Climate Change video compilations - By global warming Videos

global warming Videos

Watching: Climate Change video compilations

Scientists Laugh at Climate Change Drama Queens
Posted by: 1000frolly

Video duration: 699 seconds
Global video hits: 78

Respected Australian scientists laugh at Julia Gillard, David Suzuki and other climate change drama queens.

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Yes, its true, but ...
By: 1000frolly. on 20 May 13, 03:27:24
Yes, its true, but what you are never told is that at the? same time the other 90% of Antarctica has cooled (since 1960) The ice pack has also been steadily growing since measurements began in 1980. Overall Antarctica's grounded ice has gained at least 5,000km3 of ice since 1960.

Yes heard that one? ...
By: debrainwasher1. on 20 May 13, 02:33:03
Yes heard that one? but isn't it true that the antarctic peninsula has melted significantly?

And the Antarctic ...
By: 1000frolly. on 20 May 13, 00:46:19
And the Antarctic has been cooling steadily for at least 50 years, and its ice cap is growing, and the sea ice extents are hitting records each year (last year was another record). Go figure.?

80% of the ice ...
By: debrainwasher1. on 19 May 13, 14:43:04
80% of the ice volume in the? Arctic has melted since 1970. Go figure.

So let's look at ...
By: johndaddyo444. on 18 May 13, 12:23:46
So let's look at the full satellite data record: 1979 AMGTA = -0.17 C (+13.83 C baseline), maCO2a = 0 ppmv (337? ppmv baseline) 1990 AMGTA = -0.02 C, maCO2a = +17 ppmv 2001 AMGTA = +0.11 C, maCO2a = +34 ppmv 2012 AMGTA = +0.16 C, maCO2a = +57 ppmv 1st 11 yrs = +0.15 C/+17ppmv 2nd 11 yrs = +0.13 C/+17ppmv 3rd 11 yrs = +0.05 C/+23ppmv Conclusion? +1 ppmv CO2 causes different warming as baseline level increases. Explanation: There's a CO2 saturation level at which no further warming occurs.

That is very true, ...
By: 1000frolly. on 18 May 13, 12:14:40
That is very true, and this example shows the real extent of? the so-called 'science' that is behind the man-made climate change thought-bubble.

Let's suppose ...
By: johndaddyo444. on 18 May 13, 12:00:38
Let's suppose satellite data began in 1998 instead of 1978. What would climate scientists be forced to conclude? 1998 annual mean global temp anomaly = 0.00 C (hypothetical baseline) 2005? AMGTA = -0.18 C 2012 AMGTA = -0.26 C 1998 mean atmospheric CO2 anomaly = 0 ppmv (Mauna Loa Scripps Obs.) 2005 maCO2a = +13 ppmv 2012 maCO2a = +28 ppmv Conclusion? +1 ppmv CO2 causes -0.01 C of Cooling. Would you trust this method? No? This is how AGW is "confirmed", except satellite data starts in 1978!

The evidence for climate change WITHOUT computer models or the IPCC
Posted by: potholer54

Video duration: 963 seconds
Global video hits: 33573

SOURCES are listed in the next video, because of space constraints. Predictable posts are answered here. Please spend your time and effort in addressing the ...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Those peer reviewed ...
By: Mithras Revisited. on 20 May 13, 07:54:32
Those peer reviewed papers have hundreds of scientists behind they. I have seen some? of your scientists, they do not pass muster. CLIMATE OF DOUBT (PBS FRONTLINE) on youtube shows this political influence not scientific. It is religious and political interference in scientists, the religious right think Jesus is coming back and will fix everything and the political is to gain votes with scares.

Agenda? 21-? ...
By: joe blow. on 20 May 13, 06:45:01
Agenda? 21-? Environmentalism vs Private? Property - Brian Wilshire Listen, learn

Thanks for taking ...
By: Ron Low. on 20 May 13, 05:14:34
Thanks for taking the time to explain. We need urgent cooperative action before earth's biodiversity is irreversibly reduced to? the point below which humans in present numbers can not be fed.

Hahaha. I knew ...
By: RealOldOne2. on 20 May 13, 04:09:13
Hahaha. I knew you'd deny it & bury your head in the? sand. It's what all cultists do when they can't face reality. You've given up on science huh? Got your fingers in your ears & chanting, la la la la I can't hear you! ROTFLMAO!

Hahaha. You climate ...
By: RealOldOne2. on 20 May 13, 04:09:10
Hahaha. You climate cultists are all the same! Bury your head in the sand & stick your? fingers in your ears when you are confronted with FACTS that show your CAGW doomsday cult religion to be a pack of lies. ROTFLMAO!

It wasn't a red ...
By: George Cataloni. on 20 May 13, 03:58:27
It wasn't a red herring, I was drawing a comparison, which you're now rejecting. But like I said to Datbenik56 (if you read it): A free market wouldn't use government mandated fiat money, it would use either many kinds of bank notes or just gold/silver-backed notes. If you put your entire life savings in one bank, you're taking a? HUGE risk; so much so that I'd say it was dumb. In today's society howeve, gov's got your back: they'll just steal from everyone to pay you back what you lost.

Yes, but that's the ...
By: George Cataloni. on 20 May 13, 03:50:16
Yes, but that's the risk. Reputation is important, and would be much more important without government. It's foolish? to think that government can just make risk go away and everything will be ok; it won't. The more government bails out risk, the more risky those risks can become because "it's not my money!". Society doesn't pay in a free market, individuals do. If you don't like that risk then don't take it. Wait for others to establish a strong reputation, then take a tiny risk instead.

Responded to, not " ...
By: Martin Lewitt. on 20 May 13, 03:45:01
Responded to, not "refuted", as McIntyre noted the IPCC authors supposed to present both sides of controversy. Thanx for at least conceding the inadequacy? of the IPCC review.

I see ROO and Vin? ...
By: Quercuspalustris50. on 20 May 13, 03:39:22
I see ROO and Vin? are here. What's up guys? Y'all been doing good? Sorry y'all got kicked off greenman's channel - i think he got bored with ya. I haven't been over there since before y'all got kicked out. Still arguing the contrarian points I see - ha, ha. Well, I'll try to pop in every once in a while for the fun of it. I'm still on the zealots' side, or whatever you guys call it now- ha, ha. Alright, y'all be well.

What you expected? ...
By: Martin Lewitt. on 20 May 13, 03:37:36
What you expected? of deniers doesn't seem particular relevant.

I would like to ...
By: Quercuspalustris50. on 20 May 13, 03:21:48
I would like to think that if some of the banks had been allow to fail, folks having a mortgage with those would be living free and clear of such debt, and pouring all that $ into the economy. It's over simplistic, but it just feels good. I'm pretty sure they could have taken a small percent of that TARP money, created new banks with it, leveraged them up 10? to 20x (because they would have had pristine balance sheets), and the would have had plenty of liquidity to run the system.

If you had to ...
By: Quercuspalustris50. on 20 May 13, 03:05:54
If you had to attach a number to the cost of production of this video, what would it be? Do you? think it cost $1K, $10K, $20K? Or are you being sarcastic?

2008 was also about ...
By: Quercuspalustris50. on 20 May 13, 03:02:25
2008 was also about absolute fear to lend money to any other player in the market. This fear paralyzed the system. Liquidity dried up. (Even KO, MCD, and players flush with cash on their books need? short term lending for payroll and such.) These bad players are so big, decisions they make can cause systemic failure, whilst they have no concern for addressing systemic risk: Their focus on short term profit can be detrimental? to the long term resilience of the system.

Bla bla bla? bla ...
By: Datbenik56. on 20 May 13, 02:50:50
Bla bla bla? bla bla.

Losing faith in the ...
By: Daniel Ayala. on 20 May 13, 02:25:27
Losing faith in the financial system is inherently different than losing faith in a comp. that produces a bad product. If Ford started selling lemons they would gain a bad reputation and suffer accordingly but no one would potentially loses their life's savings. What recourse is there for recklessness that destroys people's nest eggs? Regulation of banks is necessary to avoid a "crisis of? confidence" that puts your "free market" system at grave risk and forces many to endure great hardships.

I've made ...
By: puden Tain. on 20 May 13, 02:20:20
I've made remarkable progress teaching arithmetic to? my hamster.

You are deflecting ...
By: Daniel Ayala. on 20 May 13, 02:10:38
You are deflecting the core of my points with red herrings and propped up straw-men. I don't have a problem with capitalism at all as your argument is fallacious and there is a qualitative difference between? a car company and a financial institution, especially with regards to the financial health of the economy. If I buy a broken car from a bad manufacturer who then refuses to replace it, I'm out of a car. If a bank fails because it took too many risks, my entire life savings could disappear.

"Oh boy" Yes, It ...
By: RealOldOne2. on 20 May 13, 01:53:33
"Oh boy" Yes, It doesn't surprise me you natural climate deniers deny the reality Wikipedia is biased for the CAGW doomsday climate cultists as frolly discusses. William 'Winston Smith' Connolley is famous for his historical? revisionism on Wikipedia: (bit. ly/5Fp96p)(natpo. st/7X6oOk) Is Wiki biased on climate change? The evidence says YES: (bit. ly/13AaIMd)(cbsn. ws/36BfXe)(bit. ly/9vQlh1)

Oh? boy.
By: Datbenik56. on 20 May 13, 01:30:51
Oh? boy.

> SOMEONE would ...
By: Datbenik56. on 20 May 13, 01:28:29
> SOMEONE would have paid? it, one way or the other. Most likely: - the account holders - the depositors - the investors - people loosing their houses and a part of their capital - people loosing their jobs. And PROBABLY NOT the management who caused the problems. They most likely will leave the sinking ship with yet another $ millions (plural) bonus. Without a government, thinks would have gone much more bad. an economy can't afford system banks collapsing.

I didn't say ALL ...
By: Datbenik56. on 20 May 13, 01:23:31
I didn't say ALL banks would fail in a free market but? I was only analyzing the financial crisis which we still didn't overcome. If there were no government, at least dozens of banks in both EU and USA would have failed, causing a tremendous damage to both stakeholders and the economy. You said without government they would be bailed out by themselves. I don't think so, many would have gone bankrupt. And the stakeholders and society would have paid the bill. >

"Aren't you really ...
By: Martin Lewitt. on 20 May 13, 00:55:51
"Aren't you really saying "THEY *must* have ignored X, because *I* think X forces a? different conclusion"?" No, I'm claiming they ignored X because they did. The range model projections only include the model ranges themselves as run on the different CO2 emission scenarios. There is no extension of the range for uncertainty from all the documented model errors. You are welcome to show otherwise.

Thanks for proving ...
By: RealOldOne2. on 20 May 13, 00:54:48
Thanks for proving that you have NO answer. Your CAGW-by-CO2? cult dogma proved to be FALSE! Neither do any other members of your CO2 doomsday climate cult have an answer. You all slink off into the sunset with your tail between your legs waving the white surrender flag! So pathetic & ANTI-science your cult, can't even defend it's dogmas. ROTFLMAO! ps. Every time you post crap, I'm going to call you out! Hahaha.

stop humping my leg ...
By: VeryEvilPettingZoo. on 20 May 13, 00:49:07
stop humping my leg,? retard

$James Hansen: We Are Only Beginning to Feel Climate Change\$

James Hansen: We Are Only Beginning to Feel Climate Change's Impact
Posted by: videonation

Video duration: 404 seconds
Global video hits: 2534

Accepting the 2013 Ridenhour Courage Prize, James Hansen warns of the dire environmental impacts of our growing carbon emissions.

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Agenda 21-? ...
By: joe blow. on 20 May 13, 06:46:04
Agenda 21-? Environmentalism vs Private?? Property? - Brian Wilshire Listen, learn

The mechanisms by ...
By: Hadron Munkleburger. on 19 May 13, 17:32:50
The mechanisms by which we overcome denialism and phase out the use of fossil fuels in the long run doesn't matter so much, so long as we get the job done. Those who would have us pretend that global warming is not happening either for financial or? political reasons need to rethink their position or pay a much higher price as the reality of global warming begins to show itself with less and less ambiguity.

Read a? book.
By: MrCoffeeFiend. on 19 May 13, 04:07:33
Read a? book.

2/3 right. 1/3 ...
By: rd264. on 19 May 13, 01:31:31
2/3 right. 1/3 wrong: youre not on? the way out. You are a spring chicken!

It's nice to ...
By: rd264. on 19 May 13, 01:29:29
It's nice to suppose that it's not too late, and that we'll always have options and choices, and that there will even be wonderful brave new opportunities, but its actually unknown . My guess is its too late. We've already shown that we are prepared to screw the poor and undeveloped world. So we have exercised choices that presage where we are headed. By we I mean? implicitly or tacitly or by default, but the powerful made them and 'we' passively went along.

troll? be gone!
By: rd264. on 19 May 13, 01:23:24
troll? be gone!

He wants to shut ...
By: MrCoffeeFiend. on 16 May 13, 13:58:46
He wants to shut down? the coal and oil companies. He will lie to you to get what he wants. Carbon taxes will never solve anything and hurt the poor. If you care about people living today you would not listen to his lies.

Re new party. We ...
By: Adrian Whitehead. on 16 May 13, 06:00:38
Re new party. We are already there in Australia. Feed up with failure to implement meaningful climate policy the Save the Planet party has been set up to provide real leadership in the climate emergency and promote the solutions to an? emergency speed transition to a negative emission economy.

A 100% rebate to ...
By: katakanadian. on 15 May 13, 20:13:17
A 100% rebate to taxpayers is politically attractive but I think there should be some government funded research e.g. 10-30% of carbon price? collected should go into researching solutions and the remainder given as rebates. Unfortunately, the price we need to charge now after so many years of delay is too high to be politically feasible but a price that starts low and progresses slowly will not bring the change we need.

Well it will be ...
By: Pinge Tinkery. on 14 May 13, 18:45:09
Well it will be with that attitude! What's the point in giving up, its? not like we're just going to all commit suicide, so we may as well try.

Sometimes I love ...
By: megamahatama. on 14 May 13, 14:31:59
Sometimes I love to? fist my sisters asshole

glad I am 72 and on ...
By: judith barker. on 13 May 13, 18:50:35
glad I am 72 and on the? way out; seen better days.

I have alot of? ...
By: Dorsi Diaz. on 07 May 13, 01:44:58
I have alot of? respect for this man. Thinking out of the box and looking for the public's best interest. Kudos!

> Extinction? would ...
By: cupjay. on 03 May 13, 21:36:06
> Extinction? would be best yes, darnit,? and the sooner the better climate-wise. # humanity is cancer; global warming is the cure.

Extinction would be ...
By: schoolake. on 03 May 13, 15:16:23
Extinction would be best, really, as a species we're? a fuking mess.

Scream, Panic and ...
By: Payhole Everdouche. on 03 May 13, 14:47:31
Scream, Panic and Defile a Few Virgins? to the Climate Gods. There remains the problems of Finding a Few Virgins, in this day and age...!!! Remember the Gods Demand their Virgins.

Lifting the Lid on the Politics of Climate Change
Posted by: The RSA

Video duration: 4722 seconds
Global video hits: 1354

Full webcast from the RSA event on Tuesday 16 May at 630pm BST. It will be available for 7 days until 23 May. An edited video of the event will be available ...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

We have brains ...
By: clive anthony carroll. on 19 May 13, 18:41:04
We have brains which are identical to those in? the Stone Age, so we think not much further than the next meal. We have a global, competitive economic system but national-political institutions. We can try to mitigate the effects we humans are having on this planet but to judge from history unless there is a radical change in human psychology there are no grounds for optimism. As Lovelock says it will take a global disaster to really 'wake us up'.

Introduction ends ...
By: FilipFifth. on 19 May 13, 13:01:35
Introduction ends at 5:00?

The levels of CO2 ...
By: Paul Schietekat. on 19 May 13, 06:03:35
The levels of CO2 reached 400ppmv recently. While many countries claim success stories on reducing these CO2 levels, not even a small reduction is shown on the Keeling Curve. Why? Because we replaced the combustion of fossil fuel through other combustion processes using organic fuel. The second fuel remains oxygen, otherwise a combustion cannot take place and? the exhaust of toxic materials remains. Therefore, CO2 neutral is a myth!

Kill millions and ...
By: MrCoffeeFiend. on 19 May 13, 01:36:06
Kill millions and save the future from what we think may happen in a worst case senario that cannot happen in the real world. Give us more money to waste so that you can feel better morally that you have layed down your life for the good of the future. Only problem is that? you don't really want to believe you will be on the death pile. Only non believers will die. Just remeber that when your turn comes you helped cause it all.

The biggest myth is ...
By: Neil Morton. on 19 May 13, 00:10:31
The biggest myth is that these people or the government are the right people to listen to on how to live our lives. Without paying taxes, would any worker not have solar panels saving them? hundreds of pounds per year? I don't think so, it's a wise investment especially when the cost is massively reduced without taxation. The wise will also switch out for low power consumption living, but the world isn't wise, they're voting scumbags that support governments, the largest polluters on the planet.

climate science is ...
By: Nicholas Bonasoro. on 18 May 13, 22:24:38
climate science is still not agreed upon. there is currently an argument about how? sensitive the earth's climate is to changes in CO2. people are moving towards a low sensitivity model rather than the high sensitivity one that we used to think that led to worse predictions

It's still called ...
By: Anna Keenan. on 18 May 13, 13:47:08
It's still called both, interchangeably. 'global warming' is mostly said in the US. 'Climate change' in the rest of the world. I'm looking forward to a low-carbon 'future': looking forwards not backwards. We can be smart and sustainable and have a high quality of life at the same time. NOT addressing climate change is what will send us back to the middle ages. Living in? denial and refusing to change is a huge risk. Yes, change is scary. And yes, we've got to do it.

you deal with? it!
By: Hoxification. on 18 May 13, 10:52:35
you deal with? it!

True, wrong, wrong. ...
By: RechargeableLithium. on 18 May 13, 02:56:04
True, wrong, wrong. Climate change (the? natural part) is proven. Climate change (the human part) has been proven. That human's use of fossil fuels and the subsequent increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration is warming the planet has been proven. This is basic science that dates back to the mid-1800s. If you think otherwise, please cite a source, paper, or study.

"it is completely ...
By: theElasticJesuz .. on 18 May 13, 00:05:14
"it is completely natural and such people just say it is human caused" Please cite your sources/evidence? and then deliver them to the relevant scientific authorities.

Bravo pour cette ...
By: guixav3. on 17 May 13, 20:16:15
Bravo pour cette cha�ne, elle refl�te les pens�es mes chroniques d'informations sur ma? cha�ne. Vive la Droite !

Yes global climate ...
By: Harald Obermair. on 17 May 13, 15:50:14
Yes global climate change has been proven BUT not co2 is directly causing it and not humans are causing it...it is completely natural? and such people just say it is human caused because the want money to solve this "problem"...

Global climate ...
By: jayhovasim. on 17 May 13, 14:49:05
Global climate change has been? unquestionably proven. Deal with it.

@LsBaba He woke me ...
By: ekcoylejr. on 17 May 13, 13:53:43
@LsBaba He woke me for a sound sleep when I heard "mercy of markets". Better mercy? of markets than victims of government, which is the only other choice. Socialists come many colors, but mostly camouflage.

John Ashton misses ...
By: James Greyson. on 17 May 13, 10:59:18
John Ashton misses another 'competing idea' for carbon-neutral energy and emissions capping. Why not consider carbon-negative energy (eg biochar making) and harnessing markets (via? price correction of externalities). The #400ppm milestone suggests we must implement policy to cut CO2 concentrations, not just cap emissions.

watch?v=ez7F30lazUw?
By: TheMrSirCharles. on 17 May 13, 08:45:56
watch?v=ez7F30lazUw?

Our use of fossil ...
By: LsBaba. on 17 May 13, 08:42:52
Our use of fossil fuels and energy in general over the past two centuries will be? viewed as primitive and incredibly blunt by our descendants (if we don't damage their life chances irrevocably through inaction on climate change). The move to improved energy-efficiency and alternative sources of energy are *opportunities*, *not* a burden. Like the Industrial Revolution (started in the UK), early adopters will have enormous advantage over those that hesitate.

He said "primacy"? ...
By: LsBaba. on 17 May 13, 08:23:12
He said "primacy"? :)

It was called ...
By: forfreedom61. on 17 May 13, 06:27:06
It was called climate change? long before global warming became a thing.

"Are you going? to ...
By: Francis Fielding. on 17 May 13, 06:03:26
"Are you going? to believe me, or what you see with your own eyes?" G. Marx

Nope they called it ...
By: Elas Mobranch. on 17 May 13, 05:57:57
Nope they called it Global Warming because that is the end result of increased CO2 in the atmosphere. However they were obliged to change it to Climate Change because idiots would jump on this name & say "oh it's getting colder" CC or GW is the same thing, basically it means that as the levels of CO2 rise it will have a variable effect on our weather, colder winters,? warmer summers, drought, flood, stronger typhoons & hurricanes or tornadoes. Typhoons & tornadoes out of season. Ice caps melting.

Remember when ...
By: pimpdarlin. on 17 May 13, 03:19:30
Remember when climate change used to be called global warming? They had to change it when there was no warming. Believed this bullshit all my life before realising it was an excuse to tax & control us back to the middle ages. Does anyone still believe these liars??

Did he say "the? ...
By: ekcoylejr. on 17 May 13, 01:50:52
Did he say "the? mercy of markets"? Sir, meet Milton Friedman.

We send? our dirty ...
By: everquestfan. on 16 May 13, 21:52:52
We send? our dirty industry to China and then prohibit it in our own countries.Then use China as a lever to implement regulation.Oh what incredible hypocrisy.This is globally divisive and developing countries will not submit.PS hard to follow those football analogies,was that chanting i heard?Greed will prevail,prepare yourselves.

Inside Story Americas - The US disconnect over climate change
Posted by: AlJazeeraEnglish

Video duration: 1503 seconds
Global video hits: 1147

We try to understand why the US public is so divided over global warming causes and issues? Inside Story Americas, Shihab Rattansi discusses with guests: Mic...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

You really are just ...
By: Andy Lee Robinson. on 20 May 13, 05:43:56
You really are just a paid industry troll monitoring this video instead of having a life - who else? would spend so much time spouting motivated opinions and baseless facts without being paid? Since when has *any* oil company ever cared about the poor? The poor are just resources to be exploited to fill the pockets of the rich that don't care that the biosphere is in danger. Every solar panel and wind turbine made mean lost profit for them, and that is the only reason you are here: Money.

Maybe there is a ...
By: thegoodlocust. on 20 May 13, 01:19:44
Maybe there is a little bit of acidity from it, but I suspect it is overblown and the problems were caused from other sources or even the natural acidity present in many forests. Environmentalists, after all, have a record of blaming FFs for problems caused by other things. For example,? claiming corals were dying from global warming when it was actually farm runoff and fishing trawlers.

I believe? you'd ...
By: thegoodlocust. on 20 May 13, 01:12:51
I believe? you'd better have damn good evidence for warming when you are declaring global warming to start right at the end of a mini-Ice age. We don't have that. We have scattered and unreliable surface records that have been endlessly revised decades after the fact and which have been polluted with urban heat bias.

But it wasn't a day ...
By: thegoodlocust. on 20 May 13, 01:08:53
But it wasn't a day - it was a couple hours in a day. Hell, Germany could've produced 100% of its power from solar for a couple hours if they'd fully shut off their traditional power plants rather than idling them for a few hours so people could use expensive solar power. Have you seen the biblical scale of heavy metal pollution caused by making solar panels? As for the money issue, keep in mind that poverty is the greatest killer - and these solar/wind scams? do nothing but promote poverty.

It isn't the ...
By: thegoodlocust. on 20 May 13, 01:03:04
It isn't the silicon that's the problem - it is the tellurium, indium and gallium that are the problems. I'd love to see an honest assessment? of how much energy it takes to create a solar panel - and how long it will take to produce that energy back. Also, the rare earth magnets needed for electric cars and wind turbines are an even bigger supply problem. These are major issues - and there are even bigger problems too - space requirements, power storage, etc. There are too many issues.

Acid rain was no ...
By: Andy Lee Robinson. on 20 May 13, 00:50:24
Acid rain was no myth - Whole forests were dying before sulphur sequestration was? forced. Scandinavia was really pissed with UK's pollution killing their trees. Yamal not so far away. Acid rain also the reason for the increase of sinkholes in Florida, but they didn't mention that on TV. Now with tree lines advancing north and winters not killing off the pine beetles, Canadian forests are in trouble. So many reasons to dump fossil fuels, and it doesn't have to impoverish anyone except the K bros.

Every day adds up, ...
By: Andy Lee Robinson. on 20 May 13, 00:39:34
Every day adds up, and you can't measure all benefits? in financial terms. You should see the stats. Have you seen the biblical scale of tar sands mining?

Silicon comprises ...
By: Andy Lee Robinson. on 20 May 13, 00:25:42
Silicon comprises 28% of the Earth's crust, most common element after oxygen! The expense is the energy required to extract it, and that can also come from solar energy. Natural gas is only a bridging fuel. It's great for replacing coal, but it's still a net contributor and solar is catching up. I wouldn't buy shares? in gas for a long term investment.

"It is your ...
By: bladedaemon666. on 20 May 13, 00:22:48
"It is your personal belief that global warming is caused by? carbon dioxide" nope, ss website? "It is a fact that the charts showing "global warming" start right at the end of a multi-century long cold spell known as the Little Ice Age" i see, so you base your "belief" on o few charts, sounds about right, realized a few comments ago that that's about how much info those two neurons of yours can work with. Thx for the ride, i'll come by the zoo some time (to point and laugh)

Data doesn't have ...
By: thegoodlocust. on 20 May 13, 00:07:33
Data doesn't have to lie. Data can be inaccurate. Data can be misinterpreted. When you have a bunch of environmentalists who desperately want us to stop using fossil fuels then you get to bring confirmation bias and other psychological errors into the equation. If SS? doesn't have vast resources then feel free to let me look at your books or give me access to your secret forum/mailing list. Nothing to hide right?

It is your personal ...
By: thegoodlocust. on 20 May 13, 00:05:07
It is your personal belief that global warming is caused by carbon dioxide. Unless you from the SS website as well then I don't expect you realize most of the alarmist projections are based on hypothetical positive feedback mechanisms regarding reduced albedo, increased water vapor,methane, etc. It is a fact that the charts showing "global warming" start right at the end of? a multi-century long cold spell known as the Little Ice Age. The only response to this fact consists of yet more excuses.

I believe? you are ...
By: thegoodlocust. on 20 May 13, 00:02:16
I believe? you are mistaken on that Andy. German's solar power supplied half its power - for a couple hours on one day - not a full day at all. That isn't exactly a great accomplishment considering how many resources they've wasted on this fiasco.

which incorrect ...
By: norm741. on 19 May 13, 23:47:07
which incorrect assertion?

Nothing to deny: I ...
By: vrooomie1. on 19 May 13, 23:45:56
Nothing to deny: I am a geologist who *understands* the science, and it shows *exactly* what the all-volunteer staff at SkS say it does. DATA? DOESN'T LIE.Only denialists and/or industry shills say otherwise, There is NO debate in the scientific community, and SkS does NOT have vast resources, which you CANNOT document otherwise, because, what I speak is the truth.

Money is supposed ...
By: thegoodlocust. on 19 May 13, 23:45:17
Money is supposed to be a representation of resources so we don't have to physically barter with them. Just because some government can't print vast amounts of money, causing inflation, doesn't mean they can print enough? money to get the resources that they need. That takes time and hard-work. Solar is expensive because the resources it needs are scarce. You can't print enough money to solve that problem. If anything the US is in a great position with natural gas.

"Sustained warming ...
By: bladedaemon666. on 19 May 13, 23:44:48
"Sustained warming for 50 years? or so" yeah, so you know nothing of the climate, or what anybody is claiming, if this is what you need to be convinced you have no idea what is being debated. "My personal belief" unicorns are the rulers of the moon and are watching, this is as relevant as is your personal belief to this matter. "The earth has lived through far higher levels of CO2 and life evolved under those levels." true but human society has not, panic? right

Oh and I looked up ...
By: thegoodlocust. on 19 May 13, 23:42:44
Oh and I looked up your name - looks like you are an SS member as well. Color me shocked - that makes 4 of you commenting on this video.? In any case, I read between the lines of what was said on that forum and look at things like media access - it indicates money and connections. Deny it if you like but it is obvious.

I said "almost" 200 ...
By: thegoodlocust. on 19 May 13, 23:39:54
I said "almost" 200 years. "In 1835, Professor Sibrandus Stratingh of Groningen, the Netherlands and? his assistant Christopher Becker created a small-scale electrical car, powered by non-rechargeable primary cells.[2] In 1838, Scotsman Robert Davidson built an electric locomotive that attained a speed of 4 mph (6.4 km/h).[3] Between 1832 and 1839, Robert Anderson of Scotland invented a crude electrical carriage." from Wikipedia

German solar ...
By: Andy Lee Robinson. on 19 May 13, 23:38:39
German solar supplied half the entire country's demand for a few days last year - that's already millions of tons of coal that didn't need to be burned and tons of mercury and radon not released? into the atmosphere, and all this mostly from the roofs of domestic properties, in a country with the same latitude as Alaska! It is working already. Even Romania regularly exceeds 30% of supply from renewables. Mammals versus dinosaurs - small, nimble and clean beats big, slow and dirty.

Money just goes ...
By: Andy Lee Robinson. on 19 May 13, 23:24:27
Money just goes around and comes back - just like electrons - however: US gave all its money to China out of greed for cheap labour and lax regulation - US economy shrank. China's grew? massively. Now China has all the money, proxy pollution and a massive environmental catastrophe to clean up. Meanwhile US is bankrupt and crippled by stupidity. China hung America with its own rope, and will rule the world in renewables. US becomes cheap labour for China, after Africa leapfrogs fossil fuels!

Electric vehicles ...
By: vrooomie1. on 19 May 13, 23:23:57
Electric vehicles for 200 years? You ARE? delusional! As for the hack, and your supposition SkS has "vast" resources, you HAVe no data to back that up: I've read all the SkS hack and there is NOTHING showing that. In any case, you're an industry shill, and not interested in the science. DNFTT.

Acid rain? That's ...
By: thegoodlocust. on 19 May 13, 23:22:20
Acid rain? That's another overblown environmentalist myth :). We can't impoverish our entire world based on such unreliable data. There are a thousand reasons why tree rings can vary in size and they aren't going to be consistent for thousands of years. Trees are simply? not thermometers and the data shows it.

And again, all ...
By: thegoodlocust. on 19 May 13, 23:19:20
And again, all these technologies you want rely on scarce resources. If we tried to power our society with them then they'd quickly become unaffordable (i.e. unavailable) due to supply and demand. Look at all the metals and? minerals you need for these wind-farms. You are building thousands of generators rather than a few powerful, consistent and reliable FF powered ones. And in a few years your need to repair and replace them. It isn't going to work.

The only way solar ...
By: thegoodlocust. on 19 May 13, 23:17:34
The only way solar works is with technologies that don't exist and which may not even be possible. You need vast real estate for it and that's not going to change. You'll need someway of cheaply storing that energy for night and for clouds and? there is no way of knowing when or even if we'll get that. The panels themselves are still too expensive. They are only affordable due to vast government subsidies on them. That merely hides the cost though.

What would change ...
By: thegoodlocust. on 19 May 13, 23:15:15
What would change my mind? Sustained warming for 50 years or so. My personal belief is that the last century warmed largely due to a recovery from the Little Ice Age? that ended in the mid-1800's with perhaps some anthropogenic effect as well. The earth has lived through far higher levels of CO2 and life evolved under those levels. It isn't going to be a disaster if we get a bit closer to what it used to be. How many decades of stalled warning will convince you not to panic?

The cognition of climate change denial
Posted by: uniofsydney

Video duration: 1297 seconds
Global video hits: 19

Summary: Professor Stephan Lewandowsky is a cognitive scientist in the School of Psychology at UWA. This presentation was part of the Climate Change: Busines...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

The Scientific Case for Urgent Action to Limit Climate Change
Posted by: UCtelevision

Video duration: 3540 seconds
Global video hits: 1137

Visit: http://www.uctv.tv/) Distinguished Professor Emeritus Richard Somerville, a world-renowned climate scientist and author of "The Forgiving Air: Unders...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

The earth cares ...
By: tstruss912. on 20 May 13, 01:29:36
The earth cares nothing of Al Gore, Frank Luntz, your fears, my fears...it only cares about physics. It's warming. Period.? The science is in.

I heard? nothing on ...
By: stmarienanette. on 11 May 13, 10:44:26
I heard? nothing on deforestation . Has anyone done a study on when that started and increase of co2?

'no warming', ' ...
By: JIM MAC. on 10 May 13, 03:26:57
'no warming', 'this? is a scam' . um, your are kidding right?

Regardless of how ...
By: aussieincal009. on 08 May 13, 16:05:45
Regardless of how people feel about "climate? change" I think it is common ground that trashing the planet is a really bad idea. Quite frankly I do not want to live on a trashcan planet.

Staelites Show ...
By: Aanthanur DC. on 08 May 13, 14:33:15
Staelites Show statistical warming, and Argo Shows increasing ocean heat Content. why do you Deniers always have to lie, your lies are debunked by googling 2 minutes. nodc noaa? gov/OC5/3M_HEAT_CONTENT/ OHC increasing 0-750 m and 0- 2000 m ssmi com/msu/msu_time_series html satellite data Shows warming

just recently PAGES ...
By: Aanthanur DC. on 08 May 13, 14:29:59
just recently PAGES published their Research showing that we actually were in a cooling trend,? which was to be expected, we should be entering a new glaciation period do to the milankovich cycles. and we did cool for a Long time, but then the CO2 warming took over and we warmed so fast we never saw in the time of our species. even further back.

lol ever heard of ...
By: Aanthanur DC. on 08 May 13, 14:27:44
lol ever heard of Thermometers? and the Hockey stick was not debunked by anyone, actually the contrary, every single global or hemispherical reconstruction confirmed the hockey stick graph. it is a whole hockey Team now. just recently new reconstructions on all continents by PAGES? confirmed the hockey stick again, and only a week before another study did the same..... only on denier Blogs they thik there is somwething wrong with the hockey stick,d espite the evidence.

yes, look Lindzen ...
By: Aanthanur DC. on 08 May 13, 13:59:12
yes, look Lindzen still has a Job, even Willie Soon got NOAA Money for his false paper that allegedly showed that AGW is natural. you know the paper that was ripped to peaces? by real experts and led to mass resignings at the Journal that let the paper pass peer Review, even the big Boss of the Journal admited later it never should have passed peer Review because it lacked the evidence for the conclusion Soon draw. yet he still has work and he still got Money from NOAA:

the reality is we ...
By: Nightverslonn. on 08 May 13, 13:58:40
the reality is we have no warming yet to even talk about so when you see the solutions brought about by alarmists all have something to do with taxation, and not actually addressing any problem, you should immediately be alerted to the fact this is a scam your "thousands" of sources of data are all land based and highly tainted by city? heat island affect satellites show no statistical warming and Argos shows no ocean warming of any kind facts hurt

lol you use such ...
By: Aanthanur DC. on 08 May 13, 13:56:22
lol you use such short time scales? oh well then global warming stopped every few years and came back then........ you know that climatology usually work with a time spann of atleast 30 years? and no cherry picking needed for the antarctic. Antarctica is loosing ice mass at increasing rates. ist sea ice that? is increasing. and that also do to the fact that the land ice is melting, ths it flows faster towards the water etc etc. ist the Deniers that Need the cherry picking , like they always do.

""The global ...
By: Nightverslonn. on 08 May 13, 13:55:56
""The global average surface temperature rose 0.6 to 0.9 degrees? Celsius (1.1 to 1.6� F) between 1906 and 2005" garbage we have no GLOBAL data that is accurate to tenths of degrees until the introduction of weather satellites in 1979 and since that time, we have measured a net warmth of 0.1C which falls into the bracket of statistical noise its essentially nothing the hockey stick graph has already debunked itself some of our greatest heat waves and heat records took place in the 1930s

NSIDC is an ...
By: Nightverslonn. on 08 May 13, 13:53:07
NSIDC is an interesting source indeed after 2005, the arctic sea was growing, and year after year it was growing now the Antarctic has always seen growth and this data just wasn't scary? enough so around 2009, NSIDC started changing their reports from raw data in sq kms to "this is the 12th lowest sea ice extent on record" keep in mind the record started in 1980 lol NSIDC is a highly biased source who benefits from gov't grants and has to produce alarmist rhetoric to stay afloat.

you found 2 whole ...
By: Nightverslonn. on 08 May 13, 13:49:41
you found 2 whole scientists who predict ice free summers? I assume these are climatologists? And their pay is entirely linked to alarmism. What exactly? would happen if they said "all is well" ?? Would they still have a job? So if ARGOS shows absolutely no warming in our oceans at all and our satellites show a whopping 0.1C of warmth in 33 years you don't have to be an employee for an oil company to see there is a con here the sky is falling!

I guess you missed ...
By: Nightverslonn. on 08 May 13, 13:44:57
I guess you missed the point! You're own data shows that by? 2011 ALL of the warming was gone. And now MAYBE we can show 0.1C warming MAYBE And you have to do some creative cherry picking to find any articles showing anything but ice GROWTH in the Antarctic so WOW I mean wow, we have a whole tenth of a single degree of warming in 33 years lol holy crap start building an ark!

BTW? - to make ...
By: thinkethically. on 08 May 13, 01:21:05
BTW? - to make things even more concrete, when I facetiously commented that we've "run out," it was a jab at your world view because based on thousands upon thousands of observations of data, this is not even something to be arguing about. The question has long moved past the question of "if" only "when." No alarmism just reality.

"The global average ...
By: thinkethically. on 08 May 13, 01:07:52
"The global average surface temperature rose 0.6 to 0.9 degrees Celsius (1.1 to 1.6� F) between 1906 and 2005, and the rate of temperature increase has nearly doubled in the last 50 years. Temperatures are certain to go up further." taken? from NASA (earthobservatory.nasa.gov) explicitly discusses global warming with graphs.

"Satellite data ...
By: thinkethically. on 08 May 13, 01:05:33
"Satellite data have indicated an even more dramatic reduction in Arctic ice cover in recent years. In September 2002, Arctic sea ice reached a record minimum: 4 percent lower than any previous September since 1979, and 14 percent lower than the average ice extent from 1979 to 2000. When the low ice years of 2002 to 2004 are taken into account, the average ice extent each September from 1979 to 2004 is decreasing at a rate of 7.7 percent per decade."? 2007 data not included (source nsidc.org)

"For scientists ...
By: thinkethically. on 08 May 13, 01:02:50
"For scientists studying summer sea ice in the Arctic, it's not a question? of "if" there will be nearly ice-free summers, but "when." And two scientists say that "when" is sooner than many thought ? before 2050 and possibly within the next decade or two." (From NOAA website dated 4/12/13)

Doesn't appear ...
By: thinkethically. on 08 May 13, 01:01:08
Doesn't appear that? you understand. Do you work for Exxon or something? Maybe you work in marketing for "clean coal." Here are scientific websites (you'll have to dig since youtube won't allow cut and pasted web addresses). Plenty more where this comes from. All of it contradicts your compartmentalized theory:

ssmi.com/msu/ ...
By: Aanthanur DC. on 08 May 13, 00:51:51
ssmi.com/msu/msu_time_series.html satellite record actually shows warming. nasa gov/mission_pages/Grace/news/grace20121129? html increasing ice mass loss Antarctica.

wow you are ...
By: Nightverslonn. on 07 May 13, 23:24:49
wow you are misinformed the Antarctic has been growing... I bet you didn't know that And has the arctic sea ice vanished? You have a source for that lol?? Because it hasn't happened. In fact the satellite record shows no warming at all. Where did the warming go? Could it be that the record shows the planet naturally warms and cools every 25-30 yrs and alarmists used this to scare people and make a buck?

except we're still ...
By: Nightverslonn. on 07 May 13, 23:20:42
except we're still waiting for warming in fact ANY the satellite records shows no net warming at all what tiny amount of warming that was measured reversed in 2005 and has? cooled off to the point where we no longer have any global warming so you have to come up with some creative stuff to keep the alarmism going

You're cherry ...
By: thethegreenmachine. on 06 May 13, 22:23:01
You're cherry picking. Apparently you missed that part? about short term trends meaning nothing in the long term (and I imagine you missed all the rest, too).

$Allan Savory: How to green the world\$

Allan Savory: How to green the world's deserts and reverse climate change
Posted by: TEDtalksDirector

Video duration: 1340 seconds
Global video hits: 405770

"Desertification is a fancy word for land that is turning to desert," begins Allan Savory in this quietly powerful talk. And terrifyingly, it's happening to ...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

He said? he ...
By: QronoZ713. on 19 May 13, 14:26:48
He said? he regretted it. And people do really stupid stuff sometimes. He really tought that was the only way of ending the desertitification of the land

The levels of CO2 ...
By: Paul Schietekat. on 19 May 13, 06:05:23
The levels of CO2 reached 400ppmv recently. While many countries claim success stories on reducing these CO2 levels, not even a small reduction is shown on the Keeling Curve. Why? Because we replaced the combustion of fossil fuel through other combustion processes using organic fuel. The? second fuel remains oxygen, otherwise a combustion cannot take place and the exhaust of toxic materials remains. Therefore, CO2 neutral is a myth!

Traditional? ...
By: nine9s. on 18 May 13, 21:27:59
Traditional? grazing does damage the land -- but what this video is saying is that grazing in a different way reverses that damage.

9ff70f96: The ...
By: nine9s. on 18 May 13, 21:04:18
9ff70f96: The animals eat what's there -- often the dried up plants that would otherwise have to be burned. The next time around, there are more plants growing,? so it can support more animals, who provide more fertilizer and more soil breakup than before. And so on. Savory says at the end that the only time they had to bring in animal feed was when they were reclaiming mines.

No, he's not a ...
By: nine9s. on 18 May 13, 20:59:35
No, he's not a dumbass. This happens in the desert quite regularly. When bikers gather in the open deserts to ride around, they don't go to the same place every year because when they come back, the? place is overrun with plants. Breaking up the soil is often enough to allow seeds to get into the ground and grow.

Maybe I'm ...
By: ncooty. on 18 May 13, 20:50:01
Maybe I'm misreading your comment, but are you equating organic farming advocates with "biotech companies"? That makes no sense to? me. In what way is advocacy of organic farming arrogant?

Please see my reply ...
By: ncooty. on 18 May 13, 20:47:09
Please see my reply to Crystal on? the same issue. Most people who talk about reducing the population advocate doing so by empowering women, who, when they have choices, usually choose smaller families, later in life, with children spaced further apart. Those choices lead to healthier families & a lower population. I don't know of anyone interested in population issues in public policy who advocates killing people, mandating family sizes, etc. They focus on education, empowerment, & choice.

Be reasonable. When ...
By: ncooty. on 18 May 13, 20:38:50
Be reasonable. When people talk about reducing the human population, they nearly always hope? to do so by empowering women to choose if and when to have kids (I'm not talking about abortions, but about age of marriage, access to birth control, cultural attitudes toward rape, etc.), how far apart to space pregnancies, how many children to have, etc. When women are educated, empowered, and secure (nutritionally & economically), the usually choose to have smaller, healthier families at later ages.

Re: your 1st ...
By: ncooty. on 18 May 13, 20:32:13
Re: your 1st sentence: Whereas fossil fuels move stored carbon FROM THE? GROUND to the atmosphere, livestock move less than 1/2 of consumed carbon FROM THE ATMOSPHERE back to the atmosphere. (Much of the rest is transferred to soil via root die-back.) Methane emissions from biodegradation & digestion are roughly equal, & preferable to oxidation. So, whether grass is degraded by bacteria in soil or in a cow, CH4 production is ~equal & short-cycled from atmospheric carbon, not ground-stored carbon.

well wow, simply ...
By: Leignheart. on 18 May 13, 19:04:16
well wow, simply wow, i cant believe that all they had to do was drive a tractor over the desert to make it arable. its like you found a cure for cancer, you better start calling up all the poeple in these desert regions right now so they can start planting, im gonna nominate you for the nobel peace prize. your an amazing human being. ? dumbass

just so you ...
By: Leignheart. on 18 May 13, 19:00:23
just so you understand,? because i believe you are a drug addled ignorant individual, but thats judging so i apoligize, there is nothing wrong with capitalism, to cut down forests to illegally grow weed is........ ILLEGAL. if your breaking the law then the person should be punished, it doesnt mean capitalism is evil. if you hate capitalism then perhaps you should live in china, or north korea, i bet you would love it there. moron

no offence but ...
By: Leignheart. on 18 May 13, 18:56:43
no offence but please take your bicycle and ride off? the grand canyon.

vegans are full of ...
By: Leignheart. on 18 May 13, 18:54:22
vegans are full of bs from day one, eating meat isnt wrong, buying ivory? or rhino horn, i would kill over that.

he wasnt proud of ...
By: Leignheart. on 18 May 13, 18:52:28
he wasnt proud of killing elephants. sometimes people do stupid things to try to save something they love. the important thing you dont understand is that he learned? from their deaths and benefited all the same. how do you think we know whats poisonous or not, from the many deaths, how do we get cures for diseases? from many deaths. sometimes to get knowledge it takes death sadly.

well how would you ...
By: Leignheart. on 18 May 13, 18:48:24
well how would you plan on? reducing our numbers? systematic killing? dont be insane.

you cant let nature ...
By: Leignheart. on 18 May 13, 18:46:42
you cant let nature be with 7 billion people who live to be 80 to100 years old. and also, perhaps lower the language because children could be reading your comments, do you want the future children being? heathens?

that is 'livestock ...
By: newarnav. on 18 May 13, 17:57:43
that is 'livestock industry'? not organic or natural livestock.

The arrogance of ...
By: MrMaxBliss. on 17 May 13, 19:25:39
The arrogance of stating lets use organic farming. Foolish globalists wondering why it got fucked up...by them since colonalisation.....just? leave mother nature alone.Biotech companies should be buried in a desert along with banksters and the Bilderburg group....let nature be...simple.

TO YOU THAT WANT TO ...
By: Crystal Featherstone. on 17 May 13, 00:45:18
TO YOU THAT WANT TO KILL OFF PEOPLE PLEASE START WITH YOURSELF SIR. ?

KEY POINT: RE- ...
By: Crystal Featherstone. on 17 May 13, 00:44:17
KEY POINT: RE-EDUCATION.... LISTEN?

FACT: Livestock ...
By: Shane Savant. on 16 May 13, 20:42:18
FACT: Livestock creates more greenhouse gases than all of the cars & trucks on Earth combined. So based on this fact alone there is blatant contradiction with? Mr.Savory's theory. And if you really want to get to the root of the problem? you need to STOP humans from OVERPOPULATING the Earth. The majority of our problems would resolve themselves if this principle could be taught and observed around the world... LESS PEOPLE = LESS DESTRUCTION TO OUR WORLD, it really is that simple!

FACT: Livestock ...
By: Shane Savant. on 16 May 13, 20:37:43
FACT: Livestock creates more greenhouse gases than all of the cars & trucks on Earth combined. So based on this? fact alone there is blatant contradiction with Mr.Savory's theory. And if you really want to get to the root of the problem you need to STOP humans from OVERPOPULATING the Earth. The majority of our problems would resolve themselves if this principle could be taught and observed around the world... LESS PEOPLE = LESS DESTRUCTION TO OUR WORLD, it really is that simple!

Humans collect ...
By: Andrew K Fletcher. on 16 May 13, 11:22:41
Humans collect their waste, send it down pipelines, treat it "sometimes" and then dump it in the sea and rivers. We could divert this valuable resource through the existing shipping chain, that currently transport billions of tonnes of sea water? back to the port they sailed from, which is frequently a desert coastline. Surely we can change ballast water practices and use the waste water to restore desert coastlines? Operation OASIS was presented at House of Commons, see my latest video

The frustrating ...
By: Opmovi. on 16 May 13, 10:51:19
The frustrating limit on comment length makes it difficult to clearly express my statement... I watched the video and I'm not directly disagreeing with Savory (though not so sure because a? bit over-simplified). However, I wanted to make it clear that his suggestion has nothing to do with the livestock industry in industrialized regions (sedentary, urbanized culture). So, the effort of vegetarian people in reducing the ecological footprint of our industrialized lifestyle remains effective for now

Really there's ...
By: Opmovi. on 16 May 13, 10:40:10
Really there's nothing I disagree with in your comment (this time). I was exclusively criticizing factory farming and the unreasonable over-dependency of people in industrialized regions on meat. It's not about occasional supplement but in some cases a meat-centered diet (though alternatives are abundant in industrialized regions). I agree that in some regions human-edible crops can't be grown (the traditional regions of nomadic culture), so? in those regions Savory's method can be implemented.

Are we in denial about climate change? LIVE
Posted by: Truthloader

Video duration: 2219 seconds
Global video hits: 0

We hold weekly live debates every Thursday at 7pm GMT/2pm EST/11am PST on various topics. If you have any suggestions, feel free to leave a comment or DM us ...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Re: "If you had any ...
By: VeryEvilPettingZoo. on 19 May 13, 21:47:53
Re: "If you had any knowledge of the subject then you'd know about the cycle I'm talking about, so like most Chicken Little's you're? a fake." He's a fake, just like the scientific world is a "fake", but you know the REAL story, right? Screw the climatologists, the literature, the esteemed scientific orgs - they all got the science wrong. If only they'd listen to you, they might learn a thing or two! You denier clowns? are a hoot.

well i am very well ...
By: Aanthanur DC. on 18 May 13, 21:15:44
well i am very well informed about? the science of climatology, and i am not aware of any cycle that is able to explain the late 20th ventury warming. nor do the scientists working in this field discovered such a cycle able to explain the late 20th century warming. in which journal was that research published? what's the title of the paper?

If you had any ...
By: Jojo Dynamo. on 18 May 13, 21:04:11
If you had any knowledge of the subject then you'd know about the cycle I'm talking about, so like most Chicken Little's you're? a fake.

and what is this ...
By: Aanthanur DC. on 18 May 13, 17:37:42
and what is this alleged cycle? in the scientific literature we do not find any cycle able to explain the late 20th? century warming. the increased CO2 levels however are perfectly bale to explain it.

But if you take all ...
By: Jojo Dynamo. on 18 May 13, 17:07:08
But if you take all geological records then it simply shows a cyclical? pattern.

not at? all. it ...
By: Aanthanur DC. on 18 May 13, 15:37:50
not at? all. it shows that surface temps did not rise as fast as expected, but shows no cooling trend , sure not one that is statistically significant.

the average of the ...
By: Aanthanur DC. on 18 May 13, 15:36:37
the average of the last 30 years for example as used with the satellite temp record. but? also if we take the 20th century average or the last half of 20th century average. one year being colder than the pervious one is not a climate trend at all. climate usually deals with time spanns of 30 years and more.

If we can make the ...
By: Jojo Dynamo. on 18 May 13, 05:48:02
If we can make the world warmer, could we please do it a little more? I've been freezing my ass off going on 8 months! That's pretty damned cold for? 44 degrees latitude.

"All credible ...
By: Jojo Dynamo. on 18 May 13, 05:46:32
"All credible scientists are telling you facts" With "credible" defined as "agrees with you." The? word doesn't mean that.

More like ...
By: Jojo Dynamo. on 18 May 13, 05:44:54
More like underground lava-flows which have been discovered as the real cause behind Greenland becoming green.... AGAIN. But I'm sure someone selling an agenda? is sure to ignore natural causes behind ANYTHING, just look at Al Gore.

They always do! " ...
By: Jojo Dynamo. on 18 May 13, 05:37:56
They always do! "An inconvenient truth" actually refers to what Al Gore chose to EXCLUDE since it didn't? support his foregone conclusion.

"globaly this ...
By: Jojo Dynamo. on 18 May 13, 05:35:56
"globaly this winter was stil above average" Above average for WHAT? For all of recorded history? It was colder than last year, so that illustrates a COOLING trend, as the skeptics have pointed out is right on schedule.?

So basically it was ...
By: Jojo Dynamo. on 18 May 13, 05:33:32
So basically it was a sausage-fest of fearmongers. Great, we have SO few of those (sarcasm)?

You don't speak ...
By: Jojo Dynamo. on 18 May 13, 05:31:55
You don't speak the?? HALF of it! Academic incentives aren't just economic, but more POLITICAL in terms of arbitary and autocratic awarding of accreditation and tenure, resulting in the scrambling of so-called "scientists" to stay on the good side of the hand that feeds them. And then there's the joke called "peer-review" which ensures that NOBODY says the king's naked. PS. And don't forget book-sales, which are boosted by crisis and fearmongering, granting bestseller-status to "Henny-Pennies."

Yeah.... ...
By: Jojo Dynamo. on 18 May 13, 05:24:02
Yeah.... PERSPECTIVE. ?

Climate-science ...
By: Jojo Dynamo. on 18 May 13, 05:23:14
Climate-science shows it's been getting? colder.

"Land-based ice ...
By: Jojo Dynamo. on 18 May 13, 05:21:42
"Land-based ice flowing into the sea?" That's some trick, considering it usually? melt first.

you should be more ...
By: Aanthanur DC. on 16 May 13, 18:59:34
you should be more specific, increase in sea ice, we have still a net loss of ice mass in the antarctic. and the increase of sea ice is partially do to land based ice flowing faster into? the sea. globaly this winter was stil above average, several regions had cold winters, but overall, it was and still is pretty warm.

They failed to ...
By: Steve Robinson. on 16 May 13, 06:21:39
They failed to mention? the massive increase of ice in the Antarctic and record cold winters in the North, again this year.

where are you from? ...
By: Aanthanur DC. on 15 May 13, 16:31:10
where are you from? what missinformation did? they spread?

Yes but not ...
By: AvNotasian. on 15 May 13, 15:13:03
Yes but not everyone agrees about the scale (at least I think thats what hes talking about). If my govt had their way they would bang on about climate change just to tax the? air we breath out, in the process they whip up incredible hype and misinformation. This Hype radicalises people pro and against then they get a talking and create buckets of useless shit around the real discussion being done by scientists obscuring the science and hijacking it for politics.

Thank you for ...
By: AvNotasian. on 15 May 13, 15:05:53
Thank you for creating more useless data on the web that? serves no useful purpose, maybe next time you could produce a presentation rather than sniffing each others farts and agreeing at how nice they smell... I will watch no more than 5mins Fuck that flicked through it you're doing no more than what the news does. If anyone is actualy interested in learning about climate science I point you to potholer54.

Actually according ...
By: meanmotor74. on 13 May 13, 14:40:53
Actually according to Peter Sinclair (the third guy in the panel) Truthloader asked James Delingpole to be on, but he cancelled at last minute and they were unable to get Mark Morano on to take his? place. Also if people are interested there is a project to see how much industrial soot contributes to icemelt in Greenland called the Dark Snow Project that Peter has been trying to plug.

We most certainly ...
By: hasithappens. on 12 May 13, 17:00:03
We most certainly have been changing the climate. With our rubbish. Our car fumes. Oil spills in the sea. Factorys with chimney fumes. All sorts of toxics going into the air, water, ground. Even the trees are showing us that climate change is real. So many of them have died. And what with the aeroplanes spreading their fumes all over the? sky. It is amazing that our lungs are coping.

John Stossel - Climate Change & Global Greening
Posted by: LibertyPen

Video duration: 800 seconds
Global video hits: 4615

Climatologist Roy Spencer, NASA scientist Gavin Schmidt and scientific journalist Matt Ridley are John's guests. http://www.LibertyPe n.com.

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Schmidt ... LOL !? ...
By: Antony Fendt. on 09 May 13, 04:23:28
Schmidt ... LOL !? what a jacked up prick !!

gavin schmitt is a ...
By: Vic Longdong. on 07 May 13, 08:19:30
gavin schmitt is a gutless prick for not debating roy?

I completely agree! ...
By: falcocassady. on 07 May 13, 01:13:22
I completely agree! Though there is a misconception about alternative fuels like "animal flatulence" as you said lol and others (the biggest being ethanol) and that they? dont actually produce less emissions than gasoline in cars today. If you take a gallon of gasoline and a gallon of methanol/ethanol and light them both on fire then yes the alternative fuel produces less CO2, HC, and CO but put those gallons in 2 cars and that gas car will still go farther (produce more work)

Uhh? in almost all ...
By: falcocassady. on 07 May 13, 01:08:24
Uhh? in almost all of the "1st world" there is no such thing as deforestation anymore (and hasnt existed in almost 30 years), trees are now harvested like crops. Taking the US for example there is more land mass covered by forest then there was 50 years ago

It makes the oceans ...
By: thesnare100. on 05 May 13, 14:45:36
It makes the oceans more acidic due to deforestation when there aren't? enough plants to process the CO2

You are 100% ...
By: 1000frolly. on 05 May 13, 05:24:30
You are 100% correct; Schmidt should be fired immidiately for misleading the public? and scientific fraud.

My jaw dropped when ...
By: 1000frolly. on 05 May 13, 05:10:21
My jaw dropped when Gavin Schmidt, a well-known climate fraudster, would not even sit near and speak to Roy Spencer! Like he had a communicable disease or something. Absolute proof that Gavin Schmidt and those on his side have no evidence at all for their fraudulant 'science', are? scared of a debate with any real scientist, and are simply swine with their snouts fully in the public trough.

Which part is not ...
By: sdkee. on 04 May 13, 12:16:24
Which part is not true? The part that O2 only exists because of plants or that CO2 is way less than any time in the planet's existence? I'll guess you think the latter. The evidence is? (and since you warminsts like "consensus" I'll mention that this is the overwhelming majority opinion of geologists and paleontologists) that CO2 was several thousand ppm when dinosaurs were walking around and was positively sky high during the Cambrian explosion. Temps were also much hotter. Life thrived.

Not true...?
By: Arnold Ziffel. on 02 May 13, 04:16:03
Not true...?

I agree. The only ...
By: nelsma292. on 01 May 13, 12:57:11
I agree. The only problem is that the average person can vote, but does the average person read scientific? journals?

very? biased
By: sportthisnet. on 30 Apr 13, 16:19:47
very? biased

How is this person ...
By: Jimmy McGowan. on 30 Apr 13, 01:35:26
How is this person allowed to be? a climatologist?

In person? debate ...
By: newdimensionfilms. on 28 Apr 13, 23:15:01
In person? debate is not a good forum for scientific debate. Science is meant to be impersonal and fact based, which is why written debate is superior. Lawyers argue in person, scientists write their arguments down.

> So how much CO2? ...
By: sdkee. on 28 Apr 13, 10:21:18
> So how much CO2? can plants soak up? If they are one great big carbon dioxide sink, why are CO2 levels increasing? If not for plants there would by no O2. Before plants (BF) there was no O2. You would die immediately. Plants take CO2 and turn it into O2. They are literally starving for more CO2. So why more CO2? More than? what? The CO2 level now is way less than almost any period of the planet's existence.

Climate change or ...
By: Annette Giesbrecht. on 27 Apr 13, 13:09:41
Climate change or making the world colder will hurt the countries that have short growing seasons. It will also make life more expensive and not? everyone can tolerate those wind mills.

So how much CO2? ...
By: Sean Elliott. on 26 Apr 13, 04:23:03
So how much CO2? can plants soak up? If they are one great big carbon dioxide sink, why are CO2 levels increasing?

Gavin was right not ...
By: Richard482. on 24 Apr 13, 18:12:58
Gavin was right not to debate? Roy on talk show. It's far more progressive to have an online debate through email. This way facts and figures can be checked and verified.

Glad to see you ...
By: sdushdiu. on 24 Apr 13, 03:39:17
Glad to see you finally admit the nature of your political opinion. The fact is that the net effect that is occurring is the result of MANY? interactive processes. NOT simply one source. But its nice to see that you now believe that man does indeed control the weather.

If anyone at all is ...
By: Yuval Rishu Sanders. on 24 Apr 13, 03:26:20
If anyone at all is interested in? reliable evidence, instead of a bunch of bluster from uninformed pundits, try starting with climate[dot]nasa[dot]gov[slash]evidence. There is no excuse for the ignorance I am seeing in this comments section. Form your own opinions, but make sure that your opinions are informed ones. Otherwise, you're a fool.

For anyone? else ...
By: Yuval Rishu Sanders. on 24 Apr 13, 03:07:15
For anyone? else reading: this is how it looks when an irrational mind admits defeat.

Collusion to skew ...
By: sdushdiu. on 23 Apr 13, 19:37:23
Collusion to skew results and reporting shows no wrongdoing. OK. Get your head out of your ass. So it wasn't a scandal, it was? yet another illuminating event. Its nice that you adhere to the MS adage where 'its not a bug, its an undocumented feature'. Another know it all college student.

It is pathetic, ...
By: sdushdiu. on 23 Apr 13, 19:34:41
It is pathetic, where you begin with a foregone conclusion and then argue from a point supporting this outcome, especially given that you are? so utterly ignorant of the decrease in rate of warming as well as your erroneous opinion of the volume of Antarctic ice. So in that sense, you are more intimate with ignorance than you are aware!

Dimwit, the? actual ...
By: sdushdiu. on 23 Apr 13, 19:31:52
Dimwit, the? actual total volume of Antarctic ice is INCREASING, NOT shrinking. Go read Gretchen Cook-Anderson's? reports from NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center. And the ozone hole is Cyclical Chicken Little! Talk about ignorance.

Birth of a Giant Iceberg -- Climate Change Evidence? | Video
Posted by: VideoFromSpace

Video duration: 226 seconds
Global video hits: 4837

An enormous plain of Antarctic ice is splitting in two. Airborne NASA scientists discovered the nearly 20 mile-long crack during a research flight, capturing...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

yep. that was a ...
By: NotTri. on 19 May 13, 21:59:40
yep. that was a ipad3 in the parcel which i got from Apple-YT questionnaire content last week. and i can tell u , email? and your address is enough to get your iphone 5. i found it here >>> bit.ly/16Iat8m?=grwed

LOL "Either way I'm ...
By: Sir Lew. on 19 May 13, 06:29:25
LOL "Either way I'm done" The standard cop out for the lamest of the lame. Please explain? which laws of physics (my degree by the way) allow water to form at -19C. What relevance is frictional heat got to do with global warming?? God what a lame-o.

You're either a ...
By: Fuctmentality. on 19 May 13, 05:26:48
You're either a troll or an idiot who? doesn't understand basic physics, such as heat being generated by friction. Either way I'm done.

A bit sad that you ...
By: Sir Lew. on 18 May 13, 11:46:40
A bit sad that you try to pretend you have not read my posts when we all? know you have. (Suddenly you try and address the warm ice problem despite not reading my point!) Why do that? Because you do not want to admit that I have a point and that your initial response was rather ill considered. Everyone considers me an idiot? Why? Because I make a point you cannot refute? Please explain how you get water produced when ice goes from -20C to -19C.

Because I felt it ...
By: Fuctmentality. on 18 May 13, 08:02:02
Because I felt it necessary to inform you, that everyone consider's you an idiot. Well here's the thing when ice moves it creates friction, which produces heat. Also Because of the hydrogen bond ice/water contract when it it gets warmer, which can cause large ice sheets to fracture. Seriously? do they not have water where you are from?

I responded because ...
By: Sir Lew. on 18 May 13, 05:45:37
I responded because I wanted to give a full answer. If you don't read them that why do you bother to reply since you now don't know what you are replying to? Of course I know the properties of water and ice. How much water do you expect to see at -20C? Of course the real fact is that you now realise that your original response was rather silly but? rather than admit it you are now playing the usual warmist games. Your prerogative.

WHy do you respond ...
By: Fuctmentality. on 17 May 13, 18:40:17
WHy do you respond with three comments to me? You have to know that I'm not going read them, I mean seriously you don't even know what the properties of water and ice are. Seriously do they? not have h^2o where you are from?

pt3 This is the ...
By: Sir Lew. on 17 May 13, 12:31:01
pt3 This is the difference between scientifically unenquiring minds and people who have a background in reason and logical though. Some people just think that ice plus warming equals wet slippery slush.? Others realise that an ice slab 100m thick at -20C is unaffected by a surface change of half a degree over a century.

part 2 So the point ...
By: Sir Lew. on 17 May 13, 12:22:13
part 2 So the point is that the ice has NOT melted, it has FRACTURED as it does regularly and with no relevance to global surface temps. To spell it out - look at the video. What possible difference would the alleged 1C surface temperature change make to a 100m thick ice sheet even if it had occurred, which, as it happens is not even the? case for that part of the continent. None of the ice has melted because going from -20 to say -19 does NOT melt ice.

We are talking ...
By: Sir Lew. on 17 May 13, 12:19:48
We are talking about a lump of ice hundreds of metres thick. The surface temperature of that part of the Antarctic continent has remained constant over the last two decades although part of the peninsula has warmed by about 1C. Now you are trying to tell me that even if the 1C was applied to this ice? sheet it somehow penetrates through 100's of metres and has a discernable effect causing the ice to change its behaviour even though it is always well below 0C and frozen solid??

Seriously? You're ...
By: Fuctmentality. on 17 May 13, 12:02:10
Seriously? You're not just fucking wiht me? You are unfamiliar with the properties of ice? Seriously? Smooth ice produces less friction than rough ice, and water produces less friction than ice, understand now? Ice melts into water. I can' believe I had to spell? that out for you.

So please explain ...
By: Sir Lew. on 17 May 13, 09:55:25
So please explain how ice moves faster when its surface warms by a? fraction of a degree. In reality there is nothing unusual about ice breaking off the arctic. That part of the arctic has not warmed over the past 20 years by the way.

Yes. Yes. Maybe. ...
By: Fuctmentality. on 17 May 13, 07:55:12
Yes. Yes. Maybe. Seriously did you fail every science class you ever had??

No it couldn't. The ...
By: MrCoffeeFiend. on 16 May 13, 05:24:44
No it couldn't. The west Antartic? ice melting is not caused by man made CO2. It is from ocean current shifts. Most of the ice trapped in the Antartic will never melt until a land mass collides with Antartica.

There is no global ...
By: Arjun Sharma. on 14 May 13, 09:17:19
There is no global warming...... this huge glacier will actually dilute the salt content cooling our planet...... the rainfall and snowfall everywhere is going to be bad.... might? start huge calamities in these coming months

Except the trend ...
By: skisheavenly. on 14 May 13, 06:38:46
Except the trend is? upward

No I mean Man? Made ...
By: skisheavenly. on 14 May 13, 06:37:40
No I mean Man? Made Global Warming

So, I've basically ...
By: tstruss912. on 11 May 13, 18:21:04
So, I've basically determined what psychologically is going on with you and other deniers: anxiety surrounding change, chaos, disorder, etc drive you to seek to avoid that change at any cost, which includes all the behaviors you're exibiting. You want me and others to waste our time so that we can't fight for the kind of bills that cause you? anxiety. Well, I'm wise to your bullshit. I know that you have ZERO interest in the science, you know the truth,? and it's the ACTIONS that you fear.

If that Iceberg? is ...
By: mimi Jaz. on 10 May 13, 14:06:06
If that Iceberg? is gone... A super Tsunami is coming...

You mean? Mann-made ...
By: Sinisterene. on 08 May 13, 21:41:33
You mean? Mann-made global warming Prove it

Except the trend ...
By: skisheavenly. on 08 May 13, 00:36:20
Except the trend sucks? because of AGW

More break offs to ...
By: skisheavenly. on 08 May 13, 00:35:10
More break offs to come at an? ever increasing rate

So global warming ...
By: Sir Lew. on 07 May 13, 11:40:35
So global warming makes ice move faster? Has the temperature of that part of antarctica even changed over the past few? decades? Is this just another desperate attempt to portray a perfectly normal event as evidence of 'climate change'?

Lmao.?
By: Devon Martin. on 03 May 13, 20:34:41
Lmao.?

Exactly, I was ...
By: WorkAndHelpHumanity. on 03 May 13, 02:43:09
Exactly, I was taught about climate? change in grade school. Before climate change was the same thing as global warming.

Panel Debates the Impact of Human Action on Climate Change
Posted by: The Heat

Video duration: 627 seconds
Global video hits: 204

Anchor Mike Walter moderates a heated discussion between Michael Dorsey, a visiting fellow at Wesleyan University, and Marlo Lewis, a senior fellow at CEI, o...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Denialism of Climate Change and Evolution
Posted by: NatCen4ScienceEd

Video duration: 3509 seconds
Global video hits: 3101

Far more people are climate change deniers than evolution deniers, but both camps use similar strategies to promote their views. Genie Scott explores the con...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Yeah, and if the ...
By: ExperienceCounts2. on 19 May 13, 15:17:40
Yeah, and if the continents are drifting about, it should be noticeable. If trees are growing it should be noticeable. If it isn't noticeable then it isn't happening. Obviously trees don't grow and the scientific consensus on plate tectonics is a global conspiracy. What is climate again? Weather averaged over 30 years. You demand that change over 30? years must be perceptible to the unaided human senses, otherwise it isn't happening? Real fucking rocket scientist, aren't you.

I don't need a ...
By: Lord Bassman. on 19 May 13, 12:13:18
I don't need a person who can't read explain the evidence for me. All I ever said was that if the climate is changing it should be noticeable, especially if it's a 'rapid' global climate and Ontario is part of globe and nothing different around here. Christ almighty. ? Nobody is deny anything..

While you're ...
By: ExperienceCounts2. on 19 May 13, 10:11:21
While you're spouting global conspiracy theory, why don't you? address this issue: aren't there climate scientists in China, Australia, Germany, Canada, France, Argentina and a dozen other countries who will become instantly rich and world famous if they simply show definitive proof? Why is the financial incentive in your global conspiracy *always* in favor of science? Aren't there billions of dollars to be made by the fossil fuel industry by denying science? Paranoid much?

Okay, so what *of* ...
By: ExperienceCounts2. on 19 May 13, 10:07:38
Okay, so what *of* the warming of every planet in the solar system? What is climate? It's weather measured over a long period, 30 years being the usual measure. What planets do we have temperature probes on for the last 30 planetary years? One year on Mars is 1.88 Earth years. Have we been monitoring Mars global temperature for 56 years now? How many weather satellites do we have in? orbit around other planets? For how long? Cite you're f'n sources pal because I'm calling you a liar.

When people dont ...
By: stephen green. on 19 May 13, 07:01:16
When people dont have an arguement they always start to call others what they really are themselves.They also generally run down any opponents and then personally attack them if they start to prove them wrong.If your arguement stands up you dont need to go there.The truth in this debate is that it is politically driven and politicians fund sciencific research.....big business also stands to make huge profits from manmade global? warming.And what of the warming of every planet in the solar system

Actually no, ...
By: ExperienceCounts2. on 19 May 13, 02:00:17
Actually no, mathematics is based on "proof", science? is based on the "least incorrect" description when judged against all the evidence. There are also different types of science, climate is observational science. That's the major problem with the anti-science wackos, the experiment is *us*, our planet, our global climate. The monkeys choose sensationalist media over science and they are pissing away the future of generations to come in a global experiment, the outcome of which cannot be good

So you just ...
By: ExperienceCounts2. on 19 May 13, 01:51:59
So you just casually decided to stop by a? video on climate science denial and post that climate hasn't changed where you live, then when presented with evidence that is has changed significantly you change your tune to "I've never actually noticed any change". Remind me again, WTF has whether you noticed or not got to do a very rapidly changing global climate? That makes sense. For a troll.

I did say alot of ...
By: algeren. on 18 May 13, 12:25:35
I did say alot of religions not all :p , but? yes although Islam is the fastest growing it's all based around fear. Soon we will not put up with it, like they are doing in Nigeria. The tolerant will always win against the intolerant.

science is not a? ...
By: stephen green. on 18 May 13, 09:10:52
science is not a? democracy it is based on scientific proof which is based on experiments.These experiments have to be repeatable.

curious who is ...
By: DjDedan. on 18 May 13, 07:18:43
curious who is slated to replace genie scott?? and what's the process...?

vote-bots??
By: DjDedan. on 18 May 13, 07:08:33
vote-bots??

Sorry to bust yer ...
By: Lord Bassman. on 18 May 13, 02:46:34
Sorry to bust yer positive bubble there fella, but Islam is the fastest growing fairy tale on the planet, I really don't see hope that science & reason will triumph? any time soon. The majority of evolved humans on the planet cannot grasp the reality of how they came to be. The next big time sky daddy cumming yer way will be Allah.

Listen up fuckhead. ...
By: Lord Bassman. on 18 May 13, 02:41:04
Listen up fuckhead...... you can't even read a comment properly on youtube & you think yer educating folks out here? I never once said the climate was not changing. What I ? did say is that I've never actually noticed anything different over several decades. . I'll bet a Tim Horton's' coffee the only climate science you've ever done was on the end of some climatologist's dick, and that' the only hot thing you've your brain has absorbed. I can get as rude & basal as need be when attacked. ^_^

Is your google? ...
By: ExperienceCounts2. on 18 May 13, 02:32:43
Is your google? broken? Mine worked. Besides, pearls before swine and all that. Hansen, Mann & others projected a warming climate due to GHGs 25 years ago. The climate on average is warming as fast as those projections, and it's warming nearly twice as fast at the poles. Ocean pH change, seal level increases, all substantially correct projections made 15-30 years in advance. That *IS* evidence that the theory is correct - or at least evidence to anyone who isn't in full denial of reality.

"hide the decline"? ...
By: ExperienceCounts2. on 18 May 13, 02:17:07
"hide the decline"? ? NAS says in "Surface Temperature Reconstructions for the Last 2,000 Years" section 11: "The basic conclusion of Mann et al. was that the late 20th century warmth in the Northern Hemisphere was unprecedented during at least the last 1,000 years. This conclusion has subsequently been supported by an array of evidence that includes the additional large-scale surface temperature reconstructions and documentation of the spatial coherence of recent warming described above"

No, anti-science ...
By: ExperienceCounts2. on 18 May 13, 02:08:01
No, anti-science monkey, you do the work. As Sagan said, extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. You claim that there is manipulation/deception going on. Your claim requires that every national science academy, every reputable university and working climate scientists the world over are all somehow either missing this deception or else they are choosing to remain silent, yet you present ZERO evidence. Don't cry when people? laugh.

A lot of people ...
By: ExperienceCounts2. on 18 May 13, 01:54:36
A lot of people disagree with me about a lot of things, I don't call them monkeys. The ones I call monkeys are those who willingly turn their back on the? only process that has reliably and continuously improved the human condition, simply because they read some bullshit on a website somewhere. You choose your celebrities, politicians and your sensationalist media websites over rational thought and science. "Monkeys" is the least offensive term for you in my submarine sailor vocabulary.

Long term climate ...
By: ExperienceCounts2. on 18 May 13, 01:47:39
Long term climate data for ON and all of CA is available online for anyone to look at and you're stupid (dishonest?) enough to stand there and tell people it hasn't changed. I cited data and analysis published by your own province. I thought it was only ugly Americans who were willfully ignorant to the point of? monkeydom. Apparently the idiocy spreads via Timmy Hortons and Canadian Tire.

And what evidence ...
By: MrPalmersGamehendge. on 17 May 13, 21:48:28
And what evidence have you presented to support your claim of the "current estimates" that it will still take until 2080 blah blah blah? From what sensationalist media website did I spew crap? I never said the science on the ozone layer was exaggerated...like I said the science is the? science my problem is when people (apparently like you) speak of projections as if they are evidence. They are projections nothing more and nothing less.

Why the hell did my ...
By: algeren. on 17 May 13, 14:59:01
Why the hell did my comment receive too many negative votes? Lol. What I was saying is true. Also, no god is not real and how will I eat my words? Will I suddenly get smited or some crap? I am glad to have the knowledge that religion is slowly, but surely dying and I am sure that in my lifetime alot of religions will be reduced to nothing more? than small cults. Then again it's already like that for Christianity, I mean look how many branches of it there are.

"nothing wrong". ...
By: Luis Dias. on 17 May 13, 10:21:31
"nothing wrong". Now that you took the challenge into a whole series of questions, and then? demanding I do the work for you, let me reply in kind. Cite for me the exact documents where they state they found "nothing wrong" with these papers. Oh, and spare me your antics. Until you start producing actual work, demand none from others. Until you start respecting people as people (and not "monkeys", "anti-science", etc.), expect nothing but derision and loathing.

I "cited" a ...
By: Luis Dias. on 17 May 13, 10:12:25
I "cited" a celebrity in the same vein as citing the boy in the emperor's clothes tale. Many times, it takes a "moron" (in Zizek's? sense) to see the truth that some (allegedly) more intelligent people are unable to, given their propensity to try to be smarter than they actually are. Your ideology has blinded you into full hatred and prejudice, calling "monkeys" to anyone who dares disagree with your banalities and strawmen. Where does that even come from? To get a laugh out of creationists?

*still waiting? for ...
By: Lord Bassman. on 17 May 13, 04:31:42
*still waiting? for prooooof* I just gave you some proof! No answer? Are dogs wolves? Can you make a pet wolf? Have you *observed* a wolf evolving into a dog? Why can dogs hybridize with wolves but not foxes? Why did the Russian Fox experiment produce tame foxes that? barked & behave like dogs? You want a fish to reproduce a monkey. I just gave you several thousands of years of evolution that we know with certainty took place. (because we humans forced it.) Evolution is a process!

*" -- are you ...
By: Lord Bassman. on 17 May 13, 04:27:08
*" -- are you seriously trying to use? the temperature average from ONE MONTH!?* Not really. It sounded good tho...... I just think there is more to this than what they are saying.

* most of Ontario, ...
By: Lord Bassman. on 17 May 13, 04:10:48
* most of Ontario, and southern Quebec experiencing temperatures? more than 3 degrees above normal* Right. With frost warnings as of this week.(May 12) I know the fucking diff between weather & climate. Ontario is nearly as big as Europe and the climate is the same today as it's been for the last 50 years or so. Does global warming exclude Ontario? Or is the climate changing every where else but here? ...oh ya, forgot. Americans don't know jack shit about Canada.

Climate change is simple: David Roberts at TEDxTheEvergreenStateCollege
Posted by: TEDxTalks

Video duration: 1064 seconds
Global video hits: 73363

David Roberts is staff writer at Grist.org. In "Climate Change is Simple" he describes the causes and effects of climate change in blunt, plain terms. On Apr...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Delusional people ...
By: saxmanchiro. on 14 May 13, 23:24:35
Delusional people should just keep quiet. You were created by your parents, who's parents created them, etc.? Please read up on facts like Evolution. While you are at it, please put the fairytale holy book down for a bit and read some non-fiction. The Earth is 4.5 billion yrs old, with creatures that are made of eukaryotic cells( like you) being around for almost half of that time. Before that, just unicellular Prokaryotic organisms. Oh ya, who or what is this "creator".

Oh please...You ...
By: Ozzie DoLittle. on 13 May 13, 10:53:10
Oh please...You just made? me throw the fuck up....

Great talk. I? ...
By: Bud Crafter. on 12 May 13, 09:50:47
Great talk. I? think there's too much corruption in the US government to change course in time. When will people like the Koch brothers be held to account for their actions? Will anyone stop them? Or will we just continue allowing? them to drive our species to extinction so they can accumulate a few more billion?

> In 10,000 - ...
By: sdkee. on 11 May 13, 12:45:09
> In 10,000 - 30,000 years soon No. In the next 1000 years. Interglacials last around 10k years. We are 10k years into one. And the recent history of the planet is a cycle of temperate (10k years) and snowball (100k years). Your genius idea is that the real problem is? that we might get too hot. Because or a positive feedback (please do some homework on control theory wrt positive feedback) on CO2 concentration which has already been massively exceeded in the past? This is insane!

> Northwest Passage ...
By: sdkee. on 11 May 13, 12:37:46
> Northwest Passage is melting more and more And has been since the last ice age. Actually this year the arctic is locked up with ice. > These where also times? without a lot of Oxygen in the atmosphere? we need to live You don't know what you are talking about. There is no O2 without photosynthesis. All non life planets have no O2 at all. The reason CO2 is ppm levels is that plants are starving themselves to death by using too much CO2. For billions of years there has been O2 aplenty.

Life is created ...
By: Moto Rola. on 11 May 13, 12:36:06
Life is created when we are born. The earth is also created when we are born. When one dies the world dies too along with everyone in it because for the creator one second is a million years and a million? years a second. Life was written......and it continues to be written with new chapters the earth being a single one.

Temperatures are ...
By: ILoveDominikaDetko. on 08 May 13, 10:27:20
Temperatures are stable and not unusually, we are living atm in a pleistocene glaciation or the current ice age, temperatures did balance on earth till birth. For how long, cause Northwest Passage is melting more and more as like the pole caps do. When life evolved it was hot yes, this is also the reason why there was no? life such as mammals. These where also times without a lot of Oxygen in the atmosphere we need to live. Why is there an Ice age scheduled soon it is getting hotter, not colder.

Since the ARGOS ...
By: Nightverslonn. on 07 May 13, 23:34:13
Since the ARGOS monitoring stations were set up in our oceans, we have measured exactly 0.0C warming in? our oceans globally no warming of any kind

"And an ice age is ...
By: ge556. on 06 May 13, 14:14:58
"And an ice age is scheduled soon." In 10,000 - 30,000 years soon. Let's keep? that carbon in the ground in case people need it then.

Gladly. When we ...
By: Cajundaddydave. on 06 May 13, 14:13:10
Gladly. When we have meaningful ocean heat data below 700m let? me know. Currently this is our weakest data point with an extremely small sample size and error bars as wide as the Pacific so it is essentially useless as a climate metric. OHC from 0-700m (which we do have reasonably good data) tells a very different story. It is not warming over the last 10 years.

"There are still ...
By: ge556. on 06 May 13, 14:12:09
"There are still ice caps today (Arctic, Greenland, Antarctica) even with loads of manmade co2. The earth has been warming since exiting the LIA about 300 years ago and global ice continues to recede." === Minimum arctic sea ice volume is down 80% from 1979 to 2012. It's down 67% in the last 8 years, 2004-2012. It won't? be long until there's no ice cap in the summer, and that will accelerate warming (ice reflects more sunlight, water absorbs more). youtube.com/watch?v=YgiMBxaL19M

" So far, global ...
By: ge556. on 06 May 13, 13:44:44
" So far, global warming is simply not going according to IPCC projections." False. "IPCC's climate projections? on? target so far" arstechnica. com/science/2012/12/ipccs-clim�ate-projections-on-target-so-f�ar �

Why? is this man ...
By: YO3A007. on 05 May 13, 12:24:33
Why? is this man laughing? .

"The planet is now ...
By: grindupBaker. on 05 May 13, 00:47:22
"The planet is now freezing its balls? off compared to how it was when life evolved" unfortunately for the present land-based species, life evolved in the oceans.

in order to balance ...
By: grindupBaker. on 05 May 13, 00:42:17
in order to balance in&out TOA radiation (debate-neutral mid point of "best estimates" skeptic Dr. Lindzen +1.6 & pro Dr.? Hansen +2.8) then "Global Warming" will stop when the oceans are ~+2.2 degrees C warmer than about 60 years ago. It'll take a few centuries to mix. Deepest 80% ocean is avge. ~4.4 and that will rise to ~6.6 with my example. That is one of the most significant points that a layperson might understand.

For anybody ...
By: grindupBaker. on 05 May 13, 00:42:02
For anybody interested in what "Global Warming" is (almost nobody knows apparently) it's an increase in the ocean heat content. Surface temperature is a somewhat complex symptom that affects flora & fauna and it's an okayish proxy that depends on how the ocean is mixing, absorbing and releasing its heat at any time, including any new heat, it isn't "Global Warming". For example if "final" (exc. natural periodic vagaries)? CO2x2 average surface temperature of +2.2 degrees C is required

Finally a non-idiot ...
By: sdkee. on 04 May 13, 12:27:56
Finally a non-idiot. Yes, obviously we are adapted to the history of the (recent) past. > And the ice-age that is "scheduled soon" will come in something like 10000 years? or more. Nope. Typical interglacials are ~10k years. We are now about 10k years into one. > rapid shift in climate There is none. "Global Warming" is the "Witches Cause Warts" of the modern age. Actual measured data shows no warming in more than 10 years and USA rural? stations show no warming since 1930s.

you need to check ...
By: maunaowakea777. on 03 May 13, 23:21:03
you need to check back in after looking at the recent ocean heat content data from 700M to 2000M.? The negative pacific decadal oscillation has caused significant surface mixing since 2000 and massively increased ocean warming during this period. The arctic warming is happening 50 years ahead of models.

I? disagree with ...
By: Cajundaddydave. on 02 May 13, 15:59:01
I? disagree with this. The arctic continues to recede as we exit the LIA about 300 years ago.

There are still ice ...
By: Cajundaddydave. on 02 May 13, 15:54:38
There are still ice caps today (Arctic, Greenland, Antarctica) even with loads of manmade co2. The earth has been warming since exiting the LIA about 300 years ago and global ice continues to recede. Concern about co2 is fine as long as we don't just make stuff up to scare people. We have no idea what the consequences of increased co2 will bring. This video is scientifically unsupported speculation. So far, global warming is simply not going according to IPCC? projections.

None of the ...
By: gamevalor. on 02 May 13, 03:32:42
None of the downvotes on? this climate change scaretalk video? are visible in the video statistics lol.

Climate Change and Extreme Weather: Prof. Jennifer Francis (2013)
Posted by: ghostsofevolution

Video duration: 2430 seconds
Global video hits: 6860

Superb educational video summarizing climate change evidence through 2012. Click on blue time codes to advance to these topics: Note: The original 112-minute...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Yesterday in Omaha ...
By: husker hammer. on 15 May 13, 14:41:21
Yesterday in Omaha we broke a heat record for May. 101degrees, last time it was this hot 1915. Also the drought last year was worst in 800 years. Wait, 800 years ago there was a drought just as bad? And in 1915 it was 96 in may? Mmmm...something? doesn't add up. Floods, oh my god! Rains? oh my god. Tornados? Oh no! Climate change BS give it up. Al cashed in his hoax worked so you people can stop. Snow in Alaska is alarming? What a fucking Joke this crap is. Nibiru approaching is more credible.

What the heck is ...
By: Joe Acker. on 09 May 13, 21:35:50
What the heck is going on? Well, take a look at the artificial clouds that the jets produce over my city almost everyday. The day starts out clear and blue, but, then along come the jets, then, we get the milky white glowing cloud deck. Are they geo-engineering the planet? Could that the cause of 'climate change' ... you know, ... like you say ... 'Human Caused'! Is this not what geo-engineers speak of in their attempt to solve 'climate change', the seeding or spraying of the atmosphere with? Al?

Fuck Al Gore. I? ...
By: tstruss912. on 07 May 13, 00:46:17
Fuck Al Gore. I? don't give a shit about him. I care about protecting the home that our grandkids will inherit.

They should have ...
By: Johnongonteen. on 06 May 13, 19:36:04
They should have China stop building the 1-3 new coal? plants they are building every week. Gore's WTO was environmentally one of the worst pieces of anti-environmental legislation in the history of the world. He is one of the worst pieces of human excrement to ever served the corporations in congress & as Vice president

Weather is climate ...
By: Johnongonteen. on 06 May 13, 19:33:02
Weather is climate to the global warmers in Summer, but weather is weather in the? cold seasons.

Are you a ...
By: tstruss912. on 03 May 13, 23:41:28
Are you a climatologist?? Because the science is in--it's over. Now if you read journals like Science or Nature, they talk about WHAT to do about AGW, not if it's real. It's real, and very bad, worse than the predictions, as we find out every year.

Met office for ...
By: ge556. on 03 May 13, 21:43:43
Met office for March: "This was one of the coldest Marches in the historical series, dominated by easterly winds, with high pressure often to the north blocking? the milder Atlantic air." Yup. Change the Wind direction and the UK gets cold.

2012 was a big ...
By: ge556. on 03 May 13, 14:39:14
2012 was a big record breaker, warmest by? far here in the US. But, globally, it was the ninth? warmest. Europe, and the UK in particular, are very much affected by ocean currents and wind patterns from the southwest. There is a very real possibility that global warming will cause cooling in Europe. That's one reason people use the term "climate change"--overall, it's warming, but lots of the local changes are other things. I've read that polar warming might have caused our cold spring.

Climate change is ...
By: ge556. on 03 May 13, 14:38:29
Climate change is expected to be greatest at the? poles. There could be places where there is no clear trend of a change. There could be others where it becomes cooler, as it might in Europe. Be careful with the? using personal experience in assessing global trends. The same is true on the other side. The hot, dry year the US had in 2012 doesn't mean that every year will be that hot and dry.

A good source? of ...
By: ge556. on 03 May 13, 14:06:28
A good source? of global weather history, with maps showing weather extremes (e.g., March was cool in UK, US, Germany; hot in Australia and China): ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/

You said, " the ...
By: ge556. on 03 May 13, 13:50:44
You said, " the temperature? never went up exponentially as they predicted". I asked for a reference to the incorrect prediction. You gave me the actual temperature history as an example of the hockey stick. So the? "incorrect prediction" is the actual global temperature history? One of us is confused.

Here is the UK ...
By: ljlondon. on 03 May 13, 08:01:53
Here is the UK weather? summary for 2013 - note the met office is enthusiastic supporter of global warming, (ie. not denialists) .metoffice.gov. uk/climate/uk/summaries/2013

You know the hockey ...
By: ljlondon. on 03 May 13, 07:52:57
You know the hockey stick -? here is one - the old ones all look the same - grida. no/publications/other/ipcc_tar/?src=/climate/ipcc_tar/wg1/005.htm#figspm1 news.bbc .co .uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4349133.stm

Personal experience ...
By: ljlondon. on 03 May 13, 07:47:43
Personal experience mainly. I have lived in the UK 15 years, I remember 1997 as a really hot year, but since then nothing has? stood out. This year was bitterly cold right until last weekend, for the UK, Europe and the USA - all have recently had exceptional snow storms and weeks of freezing. When I say this people answer 'yeah but it is global' - like my personal experience doesn't count,, but at some stage it must do!

The data for April ...
By: ge556. on 03 May 13, 04:24:31
The data for April will be out soon. So you think it will prove your notions right? I don't think so. It should work to change march to? april below: ncdc.noaa. gov/news/ncdc-releases-march-2013-global-climate-report

"According to NOAA ...
By: ge556. on 03 May 13, 04:21:19
"According to NOAA scientists,? the globally averaged temperature for March 2013 tied with 2006 as the 10th warmest March since record keeping began in 1880. It also marked the 37th consecutive March and 337th consecutive month with a global temperature above the 20th century average. The last below-average March temperature was March 1976 and the last below-average temperature for any month was February 1985."

"According to NOAA ...
By: ge556. on 03 May 13, 04:20:50
"According to NOAA scientists, the globally averaged temperature for February 2013 tied with 2003 as the ninth warmest February since record keeping began in 1880. It also marked the 28th consecutive February and? 336th consecutive month (28 years) with a global temperature above the 20th century average. The last below-average February temperature and the last below-average temperature for any month was February 1985."

"According to NOAA ...
By: ge556. on 03 May 13, 04:20:20
"According to NOAA scientists, the globally averaged temperature for January 2013 tied with 1995 as the ninth warmest January since record keeping began in 1880. It also marked the 37th consecutive January and 335th consecutive month with a global temperature above the 20th century? average. The last below-average January temperature was January 1976 and the last below-average temperature for any month was February 1985."

And the increased ...
By: ge556. on 02 May 13, 22:05:59
And the increased ocean warming during the hiatus in surface warming means that global warming is still happening. "global warming has accelerated, with more overall global warming in the past 15 years than the prior 15 years. This is because about? 90% of overall global warming goes into heating the oceans, and the oceans have been warming dramatically." thinkprogress. org/climate/2013/03/25/1768601/in-hot-water-global-warming-has-accelerated-in-past-15-years-new-study-of-oceans-confirms/

" the temperature ...
By: ge556. on 02 May 13, 22:01:36
" the temperature never went up exponentially as they predicted" Reference, please.? Sounds like you got that from the disinformation campaign.

On what do? you ...
By: ge556. on 02 May 13, 21:59:38
On what do? you base your preference?

"Well, the ...
By: ge556. on 02 May 13, 21:57:17
"Well, the predictions,? made 20 years ago, and repeated since then showed the hockey stick with the steep increase in temperatures which they said was agreed at 90% likely to happen - but never happened." What are you talking about? Of course it happened. Every year since 2000 has been warmer (global average surface temp) than every year 1880-2000, except 1998, the exceptional El Nino year. Have you still not looked at the graph? climate.nasa.? gov/key_indicators/#globalTemp

$Earth\$

Earth's Final Hours - Timelapse :Satellite animated images Of Climate Change,1984 to 2012
Posted by: teletechnology

Video duration: 81 seconds
Global video hits: 145

This is timelaps video created with images of Landsat Satellite showing global climate change from 1984 to 2012 via Google earth. Timelaps events includes: T...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

$\"An Inconvenient Mind: The Mental Barriers to Confronting Climate Change\"$

"An Inconvenient Mind: The Mental Barriers to Confronting Climate Change"
Posted by: NDECI

Video duration: 4725 seconds
Global video hits: 355

Andrew Revkin Author of Dot Earth Environmental Blog The New York Times Video taken by the University of Notre Dame Climate Change and the Common Good confer...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Daily English News - Inside Story Americas - The US disconnect over climate change
Posted by: DailyEnglishNews

Video duration: 1503 seconds
Global video hits: 0

http://www.youtube.c om/DailyEnglishNews Daily English News Plz Subscrib for Latest News We try to understand why the US public is so divided over global warm...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Solving the Carbon Conundrum - Facts about climate change and what we can do about it.
Posted by: hohcells

Video duration: 5915 seconds
Global video hits: 1

Barry Hilton offers an engineers perspective on climate change, what we can do about it and the available technologies that can now be applied given the poli...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

The science of climate change
Posted by: UniversityOfBristol

Video duration: 3640 seconds
Global video hits: 2792

Professor Paul Valdes, School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol http://www.bristol.a c.uk/science/courses /undergraduate/ Climate change is rarel...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Calling me a ...
By: checkyoursources. on 19 May 13, 04:50:53
Calling me a hypocrite is like me calling you a supporter of fossil fuel air pollution which kills 3 million annually, do you support those deaths? 1) My electricity provider uses renewables 2) I suppose you? think the earlier flowering of plants in spring, global net ice loss, the detection by satellites of increasing absorption at CO2 wavelengths and multiple other sources of empirical data are not indicators of the Earth gaining energy faster than it is losing it?

It takes an act of ...
By: gyddrftggggvbhf. on 16 May 13, 17:28:06
It takes an act of faith to use the present tense to describe something that stopped over 11 years ago. As for more heat going into the Oceans, that's a fantasy cooked up by people clinging to the CO2 myth - sparse pre-ARGO data; 'adjusted' data since. Carry on believing? if it makes you happy (but make sure you're walking everywhere, and don't turn your heating on, and turn your computer off - or are you a hypocrite?).

Direct from RSS: ...
By: checkyoursources. on 15 May 13, 09:12:17
Direct from RSS: Channel TLT 1979 to 2013-04 Trend= +0.130 K/decade (yep warming) and UAH:1979 to 2013 trend is: +0.138 K per decade. Name a dataset that shows cooling over the last 40 years? The warming hasn't stopped, the Oceans have a higher specific heat capacity than the atmosphere so? the Earth is still accumulating heat but more is going into the Oceans.

Because ocean has ...
By: grindupBaker. on 14 May 13, 07:22:08
Because ocean has 97.5% of ecosystem heat, freshwater has 2.3% land+air has 0.2%. The heat is merely passing through the surface into the oceans and it'll be doing this for centuries, the final little bit will still be going into the oceans in a couple of thousand years if the ocean gets a bit sated with CO2 & reduces its uptake. We just get a taste of what will happen next century when the ocean? burps. Study ENSO, AMO & THC if you are impartial & have time/interest.

At 24:35 it's fine ...
By: grindupBaker. on 14 May 13, 07:22:04
At 24:35 it's fine to play with temperature graphs & draw competing lines through them but he doesn't tell you the underlying reality. "Global Warming" is not surface temperature graphs & you can draw? lines through them to your heart's content. "Global Warming" is an increase in the ocean heat content. You need to understand what this means before you can hope to understand the babble about everywhere.

At 22:50 FYI what ...
By: grindupBaker. on 14 May 13, 07:16:09
At 22:50 FYI what he says & that graph ~1930-1960 apparently scientists wrote papers with clever theories about that 1940 bump & since they put Argo floats in they found the method ~1930-1960 (pull water up in buckets and stick a thermometer in it on the kitchen table) was pretty crappy & they managed to re-work it a bit and it still has that shape mostly but less of a bump. Now they throw out all early papers about that bump because it was just a "data artifact" (Dr. Trenberth? phrase). LOL

Suggest you Google ...
By: grindupBaker. on 14 May 13, 06:50:59
Suggest you Google coal? reserves oil natural gas world consumption production and similar words. You'll get all kinds of tables & graphs from web sites (some from the industries themselves), look for ones with dates, find a few that are similar so you know the data is pretty accurate. I think it's that simple.

then move to a ...
By: sion7186. on 20 Apr 13, 19:52:18
then move to a warmer climate it puts any thing that relies on the cold at risk fresh water does not mix well? with salt water.

You've figured out ...
By: Johnny Black. on 20 Apr 13, 03:55:30
You've figured out greenhouse effect...wait...global warming...wait...I forgot we are now calling it "Climate change" now to encompass? virtually anything so that nobody could ever pin it down as being WRONG! These are the "unbelievers " of reality.

I'm writing a paper ...
By: Kieran Giles. on 15 Apr 13, 04:05:25
I'm writing a paper on the difference between the recent climate change and previous climatic events for my Palaeoclimate Change module. I noticed that you displayed a lot of curves that supported large anthropological input? to our global carbon dioxide levels for the last few years. I would like to know some of the sources for those curves (the journals they came from). Could have a small reference list in the description? Thanks for uploading a good lecture.

"The point is that ...
By: TheRealArchAngel. on 15 Apr 13, 01:51:40
"The point is that the Cloward-Piven strategy is seen by some people as a way of bringing about revolution, and some of those people want revolution." The 3rd? major Cap&Trade they are all hot up for will merely cause a World Depression that will kill off the poor then middle classthen the elllitists who depend on the now dead poor for "power"and middle class for tax revenue/union dues I guess equally dead is "equal" "it will not bring revolution in the US" Of course not It's a "World Economy"

I didn't say that ...
By: randomxnp. on 14 Apr 13, 22:18:19
I didn't say that Cloward-Piven is not silly. Socialism is clearly silly; to me religion is rather silly, though not nearly as silly as socialism. The point is that the Cloward-Piven strategy is seen by some people as a way of bringing about revolution, and some of those people want revolution. I agree that it will not bring revolution in the US, but I don't think that will stop people trying, especially if there is revolution somewhere in the EU soon.?

Actually the error ...
By: randomxnp. on 14 Apr 13, 19:47:59
Actually the error might be a total lack of increase in water vapour in the atmosphere. NASA data to 2001 show no significant change (slight increase, not significant by any reasonable statistical model) to 700 hPa (about 3000m altitude, 10,000 ft) and a slight drop? starting in the 1990s above there up to about 300 hPa (about 9000m). All models assume increase throughout this layer. Link below is a graph of raw data, not from any study. bit[dot]ly[slash]10Vyke5

"Have you heard of ...
By: TheRealArchAngel. on 14 Apr 13, 19:37:50
"Have you heard of the Cloward-Piven strategy?" Utter silliness Governments that have collapsed or gone insolvant from Economic strain cant "gaurentee the income of the people" The US Feds are broker then the State governments from Welfare and the lost of tax revenue from the 2 cap&trade attempts Lasty,while there is a number of people willing to give up Liberty for security in the U.S. it is not a trait of the majority of rebelious by nature "Americans"..it WILL turn into a? fight

"assumptions about ...
By: TheRealArchAngel. on 14 Apr 13, 19:07:13
"assumptions about feedback due to water vapour, have proved to be incorrect." Of course, because they are considering water vapour a "feed back" instead of the principle carrier of? heat Lot of the "Climate Histoy" lectures like to mention John Tyndall but often forget to mention his conclusions that it's the "second sea" of trace to 1% water vapour between the surface and cloud line that allows the "biosphere" part of the atmosphere to retain tempature independent of sun and surface temps

Have you heard of ...
By: randomxnp. on 14 Apr 13, 18:58:28
Have you heard of the Cloward-Piven strategy? It is a political strategy to take control. Many of these people have shown that power over people is more important to? them than actual economic resources.

Well the current ...
By: randomxnp. on 14 Apr 13, 18:55:08
Well the current computer models have made some predictions. Some of the predictions that are made by all models and are distinctive of core assumptions in the model, assumptions about feedback due to water vapour, have proved to be incorrect. Just to help your English (this is a tricky one, and your English is better than my second language, so this is not criticism) - hypotheses is the plural of hypothesis.?

"Stick a vehicle ...
By: TheRealArchAngel. on 14 Apr 13, 18:54:31
"Stick a vehicle emmisions testing device on your exhaust and you'll find Obama's EPA Czar's Ire in trying to tax? co2 emmision in that it reads only 66ml of co2 per gallon.all of it from ethonol fermentation contamination" ANd of course The EPA Czar was challanged by the coal powerplant industry in US to charge "CO2 emmisions" taxes based on stack emmisions testing devices instead of "calculations".( S.E.T.D. will only show nitrogen and water vapor as only"emmisions")...so EPA had to back down

"So I am going to ...
By: TheRealArchAngel. on 14 Apr 13, 18:45:51
"So I am going to do my? part and fire up my 1968 pickup and burn a bunch of gas." To what end? Part of the hype is Aristitile's chemical Equilibrium's notion that all complex chemicals must break down simpler chemicals...which isn't true for combustion or Exothermic reactions Stick a vehicle emmisions testing device on your exhaust and you'll find Obama's EPA Czar's Ire in trying to tax co2 emmision in that it reads only 66ml of co2 per gallon.all of it from ethonol fermentation contamination

"just? think of the ...
By: TheRealArchAngel. on 14 Apr 13, 18:34:28
"just? think of the possibilities." Actually it is human naature to fear change I mean look at this 3 centimeter to 20? centimeter rise in the ocean if all the ice sheets and glaciers melt (Impossibility, but the fear is there) Other then the hype of "20 to 30 feet flooding" a impossiibility as the 99% fresh water in the evaporation/percipitation cycle locked up as glaciers and ice sheets don't add up to cause that much rise, Ice is not a "regulator of Climate" its part of heat exchange cycles

"One more way the ...
By: TheRealArchAngel. on 14 Apr 13, 18:19:03
"One more way the globalist want to control people and the world!!!! " Right...they wanted to nearly collapse the world Economy in October 2008? via the stupidity of the November 2007 US "biofuel initative" and make financially weaker governments like Spain and Greece go almost insolvent by continuing the stupidity with a double down on US June Cap&trade attached to a back of a spending bill that caused the current world reccesion How do "ellitist" win when the taxes they live off dry up?

"Of course the ...
By: TheRealArchAngel. on 14 Apr 13, 18:09:47
"Of course the hypothesis has made testable predictions" First stepin Scientific Meyhod is Observace...they've done that Second step is to derive the Hypothises....they've done that Next step is to create a set of predictions....they've done that via computer models The step? after the predictions continue to match observance is eliminate all other possibilities for results by tests and verification...so far they are still trying to get a working prediction(computer model)

Err Isn't Climate a ...
By: TheRealArchAngel. on 14 Apr 13, 08:31:53
Err Isn't Climate a Geographical locationb determined by location on earth,elevation,and relative percipitation? The 33 year tempature/weather trends is "Weather Variability" which also has 2 year,7 year, and 11 year cycls and determines droughts,extreme storms or such that can effect local Ecology..but not neccessarily Enviroment/Ecology is the part of what lives in the area cause? of local resources plus wether and Climate allowing for Rain Forest or Desert ,Grasslands/grain belt

I want a warm earth ...
By: Obongo Geddon. on 13 Apr 13, 16:37:20
I want a warm earth. We could grow more food and we could wear less clothes. There are many? advantages to a warmer earth. Tropical fruits could be grown in more area's providing vast amounts of inexpensive food. An ice free North pole would provide greater commerce with less hazards. Greenland could become one big garden, just think of the possibilities. We could have so many wonderful things if the earth was warmer. So I am going to do my part and fire up my 1968 pickup and burn a bunch of gas.

Wow, so throwing ...
By: randomxnp. on 11 Apr 13, 14:10:59
Wow, so throwing insults around to silence sceptics is taken as acceptable is it now?? Style makes a lecture worth seeing, does it? Personally I go for substance, and some of my university lectures had poor style but were far more worth listening to than this propagandist. I mean, he rounds off one figure by 20%, then blithely uses it as if it was still accurate.

Climate Change
Posted by: scishow

Video duration: 652 seconds
Global video hits: 314249

In which Hank details the five scariest things that will likely happen because of climate change. Follow SciShow on Twitter: http://www.twitter.c om/scishow L...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

The earth will ...
By: wordrush. on 20 May 13, 06:52:21
The earth will survive. In fact all of these possible outcomes can be viewed as ways to deal with the cause of the problem by earths systems so the balance will eventually be restored ( or maybe not because we could upset things enough to permanently damage our planet just haven't yet). The issue is all of the species trying to live on this planet including homo moronic (humans). We have impacted our climate and we can repair it. Or? we can just wait for the earth to kill us off.

Disturbing? stuff
By: Leon Scherry. on 20 May 13, 02:11:19
Disturbing? stuff

Meh, the Earth has ...
By: HarrisonRocks. on 19 May 13, 22:40:24
Meh, the Earth has been through worse. The Earth will be fine and life will just restart from the last checkpoint and carry on from there.?

i laugh when people ...
By: jakesweet1000. on 19 May 13, 14:55:03
i laugh when people say solar power is a renewable energy, it isn't don't believe those? liars. in a few billion years the sun will exhaust all of its power. the people must choose something sustainable.

More realistically ...
By: St0ttZy. on 19 May 13, 13:10:49
More realistically we will figure out how to remove co2 from the atmosphere? before e stop driving suvs.

sorry i meant *from ...
By: Sartorius988. on 18 May 13, 20:27:34
sorry i meant *from the earth.?

I understand theres ...
By: Sartorius988. on 18 May 13, 20:27:16
I understand theres global warming, but the only way to really stop it is through science. Within the next 50 years its feasible to attempt to divert a tiny fraction of the sun's rays onto the earth causing the cooling? needed to save the planet.

you are correct. i ...
By: tiegert1. on 18 May 13, 19:10:14
you are correct. i am glad to see freaky? ipad3 which i got previous week as a gift from yt/apple questionnaire. but i can tell you one thing, dont forget to give ur email id and delivery address to receive via courier. if you wanna try just try now ==> bit.ly/12jhuqh?=slent

There's trash ...
By: zymethpwn. on 18 May 13, 18:51:40
There's trash floating all over the ocean. We're burning millions of year's worth of oil/coal. We have covered so much of the earth with houses and roads and things that are not supposed to be there. Then there's deforestation, fracking, dams, and other things. How could that not affect the planet? Also,? stop giving thumbs ups to all your own comments. That's just sad.

Just a small tip ...
By: Riglaxable. on 18 May 13, 14:49:26
Just a small tip bro: using insults to get your point across is not a good idea. Secondly, we need more information regarding the numbers of such a scenario. When did this happen before? How do we know? What evidence is there of this claim? Find me a study to back up that once CO2 levels get to a? certain level, the first scenario will happen.

Then please explain ...
By: Riglaxable. on 18 May 13, 14:43:41
Then please explain to me how? it's possible. I'd like to know.

I've done research, ...
By: Riglaxable. on 18 May 13, 14:40:26
I've done research, and most of the research shows the number is significantly small. The general consensus is 7%. The Earth goes through warming and cooling periods all the time, determined by the solar activity. The cooling? periods are called "mini Ice Ages". The last one ended around 1800, and that's why temperature has been rising -- because there's a lot of solar activity. Also, reports show there's been no warming for the last decade.

u're right. i am ...
By: Tessa Maertens. on 18 May 13, 14:36:50
u're right. i am lucky to get my gift iphone 5 from youtube questionnaire for? nothing. And, email and your address is enough to get your iphone 5. i found it here -> bit.ly/17JyZpO?=wplnt

I'm sorry, but did ...
By: Riglaxable. on 18 May 13, 14:30:35
I'm sorry, but did I call your post stupid? Because I don't think I did; if you want, I'd gladly discuss anything with you, but calling my? post stupid just because you don't agree isn't the best way to go. Anyway, yes, people are reducing the forests, but even then, CO2 impacts the actual temperature very little. It's too weak of a greenhouses gas: water vapor is the main greenhouse gas on Earth, and that's because it traps 850% more radiation than CO2. Have a good day.

Can you back any of ...
By: Bally Hoo. on 18 May 13, 12:59:18
Can you back any of this up? Or are you just a? complete idiot?

Dont worry about or ...
By: Wowfunnyjunior2. on 18 May 13, 04:12:13
Dont worry about or pay attention to climate change. It will fix itself before we could possibly do anything noticeable about it. Though until then the consequences will simply have to be dealt with as any measures to stop it would result in? the extinction of a large portion of our species. Simply put, the earth will get hotter but it will fix itself soon and until then we just have to suck it up.

Youtube wouldn't ...
By: javier flores. on 18 May 13, 00:43:16
Youtube wouldn't let me spell? idot correctly. :(

Click on 'show ...
By: javier flores. on 18 May 13, 00:42:40
Click on 'show comment' to see an example? of an idot.

"Seriously,? do you ...
By: zymethpwn. on 16 May 13, 17:47:07
"Seriously,? do you even think humans can change the Earth's climate?" Yes I do

*thermohaline*? my ...
By: daniel duguid. on 16 May 13, 15:02:26
*thermohaline*? my mistake.

no, they can't but ...
By: daniel duguid. on 16 May 13, 15:01:18
no, they can't but the shit tonne of gasses we're producing can listen again to the thermalhaline circulation shutdown again, then use your tiny brain and think about what could happen and stop acting like a 8 year old who thinks they know all the secrets of? the universe

What about the ...
By: Jack Franko. on 16 May 13, 13:35:27
What about the melting poles ice?and the rising CO2 level in both air and oceans? Honey the climate change is irreversible and we are already in? the middle of a mass extinction !!

Most of the sea ...
By: x42brown. on 16 May 13, 09:12:06
Most of the sea level rise to date is caused be the thermal expansion of the water but the melting of ice? on land (ice sheets and glaciers) has the potential to cause much bigger rises.

/watch?v=YB7qD- ...
By: Ellie Ong.. on 16 May 13, 06:50:19
/watch?v=YB7qD-w4vVw??

Lol 9:46, don't? ...
By: Ehsan Matin. on 16 May 13, 04:04:27
Lol 9:46, don't? worry I'm your mummy

Climate Change: A Policy Forecast
Posted by: UChicago

Video duration: 3147 seconds
Global video hits: 463

What are the prospects for legislative action surrounding climate change this year? And what effect, if any, will those policies have on reducing carbon emis...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

UVU: Peace & Justice Studies: Climate Change and Violence with Dr. Banuri
Posted by: UtahValleyUniversity

Video duration: 4632 seconds
Global video hits: 0

We live in a world that seems forever captured in violence and injustice. Utah Valley University has joined over 300 colleges and universities now offering a...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Climate Change: Hope for the Best, Prepare for the Worst
Posted by: MilkenInstitute

Video duration: 3628 seconds
Global video hits: 301

Speakers: Nathaniel Keohane, Vice President, International Climate Program, Environmental Defense Fund Michael Levi, David M. Rubenstein Senior Fellow for En...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40

global warming Related Videos

global warming Videos

Watching: Climate Change video compilations