Global Climate Change video compilations - By global warming Videos

global warming Videos

Watching: Global Climate Change video compilations

Lonnie Thompson: Global Climate Change
Posted by: Dartmouth

Video duration: 4746 seconds
Global video hits: 117

Lonnie Thompson - PhD, Byrd Polar Research Center "Global Climate Change: A Paleoclimate Perspective from the World's Highest Mountains" November 17, 2009 Da...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

James Hansen: Why I must speak out about climate change
Posted by: TEDtalksDirector

Video duration: 1072 seconds
Global video hits: 101040

http://www.ted.com Top climate scientist James Hansen tells the story of his involvement in the science of and debate over global climate change. In doing so...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Google 'Ottmar ...
By: PrairleDoggedRez. on 19 May 13, 09:43:08
Google 'Ottmar Edenhofer' redistribution of wealth via climate policy' . This is? their agenda ~ plain and simple and you are the ones footing the bill.

Remember when Nasa ...
By: HIGHLANDKING1. on 18 May 13, 12:12:17
Remember when Nasa used to do things? like land on the moon but since the 60's we chose diversity and now talk about climate change... its time to? get the western world back on track - northwest front.org

> Not one species ...
By: sdkee. on 18 May 13, 09:48:01
> Not one species that ever lived had any motivation whatsoever? of 'pushing another into extinction' Who said anything about "motivation"? You do understand that there are orders of magnitude more extinct species than current ones? And? you have some basic idea how that occurs? Suppose you and I are different species and eat the same thing. If my species eat all the food then you starve. This is the a normal path to extinction.

Not one species ...
By: 3MonkeesInDenial. on 17 May 13, 14:29:53
Not one species that ever lived had any motivation whatsoever of 'pushing another into extinction'. Where did you get that crap? from?

> If another ...
By: sdkee. on 15 May 13, 10:27:27
> If another species did equivalent damage you'd easily call it an unnatural force. Why? You obviously don't understand the history of life on this planet. The natural state of things is for one species to be pushing another into? extinction while on several niches new species are being birthed. Man has created new ecosystems. The crow, rat, squirrel, ant, and many others have benefited. Others (snakes, crocodiles, wolves) have been harmed. As for unnatural chemicals I agree to a point.

> Claiming that Man ...
By: sdkee. on 15 May 13, 10:01:59
> Claiming that Man is still "part of nature" requires loosening the definition of "nature" to the point of absurdity Why? Is a beaver dam not incredibly sophisticated from the perspective of an mite? > Human technology and overpopulation have destroyed any real balance Technology, arguable. Overpopulation? Please? The earth is mostly empty of human population. A fact which you probably don't know because you are a human and tend to only go? places where humans have populated...

>? Your comment on ...
By: sdkee. on 15 May 13, 09:54:35
>? Your comment on coral shows? ignorance of life processes. Fish benefit enormously from coral reefs Some fish do. Some don't. Larger predators don't. You are missing the point. All successful lifeforms modify their environment. We have fucking islands which are made by animals called coral. These islands are bad for some species and good for others. Your insistence that there is some kind of *single good* is against all biological knowledge.

Your comment on ...
By: NoEcologyNoEconomy. on 13 May 13, 00:16:56
Your comment on coral shows ignorance of life processes. Fish benefit enormously from coral reefs, and what do coral reefs have to do with frogs? I can't answer your nonsensical question. Organisms that evolved for millions of years are attuned to natural features that Man is destroying at a record pace. If you just don't care,? don't preach morality to me. Get an education to supplant your Dunning Kruger worldview.

Claiming that Man ...
By: NoEcologyNoEconomy. on 13 May 13, 00:10:50
Claiming that Man is still "part of nature" requires loosening the definition of "nature" to the point of absurdity. If another species did equivalent damage you'd easily call it an unnatural force. Human technology and overpopulation have destroyed any real balance, though a superficial veneer seems? OK. Man has laid waste to entire forests and animal species, and introduced thousands of unnatural chemicals and other blight that nature couldn't. Nuclear weapons are classic example.

> Man is messing up ...
By: sdkee. on 11 May 13, 13:07:24
> Man is messing up nature on many fronts What makes you think man is not part of nature? Consider: coral.? This animal creates huge reefs of its own skeletons. Does this "mess up the environment"? If you are a fish then yes. IF you are a frog then no. Should we hate coral for doing this? Why? Why not? The earth and life is naturally not static. The pseudo-environmentalist idea that all change is bad is really asking that all life stop. For all species.

> "global cooling ...
By: sdkee. on 11 May 13, 13:00:58
> "global cooling since 1998" based on cherry-picking an El Nino spike How about picking the middle of the? "little ice age" as the starting point for temp records? Does this not fit into this category of cherry picking? If you pick the time of dinosaurs as the "beginning of the temp record" then there has been massive cooling since then. And unlike the time of the dinosaurs, we are now in a situation where 90% of the time the earth is a snowball. And you are worried about warming?

> Why do you people ...
By: sdkee. on 11 May 13, 12:53:20
> Why do you people act like global warming is all played out, and speak of it in the past tense? Because it never happened. At least not in the sense of anything unusual. The mid 19th C was a well know minimum in temp. Now we are hotter than that minimum. Wow, consider me amazed. > Creationist No. > 400 ppm CO2 Still lower than almost any time in the last billion years. When the Cambrian explosion happened CO2 was 10X? now.

Sad reality. ...
By: blackestjake. on 08 May 13, 09:54:46
Sad reality. Anthropogenic Climate Climate change will continue until such a time that we, as a species, experience more discomfort from doing nothing than? we would doing something. Of course the irony is that would be WAY too late.

When we wake up to ...
By: Xavier Moutoux. on 08 May 13, 01:03:28
When we wake up to the truth, we will see all-out conversion to clean, renewable energy as an absolute necessity, the equivalent of WWIII. The plan? is explained in *The Present* @ TruthContest (.) com, check it out, what this book says will blow your mind and turn our world right-side up.

Yes that pointing ...
By: MrMOJB. on 05 May 13, 23:40:52
Yes that pointing out 'global cooling since 1998' is cherry picking but it goes to show that the grandiloquence, dooms day speeches of Al Gore & Co. were full of overblown nonsense. Saying that "we are? all headed for a huge J curve of high temperature increases" is one myth already dubious. No matter what reasons for temperature cooling anyone may come up with, this is fact! How come if anything changes from the original so called facts, the excuses are thought up latter & not mentioned prior?

I thought the Swiss ...
By: NoEcologyNoEconomy. on 05 May 13, 02:19:03
I thought the Swiss were a thoughtful people, but apparently rightardism exists everywhere. CO2 is responsible for about 3/4ths of radiative forcing in the atmosphere, and to ignore that is truly clownish. It is technically a trace gas, but a very powerful one. Read this article: "CO2: The Thermostat? that Controls Earth's Temperature" (NASA site)

Ah, the old canard ...
By: NoEcologyNoEconomy. on 05 May 13, 02:09:39
Ah, the old canard about "global cooling since 1998" based on cherry-picking an El Nino? spike as a starting point and ignoring subsequent overall warming. Will that lie ever die?

I agree with you ...
By: NoEcologyNoEconomy. on 05 May 13, 02:07:09
I agree with you about hypocrisy on wind turbines (see my videos)? but you are a pathological liar on AGW. You also show hypocritical attitudes toward nature, claiming to care about birds and bats, yet not about frogs. I'm sure you'd find birds and bats expendable in some other religio-economic context. Bottom line: Man is messing up nature on many fronts, not just whichever topic fits a certain ideology.

Why do you people ...
By: NoEcologyNoEconomy. on 05 May 13, 02:02:53
Why do you people act like global warming is all played out, and speak of it in the past tense? You show complete ignorance of the issue, just as you think evolution means monkeys suddenly turned into humans. Don't tell me you aren't a Creationist on some level. We are nearly at 400 ppm CO2 and the worst effects are just beginning.? The CO2Now site has a graphic that anyone can understand.

Patio-people (i.e. ...
By: NoEcologyNoEconomy. on 05 May 13, 01:59:11
Patio-people (i.e. the Church) have been the ones constantly denying scientific evidence. You've got your clan on the wrong side of that issue. Today's flat-earthers are global warming deniers, ozone hole deniers, etc.? Get the context right, you fool.

Don't underestimate ...
By: MrMOJB. on 02 May 13, 05:24:51
Don't underestimate good old common sense which is built on history, education & life experience. Most well educated economists totally missed the Global Financial Crisis. To the people who believe that anyone who doesn't agree with their way of thinking are "uneducated" & are "idiots", just look back at history & see the rulers who had the same attitude. Scary stuff?? ? Bureaucracy & humanity with its wonderful diversity of people, & their ideas do actually have a lot to offer.

Ah the sheer amount ...
By: MrLarseth. on 01 May 13, 14:42:09
Ah the sheer amount of uneducated people posting here never ceases to amaze me. Everyone comes out with all of these ludicrous statements about scientists and the studies they carry out yet they have no actual scientific knowledge of the processes being discussed. The depressing thing is that these idiots are/will be voting for the politicians making policy decisions with regard to climate change, at least climate change denial? is a dying ideal.

Conventional ...
By: patioperson. on 30 Apr 13, 00:20:19
Conventional wisdom? was that the earth was flat. Youtube scientists know differently. Conventional funding pays to the alarmist crowd. Youtube scientists know that funding brings greed, lies, and data manipulations. Going against conventional wisdom, which is not wisdom, doesn't resemble wisdom in any way, is what sceptical scientists do. But thousands of scientists know that Hansen is a conman. That's conventional wisdom for you. Not smarter than anyone, just smarter than the globull warmers.

Hansen is the ...
By: sdkee. on 28 Apr 13, 10:49:08
Hansen is the foremost example of a climate whore. He rode the "global warming crisis"? thing like an expert. He was *always* on the forefront of the alarmism. Then the world didn't bake itself and he is left looking like the no talent asshat that he is.

A Global Climate Change (animation)
Posted by: Jose Tapia

Video duration: 571 seconds
Global video hits: 320957

Final Sci Vis (scientific visualization) Project for junior year. Each person in the class had to pick a topic in science and make a video on it, so I chose ...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

We must now do our? ...
By: Fiona Mia. on 05 May 13, 16:22:54
We must now do our? best to slow down global warming. The way to do it is explained in a great website called The Truth Contest. Check it out (open "The Present" on homepage and read page 53-56 to see what it says about clean energies).

k. ?
By: kit kat. on 01 Apr 13, 20:56:14
k. ?

Good? job! Useful ...
By: Rose Bud. on 25 Mar 13, 11:33:09
Good? job! Useful explanation

Vote? Obama.
By: robsincgill. on 24 Feb 13, 18:15:13
Vote? Obama.

Lets make a ...
By: stopclimatechange123. on 14 Feb 13, 04:19:29
Lets make a difference now! Please visit:? saveourplanetfromclimatechange.weebly.com

good? educative ...
By: tuku1960. on 01 Feb 13, 22:25:33
good? educative movie

Really nice ...
By: Michael Foster. on 07 Jan 13, 09:12:33
Really nice narrative. I will show it to my students. You did this 5 years ago? The science is solid and holds up. The only thing you might? change is to add that what was predicted has all come to pass in 2012, a year of extreme weather due to human-caused global warming. As ice melt continues to accelerate, our window of opportunity is closing. The time to make a difference is right now. Check out 350.org

very? good video
By: Claudie069. on 16 Nov 12, 10:56:02
very? good video

Excellent job. Sums ...
By: Chris56Y. on 26 Aug 12, 10:00:43
Excellent job. Sums up? most of the major risks of global warming clearly and concisely. Will pass this on. Thank you!

Do something now? ...
By: Master Anwar Memorial Trust. on 21 Aug 12, 02:41:53
Do something now? for our earth.

For all animals/ ...
By: Teppo S�rkk�. on 17 Jun 12, 08:24:41
For all animals/nature and humans to have good living conditions permanently, we need a global system that supports All Life Equally. To establish an Equality-based system All humans have to continuously lose Self-Interest and live according to what is Best For All Equally. There are courses with which a person can support oneself and others in the change. I recommend? all to find and read the websites of 'Equal Money System', 'Desteni I Process' and 'Desteni'.

This is an amazing ...
By: necubreovo1993. on 15 May 12, 18:18:40
This is an amazing video! Good job!?

Global warming, ...
By: Himacmovieman. on 15 May 12, 02:23:14
Global warming, whether it is real or not, this answer is real but suppressed, I HAVE research that has proven that we could get 200 mpg in a small car, about 5 times the efficiency 100 mpg in a big car by cracking gasoline into natural gas, but every inventor gets suppressed going back over 80 years see and search out web sites? .himacresearch byronwine. rexresearch. all.c o m it is not a myth, but oil company protection

We all have? to ...
By: DisneyLover112214. on 22 Apr 12, 12:12:33
We all have? to work together to? keep the? environment safe! Not? just because if we don't we could harmed, also because the environment is a beautiful place that God has created for us. And? just Knowing that should give? us the power to want to protect it. So COPY AND PASTE this to all? of the videos you can find and LET'S SAVE THE PLANET!!!! I LOVE THE EARTH!!!!:)

Very Well done. ...
By: ALivingRainbow. on 05 Apr 12, 17:55:20
Very Well done. Would you be interested in showing you videos on an non comercial public TV station?..to abouyt ten million viewers? I am working on? an educational series about climate.

suck ?
By: X Shatteredlies. on 25 Mar 12, 13:31:20
suck ?

KONY? 2012
By: Alejandro Tapia. on 24 Mar 12, 17:26:02
KONY? 2012

This year, ...
By: mrtee196. on 11 Mar 12, 03:45:43
This year, thousands of Christians worldwide are making a bigger? statement: giving up carbon to help save the planet. (Of course, it's nearly impossible to "give up" all carbon. But devoted Christians are doing their best to reduce their carbon footprints during this time.

@jtapia1123, Lastly ...
By: sbvor. on 11 Mar 12, 01:38:34
@jtapia1123, Lastly, to debunk your phenomenally unsustainable hybrid vehicle fantasies? (and more), Google this: SBVOR: Rare Earth Elements Spell Doom for Green Fantasies

@jtapia1123, The ...
By: sbvor. on 11 Mar 12, 01:35:20
@jtapia1123, The indoctrinated are never aware that they are indoctrinated (you are). Google this: SBVOR: Climate Change Science - an Overview Or, to comprehensively debunk each of your fallacies -- topic by topic, Google this: SBVOR: Climate Change 101 Start with tropical diseases, corals, polar bears, sea levels, hurricanes, tornadoes and drought (all are particularly egregious bald? faced lies). To debunk your renewables fantasies, Google this: SBVOR: Renewable Energy Sources are Not Green

The IPCC itself ...
By: ridgeraiser. on 08 Mar 12, 15:31:13
The IPCC itself says that there has been no? dramatic warming of the past 150 years!!!!!!!! Take a? look on the right/real report!

Melting sea ice ...
By: blackadderthe4. on 27 Feb 12, 20:41:54
Melting sea ice could trigger? colder winters 'Arctic ice is continuing its seemingly interminable decline, and it looks like the loss could be contributing to the recent spate of cold winters over northern Europe and North America...last three decades and found a link between the extent of Arctic sea ice and cold, snowy winters in the regions immediately? to the south' w ww.newscientist.c om/article/dn21521-melting-sea�-ice-could-trigger-colder-wint�ers.html

Please Check Out ...
By: Tokyorosebiz. on 19 Feb 12, 19:32:03
Please Check Out Save Planet Earth by Tokyo Rose. If? you want to Save the Planet you are better off singing about it than shouting about it. Have a listen to the truth in the lyrics.

Carter: It seems ...
By: MrOTLChamp. on 18 Feb 12, 16:04:03
Carter: It seems that a few people have a very strong say, and no matter how much talking goes on beforehand, the big decisions are made at the eleventh hour by a select core? group.

Catastrophic Climate Change & Runaway Global Warming - David Wasdell
Posted by: GlobalClimateNews

Video duration: 3205 seconds
Global video hits: 8362

24 minutes into the presentation he talks about NASA being afraid to release findings of methane releases off the coast of San Diego for fear of retribution ...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

2012:The Year Climate Change Got Real
Posted by: greenman3610

Video duration: 446 seconds
Global video hits: 20267

2012 may be remembered as the year Climate Change got real for Americans. Make sure to view the second part of this two-video upload http://www.youtube.c om/w...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Sorry, but a theory ...
By: mercianproductions. on 19 May 13, 17:34:32
Sorry, but a theory that predicts unpredictability should never be considered a valid predictor of the future. The sad fact for the alarmists is that all their models and arguments have thus far been refuted. It's not a question of science, it's a question of logic, and the logic doesn't work. Remember when it used to be called Global Warming? Well it stopped warming so they changed it to Climate Change, largely to save face... No one believes in it anymore, so get? over it.

Republicans = ...
By: Mary77877. on 15 May 13, 21:46:48
Republicans = Traitors! 1) They deny the need for change 2) When that doesn't work, they continue to block change 3) Then they start playing the poor hippy (strawman) and blame those who actually who are determined to to something about it as 'the bad evil government' Ron Paul my ass,? he is the 'Strawman in Person' to play this blame-game whenever everything else fails. And boy, have they been failing a lot lately!!

Do you like wind? ...
By: chicagogeorge. on 12 May 13, 13:29:17
Do you like wind? If you use every single breeze that blows on land, you'll get 10 or 15 terawatts. Since it's? impossible to capture all the wind, a more realistic number is 3 terawatts, or 1 million state-of-the art turbines, and even that requires storing the energy?something we don't know how to do?for when the wind doesn't blow. Solar? To get 10 terawatts by 2050, Lewis calculates, we'd need to cover 1 million roofs with panels every day from now until then. "It would take an army

Simple physics ...
By: chicagogeorge. on 12 May 13, 13:29:07
Simple physics shows that in order to keep CO2 to 450 ppm, 26.5 of those terawatts must be zero-carbon. That's a lot of solar, wind, hydro, biofuels and nuclear, especially since renewables kicked in? a measly 0.2 terawatts in 2006 and nuclear provided 0.9 terawatts. Are you a fan of nuclear? To get 10 terawatts, less than half of what we'll need in 2050, Lewis calculates, we'd have to build 10,000 reactors, or one every other day starting now.

and here is why ...
By: chicagogeorge. on 12 May 13, 13:28:44
and here is why it's hopeless: Nate Lewis of the California Institute of Technology states that CO2 emissions will have to? be 80 percent below today's to keep atmospheric levels no higher than 450 parts per million.

Joe Biden on the ...
By: chicagogeorge. on 12 May 13, 13:26:10
Joe Biden on the idea of a U.S. carbon tax: "we know it will go nowhere"; he also compares Chinese CO2 emissions to chunks of cement washing up in Oregon after the? Japanese tsunami

Yeah. After 3 ...
By: Mary77877. on 12 May 13, 09:20:53
Yeah. After 3 recordbreaking years in a row of more and stronger Tornados than ever before. The? spike of 2011 for example. And 'Sandy' the 3-in-one-cover-a-quarter-of-USA-in-snow-hurricane? Formerly known as the 'Frankenstorm'

A perfect ...
By: Maria Antowols. on 12 May 13, 09:01:41
A perfect description of the onset of chaos! Extremes in all directions.? Thank you for pointing out.

Right at the moment ...
By: bernzeppi. on 12 May 13, 00:10:48
Right at the moment you are right. The idea of a carbon tax is to reduce CO2 output and create an orderly transition to clean energy by 2050. In Australia the carbon tax reduced CO2 output by 9% in the first? six months operation as many power stations switched to gas. The opposition has promised to remove the Ctax if they get into power at the next elections so those power companies have indicated they will return to coal. So it works 29 OECD nations have effectively higher C-tax than Australia

China: "China will ...
By: chicagogeorge. on 10 May 13, 22:21:14
China: "China will wait until after this year to introduce a tax on carbon, deferring to concern that economic growth might suffer....The nation eventually expects to introduce a levy? of 5 yuan to 10 yuan (80 cents to $1.61) per ton of carbon," "A carbon tax starting at 20 yuan was the minimum needed to help reduce emissions." google bloomberg news China IS building 400 coal power plants over the next few years. Over 1000 worldwide. Coal is still king.

You're trying to be ...
By: Michael Tuthill. on 09 May 13, 18:50:53
You're trying to be ironic and cheeky but the truth is that consistent extreme "weather"? events are an effect of a changing climate. Weather =/= Global Climate.

This just in: ...
By: TheReapersSon. on 05 May 13, 18:27:01
This just in: Tornados at an all-time? low for the year blog. chron. com/sciguy/2013/05/tornado-spike-in-2011-attributed-to-climate-change-so-what-to-make-of-this-years-tornado-drought/

Let's implement ...
By: TheReapersSon. on 04 May 13, 02:14:21
Let's implement good? old-fashioned chinese eugenics!

Is that the best ...
By: TheReapersSon. on 04 May 13, 02:13:17
Is that the best you can come up with? No duplicate accounts here, although i am sure you'd like a thumbs up for your comment so you? aren't left patting yourself on the back. You sure zinged me good!

The best way to ...
By: tstruss912. on 03 May 13, 22:49:59
The best way to reduce population is to improve living standards. It's counterintuitive.? We're failing on that front too, though: the income gap is widening and more people are expected to fall into poverty.

How much do you ...
By: tstruss912. on 03 May 13, 22:48:31
How much do you get? paid to make lame comments and vote them up with your sock-accounts?

I don't believe in ...
By: WorkAndHelpHumanity. on 03 May 13, 03:13:41
I don't believe in global warming.. I believe in climate change though. That shit is grade school, completely natural. I'm not saying we don't contribute to it, but aren't we part of nature to? The only REAL answer I have to global warming(BS) is to get our population under control. Too many people equals too many problems. I'm not saying we need genocide, but if people keep breeding like? they are now, we are only gonna have more problems. Don't you see what I'm saying? Its commonsense.

The great tragedy ...
By: bernzeppi. on 02 May 13, 07:41:10
The great tragedy is that US energy independence and CO2 free power could have been? a reality 30 years ago through thorium energy. But it didn't because the US wanted the bomb. motherboard. vice. com/blog/china-is-taking-the-lead-on-thorium-reactor-development So now China is going to have it: theaustralian. com. au/business/opinion/china-moving-to-thorium-as-safe-nuclear-fuel/story-fnciihm9-1226550688296 But oil and coal interests will still garner the help of the uneducated to resist. Sad day.

Look at that! The ...
By: bernzeppi. on 02 May 13, 07:27:17
Look at that! The original uneducated-buffoon-retiree-holed-up-in-his-shotgun-shack-in-the-woods patio-puss is back. Not dead? Did they put you on a new medication? This is the fogey that laments? his grandchildren thinks he's out of touch and can't wrap his head around how hail can only form on hot humid days. China is implementing carbon tax next year and developing thorium reactors: motherboard. vice.com/blog/china-is-taking-the-lead-on-thorium-reactor-development Nurse!!! More medication!

Don't worry, I have ...
By: bernzeppi. on 02 May 13, 07:18:42
Don't worry, I have a life... this is what I do for a living: watch?v=Dj-ELN75vEw&list=PLC6F17F9A0AE640B3 As you see I have a life only you could dream of. Methinks it is you that needs to get a? life.

Get a life?
By: davidnco1. on 02 May 13, 04:18:59
Get a life?

No need to wage war ...
By: patioperson. on 26 Apr 13, 20:24:20
No need to wage war over oil. North American can become independent of foreign oil if the eco-Nazis can be stifled. Let me know what that electric brick is worth when the battery dies. Now the wars will be over? lithium mines. Good ole Germany is building coal plants that will help boost the deficient O2C that is responsible for all life on this planet. Global warming hit today. First day this year up here where it didn't freeze overnight. High today 60F. Warmest day all year. Spring is here.

"They will BUY you? ...
By: Tex Murphy. on 25 Apr 13, 16:58:19
"They will BUY you? if you don't stop BUYING from them" We have raised a generation of non technical kids who were taught more about global warming & condoms than Science. We lack the experts so we buy from china. Eco groups create barriers to any new technology so until that changes China, India Russia will be kicking our ass. The US developed the SAFE Throrium reactor in the 50s & now sits on enough refined fuel to run the US for a year, yet we sit like idiots arguing? about solar

They will BUY you? ...
By: cosmo1kramer. on 25 Apr 13, 02:53:28
They will BUY you? if you don't stop BUYING from them

A fish was found ...
By: cosmo1kramer. on 25 Apr 13, 02:51:29
A fish was found with record radiation..there is where it enters your FOOD chain. Most of the Nuclear plants in the world are near the coasts..google this too. I put solar panels on? my roof and run without the grid..have an electric car..If all americans can make their own home a power house.they won't need to wage wars for OIL,and make the whole world their enemy.How many wars does Germany fight? How many terror attacks do they have? You think they are stupid!!

Global Warming: What We Knew in 82
Posted by: greenman3610

Video duration: 631 seconds
Global video hits: 47102

Join the conversation and support this series at http://www.climatecr ocks.com In 1982, Mike MacCracken, then a senior researcher at Livermore Laboratory, gav...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Before an accurate ...
By: phantomscolts1. on 03 Apr 13, 03:07:28
Before an accurate assumption ON GLOBAL WARMING can be obtained more information must be on the table namely radiation the basic key to life on the surface of the planet balanced by the protective shield which regulates the amount of GOOD and BAD radiation into the biosphere.There is missing information of the cause and effect of burning radioactive material in our biosphere? until then everything is based on an inaccurate premise with a common conclusion.

you reveal that ...
By: greenman3610. on 29 Mar 13, 21:32:16
you reveal that you've learned your science at? conspiracy websites, not the literature. watch?v=8nrvrkVBt24

sexes?
By: Sha Parayil. on 29 Mar 13, 20:20:47
sexes?

Remember: ...
By: Rand Huso. on 14 Mar 13, 19:35:26
Remember: politicians don't come up with solutions. Engineers and scientists do. Politicians are temporary and are more interested in short-term $ than in long-term sustainable solutions. They represent the 1%, not the 99%.?

Each day provides a ...
By: Christopher C Brown. on 06 Mar 13, 03:25:43
Each day provides a new opportunity for us to live an extraordinary life; and leave our legacy for the World to cherish. What positive lasting changes do you hope to be remembered for long after you are gone from this beautiful? planet?

Yes, it is amazing ...
By: Per Hassel S�rensen. on 18 Feb 13, 14:31:07
Yes, it is amazing how climate deniers do not see? the red line (09:00 into the movie)...

TAKE NOTHING FOR ...
By: Patrick Kennedy. on 18 Feb 13, 11:02:22
TAKE NOTHING FOR GRANTED, QUESTION ALL, SPEAK UP and VOTE! Our Constitutional rights are being? corrupted by extreme, "Closet socialists" who have a "progressive" agenda that tramples upon established procedure and the Bill of Rights. Protect the Bill of Rights and the 22nd amendment. History is repeating; author Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn warns Americans with his non-fiction, written? work: "the Gulag Archipelago." Beware the United Nations, a wolf in sheep's clothing.

climate deniers who ...
By: greenman3610. on 16 Feb 13, 19:49:11
climate deniers who claim to see the big picture of time make? me laugh, and prove my point. If you want a 3 billion year overview, google Richard Alley's lecture "The Biggest Control Knob", or check the National Academy of Science publication "Origin and Evolution of Earth". It's the sure sign of arrogance and ignorance that someone like this assumes they know more than experts who have spent their lives asking the big questions.

2:16, records that ...
By: MrDoglvr1. on 16 Feb 13, 17:18:24
2:16, records that have lasted for 100 years? LOL 100 years in geologic? time does not equate to a damn thing. These people are so ignorant......seriously, one learns simple basic concepts of climate and time in intro geology courses. You don't have to be a Phd to see the holes in the basic knowledge of these people.

The CO2 graphs used ...
By: MrDoglvr1. on 16 Feb 13, 17:08:34
The CO2 graphs used by the climate "experts" conveniently don't mention that CO2 levels actually rise AFTER the? temperature rises. You got your cause and effect backwards

No doubt r planet ...
By: MicksKicks1. on 16 Feb 13, 05:57:37
No doubt r planet will change, i envisage something like the? movie Blade Runner :)

The "problem child" ...
By: followthefleet1. on 12 Jan 13, 14:57:10
The "problem child" is Climate Change itself. India and China will suffer mightily. India is highly dependent on the Himalayas for the water for one billion people in the Indus Valley alone. China, with a more educated and sophisticated population, has massive environmental defaults from garbage to air pollution. Both nations have restive populations. Their leaders like it or not, must be attentive, and responsive. As CC gets much worse, I'm optimistic. The only question: Will it be? in time?

It is truly ...
By: micers. on 12 Jan 13, 03:17:06
It is truly unfortunate that you fail to understand that governments will always seek? the advantage. If you are foolish enough to believe that India and China are honestly going to get on board with this they I guess you will also believe that the third world will buy into this as well... There is no stopping this problem child, so you should consider other solutions.

By voting up this ...
By: rufiel6rahteih. on 29 Dec 12, 07:09:17
By voting up this comment? you will help the world know that NATO is using depleted uranium, with terrible consequences for the future of humanity and all life on earth. Search for depleted uranium on youtube or google it and learn. Spread the truth if you? care.

This week's "New ...
By: followthefleet1. on 06 Dec 12, 14:45:10
This week's "New Yorker" has an article on Climate Change in "Talk of the Town", called "Paying for It". It's about a carbon tax. It has been slow coming, but this must become the road ahead. Industry and people can no long put their foot on the pedal, or turn on a light, or reap huge profits, without being heedless of the climate consequences.The author also says that there is surprisingly strong support from both the political right? and the political left. Let's get it done.

NASA has the DATA. ...
By: PlanetEarth Trimtab. on 21 Nov 12, 18:56:17
NASA has the DATA. Google: Global Climate Change, NASA Tobacco LIED for 40 years about smoking & lung cancer. Their LIES caught up with them. Oil & Coal Corporations, KOCH, EXXON, CHEVRON, BP, have been LYING & funding false propaganda against Global Warming for at least 27 years. Now their LIES are catching up with US ALL! STOP PREDATORY WALL STREET BANKS & MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS! All they want is higher Annual Bonuses, Cut Taxes, and to Gut regulations on labor, safety & the? Environment

13 years? old angry ...
By: jackie castle. on 16 Nov 12, 00:03:27
13 years? old angry, saying, "you can't take away my hope." i relate from a standpoint where it's a challenge to hold hope . i'm 47. j

I agree Wall St can ...
By: MarkNabes. on 11 Nov 12, 19:35:47
I agree Wall St can fix the weather along? with the climate if we pay them comrade

Brilliant! Thank? ...
By: Kinkspace. on 03 Nov 12, 23:38:04
Brilliant! Thank? you :*

two new ones? ...
By: greenman3610. on 03 Nov 12, 22:29:43
two new ones? coming soon ;^)

I just wanted you ...
By: Kinkspace. on 03 Nov 12, 19:04:56
I just wanted you to know that I may not pop by as much as I should but I am so grateful you are still here still producing quality videos that easily explain our environmental? reality, thank you :)

Sorry Mark, Wall ...
By: funkydunky29. on 31 Oct 12, 07:58:52
Sorry Mark, Wall Street is flooded as New York has never been flooded before. It must be that climate change theyve been? warning us about...

CO2 causes droughts ...
By: MarkNabes. on 26 Oct 12, 00:55:50
CO2 causes droughts, floods, hurricanes, tornadoes, fauna to shrink, insects to die, warm & cold temperatures, glaciers to melt & grow, etc. Until we start paying our tithes to the Global Warming Church on Wall St, everything bad that is happening will increase until we start paying for our sins and begin our penance.? Hallelujah!

Look big guy, I ...
By: seaplaneguy1. on 22 Oct 12, 18:02:26
Look big guy, I made a statement about water going from 200 ppm to 20,000 ppm (actually goes up to 40,000 in tropics), and you never address the 800 lb gorilla sitting on your face. Then you insult me. Then once again insult me, claim? I can't follow a thought. Never once do you address the gorilla (the thought). People are not stupid. You are not elite or smarter than the average bear. You just think you are. Want to solve the CO2 problem? I know how. Do you? No, just complain...

You make one more ...
By: greenman3610. on 22 Oct 12, 12:19:58
You make one more great example of denialist stupidity, and inability to follow a? thought. By all means, post away, just keep it clean, sport.

Lifting the Lid on the Politics of Climate Change
Posted by: The RSA

Video duration: 4722 seconds
Global video hits: 1290

Full webcast from the ...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

We have brains ...
By: clive anthony carroll. on 19 May 13, 18:41:04
We have brains which are identical to those in the Stone Age, so we think not much further than the next meal. We have a global, competitive economic system but national-political institutions. We can try to mitigate the effects we humans are having on this planet but to judge from history unless there is a radical change in human psychology there are no? grounds for optimism. As Lovelock says it will take a global disaster to really 'wake us up'.

Introduction? ends ...
By: FilipFifth. on 19 May 13, 13:01:35
Introduction? ends at 5:00

The levels of CO2 ...
By: Paul Schietekat. on 19 May 13, 06:03:35
The levels of CO2 reached 400ppmv recently. While many countries claim success stories on reducing these CO2 levels, not even a small reduction is shown on the Keeling Curve. Why? Because we? replaced the combustion of fossil fuel through other combustion processes using organic fuel. The second fuel remains oxygen, otherwise a combustion cannot take place and the exhaust of toxic materials remains. Therefore, CO2 neutral is a myth!

Kill millions and ...
By: MrCoffeeFiend. on 19 May 13, 01:36:06
Kill millions and save the future from what we think may happen in a worst case senario that cannot happen in the real world. Give us more money to waste so that you can feel better morally that you have layed down your life for the good of the future. Only problem is that you don't really want to believe you will? be on the death pile. Only non believers will die. Just remeber that when your turn comes you helped cause it all.

The biggest myth is ...
By: Neil Morton. on 19 May 13, 00:10:31
The biggest myth is that these people or the government are the right people to listen to on how to live our lives. Without paying taxes, would any worker not have solar panels saving them hundreds of pounds per year? I don't think so, it's a wise investment especially when the cost is massively reduced without taxation. The wise will also switch out for low power consumption living, but the? world isn't wise, they're voting scumbags that support governments, the largest polluters on the planet.

climate science? is ...
By: Nicholas Bonasoro. on 18 May 13, 22:24:38
climate science? is still not agreed upon. there is currently an argument about how sensitive the earth's climate is to changes in CO2. people are moving towards a low sensitivity model rather than the high sensitivity one that we used to think that led to worse predictions

It's still called ...
By: Anna Keenan. on 18 May 13, 13:47:08
It's still called both, interchangeably. 'global warming' is mostly said in the US. 'Climate change' in the rest of the world. I'm looking forward to a low-carbon 'future': looking forwards not backwards. We can be smart and sustainable and have a high quality of life at the same time. NOT addressing climate change? is what will send us back to the middle ages. Living in denial and refusing to change is a huge risk. Yes, change is scary. And yes, we've got to do it.

you? deal with it!
By: Hoxification. on 18 May 13, 10:52:35
you? deal with it!

True, wrong, wrong. ...
By: RechargeableLithium. on 18 May 13, 02:56:04
True, wrong, wrong. Climate change (the natural part) is proven. Climate change (the human part) has been proven. That human's use of fossil fuels and the subsequent increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration is warming the planet has been proven. This is basic science that dates back to the mid-1800s. If you think otherwise, please cite a source, paper,? or study.

"it is completely ...
By: theElasticJesuz .. on 18 May 13, 00:05:14
"it is completely natural and such people just say it is human caused" Please cite your sources/evidence and then deliver them to the relevant? scientific authorities.

Bravo pour cette ...
By: guixav3. on 17 May 13, 20:16:15
Bravo pour cette cha�ne, elle refl�te les pens�es mes chroniques d'informations sur ma cha�ne. Vive? la Droite !

Yes global climate ...
By: Harald Obermair. on 17 May 13, 15:50:14
Yes global climate change has been proven BUT not co2 is directly causing it and not humans are causing it...it is completely natural and such people just? say it is human caused because the want money to solve this "problem"...

Global climate ...
By: jayhovasim. on 17 May 13, 14:49:05
Global climate change has been unquestionably proven. Deal? with it.

@LsBaba He woke me ...
By: ekcoylejr. on 17 May 13, 13:53:43
@LsBaba He woke me for a sound sleep when I heard "mercy of markets". Better mercy of markets than victims of government, which is the only other choice. Socialists come many colors,? but mostly camouflage.

John Ashton misses ...
By: James Greyson. on 17 May 13, 10:59:18
John Ashton misses another 'competing idea' for carbon-neutral energy and emissions capping. Why not consider carbon-negative energy (eg biochar making) and harnessing markets (via price correction of? externalities). The #400ppm milestone suggests we must implement policy to cut CO2 concentrations, not just cap emissions.

watch?v=ez7F30lazUw?
By: TheMrSirCharles. on 17 May 13, 08:45:56
watch?v=ez7F30lazUw?

Our use of fossil ...
By: LsBaba. on 17 May 13, 08:42:52
Our use of fossil fuels and energy in general over the past two centuries will be viewed as primitive and incredibly blunt by our descendants (if we don't damage their life chances irrevocably through inaction on climate change). The move to improved energy-efficiency and? alternative sources of energy are *opportunities*, *not* a burden. Like the Industrial Revolution (started in the UK), early adopters will have enormous advantage over those that hesitate.

He said "primacy"? ...
By: LsBaba. on 17 May 13, 08:23:12
He said "primacy"? :)

It was called ...
By: forfreedom61. on 17 May 13, 06:27:06
It was called climate? change long before global warming became a thing.

"Are you going to ...
By: Francis Fielding. on 17 May 13, 06:03:26
"Are you going to believe? me, or what you see with your own eyes?" G. Marx

Nope they called it ...
By: Elas Mobranch. on 17 May 13, 05:57:57
Nope they called it Global Warming because that is the end result of increased CO2? in the atmosphere. However they were obliged to change it to Climate Change because idiots would jump on this name & say "oh it's getting colder" CC or GW is the same thing, basically it means that as the levels of CO2 rise it will have a variable effect on our weather, colder winters, warmer summers, drought, flood, stronger typhoons & hurricanes or tornadoes. Typhoons & tornadoes out of season. Ice caps melting.

Remember when ...
By: pimpdarlin. on 17 May 13, 03:19:30
Remember when climate change used to be called global warming? They had to change it when there was no warming. Believed this bullshit all my life before realising it was an excuse to tax & control us back to the? middle ages. Does anyone still believe these liars?

Did he say "the ...
By: ekcoylejr. on 17 May 13, 01:50:52
Did he say "the mercy of markets"? Sir, meet Milton Friedman.?

We send our dirty ...
By: everquestfan. on 16 May 13, 21:52:52
We send our dirty industry to China and? then prohibit it in our own countries.Then use China as a lever to implement regulation.Oh what incredible hypocrisy.This is globally divisive and developing countries will not submit.PS hard to follow those football analogies,was that chanting i heard?Greed will prevail,prepare yourselves.

Ethiopia: EU Helps Fight Climate Change | Global 3000
Posted by: deutschewelleenglish

Video duration: 282 seconds
Global video hits: 88

While the EU's policies on climate change aren't very popular in Europe, the commissioners in charge of climate policy and humanitarian aid have traveled to ...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Symphony of Science - Our Biggest Challenge (Climate Change Music Video)
Posted by: melodysheep

Video duration: 229 seconds
Global video hits: 305680

A musical investigation into the causes and effects of global climate change and our opportunities to use science to offset it. Featuring Bill Nye, David Att...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

We have? hit 400 ...
By: YANKEEKID95. on 19 May 13, 17:56:34
We have? hit 400 PPM.

2:26 the loss of ...
By: Maxdrive1993. on 19 May 13, 14:26:53
2:26 the loss of water in the aril sea? is not do to climate change but to massive redirection of it's tributaries by the Russian cotton industry. This is something that needs to be fixed but is not something created by global warming.

While entertaining, ...
By: Jalix Mergenberg. on 19 May 13, 04:04:41
While entertaining, arguing about the past will make no difference. We cannot change the past, or many people's perception of it. We can? only learn from the past and prevent the mistakes we have made from recurring.

The sad thing is ...
By: David Davidson. on 18 May 13, 08:50:30
The sad thing is Christians are so retarded that it was probably a genuine comment.?

one of the best ...
By: lifeisgood12341. on 17 May 13, 23:19:18
one of the best songs I've herd in a longtime We can change the world?

Don't? feed the ...
By: F8sassassin. on 17 May 13, 16:43:27
Don't? feed the trolls.

Also, I? looked at ...
By: AdmiralCasey18. on 16 May 13, 06:13:16
Also, I? looked at your channel and I'm glad I don't live your sad existence.

I'm sure he looks ...
By: AdmiralCasey18. on 16 May 13, 06:10:57
I'm sure he looks at plenty of deviant art? in secret.

Excuse me, but ...
By: AdmiralCasey18. on 16 May 13, 06:09:05
Excuse me, but where did that come from??

You're a good ...
By: AdmiralCasey18. on 16 May 13, 06:07:58
You're a good example of? what scumbags exist on the internet.

This shouldn't have ...
By: BlueBumbler. on 16 May 13, 04:48:56
This shouldn't have so many negative votes. I agree with you, thyczko2. I don't believe in global warming, but I do believe in God. Your opinion shouldn't be voted? down. However, regardless of not believing in global warming, I still think the song is pretty.

Your kind? is not ...
By: ChewyJiggles. on 15 May 13, 13:56:08
Your kind? is not welcome here.

For? the last eight ...
By: Eduardo Alatorre. on 15 May 13, 02:23:28
For? the last eight years I have been taking measurements of my area's temperature and every year the average is higher than the year before.

He also told us to? ...
By: BigSilverN. on 15 May 13, 01:33:55
He also told us to? take care of it :P

You mean a flood? ...
By: Governm3nt. on 14 May 13, 04:08:19
You mean a flood? that only happened in the area the people who wrote the Bible knew existed? lol

"Could it be ...
By: MadBrainBox. on 13 May 13, 09:04:14
"Could it be possible! This old? saint in the forest hath not yet heard of it, that GOD IS DEAD!"

I have searched for ...
By: coolkid82829. on 12 May 13, 21:00:45
I have searched for this and another video for? months, now I find them both at once? It's my lucky day! >:D

Pfft. It's too late ...
By: coolkid82829. on 12 May 13, 20:59:39
Pfft. It's too late for all? that crap about god. Times have moved on. Not, 'Jesus Christ' Oh, no, now its 'Cheese-us Crust'! PIZZA! >:D

(CO)8Co2? just to ...
By: Quintinohthree. on 11 May 13, 19:26:36
(CO)8Co2? just to bug you. Also, I'm going to hazard a guess that cobalt vapour is diatomic.

Guys, cobalt is not ...
By: Windwyld. on 11 May 13, 00:06:32
Guys, cobalt is not a? diatomic. Co2 does not exist, it's CO2. Sorry, but it's bothering me.

Explain to me how ...
By: Phanciology. on 10 May 13, 01:52:37
Explain to me how then how through the years after the industrial revolution, CO2 jumped 28% and the temperature jumped 30%, an all-time high for CO2. Explain to be how releasing any amount of carbon from our burning of fossil fuels does not raise the temperature. Unless you can back up your reasoning for not believing in MMGW with actual facts (instead of an unnamed "scientist,") then all your points are invalid and you have no basis? for continually not believing in MMGW.

I do? not deny ...
By: TheJiminiflix. on 10 May 13, 01:37:20
I do? not deny global warming - I deny man made global warming.

CO2 is absolutely ...
By: Phanciology. on 10 May 13, 00:32:28
CO2 is absolutely not bad, I agree, you have to think of the ozone as a sort of tinfoil with holes scattered throughout it. Too little ozone of CO2,? we get fried by UV, too much, and we have an inescapable greenhouse warming consequence. But right now humans are adding 28% more CO2 than there was before the industrial revolution. With that increase, we trap a significant amount of heat. Now, I'll agree with you, the carbon tax is a little shady, but denying global warming is absurd.

The earth has ...
By: TheJiminiflix. on 10 May 13, 00:22:19
The earth has always warmed a cooled. Temperature has always affected the earth. Mans influence is so miniscule? on the atmosphere there is no hard proof that the earth is in danger from Co2. I agree with not chopping down trees and no rubbish in the ocean etc but carbon tax is NOT really about environment, its an excuse to tax the people. Co2 is not bad, you exhale it, and trees depend on it. The ozone is not overdosed - that is a lie and I think the science for MMGW is equally disputed.

Allowing ourselves ...
By: Phanciology. on 09 May 13, 23:40:18
Allowing ourselves to sit back and watch the polar ice caps melt without? even ATTEMPTING a realistic solution is absolutely not an acceptable way to go about things. Just because we or other people have doubts shouldn't mean we shouldn't put a minuscule amount of funding into this cause. And, if you CLOSELY read the Carbon Tax, you'll see there are other motives like those of health incentives to tax extremely wealthy companies on overdosing CO2 into the ozone.

The Eyes of Nye-Global Climate Change.
Posted by: Tim Petersen

Video duration: 114 seconds
Global video hits: 232

Only you can stop global chilling. Sample uploaded for humor and educational purposes. Original Air Date: 2005-04-23.

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Climate Scientist Blasts Global Warming Hysteria
Posted by: 1000frolly

Video duration: 385 seconds
Global video hits: 75

Garth Paltridge, respected Australian atmospheric physicist, pans climate change alarmism.

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Climate Change Studies: Less than 1% Reject Global Warming
Posted by: TheYoungTurks

Video duration: 241 seconds
Global video hits: 36597

"I was thinking of writing a lengthy post about climate change denial being completely unscientific nonsense, but then geochemist and National Science Board ...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

what about the? ...
By: scottishchap2008. on 17 May 13, 14:22:12
what about the? hacked "hide the decline" emails? anything the inbred unelected royal family supports is suspect to me

I never thought ...
By: upisoft2. on 15 May 13, 19:02:10
I never thought there is debate if global warming is real or not. I thought the real debate was if it was? man made or not... You guys are funny. You show how FOX omit information in order to create false interpretation. And I agree with you. Next time I watch you, I see you doing it.... Damn, is there any objective media left?

Climate change ...
By: maxrevspete. on 21 Apr 13, 16:41:04
Climate change isn't a? scam, the earth has gone through massive climate changes over millions of years. The fact that the poor are taxed due to CO2 emissions IS the scam!

Except that the ...
By: Dan Mac. on 19 Apr 13, 21:34:34
Except that the reality is proving to be worse than the models predicted,? no1 ever claimed to have absolute knowledge of some absolute truth, it is a matter of finding out what is *most likely* to happen, coming at the world in any other way is completely ridiculous.

Google: "13,950 ...
By: Popular Technology.net. on 15 Apr 13, 21:53:34
Google: "13,950 Meaningless Search Results" James Powell who in a meaningless analysis is apparently ignorant that the 'Web of Science' database does not have a "peer-reviewed" only filter and the existence of a search phrase in a returned result does not determine it's context. Thus, all that can be claimed is there were 13,950? meaningless search results not "peer-reviewed scientific articles" for a query of the 'Web of Science' database - 24 of which support his strawman arguments.

Climate models are ...
By: grindupBaker. on 14 Apr 13, 01:38:07
Climate models are actually computer simulations of reality exactly like the computer video games that you play where you are a handsome? warrior and you fight Thorgs or whatever, except the climate models take the scientists' assessments of oceans, clouds, sunshine, radiation, winds, evaporation, rain, vegetation and lots of other physical effects into account. That's why they need massive computers.

The climate models ...
By: LordMonckton78. on 03 Apr 13, 13:36:31
The climate models are not actually models you know they are spherical crystal devices that when hands are laid on them a swirling mist reveals what will be happening in the future, failing that the backup system is used which employs a china teacup and some old fashioned tea, not the baggy stuff and voila predictions that would have as? much bearing on reality as a climatologist riding the train of plenty.

@Jojo Dynamo? so ...
By: StunnedByStupidity. on 30 Mar 13, 20:49:43
@Jojo Dynamo? so thats it? YOU FUCKING RETARD

0.042 degrees? C.
By: Jojo Dynamo. on 30 Mar 13, 20:46:10
0.042 degrees? C.

Shakespeare said ...
By: Jojo Dynamo. on 30 Mar 13, 20:44:57
Shakespeare said that life is a series of tales told by an idiot, signifying nothing...? he must have been talking about YOURS ROTFLMAO

"The problem is? ...
By: Jojo Dynamo. on 30 Mar 13, 20:43:15
"The problem is? you bigoted cunts? are gona kill billions and most of LIFE on Earth." Ok Henny Penny, run and tell Col. Sanders.

ROTFLMAO?
By: Jojo Dynamo. on 30 Mar 13, 20:41:52
ROTFLMAO?

Gibberish.?
By: Jojo Dynamo. on 30 Mar 13, 20:38:29
Gibberish.?

BTW because it was ...
By: StunnedByStupidity. on 30 Mar 13, 19:08:38
BTW because it was IRRELEVANT NATURE ALSO TAKES UP HALF MANS OUTPUT... But this is STRONGER proof of what I am saying you? retard...

File:Carbon Dioxide ...
By: StunnedByStupidity. on 30 Mar 13, 19:07:19
File:Carbon Dioxide 400kyr.png?

The SCIENTIFIC ...
By: StunnedByStupidity. on 30 Mar 13, 19:06:40
The SCIENTIFIC FUCKING? GRAPH PROVED IT YOU PIG IGNORANT CUNT....

Belived you would ...
By: StunnedByStupidity. on 30 Mar 13, 19:05:16
Belived you would simply move the fucking goal posts and change the topic - AGAIN with NO fucking evidence and in the most imaginably childish way possible. I couldn't give a FUCK about you or your? family, if YOU want to commit suicide I wouldnt piss on you to put you out. The problem is you bigoted cunts are gona kill billions and most of LIFE on Earth. NOW GO AWAY...

Gallon a fucking ...
By: StunnedByStupidity. on 30 Mar 13, 19:01:07
Gallon a fucking second. Now, CONCERNTRATE RETARD, YOU ARE CLAIMING BECAUSE THE QUANTITY IS O.O5% THAT THE BATH CANNOT FILL. Now for anoune with an IQ above 50 this is fucking INSANE, unfortunately you are SO fucking stupid and PSYCHOPATHIC that not only cant you realise you are a fucking retard but? EVERYONE even fucking EXPERTS who have spent their lives studying this can get through your fucking narcissicm. Now having CATEGORRICALLY MADE A COMPLETE IDIOT OF YOURSELF, prove I was right when I

"Nature? puts out ...
By: Jojo Dynamo. on 30 Mar 13, 19:00:53
"Nature? puts out 100 times man's ouput AND TAKES UP 100 TIMES you wretched fucking retard. " Yes, your intelligent argument proves it... you're a retard! A claim of 100% ANYTHING is what's retarded, particularly as a timeless constant irrespective of conditions. Ah, me....you should be a comedian, if you're going to make jokes you might as well get paid for it.

So hat produced it ...
By: StunnedByStupidity. on 30 Mar 13, 18:56:37
So hat produced it? Look the ENTIRE fucking problem is you dont understand one little FACT. The NATURAL net throughput of co2 IS IN FUCKING BALANCE. Nature puts out 100 times man's ouput AND TAKES UP 100 TIMES you wretched fucking retard. So on? average there us NO change fir thousands of years. MAN HAS UP SET THE BALANCE. Imagine a giant half full bath with taps putting in 2000 gallons per second and a plug taking out 2000 THE BATH WILL NEITHER FILL NOR EMPTY.Now add a small pipe putting in ONE

You strain out a ...
By: Jojo Dynamo. on 30 Mar 13, 18:49:04
You strain out a gnat, and swallow a camel.... that ain't kosher!? LOL

"Now co2 before the ...
By: Jojo Dynamo. on 30 Mar 13, 18:48:06
"Now co2 before the industrial revolution was around 280 ppm there is NOTHING to? produce the rise but man." Sure, only humans produce CO2 LOL Quite a little potty-mouth you've got there ROTFLMAO

"BTW causation is ...
By: Jojo Dynamo. on 30 Mar 13, 18:38:55
"BTW causation is ALSO not disproved by? correlation you willfully retarded fuckwit...? sheez you fucking people..." There's nothing to disprove. Fool.

File:Carbon Dioxide ...
By: StunnedByStupidity. on 30 Mar 13, 18:24:17
File:Carbon Dioxide 400kyr.png Search? that term in an open google page (not in the tool bar). Now FUCKER thats called evidence kindly go fuck thyself

BTW causation is ...
By: StunnedByStupidity. on 30 Mar 13, 18:21:22
BTW causation is ALSO not disproved by correlation you willfully retarded fuckwit... sheez you? fucking people...

Climate Change!
Posted by: Zsolt Balvanyos

Video duration: 95 seconds
Global video hits: 1

Home made video for global warming awareness.

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

$The Most Terrifying Video You\$

The Most Terrifying Video You'll Ever See
Posted by: wonderingmind42

Video duration: 573 seconds
Global video hits: 5753453

Over 10 million total views. Now there's a book: "...superbly crafted...A must read." -Gen. Anthony Zinni, US CENTCOM Commander (Ret.) "This book trumps most...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

The USA was covered ...
By: PrairleDoggedRez. on 19 May 13, 06:58:37
The USA was covered in ice once? who paid to get that removed you wally?

Does anybody else ...
By: devikingone. on 18 May 13, 10:49:53
Does anybody else see the parallels with the population control techniques used in the middle ages? IE: you all are going to burn in hell? if you don't repent and buy indulgences vs. the earth is going to die if you don't buy carbon credits.? Do ANY of the global warming celebrity advocates "walk the walk"? Has ANY "climate initiative" undertaken by the UN had any impact on the environment? What evidence is there that this isn't just a money grab?

You've been? had. ...
By: icebear1946. on 18 May 13, 03:09:59
You've been? had. Comes with the territory of being a low-information voter or whatever you want to call it...

lol numerous ...
By: Brock1812. on 18 May 13, 02:48:26
lol numerous climatologists (among other scientists) have proven that global warming is happening and that it has already had an effect on the world. My parents showed me a picture of how much snow they got back in the 70's and I was in awe over how much things have changed just because of global warming (GCC). The science and the facts are in front of? you. the only way you wouldn't be able to see them is if you're blind or you close your eyes

"The Most ...
By: icebear1946. on 17 May 13, 22:35:27
"The Most Terrifying Video You'll Ever See" It is? in fact terrifying that our education systems have failed so badly as to produce this kind of logic.

Not if the cause of ...
By: icebear1946. on 17 May 13, 22:34:17
Not if the cause of your action is fictitious? and the cost is suficient to do major grief and harm to all of the world's economiies. That is in fact the case here.

you could use the ...
By: Brock1812. on 17 May 13, 18:24:37
you could use the same basic logic for any decision. This doesn't mean that these logical arguments are untrue. Acting and spending? money is better then putting your head in the sand and waiting for something to happen.

This is FUBAR logic ...
By: icebear1946. on 17 May 13, 03:47:55
This is FUBAR logic. You could use the same? arguments to demand that we destroy the worlds economies to prevent ANY sort of made-up, chicken-**** catastrophe which Al Gore hoped to hoped to terrify us out of trillions of dollars with.

Just one thing. ...
By: SallinKari. on 15 May 13, 16:25:34
Just one thing. Scientist believe that higher global temperatures will actually decrease the? amount of hurricanes that form... but those that do will be much more powerful.

ERROR: Column A ...
By: ForeverRaiden. on 15 May 13, 07:10:50
ERROR: Column A will always have the same economic catastrophe, but with not so bad climate. And not an error but an observation, Column B has the best scenario, but also the worst. Still, Column A is the wisest choice, because both scenarios are recoverable from.? Where as on column B, the disaster could prove fatal to the human race.

column C Jesus ...
By: MrPrior69. on 15 May 13, 02:36:39
column C Jesus comes back and? destroys both columns and the world is recreated.

I had to stop this ...
By: steve shepherd. on 14 May 13, 23:30:39
I had to stop this video right at the start due to its Title "The most Terrifying Video you'll ever see". Because I hate False Advertising. I immediately went my collection of Video tapes, and yes after checking all the labels,? I found the above named Tape still in my collection, it has not ever been out of my possession.If it were not so terrifying I would have presented a Video response, The Title alone is enough to make grown men cry, So lets have a little more honesty in Advertising PLEASE.

The Russians made ...
By: 9avedon. on 14 May 13, 17:10:00
The Russians made the same argument when they ordered farms Collectivized. The Kulak farmers were then murdered. See how evil self righteous conjecture is, when? put in action.

Let them eat Cake? ...
By: PrairleDoggedRez. on 14 May 13, 05:50:58
Let them eat Cake? !!

Ok, lets assume ...
By: HeatherC19. on 14 May 13, 04:16:26
Ok, lets assume that everything in this video? is true. What about people who can't afford to play in column A? Cant afford photovoltaics on their roof, or an electric car, or to buy from co-ops and sustainable eco-farms? What about the big corporations making big money on dirty energy? People who live paycheck to paycheck, and who barely make it as it is, who just don't have the time OR money to be worrying about this?

Hooray! More ...
By: jwo7777777. on 14 May 13, 03:35:38
Hooray! More predictions based on oversimplified, linearized models! Let's ignore all the feedback adaptations that such changes,? even sudden changes, bring about in global weather changes and societal fabrics.

It would have been ...
By: miramar4life. on 14 May 13, 02:05:49
It would have been better to explain people? going to jail by type 1 and 2 errors.

Your video was good ...
By: miramar4life. on 14 May 13, 02:05:39
Your video was good, but I think you made a mistake in your analogy towards a lottery ticket. What you were trying to say was that Action A is like buying the lottery ticket and Action B would be not buying a ticket. If you buy the ticket and your wrong (too bad), if right, means you lost money but bigger payouts. Action B, not buying the ticket, if wrong, then it's whatever, but if you had the right numbers and didn't play the lottery, it would be? worse. playing the Lottery was a bad example.

Well put shawn. ...
By: 101orson101. on 14 May 13, 01:19:54
Well put shawn. Global Economic depression will cause all of the worse things? listed in the argument, as you have pointed out/ HOW do we know this? HISTORY. When a country doesn't have enough economic activity to keep it's people alive they will go outside and attack someone that has what they need or want. Then everyone involved suffers even more.

Interesting ...
By: 101orson101. on 14 May 13, 01:15:31
Interesting thoughts mphallow. Especially the part about manning since he has already admitted what he did? And just like wonderingmindleesssss says? THIS argument requires NO PROOF??? Thus in concept and delivery it is absolutely Pasqual's Wager. I think PDR? has your number. Your just one more econazi.

this? guys got ...
By: hukiavave hukiavave. on 12 May 13, 22:13:58
this? guys got 20000+ subscribers :/

You brought up the ...
By: Gabriel Ross. on 12 May 13, 18:31:01
You brought up the flaw in your own? reasoning. You only presented the extreme scenarios. If you were to examine the more likely intermediary scenarios, then there would be other "tickets" to choose from with both lower cost and lower risk. And one could make the argument that such is the situation we have. There is some risk and we are taking steps to mitigate it without dedicating 100% of our lives and resources to this issue.

Sev Trek. Sky Fairy ...
By: HerecomesMonckton. on 12 May 13, 18:13:49
Sev Trek. Sky Fairy Worship. Global Warming Messiah.? Make the connection my friend.

If no one can poke ...
By: shawnhenryoliver. on 12 May 13, 15:38:48
If no one can poke a hole in this argument with ease you're not reaching critical thinkers. 1) The extremes of each scenario are not guaranteed. 2) The extremes in comparison are not equivalent. Global Economic depression leads to more than just a global economic depression... More war, more? people taking action by countries for their own accord, more pollution and contamination as war will almost always have a substantial environmental impact. 3) It is not necessary to ruin the global economy.

Who wants? to ...
By: PrairleDoggedRez. on 12 May 13, 08:19:30
Who wants? to listen to you freak? you want to kill meat eaters and then you expect to be taken seriously? epic FAIL greenazi.

John Stossel - Climate Change & Global Greening
Posted by: LibertyPen

Video duration: 800 seconds
Global video hits: 4575

Climatologist Roy Spencer, NASA scientist Gavin Schmidt and scientific journalist Matt Ridley are John's guests. http://www.LibertyPe n.com.

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Schmidt ... LOL ! ...
By: Antony Fendt. on 09 May 13, 04:23:28
Schmidt ... LOL ! what? a jacked up prick !!

gavin schmitt? is a ...
By: Vic Longdong. on 07 May 13, 08:19:30
gavin schmitt? is a gutless prick for not debating roy

I completely agree ...
By: falcocassady. on 07 May 13, 01:13:22
I completely agree!? Though there is a misconception about alternative fuels like "animal flatulence" as you said lol and others (the biggest being ethanol) and that they dont actually produce less emissions than gasoline in cars today. If you take a gallon of gasoline and a gallon of methanol/ethanol and light them both on fire then yes the alternative fuel produces less CO2, HC, and CO but put those gallons in 2 cars and that gas car will still go farther (produce more work)

Uhh in almost all ...
By: falcocassady. on 07 May 13, 01:08:24
Uhh in almost all of the "1st world" there is no such thing as deforestation anymore (and hasnt existed? in almost 30 years), trees are now harvested like crops. Taking the US for example there is more land mass covered by forest then there was 50 years ago

It makes the oceans ...
By: thesnare100. on 05 May 13, 14:45:36
It makes the oceans more acidic due to deforestation? when there aren't enough plants to process the CO2

You are 100% ...
By: 1000frolly. on 05 May 13, 05:24:30
You are 100% correct; Schmidt should be fired immidiately for misleading the public? and scientific fraud.

My jaw dropped when ...
By: 1000frolly. on 05 May 13, 05:10:21
My jaw dropped when Gavin Schmidt, a well-known climate fraudster, would not even sit near and speak to Roy Spencer! Like he had a communicable disease or something. Absolute proof that Gavin Schmidt and those on his side have no evidence at all? for their fraudulant 'science', are scared of a debate with any real scientist, and are simply swine with their snouts fully in the public trough.

Which part is not ...
By: sdkee. on 04 May 13, 12:16:24
Which part is not true? The part that O2 only exists because of plants or? that CO2 is way less than any time in the planet's existence? I'll guess you think the latter. The evidence is (and since you warminsts like "consensus" I'll mention that this is the overwhelming majority opinion of geologists and paleontologists) that CO2 was several thousand ppm when dinosaurs were walking around and was positively sky high during the Cambrian explosion. Temps were also much hotter. Life thrived.

Not true...?
By: Arnold Ziffel. on 02 May 13, 04:16:03
Not true...?

I agree. The only ...
By: nelsma292. on 01 May 13, 12:57:11
I agree. The only problem is that the average person can vote, but does the average? person read scientific journals?

very? biased
By: sportthisnet. on 30 Apr 13, 16:19:47
very? biased

How is this person ...
By: Jimmy McGowan. on 30 Apr 13, 01:35:26
How is this person allowed to? be a climatologist?

In person debate is ...
By: newdimensionfilms. on 28 Apr 13, 23:15:01
In person debate is not a good forum for scientific? debate. Science is meant to be impersonal and fact based, which is why written debate is superior. Lawyers argue in person, scientists write their arguments down.

> So how much CO2? ...
By: sdkee. on 28 Apr 13, 10:21:18
> So how much CO2? can plants soak up? If they are one great big carbon dioxide sink, why are CO2 levels increasing? If not for plants there would by? no O2. Before plants (BF) there was no O2. You would die immediately. Plants take CO2 and turn it into O2. They are literally starving for more CO2. So why more CO2? More than what? The CO2 level now is way less than almost any period of the planet's existence.

Climate change or ...
By: Annette Giesbrecht. on 27 Apr 13, 13:09:41
Climate change or making the world colder will hurt the countries that have short growing seasons. It will also make life more expensive and not everyone can tolerate those wind? mills.

So how much CO2? ...
By: Sean Elliott. on 26 Apr 13, 04:23:03
So how much CO2? can plants soak up? If they are one great big carbon dioxide sink, why are CO2 levels increasing?

Gavin was right not ...
By: Richard482. on 24 Apr 13, 18:12:58
Gavin was right not to debate Roy on talk? show. It's far more progressive to have an online debate through email. This way facts and figures can be checked and verified.

Glad to see you ...
By: sdushdiu. on 24 Apr 13, 03:39:17
Glad to see you finally admit the nature of? your political opinion. The fact is that the net effect that is occurring is the result of MANY interactive processes. NOT simply one source. But its nice to see that you now believe that man does indeed control the weather.

If anyone at all is ...
By: Yuval Rishu Sanders. on 24 Apr 13, 03:26:20
If anyone at all is interested in reliable evidence, instead of a bunch of bluster from uninformed pundits, try starting with climate[dot]nasa[dot]gov[slash]evidence. There is no excuse for the ignorance I am seeing in this comments section. Form your own? opinions, but make sure that your opinions are informed ones. Otherwise, you're a fool.

For anyone else ...
By: Yuval Rishu Sanders. on 24 Apr 13, 03:07:15
For anyone else reading: this? is how it looks when an irrational mind admits defeat.

Collusion to skew ...
By: sdushdiu. on 23 Apr 13, 19:37:23
Collusion to skew results and reporting shows no wrongdoing. OK. Get your head out of your ass. So it wasn't a scandal, it was yet another? illuminating event. Its nice that you adhere to the MS adage where 'its not a bug, its an undocumented feature'. Another know it all college student.

It is pathetic, ...
By: sdushdiu. on 23 Apr 13, 19:34:41
It is pathetic, where you begin? with a foregone conclusion and then argue from a point supporting this outcome, especially given that you are so utterly ignorant of the decrease in rate of warming as well as your erroneous opinion of the volume of Antarctic ice. So in that sense, you are more intimate with ignorance than you are aware!

Dimwit, the? actual ...
By: sdushdiu. on 23 Apr 13, 19:31:52
Dimwit, the? actual total volume of Antarctic ice is INCREASING, NOT shrinking. Go? read Gretchen Cook-Anderson's reports from NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center. And the ozone hole is Cyclical Chicken Little! Talk about ignorance.

Global Climate Change group Laney College
Posted by: xxMISZMEISZExx

Video duration: 287 seconds
Global video hits: 18

This video is for a group project presentation on Global Climate change for Rauzon's geography 1 class at Laney College Spring 2013.

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Michael Levi on global climate change and energy issues
Posted by: OUPAcademic

Video duration: 93 seconds
Global video hits: 61

Michael Levi, author of The Power Surge, discusses global climate change and how it inspired him to think about energy issues. http://www.oup.com/u s/catalog/...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Global Challenges Lecture - John Shepherd - Climate Change
Posted by: gcsoton

Video duration: 3792 seconds
Global video hits: 184

Professor John Shepherd CBE FRS of the National Oceanography Centre Southampton gives a Global Challenges guest lecture on the physical basis and policy impl...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Evidence Of The Extreme Climate Change
Posted by: HawkkeyDavisChannel

Video duration: 467 seconds
Global video hits: 20359

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

ROTFLOL! There you ...
By: RealOldOne2. on 18 May 13, 12:55:58
ROTFLOL! There you go with your projection again! YOU are the one GIshGalloping all over the map! I've focused on trying to get you to answer 3 simple questions. You CAN'T, but you WON'T admit it. You are behaving just like the doomsday religious cultists who stubbornly & delusionally refuse to admit that their end-of-the-world predictions didn't come to pass. Like I said before,? go back to reading out of books & making videos. You'll be able to hide your IDIOCY better! ROTFLMAO!

Nope, you never ...
By: RealOldOne2. on 18 May 13, 12:55:46
Nope, you never given valid cites or explained the lack of warming while humans have emitted 1/3 of the FF CO2 ever produced on the planet. You are a delusional doomsday climate cult zealot who refuses to face reality!? Pathetic!

"Coming out of the ...
By: RealOldOne2. on 18 May 13, 12:55:45
"Coming out of the last ice age global temps? lagged CO2" ROTFLMAO! There's another of your delusional fantasies! Here's p-r science proving you wrong: "CO2 increase LAGGED Antarctic deglacial warming by 800�200 years"- Caillon2003 (bit. ly/5MQB81) "shakun" ROTFLMAO! Sorry, pretending to synchronize global temp w/Antarctic ice cores is BULL$HIT! The only synchronization that can be done is at the same location w/the same samples. THAT shows CO2 LAGS temp by ~800yr as Caillon shows! FAIL!

(cont) Then to ...
By: RealOldOne2. on 18 May 13, 12:55:42
(cont) Then to explain their failed predictions over the last decade, Peterson2009 moved the goalposts to 15yrs: "The simulations rule out (at the? 95% level) zero trends for intervals of 15 yr OR more". Now YOU try to move the goalposts to 30yrs, & you try to pass off a LIE that there never were any goalposts! Rassie, just like the other doomsday cultists that will never admit that their religion is wrong, you are dishonest & lie & just make stuff up. Pathetic, but SO typical!

"There never were ...
By: RealOldOne2. on 18 May 13, 12:55:30
"There never were goal? posts there" ROTFLOL! The level of your delusions never ceases to amaze me! Yes, first it was a decade. 2009? Climategate email #1231190304: "I think we have been too readily explaining the slow changes over past DECADE as a result of variability - that explanation is wearing thin." Well, it's been another half a decade since then & STILL no warming since 1998! Yes, now w/15yrs of NO warming, the EXCUSES are wearing quite thin! (cont)

WAS IT AS GOOD FOR ...
By: Ras Pesher. on 18 May 13, 10:16:05
WAS IT AS GOOD FOR DUANE AS IT WAS FOR YOU? "1) cite emp. evid 'PROVING' CO2 was primary cause" This of course is your Duane Gish question. This is where you hopped into bed with Duane. The war cry? of the ICR is that evolution is only a theory & Evolution has never been "PROVEN." Theories are explanations of the facts and may involve other theories or laws. It is predictions of the theory that are empirically tested, not the explanation itself. Hope Duane didn't snore too much!

1) has been ...
By: Ras Pesher. on 18 May 13, 09:54:05
1) has been answered multiple times from every which way.? 2) & 3) were NON-questions (faulty logic & faulty premise).

GLOBAL TEMPS LAG ...
By: Ras Pesher. on 18 May 13, 08:05:15
GLOBAL TEMPS LAG CO2 Coming out of the last ice age global temps lagged CO2. CO2 was both a cause & an effect of warming. The process was initiated when one part of the Earth warmed whilst another part cooled (no net warming). The part that warmed released CO2, but the part that cooled did not take in as much CO2. The increase in atmospheric CO2 warmed the Earth, releasing more CO2. This led to more warming & the cycle repeated. ht tp: / /w ww. people. fas.? harvard. edu/ ~shakun/ FAQs. ht ml

GREAT OWN GOAL, YOU ...
By: Ras Pesher. on 18 May 13, 06:55:04
GREAT OWN GOAL, YOU SCORED! There never were goal posts there, but if you insist then you've scored an own goal. Both 2005 and 2010 were? hotter than 1998.

"Who cares what ...
By: RealOldOne2. on 18 May 13, 00:30:50
"Who cares what Peterson said? Not me! (Most say that the appropriate time period? is 30 years)." ROTFLOL! Moving the GOALPOSTS anyone!!! Hahaha. Right & when 30 yrs go by with no warming you'll say 'Well, it really takes 100 years! You're just exposing yourself? as a total idiot! But then, that's nothing new!

Nope.? I explained ...
By: RealOldOne2. on 18 May 13, 00:30:48
Nope.? I explained why they were NON-answers! YOU are the one avoiding answering the questions. Of course we know you CAN'T, but you're just too stubborn to admit it. Just like the doomsday religious cultists when their predictions don't come to pass.

Who cares what ...
By: Ras Pesher. on 17 May 13, 22:01:53
Who cares what Peterson said? Not me! (Most say that the appropriate time period is 30 years). To show that your selection of 1998 is the result of cherry picking, try: 2000,1999,1997,1996,1995,1994,1993,1992,��1991,1990,1989,1988,1987,1986�,�1985,1984,1983,1982,1981,198�0, 1979, 1978,1977,1976,1975,1974,1973,��1972, & 1971. Both 2005 and 2010 were hotter than 1998 so your claim (no warming in 15 yrs) has been falsified. Ocean heat has increased; your claim is dead.?

You seem to? be ...
By: Ras Pesher. on 17 May 13, 21:47:49
You seem to? be avoiding the answers 1)2)3)

"I did NOT agree ...
By: RealOldOne2. on 15 May 13, 05:04:24
"I did NOT agree with you" Yes you did agree w/me, b/c you said: "The fact? of Global warming is given by (bit*ly/17l3Y7h)" The link you gave was to a graph of the last 15yrs where there was? NO warming! Thanks for playing. You've now admitted that I was correct, there has been no global warming for the last 15yrs even tho humans have emitted ~? of all FF CO2 ever emitted on the planet. That was quite a struggle for you to accept reality, but congratulations for finally doing it! Have a nice life

PLEASE FOCUS You ...
By: Ras Pesher. on 15 May 13, 02:17:14
PLEASE FOCUS You said, "Thanks for agreeing there's been NO warming in the past 15yrs" I said, "I did NOT agree with you;" implying that the topic was "WARMING IN THE PAST 15YRS" Then you attempted to change the issue from "warming in the past 15 years" to a) "late 20th? century warming" & b) "no surface temp inc." The cooling stratosphere is related to "warming in the past 15 years" as a requirement of GHG theory for warming of the climate system (lower troposphere,surface & sea).

CO2 warms the ...
By: Ras Pesher. on 14 May 13, 18:58:22
CO2 warms the atmosphere, REALLY? What part? CO2/GHGs can both warm & cool different parts? of the atmosphere simultaneously. It depends on whether CO2/GHGs in a packet of air emit or absorb more photons. Without GHGs the troposphere would be -18�C. With GHGs the troposphere typically goes from about 15C at the surface to -55C at the top of the troposphere. This may sound counter intuitive but a man on another planet would see the temp of the Earth dip slightly during a period of global warming.

"So try ...
By: RealOldOne2. on 14 May 13, 11:43:48
"So try 1997,1996,1995,1994,1993,1992,�1991,1990,1989,1988,1987,1986,�1985,1984,1983,1982,1981,1980, 1979, 1978,1977,1976,1975,1974,1973,�1972, & 1971." ROTFLOL!!! Rassie, you seem to have a severe inability to understand one of the simplest words in the English language "OR". Peterson said: "The simulations rule out (at the 95% level) zero trends for intervals of 15 yr OR more" So it doesn't matter about all those other yrs b/c there's been NO warming for 15YRS! ROTFLMAO!!! You're a? HOOT!

LET"S NOT? ...
By: Ras Pesher. on 14 May 13, 11:38:29
LET"S NOT? CHERRYPICK ONE YEAR So try 1997,1996,1995,1994,1993,1992,1991,1990,1989,1988,1987,1986,1985,1984,1983,1982,1981,1980, 1979, 1978,1977,1976,1975,1974,1973,1972, & 1971. All show warming, right?

"Cherrypicking ...
By: RealOldOne2. on 14 May 13, 11:19:15
"Cherrypicking solved" Hahaha. You? showed that you could cherry pick. Big deal. But Peterson said: "The simulations rule out (at the 95% level) zero trends for intervals of 15 yr OR MORE" Sorry, but from 1999 is NOT "15yrs OR MORE" BZZZZ. You FAIL. Now back to the 3 questions that you've dodged for hundreds of comments by GishGalloping all over the place.

EVERYONE KNOWS THAT ...
By: Ras Pesher. on 14 May 13, 11:09:17
EVERYONE KNOWS THAT YOU WERE CHERRYPICKING "cherrypicking one year is meaningless" Go to woodfortrees again: for 1997: (ht tp: //? ww w. woodfortrees. org/ plot/ rss/ from: 1997/trend/plot/hadcrut3vgl/from:1997/trend/offset:-0.128/plot/esrl-co2/from:1997/scale:0.009/offset:-3.0/trend) and for 1999: (ht tp: //w ww. woodfortrees. org/ plot/ rss/ from: 1999/trend/plot/hadcrut3vgl/ from: 1999/ trend/ offset:-0.128/ plot/ esrl-co2/ from:1999/ scale:0.009/ offset:-3.0/ trend) Cherrypicking solved

We just? get a ...
By: grindupBaker. on 14 May 13, 06:30:41
We just? get a taste of what will happen next century when the ocean burps. Study ENSO, AMO & THC if you are impartial & have time/interest.

"Global Warming" is ...
By: grindupBaker. on 14 May 13, 06:30:37
"Global Warming" is an increase in the ocean heat content. You need to understand what this means before you can hope to understand the babble about everywhere. Because ocean has 97.5% of ecosystem heat, freshwater has 2.3% land+air has 0.2%. The heat is merely passing through the surface into the oceans and it'll be doing this for centuries, the final little bit will still? be going into the oceans in a couple of thousand years if the ocean gets a bit sated with CO2 & reduces its uptake.

Rassie, rassie, ...
By: RealOldOne2. on 14 May 13, 04:34:10
Rassie, rassie, rassie. Why do you continue to dodge my 3 questions? "? 2010 was warmer" BZZZZ cherrypicking one year is meaningless. Interannual? variability. The trend of temps for the last 15yrs is zero or negative. "from 2000-2005" BZZZZ The issue is late 20th century warming. "? oceans have warmed" BZZZZ CO2 does not warm the oceans. CO2 warms the atmosphere "? Cooling Stratosphere" BZZZZZ! The issue is no surface temp increase. 0 for 4 there Rassie. Now answer the 3 questions.

WHERE DID YOU GO TO ...
By: Ras Pesher. on 14 May 13, 04:13:36
WHERE DID YOU GO TO SCHOOL? "2000-2005" was in response to ".. in the past 15yrs!" Last time I checked "2000-2005" was in the past 15 years. Once again your own source (1. usa.? gov/YJyjOt) has come back to kicked you? in the butt. GOTFASG (Get off the floor and stop grovelling)!

I'M NOT SURE WHY ...
By: Ras Pesher. on 14 May 13, 04:04:01
I'M NOT SURE WHY I'M DOING THIS, AS IT'S A WASTE OF TIME RESPONDING ...because you obviously can't read! I did not agree with you. The warming has been well documented: ? 2010 was warmer than 1998 - HadCRUT4 ? "from 2000-2005. Approximately 0.85 Watts of energy were added to the Earth system" - NASA (1. usa. gov/YJyjOt) Oh, I've used your source AGAIN. ? In the last 15 years the oceans have warmed by 15x10��J - Balmaseda, Trenberth & Kallen (2013). ? Cooling Stratosphere? & Mesosphere - J Masters

Christiana Figueres: Copenhagen and Global Climate Negotiations
Posted by: ClimateOne

Video duration: 571 seconds
Global video hits: 1

UN Framework Convention on Climate Change's Executive Secretary Christiana Figueres speaks to Climate One host Greg Dalton on global climate negotiations and...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Climate Change/Global Warming Debated - Ron Meyer - Kayleigh McEnany - Neil Cavuto - 2-18-13
Posted by: RightSightings

Video duration: 493 seconds
Global video hits: 508

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

But the number is ...
By: Tristan Nowicki. on 05 May 13, 00:25:05
But the number is significantly rising.? That 3% may be loads of Co2.

I? believe Barbie ...
By: sacredpermie. on 17 Mar 13, 18:36:25
I? believe Barbie and Ken, their stupid smiling conservative faces make me trust their opinion.

Cold burn? and heat ...
By: rhodoradizon10. on 15 Mar 13, 13:23:37
Cold burn? and heat burn alike both are responsible for climate change.

We doesn't? needs ...
By: Bill Vogel. on 10 Mar 13, 03:32:44
We doesn't? needs no stinking environment!

Our global warming ...
By: UmbraRex90. on 20 Feb 13, 04:12:22
Our global warming cycle already ended we are in a global cooling cycle it? got cold and snowed extremely early here in Houston.

Who is that ...
By: Raghu Kasthuri. on 20 Feb 13, 03:36:09
Who is that Scarlett? Johnson look alike

Caroline went WAY ...
By: GumbysImperialMedia. on 19 Feb 13, 22:02:11
Caroline went WAY off the deep end. Lol It's funny how you can tell these religious fanatics there HAS BEEN NO GLOBAL WARMING IN SIXTEEN YEARS and they will instantly reply "well 98% of climitlogists say global warming is real and we are causing it!" - YOU DUMB BITCH. SEE THIS THERMOMETER?---> 0 degrees

climate change ...
By: TheLonegunman101. on 19 Feb 13, 06:07:56
climate change exists and has since time began, it is called weather ,and seasons, and the cyclic weatherpatterns of the globe once antarctica was a tropical? swampland ,man didnt have anything to do with it becoming entombed in ice

So, there you go... ...
By: David Lowery. on 19 Feb 13, 05:03:47
So, there you go... I don't know enough to decide how bad Climate Change? is, but certainly know enough about design of experiments to know that we don't know as fact what we're being told is fact. Let's get some better solar radiation data... seriously... maybe some topographical maps of the Earth and/or Sun... Since the Sun has something like an 11 year cycle, hopefully we'll know more about the static-ish geography of the Sun in the next several years.

My reflection on ...
By: David Lowery. on 19 Feb 13, 05:00:35
My reflection on Climate Change is the same. I believe that it exists. However, I'm not sure how bad it is or how much it's getting worse. We absolutely need to know more about the Sun, the basic input. Of course, the Earth has heat too...? I'm not sure how much it has, but certainly much warmer than absolute zero. And, it seems that clouds would be a natural buffer against global warming actually doing warming, but no direct measure of this seems to be commonly available...

We have this piece, ...
By: David Lowery. on 19 Feb 13, 04:55:54
We have this piece, "energy to the Earth from the Sun" that is questionable. We have this piece of information "CO2 in the atmosphere" that is questionable, for two basic reasons. Studies are rolling in more data from additional measurements and measurement techniques are changing to get better all the time. Of course this means the studies are prone to inaccuracy and corruption, not that they necessarily are? bad, but... it isn't good science.

Climate change! ...
By: David Lowery. on 19 Feb 13, 04:53:17
Climate change! Yay! Okay, first we talk green house gases. CO2 is? a green house gas. This is an essential fact. Now how much of it there is, how fast it's going up, and how much an impact it has are all clouded in the scientific haze. Also, climatologists are a group of scientists who largely make money off of the belief in global warming. It's important to know what we don't know. We don't know that much about the Sun. We're studying it, spending lots of money...

If there is? ...
By: CorrosionX3. on 19 Feb 13, 04:26:35
If there is? climate change it's because of all the hot air coming from liberals mouths.

This comment is why ...
By: 888tho. on 19 Feb 13, 04:10:55
This comment is why your YouTube account is called, thelonelygirl...?

The weather ...
By: thalonelygirl. on 19 Feb 13, 03:29:28
The weather patterns are now not caused by nature,? but by stratospheric aerosol geoengineering.

Fact: Only 3% of ...
By: J dizzle. on 19 Feb 13, 02:52:53
Fact: Only 3% of the? all the worlds Co2 is produced by Humans

Riding The Train of Climate Change
Posted by: TheAlexJonesChannel

Video duration: 1054 seconds
Global video hits: 13142

No, the world ISN'T getting warmer (as you may have noticed). Now we reveal the official data that's making scientists suddenly change their minds about clim...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Make sure to watch ...
By: RenaissanceSeeker1. on 29 Mar 13, 16:26:07
Make sure to watch the one hour long film by Pastor Ted Pike, called "The Other Israel". Here is a 10 minute clip from that film, which informs the audience about the Edomites/Cainites and their? place in the Bible. youtube. com/watch?v=tVSZV0BtmPo The Other Israel (full film) @ youtube. com/watch?v=IJxdIXgMGAI

The world is very ...
By: RenaissanceSeeker1. on 29 Mar 13, 16:11:47
The world is very upset with the Ashkenazi Jews (AKA The Mongolian "Khazars") & to a lesser degree with the Sephardic "Talmud" following Edomite Jews. No one is upset with the True European Israelite's, who over time traveled Westward & became lost to their? identity, becoming regular White Christian people. Jews are Edom & they even admit it. In their Jewish Encyclopedia, 1925 edition, Vol. 5, p. 41 they state, Edom is in 'Modern Jewry'. israelect. com/reference/WillieMartin/ChristNotAJew. htm

where is that in ...
By: max klein. on 29 Mar 13, 14:52:30
where is that in the bible that they are Jewish? I remember they were one of the tribes that was there with all the other tribes after they went from? Egypt to Palestine.

Yes, Edomites? are ...
By: RenaissanceSeeker1. on 29 Mar 13, 14:18:46
Yes, Edomites? are Jewish.

Learn about all ...
By: Samaritan Sentinel. on 29 Mar 13, 03:56:36
Learn about all aspects of the New World Order, including the upcoming reincarnation of the Antichrist, who created the plan for the New World Order over 4,000 years ago. He will be brought back to life using modern DNA technology, fulfilling the prophecy of Revelation 17:8 All proven in my FREE e-book I just released at the site below, including who the? Antichrist is, how the New World Order started/progressed, what is to come, and what you should do. FREE! Godspeed. samaritansentinel (dot) com

Are? Edomites also ...
By: max klein. on 28 Mar 13, 22:10:57
Are? Edomites also Jewish?

They are going? to ...
By: Mr30scratch. on 27 Mar 13, 05:21:03
They are going? to change the weather every year from warming to cooling.

The Jewish ...
By: RenaissanceSeeker1. on 26 Mar 13, 09:59:35
The Jewish Encyclopedia states: "Khazars, a non-Semitic, Asiatic, MONGOLIAN tribal nation? who emigrated into Eastern Europe about the first century, who were converted as an entire? nation to Judaism in the seventh century by the expanding Russian nation which absorbed the entire Khazar population, and who account for the presence in Eastern Europe of the great numbers of Yiddish-speaking Jews in Russia, Poland, Lithuania, Galatia, Besserabia? and Rumania." biblebelievers. org. au/jews. htm

yeah what ever ...
By: drummer4life4u. on 26 Mar 13, 05:51:40
yeah what ever happened? to bill nye the science guy?

JEW or JEWISH is a ...
By: Schpankme Verimuch. on 25 Mar 13, 22:13:40
JEW or JEWISH is a religion NOT a race of people; hiring someone who claims to be of the Religion JEW does not make, that Religion the string pullers of the world. You continue to ignore the evidence: ... search: THREE CITY STATES see YouTube: Season of? Treason Full see YouTube: Syncretism The Magnum Opus

Who rules the ...
By: RenaissanceSeeker1. on 25 Mar 13, 19:57:18
Who rules the planet? Some say it is "The Illuminati", others say it is "The Globalists", or "The Corporations run by 'The Elite Class'", while still others say it is "The Nazi's". The world has awoken and now realizes that we are slaves being ruled by a group? of "power-hungry psychopaths". But who really are these evil ENEMIES OF MANKIND? Who have "World Famous Men" named as the guilty party? Watch "What World Famous Men Said About the Jews", Full film @ youtube. com/watch?v=TKogb7pglZo

Yes and No. We now ...
By: RenaissanceSeeker1. on 25 Mar 13, 19:56:58
Yes and No. We now live in a Zionist controlled system, run by Zionist collaborating corporations. ?

There is no "Jesuit ...
By: RenaissanceSeeker1. on 25 Mar 13, 19:55:52
There is no "Jesuit Internet Defense League" that goes around trying to censor YouTube videos that are critical of the Jesuit Order & the Vatican. But there is a "Jewish Internet Defense Force", a predatory gang of scheming Jews who relentlessly go around sabotaging blogs, websites and YouTube videos critical of Jews, Israel & Zionism. It's not Catholic Jesuits who are training their pupils to manipulate Wikipedia to favor their causes? & ambitions, it's Zionist Jews who are behaving this way!

Time to wakeup ...
By: Schpankme Verimuch. on 25 Mar 13, 14:57:41
Time to wakeup There are no Governments only Corporations; controlled by VATICAN Banksters and its CITY OF LONDON? Corporations known as UNITED STATES, CANADA, ISRAEL and the other British Colonies. Claiming to be a CITIZEN, EMPLOYEE, PERSON or RESIDENT within their documentation, provides your consent to be treated under Trade & Commerce Law. ... search: THREE CITY STATES see YouTube: Season of Treason Full see YouTube: Syncretism The Magnum Opus

The system that ...
By: RenaissanceSeeker1. on 25 Mar 13, 05:18:50
The system that currently controls our Western nations has become rotten & corrupted. The people who are intentionally creating the corruption are the ZIONISTS! If you don't? yet fully understand these foreign Communist agitators then I would recommend that you listen to this 46 minute broadcast/video by Benjamin Freedman, who used to be a Zionist, but later on in life traded sides & became a Zionist EXPOSING patriot. Learn about the EVIL Zionist plot @ youtube. com/watch?v=2oyeBy_EHxw

Time to wake-up ...
By: Schpankme Verimuch. on 23 Mar 13, 23:18:27
Time to wake-up from your bibEL babEL: search: THREE CITY STATES see YouTube: Season of Treason Full see YouTube: Syncretism The Magnum? Opus

Almost everything ...
By: Schpankme Verimuch. on 23 Mar 13, 23:16:06
Almost everything you've been taught, see or think you know is a Lie, Hoax or Fraud. There are No Nukes, No Big Bang, No Satellites, No Man?? in? Space, No Hubble Telescope, No MARS Lander, No Oil Shortage, No Water Shortage, No Food Shortage, No Subduction, No Man Made Global Warming, No Safe Vaccine, No Truth in Media, No Savior, and no end to? the Funding required to perpetuate Theoretical Physics. search: THREE CITY STATES see YouTube: Season of Treason Full Syncretism The Magnum Opus

i noticed days ago ...
By: MrMysticPaladin. on 23 Mar 13, 17:58:44
i noticed days ago spring started and i looked outside today and it was? snowing

It is too late. The ...
By: treenoise. on 23 Mar 13, 00:14:23
It is too late. The climate train has left the station. As with gravity, opinions (of hope or denial) are irrelevant. By the? time the climate train reaches its? destination, the Earth will be a? very different environment and so will be what life can survive and flourish in it. --- There is no JUSTICE for the innocent, but EVIL IS ITS OWN PUNISHMENT and a just life is its own reward. --- This is an Ethical Apocalypse. The planet is healing itself of the disease that is humanity.

Yes, Edomites. They ...
By: RenaissanceSeeker1. on 23 Mar 13, 00:12:28
Yes, Edomites. They are the wicked evil enemies written about in the BIBLE, which God commanded to be destroyed, not negotiated with. ?

Edomites??
By: max klein. on 22 Mar 13, 19:20:02
Edomites??

2007 AAAS Opening Video Presentation Global Climate Change and Human Well-Being
Posted by: Mary Vincent

Video duration: 728 seconds
Global video hits: 3

2007 AAAS Opening Video Presentation Global Climate Change and Human Well-Being.

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Global Warming: A Way Forward: Facing Climate Change - NationalGeographic.com - 24hToday.com
Posted by: 24hToday

Video duration: 465 seconds
Global video hits: 4737

A Way Forward: Facing Climate Change Explore the global impact of climate change and its devastating effects?and learn what scientists suggest in response?in...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

$Collaborative-Scholarship Across the Disciplines: \"Global Climate Change\"$

Collaborative-Scholarship Across the Disciplines: "Global Climate Change"
Posted by: QuinnipiacUniversity

Video duration: 5089 seconds
Global video hits: 64

On Tuesday February 26, 2013, the Collaborative for Excellence in Learning and Teaching, along with the Scholarship Across the Disciplines committee, hosted ...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40

global warming Related Videos

global warming Videos

Watching: Global Climate Change video compilations