals/ ...
By: Teppo S�rkk�. on 17 Jun 12, 04:57:47
For all animals/nature and humans to have good living conditions permanently, we need a global system that supports All Life Equally. To establish an Equality-based system All humans have to continuously lose? Self-Interest and live according to what is Best For All Equally. There are courses with which a person can support oneself and others in the change. I recommend all to find and read the websites of 'Equal Money System', 'Desteni I Process' and 'Desteni'.

fuck off ...
By: shavonne1111. on 12 Apr 12, 11:45:30
fuck off greenhouse? effect!

The? Bunny Doesn't ...
By: 275hammy. on 11 Apr 12, 21:19:09
The? Bunny Doesn't Move That Much.

The IPCC itself ...
By: ridgeraiser. on 08 Mar 12, 15:39:32
The IPCC itself says that there has been no dramatic warming of the past 150 years!!!!!!!! Take a?? look on the right/real report!

About 30 percent of ...
By: 12345chezz. on 01 Mar 12, 09:57:20
About 30 percent of the sunlight that beams toward Earth is deflected by the outer atmosphere and scattered back into space. The rest reaches the planet's surface and is reflected upward? again as a type of slow-moving energy called infrared radiation.

Die Kanadier lassen ...
By: MultiNewMedia. on 16 Dec 11, 23:51:37
Die Kanadier lassen sich offenbar? nicht l�nger von den Klimaschwindelverbrechern verarschen. Googleeingabe: "Neues zur? Klimal�ge -- News of climate lies" Wenigstens schonmal EIN Land, dass es begriffen hat!

I'm a little ...
By: katyasinger. on 15 Dec 11, 03:07:02
I'm a little confused.? You just compared people to tornadoes, volcanoes and earthquakes!!!

Was haben Menschen, ...
By: awo42555. on 12 Dec 11, 11:41:51
Was haben Menschen, Tiere und Pflanzen gemeinsam? Alle produzieren ausschlie�lich CO2 und KEINEN Sauerstoff! CO2 ist auch? kein Treibhausgas. Es ist das schwerste Gas in der Luft und sackt immer zu? Boden! Jeder Propangasofen ist deshalb mit einem Warnhinweis ausgestattet. Die Photosynthese ist Betrug. Die Presse, Schulen und Unis l�gen! �berpr�ft es selbst, damit ihr nicht an die Klimawandelreligion glauben m�sst, sondern es wisst! Wer wei�, mu� nicht glauben!

CO2 absorbs an ...
By: m1aws. on 21 Nov 11, 14:24:04
CO2 absorbs an overall approx 0.035% of the light bandwidth. Less if there is any humidity. Mans contribution is approx 3% of that 0.035%. This film was made to influence tiny babies who cannot? know better. Shame on you.

you're an idiot, ...
By: 496112. on 21 Oct 11, 08:06:43
you're an idiot, golobal "warming" doesnt mean that its gona get warm everywhere -_-. There was? a REASON the ice age took place and thats what we're trying to avoid this time around

You are propagating ...
By: MsWanderer1. on 04 Sep 11, 19:40:07
You are propagating the propaganda and NOT the facts; we do? not KNOW it global warming is beneficial or detrimental. Warmer climate could simply produce longer growing seasons further north and south for the production of food and biofuels. It could also make more landmass habitable. There are no definitive "SCIENTIFIC" answers yet; just politically motivated rhetoric to support pure political bullshit agendas. Wise up or STFU..!..

its all americans ...
By: murtalink. on 16 Aug 11, 09:02:25
its all americans fault. They? discovered most modern thing like cars, industries and other things of modern life style that making this green house gas. To save the world lets go back to the ancient life style.

@skeatesy1 oh shit? ...
By: svendiamond. on 26 Jul 11, 00:26:51
@skeatesy1 oh shit? the? bible said it? then it must be true!

dude stop copying ...
By: svendiamond. on 26 Jul 11, 00:26:28
dude stop copying and pasting your comment on every greenhouse effect video. we're talking? about the greenhouse effect. not global warming.

global warming is ...
By: TheAustenFilms. on 23 Jul 11, 03:25:20
global warming is BS. face the god dang facts! it was snowing in california in the summer time last year! some places where its supposed to be hot was getting snow 1 or 2 weeks ago. even i got more snow then i usualy do! it is getting a little hotter but poles are shifting! its natures course! it happend before! history repeats! their have been drouts and ice ages! it will happen again its not the end! adapt like all humans do! dont be? a wimp!!! dont talk about it if u cant defend with facts!!!!

NO.NO Heat cannot ...
By: david222444. on 18 Apr 11, 20:48:17
NO.NO Heat cannot flow from cold to hot. The upper atmosphere is freezing heat cannot be transmitted to a warmer? earth. When you open your fridge heat does not come out.

what a wierd? video
By: xxthecoolboy. on 01 Mar 11, 10:56:35
what a wierd? video

chemtrails ..?
By: junak777. on 09 Feb 11, 09:09:18
chemtrails ..?

can you please send ...
By: ALJ7620. on 07 Feb 11, 15:56:48
can you please send the text? to this video?

Your best website ...
By: sailRichard. on 06 Dec 10, 05:05:04
Your best website for learning about? climate science as a layman is Skeptical Science. They patiently explain the science, including debunking of all skeptic arguments. No trolling, no politics, no policy, just science in the comments section.

The greenhouse ...
By: sailRichard. on 06 Dec 10, 05:01:51
The greenhouse effect has been accepted science for a century. the greenhouse gas effect was first proposed by Joseph Fourier in 1824, proven to exist by John Tyndall in 1858, and quantified by Svante Arrhenius in 1896. * But for Rush Limbaugh and the? Republicans and tea baggers, Global Warming is just an agenda cooked up by Al Gore and other liberals.

Fourier calculates ...
By: sailRichard. on 06 Dec 10, 05:00:12
Fourier calculates colder earth without an atmosphere (1824) Tyndall discovers relationship between CO2 and long-wave radiation? (1859) Arrhenius calculates global warming from anthropogenic CO2 (1896) Chamberlin models global carbon exchange including feedbacks (1897) Callendar predicts global warming increase catalysed by CO2 emissions (1938) Revelle predicts inability of oceans to sequester anthropogenic CO2 (1958)

Greenhouse Effect ? ...
By: bofawziii. on 24 Nov 10, 19:37:46
Greenhouse Effect ? is fuckin Bullshitttt

CO2 and the Greenhouse Effect
Posted by: PICSClimateInsights

Video duration: 486 seconds
Global video hits: 1503

This video describes why carbon dioxide has such a critical influence on the Earth's climate and the main sources of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere. More i...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

The Greenhouse Effect - Cool Science Experiment
Posted by: Spangler Science TV

Video duration: 207 seconds
Global video hits: 47109

Steve invites a young scientist to show his science fair project about the Greenhouse Effect. About Steve Spangler Science... Steve Spangler is a celebrity t...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

thats kind of what ...
By: thomas lowe. on 20 May 13, 02:22:18
thats kind of what i think to, ,co2 is absorbed by plants which in return sends out good oxygen, so since plants absorb co2 then how could it be co2 gasses causing the heating of the planet? could it be something so simple as something like sun flares? no thats ridiculous isnt? it.

Well a lot of ...
By: Tweeaak Tweek. on 17 May 13, 03:31:43
Well a lot of people are saying the experiment failed. It didn't fail actually. The results? were recorded to be 71, 79 and 81. The only thing that failed was the presentation because the CO2 jar was allowed to cool both during the set up and actually while they were explaining things.

How can O2 be? ...
By: Lokautable. on 16 May 13, 14:28:13
How can O2 be? worse than CO2

Did u see his ...
By: dekenya mouphe. on 10 May 13, 20:46:02
Did u see his reaction when? he brought up the glaciers melting in Alaska?

Also the? control ...
By: SGRock94. on 01 May 13, 00:57:14
Also the? control stayed constant, proving that CO2 and tree really do something

Why can i not stop ...
By: PerryIncorperated. on 23 Apr 13, 01:11:00
Why can i not stop watching? your videos?

Well as nice as the ...
By: nithia. on 20 Apr 13, 05:39:50
Well as nice as the things inside were to demonstrate what each was it does add a variable. To do it right you would have to have each jar have exactly the same thing in each one. That aside though the south poll ice cap is actually getting bigger while the north cap shrinks so it can not be global warming as the weirdos say. And with that said plants use CO2 and release oxygen so we should actually get a rain forest effect going. Oh ya and? O2 is worse than CO2.

yeah im sure u ...
By: thedamienist. on 18 Apr 13, 06:59:42
yeah im sure u noticed that the control and the CO2 filled containers did not have plants yes? to much CO2 can kill a plant but in small portions it helps the plant grow and its been proven that there r more plants to use up CO2 than there is CO2 bn produced by automobiles or animals so this experiment is basicly a crap experiment

yeah im sure u ...
By: thedamienist. on 18 Apr 13, 06:59:30
yeah im sure u noticed that the control and the CO2 filled containers did not have plants yes to much CO2 can kill a plant but in small portions it helps the plant grow and its been proven that there r more plants to use up CO2 than there is CO2 bn produced by automobiles or animals so this experiment is? basicly a crap experiment

It? keeps on ...
By: crystal13513. on 13 Apr 13, 05:08:35
It? keeps on loading.

I keeps? on loading.
By: crystal13513. on 13 Apr 13, 05:05:23
I keeps? on loading.

lol?
By: Kristine Sadowski. on 04 Apr 13, 23:33:28
lol?

Firstly:? It' CO2, ...
By: Tweeaak Tweek. on 04 Apr 13, 07:03:01
Firstly:? It' CO2, not C02. Secondly: Keep in mind that the CO2 had longer to cool after the "sun" was removed. That time between them removing the "sun" and checking the CO2 temperature could have been enough for it to have adjusted to room temperature again.

Physics isn't ...
By: 5Ghost8Dragon3. on 01 Apr 13, 06:57:43
Physics isn't really biased since we DO need a certain amount of greenhouse gases? to trap heat on the planet to help keep it warm, not to mention that we, and all other animals, breath O2 to live, and expel CO2, which plants then take to and expel O2 in return. It's all so that we can, you know, survive.

It's saying that ...
By: clarabellen. on 16 Mar 13, 01:29:05
It's saying that the Earth functions better when we have plants and less CO2 gasses being spewed into our air. The jar with the plant was cooler, and the jar with the CO2 (which represented the crap we pollute our air with) was much? hotter.

lol?
By: jeremiah vallot. on 13 Mar 13, 23:32:15
lol?

The sun? .. Yes
By: Raphael Sirard. on 04 Mar 13, 23:28:45
The sun? .. Yes

6co2+6h2o+light? ...
By: FreeHugsFromMrCreeps. on 21 Jan 13, 06:47:59
6co2+6h2o+light? energy=c6h12o6+6o2

Bad experiment?
By: movosss. on 01 Jan 13, 02:24:42
Bad experiment?

I can't belive ...
By: salabud434. on 14 Dec 12, 01:56:56
I can't belive steve approved this comment?

Can't you? just say ...
By: Anna Nguyen. on 09 Dec 12, 05:31:17
Can't you? just say Global warming!

The? experiment ...
By: C4Chaos42. on 27 Nov 12, 00:48:24
The? experiment failed. Both the control and C02 had the same temperature.

O2 combusts more? ...
By: Daniel Williams. on 19 Nov 12, 19:08:20
O2 combusts more? easily than CO2 kill all plants to prevent

1:51-1:54 hmmm a ...
By: odymeg. on 16 Nov 12, 15:20:51
1:51-1:54 hmmm a tube?

not necessarily ...
By: Bengzone. on 12 Nov 12, 21:26:11
not necessarily smart but he has more? knowledge

Clear the Air - The Greenhouse Effect
Posted by: PICSClimateInsights

Video duration: 102 seconds
Global video hits: 1780

www.pics.uvic.ca.

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Carbon Dioxide and the Greenhouse Effect
Posted by: MIT + K12

Video duration: 213 seconds
Global video hits: 1555

What is the Greenhouse Effect and what role does carbon dioxide play? License: Creative Commons BY-NC-SA More information at http://k12videos.mit .edu/terms-c...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Greenhouse Effect: In A Nutshell
Posted by: UCRglobalclimate

Video duration: 182 seconds
Global video hits: 2510

By Xitlali Tapia Created for UCR course GEOLOGY 011 - Global Climate Change Funded in part by the NASA GCCE Grant "Down to Earth Climate Change: Engaging Tom...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

$\"Green House Effect Results Part 2\" (#16)$

"Green House Effect Results Part 2" (#16)
Posted by: MzBeautifulBarnes

Video duration: 58 seconds
Global video hits: 74181

Part 2 challenge using the green house e.

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Wow! your hair? ...
By: ToonCrazy3. on 19 May 13, 11:43:06
Wow! your hair? grew a lot im going to try this.

This jus looks like ...
By: sherr sherr. on 11 May 13, 15:28:02
This jus looks like normal? hair growth

Bonjour,\nL� ...
By: MzBeautifulBarnes. on 16 Mar 13, 18:28:45
Bonjour,\nL� beaucoup de facteurs qui jouent des r�les en maintenant les cheveux naturels.? Utilisant quels produits �tes vous actuellement. Combien de fois est-ce que vous nettoyez, conditionnez et conditionnez profond�ment ? Employez-vous le shampooing, si est ainsi il sulfate gratuit ? Donnez-moi un r�sum� de ce que vous faites et employez.

Bonjour; je ...
By: Godeliv Kenga. on 03 Mar 13, 05:30:43
Bonjour; je voudrais savoir comment garder mes cheveux natural et comment et quel produit pour faire pousser? mes cheveux,merci de votre aide.

anaqah natural ...
By: alexandra tooty. on 11 Nov 12, 14:13:22
anaqah natural beauty products has hair growth cream made from shea butter and? natural oils its perfect for afro type hair. I myself use it and my friends and it makes your hair grow really fast, soften it and moisturise the hair. my hair has grown 1 inch a month since the first month of using it and i have re growth of new hair i really do recommend it they have a website anaqah.co.uk also they sell on ebay

Yeah? your skin ...
By: bslorbust. on 04 Nov 12, 17:33:47
Yeah? your skin looks great!

ok thanks?
By: Tamika Pinder. on 27 Sep 12, 18:45:33
ok thanks?

@catsMeow2133...you ...
By: MzBeautifulBarnes. on 26 Sep 12, 01:35:26
@catsMeow2133...you can but dont have too...you? can do every other day too

do you need to? do ...
By: Tamika Pinder. on 24 Sep 12, 19:02:53
do you need to? do that every night?

@lanicert...yes, ...
By: MzBeautifulBarnes. on 20 Sep 12, 03:09:32
@lanicert...yes, the? ghe aides in length retention by keeping the hair moisturized avoiding breakage from dryness :)

I'm not trying to ...
By: lanicert. on 17 Sep 12, 21:58:45
I'm not trying to be a downer, but the growth rate seems to be the normal rate that the hair would grow in that amount of time, not a faster rate. What do you believe that this method has? done for you? Is it primarily in retaining the hair on the ends and preventing it from breaking off?

I noticed in the ...
By: BecomingVirtuous. on 17 Sep 12, 17:18:47
I noticed in the comparison pictures, by October your skin appears clearer. Did your diet or stress levels improve throughout your regimen? Do you drink a lot? more water?

what was the ...
By: SassyLollipops. on 05 Sep 12, 23:57:39
what was the prdoucts you used...? and how many times would you wash your hair? a Month???

rellebell? Please? ...
By: rellepsu1. on 21 Aug 12, 06:18:22
rellebell? Please? Subscribe ?? rellebell? Please Subscribe ?? rellebell? Please Subscribe ??

i just started my ...
By: oBeyonce. on 08 Aug 12, 14:55:16
i just started my journey and i would know? if you use Vitamin Supplement for Healthy Hair ????

great? results!
By: Christiane Adam. on 16 Jun 12, 10:07:51
great? results!

if your? hair can ...
By: MzBeautifulBarnes. on 05 Jun 12, 03:55:48
if your? hair can take it...when I first started this my hair had got a mildew smell from not ever drying...so I went to less water and skipped a day or so

Should you do? this ...
By: XxMExX1997. on 30 May 12, 18:59:38
Should you do? this every night? Because I'm ready to start now

How often do you ...
By: Colette ChoColette. on 27 May 12, 22:26:35
How often do you do? the GHE?

I love your mini ...
By: mechellegadson. on 15 Apr 12, 16:41:02
I love your mini braids...I want to wear them for the? summer

love the video! ...
By: BeautyFashionTube. on 21 Feb 12, 02:55:47
love the video!check out my hair progress @beautyfashiontube...

do you do the GHE? ...
By: Mariam Koita. on 03 Feb 12, 13:08:34
do you do the GHE? everynight?

would rosemary, tea ...
By: tripudium17. on 01 Feb 12, 08:34:33
would rosemary, tea tree? have helped with that?

those are great ...
By: TheAly170. on 15 Jan 12, 23:19:20
those are great results!! how often did? you GHE??

Green House Effect Tutorial
Posted by: RealQueensRegimen

Video duration: 228 seconds
Global video hits: 45633

Climate Challenge - Greenhouse Effect
Posted by: LegendaryFX

Video duration: 121 seconds
Global video hits: 51072

http://www.youtube.c om/watch?v=lIjGynF4q kE----------------- CLICK HERE for Debate -------------------- -------------------- -------------------- -- Life depends...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

I'm french? and i ...
By: ldurbiano. on 15 Oct 12, 19:47:48
I'm french? and i studie this vid , it's very good ;)

We all know that ...
By: pmcpreston. on 13 Jul 12, 22:30:50
We all know that global warming is real but it seems like no matter how hard the human race tries, nothing changes. It just gets hotter and hotter. So how the hell do we stop? it?

For all animals/ ...
By: Teppo S�rkk�. on 17 Jun 12, 04:49:33
For all animals/nature and humans to have good living conditions permanently, we need a global system that supports All Life Equally. To establish an Equality-based system All humans have to continuously lose Self-Interest and live according to what is Best For All Equally. There are courses with which a person can support oneself and others in the change. I recommend all to find and read the? websites of 'Equal Money System', 'Desteni I Process' and 'Desteni'.

ALL GREENHOUSE ...
By: Christopher Richardson. on 05 Jun 12, 21:18:12
ALL GREENHOUSE GASES THAT ARE PRODUCED ARE GOING INTO THE SKY LOOKING FOR A WAY INTO SPACE...BUT IT IS TRAPPED IN THIS LAYER, THEREFORE CAUSING EXTRA LAYERS CAUSING POLAR ICE CAPS TO MELT AND FLOOD THE EARTH! ALSO CAUSING? HEATWAVES ETC. TIME SOME OF YOU WOKE UP AND SMELT THE GAS! #SAVETHEPLANET

ALL OF YOU SAYING ...
By: Christopher Richardson. on 05 Jun 12, 21:16:32
ALL OF YOU SAYING THAT THIS IS BULLSHIT AND PEOPLE ARE JUST PROFITING OFF? IT...WAKE THE FUCK UP! THE CLIMATE IS SUFFERING BECAUSE OF YOUR DISBELIEF AND IT IS HURTING THE GLOBE! @deeptruthhunter IT IS NOT BECAUSE OF THE SUN! IF IT WERN'T FOR THE SUN WE WOULD DIE AS THE EARTH WOULD BE -18oC! HERE IS THE TRUTH: THERE IS A PROTECTIVE LAYER AROUND THE GLOBE THAT THE SUN RAYS REFLECTS BACK AND FORTH OFF - THIS KEEPS THE TEMPERATURE AT AN AVERAGE OF 14oC.

THIS IS A BULL SHIT ...
By: deeptruthhunter. on 26 Jan 12, 14:09:44
THIS IS A BULL SHIT THE SUN IS THE MAIN DRIVER? TO EARTHS TEMPS AL GORE IS FILLING HIS POCKET ON THIS CONSPIRACY THEORY

Who? in their right ...
By: david222444. on 19 Jun 11, 13:55:08
Who? in their right mind could think that man can increase and decreae the temperature of the climate like a room thermostat? Only idiots would believe this shit.

real? good vid
By: hahalolbigboyz99. on 21 May 11, 14:19:19
real? good vid

go to hell were you ...
By: mariotubegr. on 02 May 11, 09:59:30
go to hell were you belong...? global warming and global depression scumbugs....

The world is not? ...
By: david222444. on 27 Mar 11, 20:11:36
The world is not? getting hotter anymore. Carbon dioxide concentrations increased as a result of past global warming probably caused by the old grand solar maximum. Carbon dioxide is essential to all life on the planet it is not a pollutant.

silly question but. ...
By: inelekontes. on 11 Jan 11, 19:00:38
silly question but... does anyone? know the name of the song?

we must take ...
By: lefis96. on 07 May 10, 13:38:38
we must take somethink NOW!?

In just FIVE YEARS ...
By: goog2k. on 29 Jan 10, 01:22:53
In just FIVE YEARS between 2004-2009 the thickness of arctic ice has DROPPED 42%. This was discovered by NASA satellite measurements. Reported 7/7/09 Search: New NASA Satellite Survey Reveals Dramatic Arctic Sea Ice Thinning Global Warming is changing our world NOW. CO2 is 35% above levels for 650,000 years. In just 30 years CO2 will be over 450ppm, enough to acidify oceans to the point of stopping the? growth of many planktons and corals. They are at the base of the oceans' food chain. Oops!

what/??/is this ...
By: xaxsha. on 26 Jan 10, 13:25:26
what/??/is this thr is no such thing as enhanced greenhouse effect? it is all a lie? so who iis telling the truth? i mean like i've been learning it? all my school life that temp is rising sharply due to man-made greenhouse effect!!

Volcanic activity ...
By: AnnoyingingeXD. on 23 Jan 10, 22:13:50
Volcanic activity produces WAY more CO2 than any man-made cause. And by your own admission, volcanic activity is very quiet around now. So no, we are making no effect whatsoever.?

I've created a poll ...
By: AGWnot. on 19 Jan 10, 13:27:45
I've created a poll entitled, 'Do you believe that man-made CO2 is causing Global Warming?' Just go to the link below and vote YES or NO misterpoll*com/polls/469706 P.S. Inside the link, replace asterisk? (*) with a dot (.)

A few years ago ...
By: magicalgoats. on 17 Jan 10, 12:05:41
A few years ago when? research that smoking tobacco gave you cancer, a similar argument that it was all a big lie was going around with some scientists saying it was even good. Then it was discovered these same scientists were funded by tobacco companies. The same thing also happened with living near a nuclear waste disposal site in the UK. I'd say the NWO is more likely to be funding research into global warming being fraud, since oil makes billions of dollars while raping the health of 3rdWorld

and smoking ...
By: magicalgoats. on 17 Jan 10, 01:04:29
and smoking doesn't? give you cancer right?

GLOBAL WARMIING IS ...
By: DarkXAce. on 03 Dec 09, 04:28:16
GLOBAL WARMIING IS A? FRAUD!

Where did you get ...
By: MrPincoNico. on 27 Nov 09, 10:51:12
Where did you get your facts from. Yes it has happened in the past. This was through excessive Volcanic activity. This time the? excess carbon dioxide is from a man made sources, eg cars,etc. Not volcanic activity. Which by the way has being the most quiet for the last 10 000 years.

I think it was ...
By: Alex Orneskans. on 09 Oct 09, 19:38:56
I think it was created by? a politician or something xDDD not sure but i think so xD

Climates always ...
By: Alex Orneskans. on 09 Oct 09, 19:38:03
Climates always change there has been a time where the earth had 10 times the amount and by the? way this theory that man made global warming comes from politicals. there is no proof of the so called green house effect and by the way Co2 is heavier than air why would it rise up so high??

to all who say ...
By: sk8bow. on 29 Jun 09, 18:23:26
to all who say pollution is part of nature. i ask you this question: why would nature evolve for survival by learning from what does not promote survival? it's all how you look at it. either we can accept pollution as it changes the environment, or we can learn to live efficient and? progress in environmental education. the quality of the world depends on the popular human opinion.

you really think ...
By: sk8bow. on 29 Jun 09, 18:11:54
you really think the way you look at the world will help us ? it's inevitable that we kill ourselves off faster with opinions like yours. get your head? straight for the children who are going to inherit the earth. why should you care? you're not going to be alive to care. selfish and stubborn ass!

Greenhouse effect ...
By: nowyouseeme1. on 24 Jun 09, 23:03:06
Greenhouse effect is a lie created by science all is a natural thing? of nature.

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40

global warming Related Videos

global warming Videos

Watching: Greenhouse Effect video compilations