Climate Change video compilations - By global warming Videos

global warming Videos

Watching: Climate Change video compilations

Astronomy Cast Episode 308: Climate Change
Posted by: Fraser Cain

Video duration: 2985 seconds
Global video hits: 0

Astronomy Cast Episode 308: Climate Change.

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

How do they get a ...
By: Fred Newton. on 18 Jun 13, 03:02:08
How do they get a global temp from before records from? the past before records when ice cores are from a limited part of the planet

Dam, had no idea ...
By: Eric Charland. on 18 Jun 13, 02:59:19
Dam, had no idea you had? one before 309 at 11pm

greener? energy ...
By: icarusfactor. on 18 Jun 13, 02:58:44
greener? energy will make it possible to get energy to places that dont have it. Current oil coal methods wont fix this

How about temp rise ...
By: icarusfactor. on 18 Jun 13, 02:53:43
How about temp rise and earthquakes , heating up? the plates?

and = is?
By: icarusfactor. on 18 Jun 13, 02:49:26
and = is?

Hydro carbons once ...
By: icarusfactor. on 18 Jun 13, 02:48:45
Hydro carbons once burnt takes loads of energy to make them hydrocarbons again. Water and easily change from hydrogen and oxygen and back? to water with low energy cost.

H2O I? mean
By: icarusfactor. on 18 Jun 13, 02:46:52
H2O I? mean

Why I would like to ...
By: icarusfactor. on 18 Jun 13, 02:46:41
Why I would like to see water fue H2Ol cells used for fuel and? electric generation.

Still, it's amazing ...
By: Rob Ross. on 18 Jun 13, 02:44:35
Still, it's amazing you can fact-check in real time. Thanks Information? Age!!!!

Methane is cleaner ...
By: icarusfactor. on 18 Jun 13, 02:43:18
Methane is cleaner to burn it off,? then letting it leak.

China built the ...
By: icarusfactor. on 18 Jun 13, 02:41:29
China built the great wall to? hold off the huns and pushed them toward Rome. Tells you how bad these guys where :)

The huns caused the ...
By: icarusfactor. on 18 Jun 13, 02:39:53
The huns caused the dark ages. awful? bunch of barbarians.

The more energy in ...
By: icarusfactor. on 18 Jun 13, 02:37:08
The more energy in the ocean or atmosphere means more energy for? storms.

If only we could ...
By: randy8118. on 18 Jun 13, 02:35:17
If only we could take the CO2 from venus and? move it to mars and make two habitable planets.

space is not the ...
By: icarusfactor. on 18 Jun 13, 02:34:33
space is not the best to? radiate away heat away to.

350 parts per ...
By: icarusfactor. on 18 Jun 13, 02:30:22
350 parts per million? is the goal.

It's entirely ...
By: Jeff Setzer. on 18 Jun 13, 02:27:46
It's entirely possible I may? be picking up a cake pop maker next time I'm in a dept store :$

Cool ? double header
By: Bob Drach. on 18 Jun 13, 02:25:20
Cool ? double header

There was that ...
By: Citizen Gold. on 18 Jun 13, 02:25:17
There was that game? on Sliders that was intellectual and physical. Gamify science to the point of having "sports" stars.

Oooh...sciency!?
By: Robert Blaskiewicz. on 18 Jun 13, 02:24:23
Oooh...sciency!?

I found the cake? ...
By: Rob Ross. on 18 Jun 13, 02:23:01
I found the cake? pop segment wonderfully amusing.

#FOD FTW!!?
By: Citizen Gold. on 18 Jun 13, 02:21:53
#FOD FTW!!?

deja vu all? over ...
By: Jeff Setzer. on 18 Jun 13, 02:21:44
deja vu all? over again :)

Hey,? folks!
By: Robert Blaskiewicz. on 18 Jun 13, 02:21:17
Hey,? folks!

Good? evening....
By: Dan Bice. on 18 Jun 13, 02:20:46
Good? evening....

Climate change is simple: David Roberts at TEDxTheEvergreenStateCollege
Posted by: TEDxTalks

Video duration: 1064 seconds
Global video hits: 75495

David Roberts is staff writer at Grist.org. In "Climate Change is Simple" he describes the causes and effects of climate change in blunt, plain terms. On Apr...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Ok to be fair i ...
By: grant2225. on 18 Jun 13, 03:18:38
Ok to be fair i will ask that you name 100 scientist you know of? Actually i do believe we are causing issues for the planet( not destroying by any means) but i? also see and agenda behind the climate change alarmist hysteria. Look forward to hearing the 100 or so scientists you take advice from.

Open your eyes. 97% ...
By: gsc2011. on 17 Jun 13, 18:00:04
Open your eyes. 97% of scientists agree that we are causing climate change. That is what these people are educated in, and what? they spend their entire lives studying. It is SCIENCE. I am not an expert by any means, but I am going to listen to what people who actually know what they're talking about when it comes to climate change, and not ignorant hacks like you.

Where are the facts ...
By: grant2225. on 12 Jun 13, 04:10:02
Where are the facts and evidence in this presentation . All i could see was scare mongering? once again. By someone who has not expertise to comment on the matter of the climate changing.

Just scare tactics. ...
By: politicaljunkie4ever. on 11 Jun 13, 17:58:04
Just scare tactics. He mentions feedbacks briefly but this is the area where the climate scientists have virtually no idea on. The best scientific evidence is that excess water vapour leans towards being a negative feedback! If negative, then we have absolutely? nothing to worry about. I can tell scary bedtime stories too. But as

The year 2300? Yawn ...
By: klondike444. on 11 Jun 13, 06:55:28
The year 2300? Yawn. 2100? Uh-huh. How about you tell us what we, or our children or our grandchildren (as appropriate) are likely to face? That's all there's any chance of our responding to. Constantly talking about remote dates in the future is the ongoing curse of climate change discussion. Make it about sooner. ? Make it personal!

Wow, never heard ...
By: Andrea Li-Yan. on 04 Jun 13, 05:13:43
Wow, never heard that before. Did you make that up? because that is some crazy shit. ?

Deve ser afilhado ...
By: Wa Mor. on 03 Jun 13, 02:18:36
Deve ser afilhado do Gore.? Mentiroso e fazendo uma pol�tica de causar p�nico aos ouvintes. Deletem esse v�deo.

Well,? that appears ...
By: Zog Hackendorft. on 25 May 13, 16:16:36
Well,? that appears to be the opinion floated on Anthony "no degree and no currently accepted certification in meteorology" Watts has posted on his website, but if you do a little fact checking you find this from the science nerds at windows2universe: "The Argos and BIOS program have both published results that confirm that the ocean? is warming. The whole ocean has warmed about 0.1 degree Fahrenheit (0.055 degree Celsius) in the past 30-50 years." They then go on at length to say this is bad.

Well done,? David: ...
By: BenE. Taylor. on 20 May 13, 15:21:43
Well done,? David: very clear. However, simply look around you at what is happening in the world. It matters not what I/you/we say: nothing will change...

Delusional people ...
By: saxmanchiro. on 14 May 13, 23:24:35
Delusional people should just keep quiet. You were created by your parents, who's parents created them, etc. Please read up on facts like Evolution. While you are at it, please put the fairytale holy book down for a bit and read some non-fiction. The Earth is 4.5 billion yrs old, with creatures that are made of eukaryotic cells( like you) being around for almost half of that time. Before that, just unicellular Prokaryotic? organisms. Oh ya, who or what is this "creator".

Oh please...You ...
By: Ozzie DoLittle. on 13 May 13, 10:53:10
Oh please...You just made me throw? the fuck up....

Great talk. I think ...
By: Bud Crafter. on 12 May 13, 09:50:47
Great talk. I think there's too much corruption in the US government to change course in time. When will people like the Koch brothers be held to account for their actions? Will anyone stop them? Or will we just continue allowing? them to drive our species to extinction? so they can accumulate a few more billion?

> In 10,000 - ...
By: sdkee. on 11 May 13, 12:45:09
> In 10,000 - 30,000 years soon No. In the next 1000 years. Interglacials last around 10k years. We are 10k years into one. And the recent history of the planet is a cycle of temperate (10k years) and snowball (100k years). Your genius idea is that the real problem is that we? might get too hot. Because or a positive feedback (please do some homework on control theory wrt positive feedback) on CO2 concentration which has already been massively exceeded in the past? This is insane!

> Northwest Passage ...
By: sdkee. on 11 May 13, 12:37:46
> Northwest Passage is melting more and more And has been since the last ice age. Actually this year the arctic is locked up with ice. > These where also times? without a lot of Oxygen in the atmosphere we need? to live You don't know what you are talking about. There is no O2 without photosynthesis. All non life planets have no O2 at all. The reason CO2 is ppm levels is that plants are starving themselves to death by using too much CO2. For billions of years there has been O2 aplenty.

Life is created ...
By: Moto Rola. on 11 May 13, 12:36:06
Life is created when we are born. The earth is also created when we are born. When one dies the world dies too along with everyone in it because for the creator one second? is a million years and a million years a second. Life was written......and it continues to be written with new chapters the earth being a single one.

Temperatures are ...
By: ILoveDominikaDetko. on 08 May 13, 10:27:20
Temperatures are stable and not unusually, we are living atm in a pleistocene glaciation or the current ice age, temperatures did balance on earth till birth. For how long, cause Northwest Passage is melting more and more as like the pole caps do. When life evolved it was hot yes, this is also the reason why there was no life such as mammals. These where also times without a lot of Oxygen in the atmosphere we need to live. Why is there an Ice age scheduled soon? it is getting hotter, not colder.

Since the ARGOS ...
By: Nightverslonn. on 07 May 13, 23:34:13
Since the ARGOS monitoring stations were set up in our oceans, we have measured exactly? 0.0C warming in our oceans globally no warming of any kind

"And? an ice age is ...
By: ge556. on 06 May 13, 14:14:58
"And? an ice age is scheduled soon." In 10,000 - 30,000 years soon. Let's keep that carbon in the ground in case people need it then.

Gladly. When we ...
By: Cajundaddydave. on 06 May 13, 14:13:10
Gladly. When we have meaningful ocean heat data below 700m let me know. Currently this is our weakest data point with an extremely small sample size and error bars as wide as the Pacific so it is essentially useless as a climate metric. ? OHC from 0-700m (which we do have reasonably good data) tells a very different story. It is not warming over the last 10 years.

"There are still ...
By: ge556. on 06 May 13, 14:12:09
"There are still ice caps today (Arctic, Greenland, Antarctica) even with loads of manmade co2. The earth has been warming since exiting the LIA about 300 years ago and global ice continues? to recede." === Minimum arctic sea ice volume is down 80% from 1979 to 2012. It's down 67% in the last 8 years, 2004-2012. It won't be long until there's no ice cap in the summer, and that will accelerate warming (ice reflects more sunlight, water absorbs more). youtube.com/watch?v=YgiMBxaL19M

" So far, global? ...
By: ge556. on 06 May 13, 13:44:44
" So far, global? warming is simply not going according to IPCC projections." False. "IPCC's climate projections? on target so far" arstechnica. com/science/2012/12/ipccs-clim�ate-projections-on-target-so-f�ar �

Climate Change
Posted by: scishow

Video duration: 652 seconds
Global video hits: 325511

In which Hank details the five scariest things that will likely happen because of climate change. Follow SciShow on Twitter: http://www.twitter.c om/scishow L...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Anyway, did I thank ...
By: marymungoandmidge. on 19 Jun 13, 02:36:17
Anyway, did I thank you for cheering me the fuck up? lolz.. 20 - 80? years?, that's quite optimistic of you really, in reality could be much sooner!.. Chesty x

Yeah, no. The earth ...
By: Seven Martin. on 19 Jun 13, 02:04:13
Yeah, no. The earth is screwed because the sun wil? expand and destroy it and you will die in 20-80 years!

Piano!?
By: kaicook100. on 18 Jun 13, 22:10:00
Piano!?

Just now look, the? ...
By: poisonrune. on 18 Jun 13, 17:14:17
Just now look, the? bee population is drastically falling. We're fucked! RUN!

but will it be soon ...
By: Michael Morris. on 18 Jun 13, 02:18:53
but will it be soon :( like how meny years will it take if it was going to do so :( and will? it do so

"You know who ...
By: ackbarfan13. on 17 Jun 13, 20:01:01
"You know who doesn't have air conditioning?? Cucumbers....and cows." I laughed so hard! lol

Climate change ...
By: TheInglip. on 17 Jun 13, 13:43:48
Climate change itself won't kill anyone until its direct effects on temperature affect things like rainfall patterns or ocean pH to cause elevated temperature, floods, droughts, etc, and render the environment unsuitable for us humans. In industrialised nations deaths will be offset by air conditioning and controlled food growing environments, but IMO it's hard to predict when "climate change" will affect the global mortality rate, especially in this day? of age of exponential population growth

In response to a ...
By: Katheryn Hill. on 17 Jun 13, 05:52:31
In response to a previous comment, no increased carbon production in the atmosphere does not? increase plant productivity, at least not in the long term. Increasing carbon will cause short term spikes in growth but without accompanying increases in water availability, nutrients like iron or phosphorus etc plants will only make minimal increases in growth and cannot take up nearly as much carbon.

hello plz tell me ...
By: Michael Morris. on 17 Jun 13, 03:23:00
hello plz tell me when will climate change happin like kill us?

poor pestilence ...
By: blazelord1. on 16 Jun 13, 22:22:27
poor pestilence he's the only one left out?

I'd say we're? both ...
By: marymungoandmidge. on 16 Jun 13, 20:03:37
I'd say we're? both screwed!.. chesty x

our? world will be ...
By: EpicProDudeOfAwesome. on 16 Jun 13, 20:01:30
our? world will be fine, we're the ones that are screwed

Enlightening and ...
By: marymungoandmidge. on 16 Jun 13, 18:24:38
Enlightening and really sad, our beautiful world is dying.. no? doubt whatsoever. chesty x

Relax, it's man ...
By: MrRayplumer. on 16 Jun 13, 18:06:33
Relax, it's man trying to learn how to control the weather that's bringing the radical results. Did you know it's against the law to use weather? for warfare?

The ipccs ...
By: George Beasley. on 16 Jun 13, 09:00:25
The ipccs predictions have been? completely wrong

Problem is we are ...
By: NessaWyvern. on 16 Jun 13, 03:42:40
Problem is we are cutting down those plants faster than? they can grow and 'lock up' that carbon.

Probably spelled " ...
By: damianminecraft03. on 15 Jun 13, 16:45:35
Probably spelled "REFRENCE"? wrong.

Supernatural ...
By: damianminecraft03. on 15 Jun 13, 16:45:03
Supernatural refrence.?

PPM of CO2 in the ...
By: Donbd83. on 15 Jun 13, 06:15:17
PPM of CO2 in the atmosphere is 400, amount of oxygen 18.2 million PPM. Plants thrive at around 1000-1200 ppm of CO2, if CO2 levels rise it would stimulate plants to grow larger, bigger plants use more CO2 effectively turning more carbon back into oxygen, bigger plants=more oxygen production and more food generated by plants. Does climate change happen; yes, is it as severe as they would have us believe;? no. The planet naturally creates CO2, we contribute 17% of what it does naturally.

Also the web link ...
By: PHZadeW. on 15 Jun 13, 03:24:48
Also the web link is for military, so I am curious if you have seen the report written by the military stating that the greatest threat to defense in the future will come from climate? change? It was on many network news channels and would be available to you upon request from the networks. I appreciate your link and would be happy to read this article, as I'm fine to hear other sides. I only ask people check references from info, so if this belief makes sense to you that's cool with me.

climate change ...
By: Ricardo S. Philpot. on 15 Jun 13, 03:13:02
climate change affects on the people life much. It's time people did something?

Why are half of ...
By: Geoff Ward. on 14 Jun 13, 23:41:19
Why are half of these comments so.... ahhhh... climate change is real, not your direct marketing/propaganda/I don't wanna down size my mansion to? clean up my industry hate spigot right wing rich overlord mouth piece... Climate change is an overwhelmingly world wide agreed upon majority, not your backwoods hillbilly misinformed fact source. Check US, Chinese, UK, Japanese, Australian, Canadian, etc scientific industrial agricultural news source/publication/web site for a universal agreement - KTB

Basically CO2 is ...
By: DarkBabyIon. on 14 Jun 13, 15:55:28
Basically CO2 is the case? Well lets shut down everything that needs to output CO2, once we? find a substatitute to what we use today, give it a few years so plants will take the carbon and make oxygen and already a cool-off right? Well too bad economics work like organisms, sudden change and everyone's bankrupt.

I can't really be ...
By: PHZadeW. on 14 Jun 13, 15:01:02
I can't really be bothered continuing this debate to be honest. I had a look at your link to veteranstoday (which is not a very credible factual resource) and the page no longer exists. I have taken an objective view of this and even defended skeptics because all science should be logically debated, however if? you have an idea of how chemicals and environment work it is simple fact not belief. So the arguments become less logical similar to the Earth being flat or evolution being false.

But the the ...
By: Candychocoblock. on 14 Jun 13, 09:23:24
But the the temperature of the earth? has been rising and falling for millions of years, regardless of human interference. If you look at a graph that displays the average temperature from about the 1800s to now, it goes up and down a LOT. This has always happened - it's NATURAL. Carbon dioxide and temperature increase are NOT linked. Just because they both happen to be going up, doesn't mean they're linked. Not at all. Do YOUR research. (and before you ask me, yes, I have done mine)

$Allan Savory: How to green the world\$

Allan Savory: How to green the world's deserts and reverse climate change
Posted by: TEDtalksDirector

Video duration: 1340 seconds
Global video hits: 449287

"Desertification is a fancy word for land that is turning to desert," begins Allan Savory in this quietly powerful talk. And terrifyingly, it's happening to ...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

I? have no idea ...
By: Nikforever2012. on 19 Jun 13, 02:14:53
I? have no idea about climate change but I do know is if we cant trust people like this humanity is fucked period!

um? agriculture is ...
By: wrathofme03. on 19 Jun 13, 02:05:42
um? agriculture is that but on a large scale to fit todays society and population...one is a more efficient version of the other.

I? tell you the ...
By: tlo2504. on 18 Jun 13, 23:31:16
I? tell you the truth... One day you will see and then you will be like me, wishing you were blind. By then its to? late.

all went downhill ...
By: AmosOHiggins. on 18 Jun 13, 21:58:44
all went downhill since the advent of agriculture. Bring back? the hunter-gatherers! Only sustainable way of life x

Unbelievable how ...
By: gpecote. on 18 Jun 13, 21:51:49
Unbelievable how people judge and condemn people for trying, and more so learning from their mistakes. Have you been there? Are you even looking at the information with an open mind instead of condemning the person for their mistakes?? Last time I checked nobody's perfect, we are all doing the best we can with what we know!! Get the hell off your insecurities and wake up!! It's the arrogance that will kill us all!!

humans are part of ...
By: SweertugaDany. on 18 Jun 13, 18:56:42
humans are part of nature, we are programmed to consume our planet, just the same way a maggot consumes a fruit making it rot, if we keep growing our planet will die and we will colonize another, that is nature, so if you want? to keep planet earth slaughter 90% of the world population

go? and watch the ...
By: Tradelbrumm. on 18 Jun 13, 18:53:28
go? and watch the teletubbies...

Sorry, I only swear ...
By: tlo2504. on 18 Jun 13, 13:28:02
Sorry, I only swear as a protest? against internet porn. When they take that off, then I will stop.

Sorry mate, but if ...
By: tlo2504. on 18 Jun 13, 12:47:45
Sorry mate, but if he came to me with a CV (40,000 elephants slaughtered by mistake)... I would advise him to seek out another career. If I was in that government they would have all been? sacked immediately. He would be the last person I would? go to for advice on the environment.

People make ...
By: hamsterbom. on 18 Jun 13, 12:42:33
People make mistakes no matter what title they have and it wasn't his experts they where assigned by the government to check his research. Also he is hardly doing anything, pretty much making? sure lifestock isn't standing in the same place for to long. :o

I understand your ...
By: hamsterbom. on 18 Jun 13, 12:38:48
I understand your concern and it's healthy to be sceptical? but at this point it's redundant since there is 1million hectars(if we are to believe it) of land that shows this is working. Land that now again is supporting wildlife.

They were obviously ...
By: tlo2504. on 18 Jun 13, 12:34:32
They were obviously not experts then were they? Experts are people with a wealth knowledge and know what they are doing. This guy and his experts made a very costly mistake to? the environment and the creature that lived there... And you want me trust him and his experts. Once bitten twice shy. He is not going to convince me what ever he says.

Sorry, but he ...
By: tlo2504. on 18 Jun 13, 12:28:16
Sorry, but he obviously thinks he is correct again, cant help thinking that the last mistake was enough... Shouldn't be aloud to make decision on the environment as far as I'm concerned. There an awful lot? of people, me included who would not listen to him after making a mistake like that.

What is it about ...
By: David Robison. on 18 Jun 13, 12:27:13
What is it about YouTube - people watch a video? and then start swearing at each other violently?

He thought in the ...
By: hamsterbom. on 18 Jun 13, 12:15:39
He thought in the 1950's? that this was needed to save the land he was in charge over and experts agreed with him. Better watch the video again.

There is no threat ...
By: tlo2504. on 18 Jun 13, 11:56:29
There is no threat to mankind from desertification... He is full shit! There is? only one? way and its his way? I don't think so. He's already made one fucking big mistake, which cost lives of 40,000 of Gods creatures. He's fucking an arrogant cunt.

There is not only ...
By: tlo2504. on 18 Jun 13, 11:55:22
There is not only one option you? fucking prick.

I don't think you ...
By: tlo2504. on 18 Jun 13, 11:50:02
I don't think you have listen to what he has said... Wanker thinks he can kill animals (shot 40,000 elephants). This is one? fucking big ignorant cunt who needs to be locked up.

The discussion is? ...
By: hamsterbom. on 18 Jun 13, 11:38:15
The discussion is? about man made deserts, not the natural deserts.

Nature has evolved ...
By: hamsterbom. on 18 Jun 13, 11:24:14
Nature has evolved for millions of years, then humans come? and fuck everything up even when our intentions are often good. :\

They? are, actually ...
By: Miesha88. on 18 Jun 13, 10:36:12
They? are, actually. Deserts expand very fast if there are no trees and vegetation to stop it. In Chile right now the desert is spreading at a rate of 1 meter per day. So you could say the desert is "going", or at least growing. It's unlikely to stop, either.

Watch and learn... ...
By: tlo2504. on 18 Jun 13, 07:18:06
Watch and learn... The deserts are? not going anywhere.

The Scientific Case for Urgent Action to Limit Climate Change
Posted by: UCtelevision

Video duration: 3540 seconds
Global video hits: 2666

Visit: http://www.uctv.tv/) Distinguished Professor Emeritus Richard Somerville, a world-renowned climate scientist and author of "The Forgiving Air: Unders...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

42:00?
By: rbruceh. on 17 Jun 13, 06:50:47
42:00?

It's called "global ...
By: ge556. on 16 Jun 13, 22:29:44
It's called "global warming" because it's global. There may be regions that cool, but overall the Earth is warming. This Spring, warmer arctic temperatures caused changes in wind patterns that kept much of the northern hemisphere cooler than usual. A breakdown of the gulf stream would? cause Europe to be cooler. Climate changes have causes. Science can be helpful in understanding them. Denialist disinformation is not helpful.

Go to Skeptical ...
By: Richard Lock. on 16 Jun 13, 16:34:14
Go to Skeptical Science dot com and read arguments number? 9 and 55.

@rugbyguy59 You ...
By: George Beasley. on 16 Jun 13, 09:11:55
@rugbyguy59 You should? have seen even the alarmist Guardian newspaper published no surface warmig since 1998 even a decrease.

@rugbyguy59 I ...
By: George Beasley. on 16 Jun 13, 09:10:44
@rugbyguy59 I respect that you are? bring a good man. The greenhouse effect it true. But you should understand in Europe since 2008 winters have been far colder and below the averages from the 1900s. You can't say Europe is warming at all. Check any website. Just type- Europe is getting.... and you will get colder as the top result.

"the satellite ...
By: rugbyguy59. on 14 Jun 13, 15:18:42
"the satellite record doesn't? show warming yet" Both satellite records show significant warming trends

The people who ...
By: rugbyguy59. on 14 Jun 13, 15:17:23
The people who study this don't act like you and pick two convenient data points and base their entire position on it. They look at all the data. Science costs money. Why? don't you think potential problems should be studied? Or do you think we should limit science to things that are cheap and easy to study? Why not ban it? Because that would cause unnecessary problems. A tax creates a market force that causes the change to occur over time Fearing taxes is a stupid reason to reject science

"But then look at ...
By: ge556. on 13 Jun 13, 05:17:23
"But then look at global warming.? If it was occurring (and the satellite record doesn't show warming? yet)" False. It shows plenty of warming.

you confuse 2 ...
By: Nightverslonn. on 12 Jun 13, 14:03:42
you confuse 2 different issues one - pollution Pollution absolutely needs to be addressed! China, for example is out of control. But then look at global warming. If it? was occurring (and the satellite record doesn't show warming yet) then why the need to tax co2 (plant food) ??? why not just out law it all together I mean if it really is going to kill us all, wouldn't taxing it just allow the problem to continue?

lol I am not a ...
By: Nightverslonn. on 12 Jun 13, 13:59:27
lol I am not a scientist and that matters? why do you just believe anything put in front of you? because someone put "scientist" as their title? try looking into it yourself how much warming has actually been documented globally by our most advanced satellites? do you even know? seems to me you need to pay your carbon taxes and keep your mouth shut you are the perfect sheep

so what you are ...
By: Nightverslonn. on 12 Jun 13, 13:57:21
so what you are also saying is ... that people who look into this for a living surprisingly claim there is a nasty 0.2C boogy man and we need to do something about it but first, lets pay those a few more hundred million to study it DUH if this? was a real problem, why the need to tax it? why just not ban it? that should be the biggest indication that this is yet another scam to hose the public

A study was ...
By: paz9iffy. on 10 Jun 13, 17:21:13
A study was completed last year linking warming in the Arctic with extreme weather events in N America and Europe. You can find it by searching the authors names "Jennifer Francis Stephen Vavrus". Apparently sea ice loss has the characteristic of creating so-called "blocking" weather patterns. It is a change in the Jet Stream that causes it to sit in one place for a week or more. That allows for the buildup? of extremes of various kinds.

People who look at ...
By: rugbyguy59. on 10 Jun 13, 04:10:22
People who look at the data for a living...as in climate scientists...agree in massive numbers that it is us and it is a problem. The problem with those in the denial crowd is they listen to blog science? and cherry pick through a tiny proportion of the peer reviewed literature. You assert there is an issue with heat islands yet there is no evidence for a problem Satellite records are in reasonable agreement with land based measurements. They both have clear, statistically significant trends

I am a geniot and I ...
By: thehorrorification. on 09 Jun 13, 22:33:07
I am a geniot and I am serious, every major problem on this planet is caused by too many people. Humanity is like a devalued currency, the more there is the less each is worth. Hitler had the right idea, he was just an underachiever and limited in the range of folks he killed. I have a plan that will lower CO2 emissions by 50% - kill 50% of the people on the planet. Start with Lady Gaga and all her fans then anyone that likes The Shawshank Redemption. Thin out the mediocre herd. ?

I get it. All I ...
By: paz9iffy. on 09 Jun 13, 14:33:53
I get it. All I have to do is ignore Wikipedia, NASA, NOAA, NAS, AMS and every other scientific body in the entire world and listen to blogs, right-wing think tanks and a few contrarian scientists and I'll be OK. Sounds like a great plan. I'll just ignore the 15K tons of coal each of our 7000 power plants? burns each day, the 3,570 million gallons of oil the world burns each day and the growing use of natural gas. No effect on the environment.

Grow a Brain..Big ...
By: dannffc. on 09 Jun 13, 11:44:35
Grow a Brain..Big Business funded Alarmism to further tax people and enslave them.. Think what you want..I've? reviewed both sides of the discussion, not just been Scared in to a viewpoint...

I was going to ...
By: paz9iffy. on 09 Jun 13, 03:57:44
I was going to thumb down your? comment, but now I can't figure out if you are being ironic or not. For a while I thought you were and I was going to thumb you up! I think you are either an idiot or a genius, maybe both!

you? are
By: paz9iffy. on 09 Jun 13, 03:55:12
you? are

Either way, you're ...
By: Nightverslonn. on 07 Jun 13, 13:41:33
Either way, you're desperately taking tiny tiny changes and blowing it up as alarmism the whole AGW crowd is most people don't look at the? data, just parrot what CNN tells them to think I would argue one could never "adjust" the data that is skewed by the heat island affect, especially into these tiny measurements Our best way to get global information, and quickly, would be from space and all we have seen is NOISE we have trend in the sat record, and this is bunk alarmism

Actually 2005 to ...
By: rugbyguy59. on 07 Jun 13, 07:03:07
Actually 2005 to 2012 UAH shows warming but either way you're desperately trying to present the noise of natural variation as a meaningful trend. Argo data shows warming bit*ly/1134mEM Heat Island effects are statistically removed and there is lots of evidence they make no? difference and none that they do.

I don't deny that ...
By: Nightverslonn. on 07 Jun 13, 01:19:20
I don't deny that the satellite record did record 0.7C warming from 1980 to 2005. Its just fact, but unfortunately, the warming trend reversed. And also unfortunately, ARGOS, has measured no warming in the oceans at all. And if you make your entire living off of milking govts and scaring people, no real surprise that alarmists and con artists deny what the satellite record has measured its easier to use stations near cities and taint data with? the heat island affect

The only way to ...
By: goodoldazed. on 06 Jun 13, 08:55:24
The only way to stop climate change to is ban fossil fuel and study the work of? Nicola Tesla to find an electronic method of ecosphere ionization to rebuild the depleted ozone layer.

Gee so you've ...
By: rugbyguy59. on 06 Jun 13, 03:19:56
Gee so you've changed the usual denier meme to "it stopped warming in 2005"? Close but you forget the oceans. And it's warmed about 0.5C since satellites. 4,8C if we use UAH's trend HIE is a sily argument. All you need to do to see it's false is look at where most of the warming is happening. It's also been? soundly hammered in peer review

huh funny, but the ...
By: Nightverslonn. on 05 Jun 13, 21:56:26
huh funny, but the satellite data is quite clear 0.7C warming up to 2005 and by 2011 there was a? net warming of 0.0C reality is you are using false data our net warming over the entire record is maybe 0.2C NET look up net and try to understand the definition but we have no trend, and the only way to make one up is to cherry pick land station data near cities and the heat island affect there over the past 3 decades sats have only measured what you claim every decade lie often do you?

Funny, UAH data ...
By: rugbyguy59. on 04 Jun 13, 06:39:52
Funny, UAH data gives a 1979 to 2012 trend of 0.142C/decade which equals a bit more than 0.426C over the entire satellite period. RSS puts the trend? at 0.138C/decade. NOAA 0.157C/decade. Gistemp 0.165C/decade. HADCRUT4 0.163C/decade. And then BEST gives a whopping 0.256C/decade But I guess you're just cherry picking a couple of convenient data points and drawing a straight line. Reality bites you again

Professor Alden Griffith on Climate Change as a Perfect Storm
Posted by: WellesleyCollege

Video duration: 4547 seconds
Global video hits: 493

Alden Griffith, Assistant Professor of Environmental Studies, Wellesley College The Madeleine Korbel Albright Institute for Global Affairs at Wellesley Colle...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Inside Story Americas - The US disconnect over climate change
Posted by: AlJazeeraEnglish

Video duration: 1503 seconds
Global video hits: 3052

We try to understand why the US public is so divided over global warming causes and issues? Inside Story Americas, Shihab Rattansi discusses with guests: Mic...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Well, it appears ...
By: vrooomie1. on 14 Jun 13, 22:55:04
Well, it appears you may be that moron, given that SkS links directly to primary, peer-reviewed work, none of which you've provided to support your assertion. Show to documentation that supports this so-called 'debate' in the climate change community, or forever be known as a? LIAR, and a typical denier.

There most ...
By: Coke Supply. on 14 Jun 13, 21:23:53
There most certainly IS debate in the scientific community regarding this subject. And the SkS website is a freaking joke. Only a fucking moron would take ANYTHING at face value on that? website. I've only recently been visiting that site, and judging by the comments sections, most other visitors take a dim view of the site too.

Einstein was? an ...
By: Coke Supply. on 14 Jun 13, 21:09:43
Einstein was? an agnostic Atheist.

Zionist kikes like ...
By: Dieter Schneider. on 11 Jun 13, 01:36:36
Zionist kikes like you are? the true SS.

People dont want to ...
By: mcwolfus. on 01 Jun 13, 00:34:52
People dont want to change their lifestyles. Why should they? Governments have to keep the population happy, and growth increasing. History tells us that we are? NOT collectively a clever species.

"We try to ...
By: newdimensionfilms. on 29 May 13, 16:45:00
"We try to understand why the US public is so divided over global? warming causes and issues?" ....because of a massive disinformation campaign funded by the oil and gas industries (primarily the Koch brothers). This question has been asked and answered,

Hey, you SS guys ...
By: thegoodlocust. on 24 May 13, 18:54:40
Hey, you SS guys all spammed? into this videos comment section. All anyone has to do is google the names (sans the one who deleted his comment) with "skeptical science" to see what I'm talking about. And thanks, but I have better reading material than bullshit liberal circle jerk pseudo-science trying to make you guys feel better about yourselves. I classify him as an activist fool and propagandist along with Oreskes. Still waiting for the evidence for your accusations btw.

SS superiors?? Now ...
By: Andy Lee Robinson. on 24 May 13, 18:04:15
SS superiors?? Now I'm worried - you really are obsessed, and let belief override reality, and that is not healthy, even for a conservative atheist. I recommend Chris Mooney's book, "The Republican Brain". You can jump off a cliff, and flap your arms as much as you like, and may even convince yourself that you are flying for a while, but? the truth is going to hurt. Meanwhile I'll just watch from my scientific parachute as you 'fly' by and stain the rocks. Just how sure are you really?

And if you think ...
By: thegoodlocust. on 24 May 13, 16:54:38
And if you think I'm a sock puppet you are an idiot. I've used this username for nearly 15 years now. That shows you are making bullshit? up. Or, perhaps, one of the idiots you idolize fed you some bullshit about me. You said I'm funded by organizations like the Heartland Institute - prove it. Or better yet, tell me what liar told you that. PM me if you like. I wouldn't want you to get in trouble with your SS superiors.

4. The fake memo ...
By: thegoodlocust. on 24 May 13, 16:51:26
4. The fake memo said obvious bullshit like "[D]issuading teachers from teaching science" 5 And "keep opposing voices out" 6. While trying to pump up Gleick as some important climate crusader.? 7. Gleick had previously declared "war" on climate skeptics 8. Got the monetary sums incorrect - from an incorrect reading of the documents Gleick admitted to stealing Let me know what you agree on. I think you'd have to be an idiot to think Gleick didn't forge it - he is an admitted thief.

Ok, so let's see ...
By: thegoodlocust. on 24 May 13, 16:48:49
Ok, so let's see what we can agree on here. 1. Gleick admitted to pretending to be someone else to obtain Heartland's private documents. 2. Gleick inserted another document with those real documents that read like the "Protocols of the Elders? of Zion" for climate skeptics 3. After getting caught Gleick later claimed that the juicy fake memo was anonymously mailed to him and that motivated him to commit identity fraud to steal documents from the HI.

Put your toys back ...
By: Andy Lee Robinson. on 24 May 13, 10:05:57
Put your toys back in your pram, stupid little sock puppet. "Forging documents" is a conservative projection, because that is what unscrupulous people like you would do - you project it. Science is still true whether you believe it or? not, and you have no evidence to support your lies. no amount of tantrums, insults and trolling will change that. The world is still warming, weather getting more extreme and costly and the biosphere is in danger and you are not helping - it is you that is immoral.

I'm "well-known" by ...
By: thegoodlocust. on 24 May 13, 00:57:54
I'm "well-known" by who exactly? I don't get money from posting youtube comments. You stupid SSs engage in retarded conspiracy theories everytime someone disagrees with you. Hell, you guys can't even find significant fossil fuel money going to? skeptical groups and so you have to forge documents like Gleick did. You guys have no morals. Hell, you probably really believe your bullshit so you don't mind forging documents to prove what you "know" is true.

thegoodlocust is a ...
By: Andy Lee Robinson. on 23 May 13, 11:24:55
thegoodlocust is a well known "astrosmurf" funded indirectly through astroturfing (fake grassroots) organizations such as Heartland Institute, Americans for Prosperity, ALEC and CPACT etc, in turn funded anonymously through front organizations funded by fossil fuel interests. These unscrulpulousness organizations have no limits to keep making profit at any cost. Renewable energy represents lost sales, so are desperate to keep the world addicted to oil. Science does not? lie. Follow the money.

For all the SS ...
By: thegoodlocust. on 21 May 13, 16:44:11
For all the SS goons still trolling this video - this WUWT article? shows your study was complete bullshit: "Cook's 97% consensus study falsely classifies scientists' papers according to the scientists that published them." They directly contacted several of the authors of some of the papers you guys used and the authors of those papers say you FALSELY said those papers endorsed AGW when it was just the opposite. Remember when I told you about confirmation bias? Just proved it.

Total troll poop... ...
By: Andy Lee Robinson. on 21 May 13, 12:09:17
Total troll poop.... Funny, your name is an anagram? of "a lone foreskin" - quite apt.

Your irate rant ...
By: zutroy1. on 20 May 13, 20:04:26
Your irate rant does nothing to change the fact that I have a university degree in environmental sciences, and you don't even have the beginnings of an understanding of what the actual discussion is in academia. Wave the flag of your obviously misrepresentative study, but don't try to pretend you know anything about science, when you are insulting someone who spent actual time learning and being awarded a BSc and? MSc. You are a layman fool trying to argue from authority which you have none of.

They've been ...
By: foresakenlion. on 20 May 13, 18:01:20
They've been spraying aluminum into the atmosphere to geo-engineer the planet for over a decade, their aluminum is poisoning the food, requiring Monsanto's aluminum resistant seeds,? while they pretend they're proposing these things, they have already started without your consent a long time ago, and now they come to you and reveal it.

Ozone depletion you ...
By: foresakenlion. on 20 May 13, 17:45:36
Ozone depletion you mean like the kind you cause when you take your TESLA radio array called HAARP in Alaska and then you punch holes in the ozone with a microwave laser beam? Or the fact that they do not tell the public, every time you launch a space vehicle you have to punch a hole in the atmosphere, including the? ozone. So who destroyed the ozone if it's destroyed? The same governments that did open air nuclear testing. Therefore if it exists, it was caused by governments around the world.

Michael Mann is a ...
By: foresakenlion. on 20 May 13, 17:40:23
Michael Mann is a fraud... it's proven he's a liar, the UN IPCC was manipulating the data to gain a global crabon tax to fund their World government, and AJE is a co-conspirator by aiding them in this lie which? has already been proven.

If it's man made, ...
By: foresakenlion. on 20 May 13, 17:36:32
If it's man made, it's the world's governments that caused it through nuclear tests which released uranium and plutonium into the atmosphere and sea. Michael Mann is a liar who has been proven to be a fraud, him and the IPCC were altering the climate models to support their drive for a carbon tax, which would have given the carbon exchange trillions of dollars,? including Al Gore who propagandized the public with an "Inconvenient Truth" which was a LIE based on Michael Mann's manipulated data.

And here I thought ...
By: thegoodlocust. on 20 May 13, 09:39:15
And here I thought we were starting to understand each other. I'll tell you what I think - I think you were told by someone at SS that I'm a paid industry troll (who works on Sunday apparently). How accurate? is that guess? Oil companies have fed more people than any charity. They are also the biggest funders of research at universities (other than maybe the Federal government). You know those evil Koch guys? $100 million donation to a New York hospital. So yes, I respect oil companies.

$James Hansen: We Are Only Beginning to Feel Climate Change\$

James Hansen: We Are Only Beginning to Feel Climate Change's Impact
Posted by: videonation

Video duration: 404 seconds
Global video hits: 4180

Accepting the 2013 Ridenhour Courage Prize, James Hansen warns of the dire environmental impacts of our growing carbon emissions.

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

He's been repeating ...
By: superduperjew. on 11 Jun 13, 13:04:58
He's been repeating himself? for a very long time now.

some people? just ...
By: Ethan Jahn. on 05 Jun 13, 05:27:32
some people? just aren't good at public speaking. meh.

BROHEMOTH ya coulda ...
By: abighairywoman. on 02 Jun 13, 02:57:24
BROHEMOTH ya coulda had a little enthusiasm god dam. dude is like? a robot.

The future ...
By: schoolake. on 01 Jun 13, 12:32:58
The future generations - if there are any - will have to attempt to survive in a toxic & mostly dead environment with really 'interesting' weather. They will also be so genetically damaged from fallout & toxins that they probably won't be able to reproduce anyway. We are no better than yeast, reproducing to? the limit of our fuel/energy, leaving increasing amounts of toxins behind, which will bring about the standard result.

Take it back. ...
By: jffryh. on 01 Jun 13, 03:35:13
Take it back. humanity is worth saving. People alive today may be assholes, but think of future generations and their potential. there will be no paradise for animals on a future earth without humans. We will take all other life out with us. The only choice is either save humanity or omnicide. Even if complex animals? could survive after humanity, human level intelligence would never evolve again. It was a miracle we evolved as we are in the first place.

We need more humans ...
By: Mark K.. on 30 May 13, 17:50:17
We need more humans like James Hansen.?

I think being aware ...
By: schoolake. on 29 May 13, 15:46:17
I think being aware enough to recognize and be grateful for how privileged we have been is something everyone should do we only have to look at what we have done and are still doing to the Indigenous populations of this continent. Listening to John Trudell helped get me through my first couple years of collapse awareness ~ Interesting? times indeed ~ being crazy helps and I've got that covered.

LOL or it could be ...
By: schoolake. on 29 May 13, 03:26:31
LOL or it could be something simple like a bad tooth that you can't get fixed (and which? is undoubtedly killing people somewhere right now) Heck we're first worlders we have it made compared to the majority of the planet, I'm thankful I wasn't born in Pakistan or China spending my life making crap for the US consumer. Being outdoors with nature keeps me sane and busy while watching it all collapse - we only have today anyway.

I've seen this ...
By: schoolake. on 29 May 13, 00:18:42
I've seen this coming since I was 13 it's always? amazed me how blind people are but I'm no longer surprised by what homo colossus is (in)capable of. I personally think as the feedbacks and albedo build in the arctic it will be ice free by 2015 - possibly sooner ~ acceptance of mortality is one of best things to ponder while alive, gives perspective imo ~ getting old is slow and painful too, some days a dirt map sounds just about right. We could get lucky and Yellowstone could blow ~

Your right, it's ...
By: schoolake. on 28 May 13, 16:44:42
Your right, it's impossible to get people to understand that we're not much more than yeast. 7 billion plus (growing by 200+ thousand a day!) continually creating,? consuming and expelling toxins. The oceans are dying - 70,000 metric tons of radioactive waste piled all over. Drought, flood and famine ~ fun times ahead. I do lose patience because it's not like this stuff isn't happening EVERYWHERE. Nobody gets out alive, all we can do is just try and be kind ~ I do try (it's really hard though)

I've been 'doing' ...
By: schoolake. on 28 May 13, 16:23:08
I've been 'doing' things since the 60's. I haven't? given up I grow what food I can, don't travel, didn't procreate, consume as little as possible and am still attempting to rehab damaged land. Meanwhile the majority continue mindlessly breeding, consuming and destroying what's left of nature and it's the kids who will pay the biggest price by having front row seats at the extinction (200 species a day & speeding up) We "are" all committing suicide by destroying our environment ~ Que sera sera ~

Some of us get it, ...
By: schoolake. on 28 May 13, 15:59:28
Some of us get it, the rest are in for such a surprise ~ We've been headed in this direction since we settled down and started growing monoculture crops, throw in a few paternalitic monotheistic gawds, fossil fuels and our 'discovery' of radiation and it's various uses... yep we're toast. It's only a matter of time before we have our own personal Fukushima (hopefully DC is downwind when it happens) Check out 'death by utopia'? or John B. Calhoun - it's all there in his universe experiments.

That's Good? *bye* ...
By: schoolake. on 28 May 13, 15:43:53
That's Good? *bye* world. Don't worry nobody gets out alive anyway ~

The American author ...
By: Edward Black. on 21 May 13, 00:44:10
The American author and activist Derrick Jensen has a radical -- and maybe? sane -- notion about what we should & need to do:? suspend all production & thus consumption. Can it be done? It's worth a serious discussion. One we probably won't have. The discussion is always on maintaining the existing system. & never about our seemingly endless production and consumption... which can't be sustained over the long run. I mean, how long can we keep this system of endless production & consumption?

Go kill yourself ...
By: TheRespawnTimer. on 20 May 13, 20:21:14
Go kill yourself then okay? Ill begin. Good? by world

Agenda 21-?? ...
By: joe blow. on 20 May 13, 06:46:04
Agenda 21-?? Environmentalism vs Private? Property? - Brian Wilshire Listen, learn

The mechanisms by ...
By: Hadron Munkleburger. on 19 May 13, 17:32:50
The mechanisms by which we overcome denialism and phase out the use of fossil fuels in the long run doesn't matter so much, so long as we get the job done. Those who would have us pretend that global warming is not happening either for financial or political reasons need to rethink their position or pay a much higher price as the reality of? global warming begins to show itself with less and less ambiguity.

Read? a book.
By: MrCoffeeFiend. on 19 May 13, 04:07:33
Read? a book.

2/3 right. 1/3 ...
By: rd264. on 19 May 13, 01:31:31
2/3 right. 1/3 wrong: youre not? on the way out. You are a spring chicken!

It's nice to ...
By: rd264. on 19 May 13, 01:29:29
It's nice to suppose that it's not too late, and that we'll always have options and choices, and that there will even be wonderful brave new opportunities, but its actually unknown . My guess is its too late. We've already shown that we are prepared to screw the poor and undeveloped? world. So we have exercised choices that presage where we are headed. By we I mean implicitly or tacitly or by default, but the powerful made them and 'we' passively went along.

troll? be gone!
By: rd264. on 19 May 13, 01:23:24
troll? be gone!

He wants to shut ...
By: MrCoffeeFiend. on 16 May 13, 13:58:46
He wants to shut down the coal and oil companies. He will lie to you to get what he wants. Carbon taxes will never solve anything and hurt the poor. If you care about people living today you would? not listen to his lies.

Re new party. We ...
By: Adrian Whitehead. on 16 May 13, 06:00:38
Re new party. We are already there in Australia. Feed up with failure to implement meaningful climate policy the Save the Planet party has been set up to provide real leadership in the climate emergency and promote the solutions to an emergency speed transition to a negative? emission economy.

James Hansen: Why I must speak out about climate change
Posted by: TEDtalksDirector

Video duration: 1072 seconds
Global video hits: 106203

http://www.ted.com Top climate scientist James Hansen tells the story of his involvement in the science of and debate over global climate change. In doing so...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Ex hippie hobo? ~ ...
By: PrairleDoggedRez. on 18 Jun 13, 20:36:23
Ex hippie hobo? ~ what a fucking nutjob.

Am I doing ...
By: ivorysand. on 18 Jun 13, 02:33:45
Am I doing something wrong or? is this link not working? I had "Invalid parameters".

Do you honestly ...
By: TheSaltyAdmiral. on 14 Jun 13, 13:56:48
Do you honestly think you, YOU, though of that? but none of the scientists did? hahaha

superb content, but ...
By: emailjwr. on 12 Jun 13, 02:13:44
superb content, but james hansen really needs to? get a bit more animated. in this day and age one needs to keep people's attention, and this message needs to be heard

James Hansen is ...
By: MrApplewine. on 09 Jun 13, 17:33:20
James Hansen is truly the Messiah of Environmentalism. The non-believers should be cleansed ! We could even team up with the middle eastern muslims against our common enemy,? the pro westerners in American and Europe.

Are you saying that ...
By: sonreiro. on 09 Jun 13, 14:41:32
Are you saying that the at times hypocritical or misguided actions of one man are proof that a concept involving the entire earth is invalid? And who is really making the money? The handful of small energy companies making millions promoting electric cars, solar panels, and other new ways of obtaining energy... or the multiple oil companies making BILLIONS...promoting that Climate Change is a joke is great for their? business!

people care about ...
By: John Butts. on 09 Jun 13, 00:19:44
people care about global warming but they care about their bank account more, and as long as fossil fuels are cheaper than alternative energy or people start dying off nobody is? gonna do? a fucking thing about it.

Joe Bastardi? Who ...
By: 2011ESD. on 05 Jun 13, 12:53:06
Joe Bastardi? Who claimed that the Arctic was going to go back to normal in his 2012 summer sea ice extent? prediction and then looked like a fool as it decreased in 2012 and smashed the record in 2013 for lowest extent. Yea...follow him.

want it explained ...
By: Natchler. on 04 Jun 13, 16:23:08
want it explained even more?? (although, how much more do you really need) /playlist?list=PL82yk73N8eoX-Xobr_TfHsWPfAIyI7VAP

While i don't ...
By: david K. on 04 Jun 13, 11:55:25
While i don't really have an opinion as to who/what causes climate change... if you look at the graph at 9:00, it shows a consistent trend over the last 800 thousand years. A trend that we are riding right now. All the way to the peak. If history repeats itself, its only a matter of time before future humans will be complaining of global cooling. James mentions the correlation of CO2? and temperature, but glossed over the history... guess we will never live long enough to know.

Should one have an ...
By: naturfagstoff. on 04 Jun 13, 07:58:56
Should one have an agenda when studying climate? Is science about agendas, or about finding out more about nature? James Hansen DID predict 6m sea level rise by 2100, and has also stated he did believe that global temp would rise by 6C by 2100. Do I think this will happen? No. Does? the IPCC think this will happen? No. Does most climate scientists think this will happen? No. Do You think this will happen? Just answer that question. Maybe we do agree? on something after all.

Yeah your probably ...
By: Andrew Darroch. on 03 Jun 13, 20:18:08
Yeah your probably right, this scientist that has studied climates his entire life has no Idea what he? is talking about. He just feeding us lies because his agenda doesn't fit yours right?

IPCC recently added ...
By: naturfagstoff. on 31 May 13, 19:16:23
IPCC recently added malaria mosquito on the endangered species list. ?

Are the poles ...
By: naturfagstoff. on 31 May 13, 19:14:29
Are the poles melting more rapidly? No. What sea level rise is it? 3,2 mm? per year. That is 32 cm PER CENTURY.

The title answers ...
By: naturfagstoff. on 31 May 13, 19:10:31
The title answers itself: I think You got money enough for talking about it. Go ask Al Gore to come and close the windows. We really need more warming to affirm CO2 is actually a climate gas in the atmosphere we have here on earth. Mars: 95% CO2. Very little water. Very little O2 and N2. Venus: 98% CO2, No water. Very little O2 and N2. No plate tectonics, No functioning core dynamo. But You know what: They both warmed? in the period 1975-1998? No why is that, man? Is CO2 on earth

science.nasa.gov/ ...
By: passtheshuga. on 31 May 13, 06:48:35
science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/22mar_saber/ From the NASA article above:? "Carbon dioxide and nitric oxide are natural thermostats" Dinosaurs lived in a temperate environment. We are currently exiting an Ice age. Most people/scientists accept these as fact. I am unsure then why there is any debate about anthropogenic climate change. Before anyone else can accuse me of it: Yes - I hate nature. All of it.

Go? feck yourself !!
By: PrairleDoggedRez. on 30 May 13, 22:59:28
Go? feck yourself !!

Guys we can jus ...
By: Tree4078. on 30 May 13, 16:50:50
Guys we can jus rely purely on scientists we can do from small to big things to reduce global warming like walk instead of using a car to travel somewhere nearby ; turn of your phone at night ; socialise more going out instead of sitting on a laptop doing nothing necessary ; eat local food ; see if u don do anything then think about ur son n daughter ur grnd daughter or son who may even die because? of this global warming otherwise think your own ppl may curse u that becz of u they are sufferin

Goodby, TED. If ...
By: SteveHovland. on 30 May 13, 04:50:12
Goodby, TED. If you're going to censor people you have? nothing to contribute.

Your ridiculous hat ...
By: tomvld. on 27 May 13, 22:41:51
Your ridiculous hat makes all your arguments invalid.?

Go organic and go ...
By: drknakkie. on 27 May 13, 17:40:03
Go organic and go vegan !!?

We eternally ...
By: squamish4244. on 27 May 13, 12:23:04
We eternally icebound humans have flourished? in this brief interglacial and may proceed to off ourselves with too much heat. At least we have our sense of irony.

We? CAN do ...
By: TClaes24. on 27 May 13, 11:52:15
We? CAN do something listen! JUST FUCKING DO IT! Jezus

Climate change is? ...
By: GearysofWar. on 27 May 13, 08:10:08
Climate change is? a joke. We have very little to no effect at all. This misconception is all for power and money. Who's that one guy who is a multimillionaire that has his own private jet, limo, and mansion? He made millions off of this climate change crap. He made a movie called an Inconvenient Truth. He almost became our President.. (Lol btw) Silly Al.

Adapting to Climate Change Through Barriers
Posted by: AssociatedPress

Video duration: 93 seconds
Global video hits: 53

Instead of protesting against the evils of carbon pollution, many officials and environmental advocates are adopting the model of boy scouts when it comes to...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

wow.... go? kill ...
By: politicalchanel. on 18 Jun 13, 09:32:27
wow.... go? kill yourself

Ever been tested? ...
By: MrSuperJuden. on 18 Jun 13, 00:44:41
Ever been tested? You may just be a retard.?

Sure it is. The ...
By: MrSuperJuden. on 18 Jun 13, 00:43:51
Sure it is. The fucking scientists had their emails leaked and admitted in them? that it was a hoax you sheeple fuck wit.

FUCK, it's exact ...
By: pvtjamesryan3. on 17 Jun 13, 22:08:22
FUCK, it's exact 0.0002% warmer this year...this fucking sucks!! OBAMA NEEDS? TO TAX BREATHING OUT!!

U.S. Carbon ...
By: MrChakaMalaka. on 17 Jun 13, 16:23:44
U.S. Carbon Emissions: 2012 Levels At 20 Year Low @HuffPo What to Make of a Warming Plateau- @ New York Times The rise in the surface temperature of earth has been markedly slower over the last 15 years than in the 20 years before that.? And that lull in warming has occurred even as greenhouse gases have accumulated in the atmosphere at a record pace.

I've lived in ...
By: Primalxbeast. on 17 Jun 13, 15:47:18
I've lived in Kansas before. No thanks, I'll take my chances with the ocean and hurricanes in Florida rather than be inundated with fundies in a flood of wheat and corn fields.? There's nothing in Kansas worth living for. Leave before you die of bordom.

They think they can ...
By: Primalxbeast. on 17 Jun 13, 15:37:27
They think they can fight the? ocean? Good luck with that.

Europe? has to pay ...
By: Denis Kynes. on 17 Jun 13, 15:08:32
Europe? has to pay for the US pollution.

Umm, as far as I ...
By: Tim O. on 17 Jun 13, 13:53:55
Umm, as far as I know. The carbon levels as of this month are 440ppm. This is the highest that it's? been in years, but not nearly enough to sustain healthy plant life. This isn't due to pollution, but rather geo-engineering . In short, more science is coming out against this mainstream notion of climate change. I can't believe that these people still haven't come out with the truth. This is a total psy-op to implement a new global carbon tax under the guise of saving the planet. Just google

instead of just ...
By: politicalchanel. on 17 Jun 13, 13:46:31
instead of just focusing on cutting? green house gas emission..... what focus? what the fuck is the US doing to curb green house gases? it is literally the most polluting country in the world! 1st by a landslide per capita and second in total; fuck the US now the whole world has to go Holland on their cities

climate change ...
By: politicalchanel. on 17 Jun 13, 13:46:06
climate change isn't a hoax you idiot! study the research and stop this moronic anti-science movement; how aeful has this world? become for people to be anti-science? do you WANT to be in the stone age?

IDIOT! Climate ...
By: politicalchanel. on 17 Jun 13, 13:44:58
IDIOT! Climate change is real! there's a lot of bullshit politicians do, anti-science propaganda is probably the worst; fighting against climate change is DEFINITELY NOT such a thing; fighting against climate needs to be ramped up... by? switching to biofuels, solar and such, not by these barriers; study the reasearch on climate change and convince yourself; just make sure it's ACTUAL research not bullshit

We never learn ...
By: FlowerClown. on 17 Jun 13, 13:02:49
We never learn just? adapt

Yes, let's ...
By: Marlene Petty. on 17 Jun 13, 11:56:48
Yes, let's encourage people to stay on the coasts - because they're safe and barricaded. I can read the writing on the wall... Sorry, I guess I lack TRUST! That's why I live in Kansas thousands of feet above ocean level. We can hide from tornadoes, but rising ocean waters?? I think they need to relocate people. That may be too drastic, too expensive, but they need to stop? building communities on the coasts for right now.

@Chrisbrown43. How ...
By: 660630989. on 17 Jun 13, 11:08:11
@Chrisbrown43. How did you pridict ? If you can't pridict your? ending life lulz keep in mind :-D

chrisw443, how? ...
By: Anita Mathis. on 17 Jun 13, 10:46:17
chrisw443, how? have you arose to that conclusion regarding a specific year deadline? Are you referring to a specific triggering event that has already occurred which will guarantee this?

AP is owned by the ...
By: MaxOneMedia. on 17 Jun 13, 09:00:04
AP is owned by the Rothschild Globalist Banksters From Hell. They will make money off this Global Warming scam. Do not trust? AP reporting. It is a scam just like CNN, MSNBC, NBC, ABC, CBS and other controlled media reporting and manipulation

See, it's not ...
By: SootyHunt. on 17 Jun 13, 08:54:41
See, it's not Global Warming? !!! More people are moving to city's like New York.... it's obvious then......... New York is sinking because of all the greasy fat ass American's moving there !!!

Full of? shit, Chem ...
By: SootyHunt. on 17 Jun 13, 08:52:23
Full of? shit, Chem Trails, Haarp etc !!!!!!

New york will be ...
By: chrisw443. on 17 Jun 13, 08:20:05
New york will be under water? by 2020, there wont be a new york left. Adaptation will not work, billions will die you idiots.

One other thing is ...
By: jbfane. on 17 Jun 13, 08:14:05
One other thing is it just me or is anyone else sick of politicians and the media making everything a? war or battle. Why does it always need to be a battle? There is a war on drugs, a war on crime, now a battle against warming, wars against illegal immigration. So I ask you - does every single thing have to be a war or battle? No it does not and the media and politicians using this terminology shows their mentality. They hate everything and they want to destroy everything.

The battle against ...
By: jbfane. on 17 Jun 13, 08:08:50
The battle against climate change is bullshit and another excuse for them to rape you as far as money goes. Never forget politicians? are businessmen and attorney first and they live to screw you over. If they really cared about anything they would stop using oil, stop drilling and encourage people to return to a simpler lifestyle but instead they encourage you to spend more, consume more, and care less. No thanks had enough of Bloomberg and his ilk.

You should know ...
By: aznguymetal. on 17 Jun 13, 07:46:13
You should know city? of Venice is? sinking, so how do you know sinking island hoax and sea rising false.

Bankster controlled ...
By: MaxOneMedia. on 17 Jun 13, 07:41:15
Bankster controlled AP loves? to promote this fake Climate Change garbage. It is another scam for the Globalist to tax and control. AP is a Information Gate Keeper for evil

Climate Change and Extreme Weather: Prof. Jennifer Francis (2013)
Posted by: ghostsofevolution

Video duration: 2430 seconds
Global video hits: 8763

Superb educational video summarizing climate change evidence through 2012. Click on blue time codes to advance to these topics: Note: The original 112-minute...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Climate science is? ...
By: theecanmole. on 17 Jun 13, 01:15:05
Climate science is? mainstream science. Only cranks reject it.

Humans dont cause ...
By: Shiftin Gearz. on 14 Jun 13, 14:44:10
Humans dont cause this!! ? HOLY SHIT WAKE UP!!!! Earth needs CO2. Aww forget about you dummys

There are actually ...
By: husker hammer. on 09 Jun 13, 18:00:28
There are actually less hurricanes,tornados and average temp is down. It's all a scam to tax the? people.

We now know there ...
By: johndaddyo444. on 09 Jun 13, 08:19:08
We now know there is no such thing as a "solar constant". The whole notion was ludicrous. And yet, all global climate models assume? no long term solar forcing of climate change! How absurd does one's science have to get in order to believe such cockamamie drivel? ALL climate change is traced back to Solar Forcing. It becomes more and more clear with each year of cooling -- after more CO2 than ever (allegedly) has filled the atmosphere. CO2 causes global warming, then COOLING??? Nonsense.

Go back 100 yrs and ...
By: johndaddyo444. on 09 Jun 13, 08:15:53
Go back 100 yrs and you? don't have any satellite data - so you don't really know what global mean temperature was. You might have an inkling IF the Hadley Centre hadn't fudged the data so badly, and lost the original records and method used to create the data set from the 1800s and early 1900s. You might have a fighting chance at understanding long term climate change IF climate scientists hadn't rushed to judge CO2 the guilty agent, rather than studying the Sun & Oceans more carefully.

Prove it. Not one ...
By: johndaddyo444. on 09 Jun 13, 08:10:39
Prove it. Not one serious scientists backs up your claim. Only journalists and political activists seeking to salvage a modicum of respect after epic fail with a ridiculous theory like warming due to CO2. You can't "drive climate" with fractions of one? degree change. Utter nonsense.

Difference is we? ...
By: pink pearl. on 09 Jun 13, 01:46:41
Difference is we? have unusual drought, floods, heatwaves, cold snaps, hurricanes, new-record-setting temps etc EVERY year, all over the world.

I don't think " ...
By: pink pearl. on 09 Jun 13, 01:44:24
I don't think "arctic? ice" means every inch of Greenland was covered in ice.

Your? figures only ...
By: pink pearl. on 09 Jun 13, 01:42:59
Your? figures only go back to 1998, but each figure has a + sign, Go back 100 years and the trend line is very obviously upwards. There is no global cooling.

negative ...
By: tstruss912. on 07 Jun 13, 04:39:41
negative externalities which is TOTALLY NORMAL AND NECESSARY in a capitalist system. Stop listening to propaganda and come back to reality. You are strong enough--quit being weak.?

The top ...
By: tstruss912. on 07 Jun 13, 04:38:45
The top climatologists in the world, Al Gore, Bush, Gingrich, Frank Luntz, the Koch Bros climatologist, most of the world population....all of us know what the science says: man made CO2 is adding to the effect of the sun, earth tilt, etc to push us over the "humans are happy to live here" temperature range. Who are we to put our grandkids and their kids future home on the crap table and roll the dice?! And who said anything about "socialism and communism"?! We're talking? about regulating

I agree completely, ...
By: johndaddyo444. on 07 Jun 13, 04:20:44
I agree completely, tstruss912. (Pause to enjoy a moment of agreement) Now, how? do we protect the home our grandkids will inherit? Should we borrow as much as possible and max out all of our credit in a vain attempt to change climate? Should we expedite the introduction of Socialism & Communism (centralized Gov't control) over our lives? Or should we cherish the freedoms which helped make America the greatest nation in history (before we started going astray)? I want my grandkids to live free.

Quite right. And ...
By: johndaddyo444. on 07 Jun 13, 04:10:49
Quite right. And the river Thames froze over about 400 yrs ago in a clear & direct response to solar forcing (or rather, lack thereof -- the quiet Sun associated with the Maunder minimum). Why would modern climate scientists throw out 400 yrs of climate science and push a political agenda at this time? Why would biologists and botanists think more CO2 would be harmful to plants? Why would paleoclimatologists ignore the role of 7000ppmv? of CO2 in the pre-Cambrian explosion of new life forms?

Quite right, ...
By: johndaddyo444. on 07 Jun 13, 04:05:42
Quite right, constitutionfst. I wonder how long Prof. Francis spent compiling this list of false evidence and improper correlations? Hurricane Sandy in 2012 is no more evidence of global warming due to CO2 than the early May snows in Colorado and Memorial day (end of May) SNOWSTORM in Vermont in 2013 was evidence of global cooling and the onset of? the next Ice Age.

No scientist would ...
By: johndaddyo444. on 07 Jun 13, 04:01:26
No scientist would dream of making such a statement: "the science is in--it's over." At 12:25 Prof. Francis presents? a false representation of solar + volcanic forcing from models (i.e. NOT from observation). Wouldn't it make more sense to compare observed temperatures with observed solar forcing? Perhaps climate scientists don't yet know that we can do this now. There are 5 satellites constantly monitoring the Sun, and we've correlated subtle changes in solar energy output with sunspot cycles

What the heck is ...
By: johndaddyo444. on 07 Jun 13, 03:55:55
What the heck is going on here? I think climate models are generating false estimates of mean global temperatures. Check out the satellite data, which proves the models wrong. USA 48 states "record" heat wave in 2012 represents 1.6% of earth's surface - insignificant in comparison to sea surface temperatures (70% of earth's surface). Global climate models are all wrong. They try, but they fail. So we ought not use the output from these models to stuff? the database with false ocean temps.

Odd, but as someone ...
By: johndaddyo444. on 07 Jun 13, 03:51:01
Odd, but as someone whose job depends on the latest data on solar forcing, my? understanding is that more than 50% of what we know about the Sun has been learned in the past 15 years. Hard to imagine how climate scientists "already considered" this new data and incorporated it into their climate models in the 1980s. Also hard to understand why all modern climate models failed to project current global cooling. UAH global satellite data: 1998 +0.42C 2005 +0.26C 2012 +0.16C April +0.10C, May +0.07C

Then you had better ...
By: constitutionfst. on 05 Jun 13, 18:47:54
Then you had better check out "What in the World are they spraying?" and "Why in the World are they? spraying?" both are free videos on youtube. They are also spraying Strontium, God only knows why, but it's showing up in the soils were ever people report chemtrails. This whole climate change hoax is spawning far more dangerous "solutions" then any phony problem we puny humans might be causing.

HAARP can only ...
By: constitutionfst. on 05 Jun 13, 18:35:35
HAARP can only control weather on a very localized area. The Billions of watts it takes to? affect even a small area is very hard to sustain over long periods (days). Maximum effect can only be achieved if coordinated with arial spraying of a metallic or semi-metallic catalyst for the energy to act upon.

I'm at least as old ...
By: constitutionfst. on 05 Jun 13, 18:31:15
I'm at least as old as Ms. Francis climate trends over the last 60-70 years are getting milder, NOT more severe. My parents and grandparents told me of even more? severe climate of the early part of the last century and the later part of the 19th. Tall tales are easy to pull on children who do not have the benefit of personal experience.

Wait for the ...
By: wahinni7. on 04 Jun 13, 23:18:42
Wait for the methane to be released because of this. We are? in for some really unpleasant times.

And so what about ...
By: wwwlauretteca. on 04 Jun 13, 05:58:00
And so what about HAARP and it's role in changing the jet stream??? Anybody want? to even mention that/??

Jennifer Francis ...
By: ghostsofevolution. on 31 May 13, 15:24:55
Jennifer Francis and Joe Romm both recommend an excellent online webpage as a more detailed primer on the jet stream. Just google this title: "A Rough Guide to the Jet Stream: what? it is, how it works and how it is responding to enhanced Arctic warming"

22:41? artic sea ...
By: maarten kaskens. on 30 May 13, 07:17:12
22:41? artic sea ice last 1450 years. Is this correct? The Viking Era (793 to 1066) to 1500s The Vikings sailed from Iceland and first settled in Greenland in 981. They developed pasture land and farms on the western Greenland coast.

Its not really hard ...
By: 64jcl. on 22 May 13, 09:08:50
Its not really hard to understand that UK and? Europe have experienced cold blasts when you look at the weather systems that has lingered over the Arctic area with high pressures. Yes this is all because the Arctic is warming fastest and is really a major part of the global temperature rise. You know -20C instead of -30C is still warming even though both temperatures are cold. The general idea however is that we will experience more extreme heat when it gets warm in the summer months.

Dr Richard Milne - Critical Thinking on Climate Change: separating skepticism from denial
Posted by: EdinburghUniversity

Video duration: 4795 seconds
Global video hits: 30328

Dr Richard Milne, School of Biological Sciences, presents Critical Thinking on Climate Change: separating skepticism from denial. Recorded on 11 October 2011.

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

The bottom line is ...
By: tstruss912. on 03 Jun 13, 05:17:27
The bottom line is that 97% of experts agree and? action will be taken. Period. You can throw tantrums because you're anxious regarding? the? change all you want. I feel sorry for you that you feel so scared but that won't stop policy forever.

Have you seen ...
By: grindupBaker. on 03 Jun 13, 04:32:09
Have you seen Berkeley Earth Inc. site of Dr. Richard Muller. Their reanalysis of land-only AST since 1753 based on? (they say) the full content of large data sets gives a smooth upward curve with each volcano named on it. Collate that with the ocean heat content, forget the flakey fluid ocean surface and Bob's Your Uncle. I've no time till winter, they say you can download their data and software & reanalyze it yourself. Fun stuff.

None of it scares ...
By: grindupBaker. on 03 Jun 13, 04:18:15
None of it scares me, I've got one? foot in the grave, but you sure are babbling.

The bottom line is ...
By: tstruss912. on 02 Jun 13, 20:54:57
The bottom line is that 97% of experts agree and action? will be taken. Period. You can throw tantrums because you're anxious regarding the? change all you want. I feel sorry for you that you feel so scared but that won't stop policy forever.

The bottom line is ...
By: Galv140577. on 02 Jun 13, 20:34:30
The bottom line is that even if the psycho-eugenicist depopulationist wealth-hording monopoly-men who hold us all hostage in their little real-life? monopoly game so they can continue to cheat at it relentlessly & hold all our resources to perpetual ransom succeed in wiping out 95% of humanity to proclaim themselves Gods then there will still be huge question marks dangling over the history of the world & their false claims to Godhood. I hope they fail. That's what everyone should expect anyway.

The future history ...
By: Galv140577. on 02 Jun 13, 20:27:19
The future history books will say that 95% of humanity died because they didn't do as their God the government told them to do, & then they'll make up some vague unscientific bullshit to validate this claim & warn people not to question it & make severe examples of anyone who does dare to question their lies. Hitler was very much into the 'environMENTAL' movement, because he? was a fascist & sadly this shit we're witnessing today on a global scale is 'green-fascism'.

The bottom line is ...
By: tstruss912. on 02 Jun 13, 18:50:27
The bottom line is that 97% of experts agree and action will be taken. Period. You can throw tantrums because you're anxious? regarding the change all you want. I feel sorry for you that you feel so scared but that won't stop policy forever.

I seem to have ' ...
By: naturfagstoff. on 02 Jun 13, 18:21:51
I seem to have 'published? the most' in this debate, so does that mean you support my views, irrelevant of what they are?

Pure alcohol is ...
By: naturfagstoff. on 02 Jun 13, 18:19:18
Pure alcohol is about 96%. Where did You get? this number? I think 100% of all scientists who are involved in climate research are 100% aware of the fact that the conclusions in their reports, and what they get funding for trying to discover is 100% dependent on government funding. And that their future funding is about 97-100% dependent on? their finding that human CO2 is a problem. So are they really unbiased?

Latest warming in ...
By: naturfagstoff. on 02 Jun 13, 18:15:05
Latest warming in troposphere (where CO2 HAS an effect over water vapor): 0,1C over the? period 1979-2013. That is less than 0,3C per century. That really does not scare anyone.

Propaganda like ...
By: naturfagstoff. on 02 Jun 13, 18:11:02
Propaganda like that shown? in the video above?

Argumentum ad ...
By: naturfagstoff. on 02 Jun 13, 18:09:30
Argumentum ad Populum. Science is not established by a show of hands,? be it Bush, Gore or Obama.

I think that ...
By: naturfagstoff. on 02 Jun 13, 18:04:30
I think that probability is slightly higher. The? rest is a matter of fact.

Yeah, man. I've ...
By: naturfagstoff. on 02 Jun 13, 17:56:44
Yeah, man. I've heard? of that. But of course, the CO2 hysterics are out to wipe that from the books as well. I suppose sometime in the future we will read in science text books that human CO2 caused that too, because someone made a time-travel back to the period 100 years before it, to suck CO2 out of the air.

I don't have to. It ...
By: naturfagstoff. on 02 Jun 13, 17:39:28
I don't have to. It is sufficient to show that the human part of CO2 in the atmosphere has little effect. Human fossil CO2 in atmosphere has several times been calculated to 4-5% of total atm. CO2. CO2 should show warming in lower troposphere, but it does not. Greenhouse effect at lower atm. altitude is primarily due to water vapor. It is the CO2 hysterics that have to prove that human fossil CO2 has a scary effect. So far, using some 100 billion dollars, over 30+? years, no evidence. Why?

No fingerprint ...
By: naturfagstoff. on 02 Jun 13, 17:31:07
No fingerprint found for CO2 warming troposphere, measurements have been done with satellite. Warming at sea level? and on ground based thermometers are showing increase, but in this part of the atmosphere, water vapor is the predominant cause of greenhouse warming. Temp 'rise' in lower troposphere is in the order +/-0,1C from 1979-2013, confirmed with satellite and weather balloons. Thermometer rise in same period: +0,4C, caused by water vapor, clouds and sunshine.

I think you are ...
By: 1000frolly. on 17 May 13, 05:13:31
I think you are getting mixed up with another study. There was one by Anderagg et al and another by Doran & Zimmerman (75 out of 77 = 97%). Because of the questions they ask, both are? complete nonsense, and do not separate sceptics from believers.

You read the study ...
By: tstruss912. on 17 May 13, 04:00:39
You read the study wrong. It was 908 climatologists in total and 97% of those who PUBLISH THE MOST were convinced that humans were responsible for? warming trends. Reread the study since you left that point out.

See my vid ""the 97 ...
By: 1000frolly. on 17 May 13, 03:42:42
See my vid ""the 97% consensus is pure fiction" ?

No, it can be put ...
By: tstruss912. on 17 May 13, 03:12:53
No, it can be put to a vote 37 times just like "Obamacare" if you want. It means nothing. We put experts in charge for a reason. Do you vote on what to do? with car safety and water purity? Nope, because you don't know anything about those topics. The bottom line is that 97% of experts agree and action will be taken. Period. You can throw tantrums because you're anxious regarding the change all you want. I feel sorry for you that you feel so scared but that won't stop policy forever.

So you are scared ...
By: 1000frolly. on 17 May 13, 02:25:23
So you are scared of a vote on carbon taxes and the like; wonder why? Could it be because most folk have now realised that they have been HAD? Mate, you are the one who has been brainwashed; there is no evidence at all that our CO2 is now, or will cause a problem? with the climate. See all my vids debunking CAGW.

Gov has experts who ...
By: tstruss912. on 17 May 13, 01:47:15
Gov has experts who SHOULD handle such things based on evidence. That's why your water is clean.? Voting is not relevant. But, you should know that you're in the minority, and that the minority is only as big as it is due to MASSIVE propaganda.

"and most of the ...
By: 1000frolly. on 17 May 13, 00:16:15
"and most of the world? population.. ". Are you ready to have a vote on this? -Like right now?

You're entitled to ...
By: tstruss912. on 16 May 13, 20:08:15
You're entitled to your opinion, which is one that most climatologists, Frank Luntz, Bush, Gore, and? most of the world? population disagree with.

Google+ Conversation with Al Gore about Combating Climate Change - Hangout on Air
Posted by: TakePart

Video duration: 2525 seconds
Global video hits: 0

Google+ Conversation with Al Gore about Combating Climate Change - Hangout on Air To learn more about climate change, what's changed over the last seven year...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

I agree. Gore ...
By: tnekkc. on 18 Jun 13, 17:21:00
I agree. Gore should be in prison? for global warming hoaxing.

Global warming talk ...
By: tnekkc. on 18 Jun 13, 17:17:10
Global warming talk is not science,? it is liberal religion. Gore is snake oil hoax.

Once the people of ...
By: Ant Trethowen. on 18 Jun 13, 13:16:33
Once the people of the world have take back their human rights and limited Government to a minim & members in government are once again public servants, they should be taxing the hell out of these big Corporations for all their mess. Oil spills, barium all? over our land from there aerial spraying, toxic GMO food and stock etc.. and forcing car manufacturers to make more efficient vehicles other whys we will not allow them in the country. Why should we pay for there mess!

Say No to GMO, Say ...
By: Ant Trethowen. on 18 Jun 13, 12:58:43
Say No to GMO, Say NO to aerial SPRAYING and do your homework on weather warfare as it just might open? your eyes to what is really going on! Nothing is as it seems!

Algor does not have ...
By: Ant Trethowen. on 18 Jun 13, 12:57:59
Algor does not have the Earth or common man's best interests at heart. He is working for his own big corps on this and others as another way of profiting and Taxing us more for there gain through fear and misinformation on the matter, He wants to depopulate the world! Let us start with him first then! The? earth is more than capable of feeding the population 5 time over if we took our country back from elitists and puppeteers like him.

Yes there are ...
By: Ant Trethowen. on 18 Jun 13, 12:56:45
Yes there are issues with pollution by man, but the major pollution is being done my big corporate companies how don't care about anything or anyone but making money and puting a stop to anything that might threaten their interests like new technologies and really could help mankind an keep it green at the same time. Even by influencing governments and? legislation to prevent it. Offen these new ideas have no financial benefit and have a way of setting man free from the reliance of big corps.

Hey Tyler, Very ...
By: Ant Trethowen. on 18 Jun 13, 12:54:38
Hey Tyler, Very hard to mention all the facts behind this swindell. In a nut shell it is a fact that earth is a living breathing machine & is constantly changing and has circles or? climate changes regardless of how many people are on it. Scientist are noticing these same changes on other planetary bodies also and to our knowledge no one is living on them.

Hey Tyler,? Very ...
By: Ant Trethowen. on 18 Jun 13, 12:54:24
Hey Tyler,? Very hard to mention all the facts behind this swindell. In a nut shell it is a fact that earth is a living breathing machine & is constantly changing and has circles or climate changes regardless of how many people are on it. Scientist are noticing these same changes on other planetary bodies also and to our knowledge no one is living on them.

Hey man! I hope all ...
By: Tyler Neher. on 17 Jun 13, 23:55:57
Hey man! I hope all is well. It was something? glazed over in the rehearsal (I don't know if you were there.) just briefly. But given that you're a researcher in the field, i'll yield to your expertise.

Hi Tyler. I am JB ...
By: BCLS group: BioCultural Landscapes & Seascapes. on 17 Jun 13, 23:51:28
Hi Tyler. I am JB Pichancourt (the ozie-french research scientist from the panel with you), and? I don't remember other panelists had notes on Biodiversity outside me. What I asked is absolutely not well known. This is ongoing science. We don't know which species that contribute to carbon sequestration is going to be extinct? The exact relationship between biodiversity and carbon sequestration??? and which associated cultural trait important to manage biodiversity is going to disappear?

Hey BCLS, I was on ...
By: Tyler Neher. on 17 Jun 13, 15:50:59
Hey BCLS, I was on the panel and let me clarify some of what happened. We had some notes on biodiversity to discuss, but unfortunately we ran out of time to talk about it. We did speak about it before the chat. Global climate change is threatening global biodiversity; this is known. Biodiversity is the engine of speciation and promotes atmospheric carbon-capture (as you noted). Action must be taken to promote conservation efforts as efforts to reduce climate change, not? just "saving the trees."

Hey Ant, I don't ...
By: Tyler Neher. on 17 Jun 13, 15:45:09
Hey Ant, I don't have a PhD and I was one of? the people on the panel. What exactly do you believe the truth is with respect to global climate change?

Hello irondmax, I ...
By: Tyler Neher. on 17 Jun 13, 15:43:09
Hello irondmax, I was? the panelist from Florida, and I do not own any Tesla stock. I hope that clears things up!

Tyler Neher here, ...
By: Tyler Neher. on 17 Jun 13, 15:42:10
Tyler Neher here, the panelist from Florida. I have not made a single dollar off of this broadcast or the subject. I am just a student, and was not? backing any industry. I hope that clarifies things!

Good call, Anthony! ...
By: Tyler Neher. on 17 Jun 13, 15:39:53
Good call, Anthony! One thing we must be careful about is blaming every natural disaster on climate change. The science says that global climate change will produce more storms, floods, etc., but we can't say that any particular event was caused? by climate change.

Ad hominem attacks ...
By: Tyler Neher. on 17 Jun 13, 15:37:44
Ad hominem attacks will get you nowhere in life. When you're ready to talk science, feel? free to reply.

We are Way..... ...
By: MelanieH2. on 17 Jun 13, 14:02:41
We are Way..... Past the ? of existence(Stop wasting TIME on it) The ? NOW is HOW? * People coming together for solutions is? the Answer! * Get going~ that's what NEEDS TO HAPPEN NOW! Get our Colleges involved w/ turning Toxic chemicals in our water and air; turning them into O2 or something good for mankind. READY?!!! (its not going to be easy- but NEEDS to happen- FIX What is wrong or IT WILL kill? you!)

Al Gore...? He lost.
By: David Lee. on 16 Jun 13, 23:34:56
Al Gore...? He lost.

Thank God? for Al ...
By: nilent. on 16 Jun 13, 16:44:53
Thank God? for Al Gore. Unless we deal with the effects of anthropogenic/man made global warming/climate change there is a real probability that the human race will become extinct. And far worse...that the earth's oceans and atmosphere will eventually boil off into space as a result of a runaway greenhouse effect. Those are the stakes!!! The science is absolutely overwhelming that these are real problems and real threats. Denialists are misinformed, politically motivated and/or just greedy.

Thx for? the talk
By: perla Sanchez. on 16 Jun 13, 09:07:29
Thx for? the talk

Oh Al Gore, what a ...
By: gconol. on 16 Jun 13, 08:42:15
Oh Al Gore, what a great scam artist you are. So, basically he wants us to give up our lifestyle to reduce carbon emissions while he can enjoy traveling around the world with his private Jets and? really awesome cars. Yea, that's convenient....for him.

Tyler Neher, You ...
By: gary sin. on 16 Jun 13, 04:59:09
Tyler Neher, You are a fucking idiot,? everything you have said so far is wrong. I

Electric cars are a ...
By: gary sin. on 16 Jun 13, 04:55:03
Electric cars are a joke in themselves, If? 1% of the american population switched to electric the entire energy grid would overload and fail... shit is stupid

The Climate Question: Degrees of Change - Part 1
Posted by: AlJazeeraEnglish

Video duration: 1487 seconds
Global video hits: 17146

Climate Change has become one of the biggest, most complex issues of our time. And the warnings from some of the world's leading scientists are getting loude...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

"..if nothing is ...
By: 1000frolly. on 12 Jun 13, 09:19:14
"..if nothing is done, the certain end result is? total extinction of humans. " I just could not stop laughing when I read this; just where did you get this twaddle from?

"Decreasing arctic ...
By: 1000frolly. on 12 Jun 13, 09:17:15
"Decreasing arctic sea ice seems to cover the "GW" part. And if the arctic ice clears? completely that seems like it will give us the "C". Arctic ice is not evidence for GW.? But there has been GW (in the 18th, 19th & 20th century anyway; there has been none at all this century), we know that from the temperature record. "And if ..." Ahh yes, that little word, IF. And IF an asteroid hits us tomorrow,we will all be dead. "the A part". Correct, there is no evidence at all for any human influence.

Chemtrails, no I ...
By: mikedelhoo. on 12 Jun 13, 06:30:42
Chemtrails, no I can't see it for myself. I only see con(densation)trails. If they were spraying aluminum all over the place wouldn't it kind of settle out everywhere, like a? fine dust?

Hmmm...? so " ...
By: mikedelhoo. on 12 Jun 13, 06:20:57
Hmmm...? so "absolutely no evidence of CAGW"? Decreasing arctic sea ice seems to cover the "GW" part. And if the arctic ice clears completely that seems like it will give us the "C". Are you somehow stuck for evidence of the "A" part then?

...Um actually most ...
By: fabregeffrard. on 06 Jun 13, 13:49:57
...Um actually most scientists also believe that human DOES play a role in contributing to climate change. Hench that is also not for debate (at least? within the scientific community that is).

The reply of David ...
By: Demir Parcasi. on 12 May 13, 13:45:20
The reply of David Suziki to "What will happen if nothing is done?" is " I don't know" is? terribly wrong answer. He, I and all ecologists know the correct answer. if nothing is done, the certain end result is total extinction of humans. Life of humans can only be sustained in a very small temperature margins, if you continue to warm the planet indefinitely, at the end the planet will be too hot to live on.

You may give voice ...
By: Demir Parcasi. on 12 May 13, 13:31:00
You may give voice the anti-scientists but you must also give voice the scientists to reply their lies like there is no warming in this century or antarctic sea ice counterbalances sea ice loss of arctic. Truth; 9 of 10 warmest years on the record are in 21th century and arctic sea ice? loss is unprecedented in the known earth history and is at least 3 times greater than antarctic sea ice gain which is also consistent with global warming projections.

nooooo global ...
By: Sweetcupcakes23. on 30 Apr 13, 04:20:56
nooooo global warmingg gooo? awayyy :'(

We must take ...
By: Jolene8. on 10 Apr 13, 06:43:23
We must take control of the health of this home of ours. Consume less energy and? give this home of ours love.

Airlines needs to ...
By: Jolene8. on 10 Apr 13, 06:41:56
Airlines needs to slow down production. Forests need to be repopulated. We should not rely on these big money guys. They are heartless. We need to act as one. We can save this planet with love. Come on people. It's up to us. If your faith is strong,? please pray. It does help. Spread this message brothers and sisters. Much love.

Anyone who wants ...
By: GinnyinCO. on 02 Apr 13, 06:28:03
Anyone who wants evidence, check 350.org. NYT 4/1/13 editorial on James Hansen (NO April Fool) New studies this last year have reinforced he's been at least 97% right all along. Getting the sense I can't include links. Google: Unitarian Universalist UN Climate Change Task Force. TONS of info, links, science. I married an env eng? (MS) in '75. This is NOT fantasy or made up Conservacrap.

i'm still waiting ...
By: segoverial. on 22 Mar 13, 17:41:54
i'm still waiting on globol warming, sweden is to cold? :(

"It's goodbye for ...
By: Rand Huso. on 19 Mar 13, 02:37:33
"It's goodbye for now." Famous? last words.

2. Yes; absolutely? ...
By: 1000frolly. on 15 Mar 13, 07:45:16
2. Yes; absolutely? normal.

1. It is possible. ...
By: 1000frolly. on 15 Mar 13, 07:42:38
1. It is possible. Our planet has been on a cooling trend for 60 million years. The last 3 million years of which have been easily the coldest of all in this period, because we have descended in a series of ice ages/inter-glacials. The climate in the last 3 million years has easily been the most unstable in the last 60 million year period, with wild swings in temperature of 10c or more. We are now close to the highest temperature than we have experienced throughout the last? 3 million years.

u're right, i ...
By: TheKingJN. on 15 Mar 13, 05:06:14
u're right, i couldn't believe it when my friend told me about this site. i know one thing for sure, i've been getting paid about $200 a week? just for letting brands know what i prefer to buy. its worth a try here: bit.ly\YeWTkn

Two quick questions ...
By: AmazingApe. on 14 Mar 13, 15:03:35
Two quick questions for you: 1. When climatologists say that the Arctic sea hasn't been an open body of water for at least 3 million years (analysis of seafloor sediments clearly show that) do you believe them? 2. If we see an ice free Arctic sea within a few year (collapse of the volume of sea ice clearly show that this is about to happen), would you view this as nothing more than a normal fluctuation? in the earth's climate?

You are a real ...
By: 1000frolly. on 14 Mar 13, 08:21:21
You are a real believer, aren't you? Don't you know that there is absolutely NO evidence for CAGW? Not a shred. If you do? not believe me, just ask anyone for some evidence of CAGW; I have many times, and so far have not had a single reply to the question.

Why can I not find ...
By: Himacmovieman. on 14 Mar 13, 05:31:27
Why can I not find intelligent life on this planet with money guts and integrity that actually cares that our planet is getting hotter as a result of burning millions of barrels of oil every day.?? WTF- I wrote a book that explains how many people actually got 5 times the gas mileage by refining gasoline into natural gas with a money back guarantee and sold over 2500 with only 2 refunds requested and free 90% of it on net at website him acre search dot com and seems no one cares...

They love water? ...
By: paz9iffy. on 13 Mar 13, 21:33:37
They love water? too, so a flood should be great.

It looks like we're ...
By: AmazingApe. on 11 Mar 13, 19:33:44
It looks like we're going to have an ice-free Arctic sea (during the late summer) somewhere between 2015 and 2020. In a sick way, this is a good thing, because when this comes to pass, moron agw deniers will have to shut up. Let's just hope that, when we get there, it's? still not too late, as long as we act decisively.

We love those green ...
By: 1000frolly. on 11 Mar 13, 10:57:11
We love those green plants that give us oxygen, that is why we are feeding the what they love;? CO2. How come you hate them so much, that you wish to starve them? Don't you care about the planet?

The Antarctic sea ...
By: 1000frolly. on 11 Mar 13, 10:53:05
The Antarctic sea ice extents has just posted a satellite record (a 30-year high on Sept 26th 2012) of over 19.4 million sq km. Source; National Snow and Ice Data Centre? in Boulder, Colorado, I suppose Greenpeace did not tell you, eh?

This is the biggest ...
By: 1000frolly. on 11 Mar 13, 10:33:05
This is the biggest load of twaddle I have ever seen (except for Lawson, of course) See my vid 'Alarmists are? the Deniers'.?

just so you know it ...
By: Benjamin Moss. on 10 Mar 13, 03:06:00
just so you know it is up for debate. Some scientists are arguing that urban heat islands play a major role is tainting temperature samples. So as to say that the earth's temperature? is rising, but not considering it may only be the points of measurement.

Denialism of Climate Change and Evolution
Posted by: NatCen4ScienceEd

Video duration: 3509 seconds
Global video hits: 3712

Far more people are climate change deniers than evolution deniers, but both camps use similar strategies to promote their views. Genie Scott explores the con...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

They can't handle ...
By: richard frascone. on 12 Jun 13, 22:34:18
They can't handle facts, period. Have you seen show #17 on Elon Musk yet? Go to who's telling the truth with rich frascone #17 and? enjoy.

"Where did you get ...
By: ge556. on 12 Jun 13, 21:30:24
"Where did you get the? idea, Nasa got caught manipulating the data??" Standard denialist lie. They can't handle the fact that climategate was debunked.

Exactly.?
By: XGralgrathor. on 05 Jun 13, 09:03:45
Exactly.?

Mars ice caps are ...
By: Jeff MacLeod. on 01 Jun 13, 20:05:28
Mars ice caps are melting due to changes in albedo.?

If you want to see ...
By: ExperienceCounts2. on 01 Jun 13, 19:57:59
If you want to see how persistent corporate denial of reality can be, look up Claire Patterson and his fight against leaded gasoline. Today, right now, the corporation that used to belong to oil companies and General Motors *still* denies that there is any evidence that high lead levels in humans cause problems. Why? So? they can still sell lead in developing economies where it hasn't been banned yet. Tobacco companies (and Fred Singer) *still* claim that smoking doesn't cause cancer.

The Right Offensive ...
By: IThinkWithMy Liver. on 01 Jun 13, 12:10:31
The Right Offensive deserves to be in prison for life? for treason. Not Bradley Manning nor Julian Assange.

Simple is good, no? ...
By: IThinkWithMy Liver. on 01 Jun 13, 12:08:39
Simple is good, no? Uh - guess that's subjective, as long as you are logically consistent and say that putting you into prison for life is simple, because that removes all complications from your life. Or, the simple life after a total? nuclear war levels everything is good.

Great response! ...
By: IThinkWithMy Liver. on 01 Jun 13, 12:06:14
Great response! Keep it? up!

Simple questions ...
By: ExperienceCounts2. on 27 May 13, 04:01:17
Simple questions that you won't answer: a) What is the specific data source(s) you used to determine that the 30 Mars year climate trend (56 Earth years) is warming? b) Name ONE specific paper that was corrected or retracted as a result of "climategate" e-mails. c) Name ONE specific data set that was inappropriately manipulated and cite the specific manipulation you? object to. Here's a hint: you're delusional and/or a liar, which you will now prove to everyone by your non-answers.

Hence the saying " ...
By: ExperienceCounts2. on 27 May 13, 03:51:52
Hence the saying "trust the science, not the scientist".?

Contrarian doesn't ...
By: ExperienceCounts2. on 27 May 13, 03:50:00
Contrarian doesn't fit because of their dogmatic approach. If it were religion, economics, policies, investments etc., there isn't any way of testing which position is correct. Science is testable and falsifiable, backed by evidence and published for all to review/challenge. To take a position opposing a massive body of testable evidence without presenting any specific testable reason/hypothesis supporting the opposite position is denial. They don't disagree, they deny and? claim conspiracy.

Where did you get ...
By: richard frascone. on 26 May 13, 03:20:36
Where did you get the idea, Nasa got caught manipulating the data?? Post your proof or piss off, Okay?

greetings from mars ...
By: godscuttingyoudown. on 25 May 13, 20:51:31
greetings from mars where the polar ice caps are also melting from all the industrial pollution and car smog we have listen to your light skin race of humans on earth THEY WOULD NEVER lie to you, don't pay attention to those climate gate emails or NASA ozone fraud, or NASA getting caught manipulating data, or rich white people on purposely crashing economies for profit, or leaders trying to disarm you & arm your local police like a para? military brute force; just keep listening to white people

Groups of " ...
By: Lawrence E. Alba. on 25 May 13, 12:00:22
Groups of "scientists" promoting minority opinions are more committed to the? exercise of political action than the offering of real, solid alternative theories. Additionally, when one checks bona fides for minority opinion scientists, one finds they often don't have degrees in the type of science in which they hold contrarian opinions,(civil engineers on evolution, chemists on climate change, physicians on the Big Bang). Yet their statements come bearing science credentials in a misleading way.

Science & climate ...
By: Lawrence E. Alba. on 25 May 13, 11:41:08
Science & climate change "contrarians"? works just fine.

I did not compare ...
By: Luis Dias. on 24 May 13, 15:45:20
I did not compare anything. Again, you see things where they are not, curious pattern. Small unimportant detail, Watts did publish at least one peer-reviewed paper AFAIK, but I really don't care except to say that you are wrong. And to your silly question, the answer is simple. It's not my job. I don't receive any paychecks for doing climate science. Your question is the silliest ever, since? it tries to prove something no one said, implies falsehoods, and skews the discussion. IOW, BAU.

"The only honest ...
By: XGralgrathor. on 24 May 13, 13:30:08
"The only honest answer? is that we don't know yet" A good start would be to ask "what's the worst that *did* happen?" and let the geological record guide us to an answer. If the past is anything to measure the future by, prospects aren't all that good. At least, not? for our current civilization.

I didn't know there ...
By: ExperienceCounts2. on 24 May 13, 13:18:41
I didn't know there were carnivorous gourmand? tulips! Though if I had to guess, I'd say "a lot like chicken".

A huge amount ...
By: ExperienceCounts2. on 24 May 13, 13:16:54
A huge amount depends on what happens with the methane, but the most recent bit I read is that taller vegetation is replacing shorter on the tundra, and in some places/under some conditions it's? mitigating the CO2 released from the permafrost. Problem is "What's the worst that can happen?" with climate change is like "What were conditions like before the big bang?". The only honest answer is that we don't know yet. That's what makes the anti-science so insanely criminal/vile/detestable.

"If only we could ...
By: XGralgrathor. on 24 May 13, 13:01:31
"If only we could simplify this? biosphere down to just tulips and elephants, eh? That would be "better", eh?" Don't know. What do elephant ribs taste like?

Really, you should ...
By: XGralgrathor. on 24 May 13, 12:51:49
Really, you should read the link I sent you. Fascinating stuff. Shows all current models, including the? most liberal ones, are severely underestimating the effects of warming. Once the permafrost lets go, we're all fucked. In the face. With a bazooka.

"Ocean ...
By: XGralgrathor. on 24 May 13, 12:50:01
"Ocean acidification.? Rapidly rising sea levels. Equatorial climate. Migrating disease patterns" I'd say those are all nice things. I like a bit of lemon in my iced tea. Now if we can just get the salt out of the oceans, I can simply use ocean water to get the acidity - I won't have to barbarically cut a lemon to bits for my iced tea! Good, innit?

You're now ...
By: ExperienceCounts2. on 24 May 13, 12:49:24
You're now comparing science published in reputable journals with sensationalist media gossip from Wattsuphisass. Watts hasn't published ANY science, testable theories, hasn't committed to specific projections. He doesn't cite his sources or show his algorithms. He's a professional liar? (and a bad one at that) Jones publishes his work for review and paranoid global conspiracy freaks like you haven't responded to it in the journals where published. Why not? Answer that one simple question.

Speaking of simple, ...
By: ExperienceCounts2. on 24 May 13, 12:33:39
Speaking of simple, isn't it beyond simplistic to speak only of one of the many effects of global warming, and then to narrow it down to specific regions of the globe? Ocean acidification. Rapidly rising sea levels. Equatorial climate. Migrating disease patterns. I have to say that stating "simpler is better"? when it comes to a biosphere has to be about as simple minded as I've heard. If only we could simplify this biosphere down to just tulips and elephants, eh? That would be "better", eh?

Here, this is? cool ...
By: XGralgrathor. on 24 May 13, 11:57:34
Here, this is? cool stuff: wunderground . com/resources/climate/melting_permafrost.asp

$Collaborative-Scholarship Across the Disciplines: \"Global Climate Change\"$

Collaborative-Scholarship Across the Disciplines: "Global Climate Change"
Posted by: QuinnipiacUniversity

Video duration: 5089 seconds
Global video hits: 84

On Tuesday February 26, 2013, the Collaborative for Excellence in Learning and Teaching, along with the Scholarship Across the Disciplines committee, hosted ...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

The cognition of climate change denial
Posted by: uniofsydney

Video duration: 1297 seconds
Global video hits: 329

Summary: Professor Stephan Lewandowsky is a cognitive scientist in the School of Psychology at UWA. This presentation was part of the Climate Change: Busines...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

The science of climate change
Posted by: UniversityOfBristol

Video duration: 3640 seconds
Global video hits: 3056

Professor Paul Valdes, School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol http://www.bristol.a c.uk/science/courses /undergraduate/ Climate change is rarel...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

I do not have to ...
By: Gary Warner. on 16 Jun 13, 02:21:16
I do not have to read the IPCC Report on Climate Change to know it is happening, I can see it. Greedy CEO's that control the News have fooled the fools that watch crap like Fox News. As the blind fools drown on Wall Street, the Atlantic Ocean running through NY City, they will still be watching Fox News, there? is no climate Change, there is no Climate Change. LOL

"earlier? flowering ...
By: gyddrftggggvbhf. on 23 May 13, 20:13:47
"earlier? flowering of plants in spring" - That will depend where you are. Many areas have cooled since the warm 1990s. "global net ice loss" - in the Arctic and the Antarctic peninsula - We're in a warm period; no proven link to CO2. Gain of ice in most of Antarctica, unless you think ice melts at minus 50C. "increasing absorption at CO2 wavelengths" - mmm, and NO? global warming since 2002.... strange, that. Source, please. Fossil fuel air pollution kills 3 million/yr? Source of data?

Calling me a ...
By: checkyoursources. on 19 May 13, 04:50:53
Calling me a hypocrite is like me calling you a supporter of fossil fuel air pollution which kills 3 million annually, do you support those deaths? 1) My electricity provider uses renewables 2) I suppose you think the earlier flowering of plants in spring, global net ice loss, the detection by satellites of increasing absorption at CO2 wavelengths and multiple other sources of empirical data are not indicators of the Earth gaining energy faster than it is losing it? ?

It takes an act of ...
By: gyddrftggggvbhf. on 16 May 13, 17:28:06
It takes an act of faith to use the present tense to describe something that stopped over 11 years ago. As for more heat going into the Oceans, that's a fantasy cooked? up by people clinging to the CO2 myth - sparse pre-ARGO data; 'adjusted' data since. Carry on believing if it makes you happy (but make sure you're walking everywhere, and don't turn your heating on, and turn your computer off - or are you a hypocrite?).

Direct from? RSS: ...
By: checkyoursources. on 15 May 13, 09:12:17
Direct from? RSS: Channel TLT 1979 to 2013-04 Trend= +0.130 K/decade (yep warming) and UAH:1979 to 2013 trend is: +0.138 K per decade. Name a dataset that shows cooling over the last 40 years? The warming hasn't stopped, the Oceans have a higher specific heat capacity than the atmosphere so the Earth is still accumulating heat but more is going into the Oceans.

Because ocean has ...
By: grindupBaker. on 14 May 13, 07:22:08
Because ocean has 97.5% of ecosystem heat,? freshwater has 2.3% land+air has 0.2%. The heat is merely passing through the surface into the oceans and it'll be doing this for centuries, the final little bit will still be going into the oceans in a couple of thousand years if the ocean gets a bit sated with CO2 & reduces its uptake. We just get a taste of what will happen next century when the ocean burps. Study ENSO, AMO & THC if you are impartial & have time/interest.

At 24:35 it's fine ...
By: grindupBaker. on 14 May 13, 07:22:04
At 24:35 it's fine to play with temperature graphs & draw competing lines? through them but he doesn't tell you the underlying reality. "Global Warming" is not surface temperature graphs & you can draw lines through them to your heart's content. "Global Warming" is an increase in the ocean heat content. You need to understand what this means before you can hope to understand the babble about everywhere.

At 22:50 FYI what ...
By: grindupBaker. on 14 May 13, 07:16:09
At 22:50 FYI what he says & that graph ~1930-1960 apparently scientists wrote papers with clever theories about that 1940 bump & since they put Argo floats in they found the method ~1930-1960 (pull water up in buckets and stick a thermometer in it on the kitchen table) was pretty crappy & they managed to re-work it a bit and it still has that shape mostly but less of a bump. Now they throw? out all early papers about that bump because it was just a "data artifact" (Dr. Trenberth phrase). LOL

Suggest you Google ...
By: grindupBaker. on 14 May 13, 06:50:59
Suggest you Google coal reserves oil natural gas world consumption production and similar words. You'll get all kinds of tables & graphs from web sites (some from the industries themselves), look for ones with dates, find a few that are similar so you know the data is? pretty accurate. I think it's that simple.

then move to a ...
By: sion7186. on 20 Apr 13, 19:52:18
then move to a warmer climate it puts any thing that relies on? the cold at risk fresh water does not mix well with salt water.

You've figured out ...
By: Johnny Black. on 20 Apr 13, 03:55:30
You've figured out greenhouse effect...wait...global warming...wait...I? forgot we are now calling it "Climate change" now to encompass virtually anything so that nobody could ever pin it down as being WRONG! These are the "unbelievers " of reality.

I'm writing a paper ...
By: Kieran Giles. on 15 Apr 13, 04:05:25
I'm writing a paper on the difference between the recent climate change and previous climatic events for my Palaeoclimate Change module. I noticed? that you displayed a lot of curves that supported large anthropological input to our global carbon dioxide levels for the last few years. I would like to know some of the sources for those curves (the journals they came from). Could have a small reference list in the description? Thanks for uploading a good lecture.

"The point is that ...
By: TheRealArchAngel. on 15 Apr 13, 01:51:40
"The point is that the Cloward-Piven strategy is seen by some people as a way of bringing about revolution, and some of those people want revolution." The 3rd major Cap&Trade they are all hot up for will merely cause a World Depression that will kill off the poor then middle classthen the elllitists who depend on the now dead poor for "power"and middle class for tax revenue/union dues I guess equally? dead is "equal" "it will not bring revolution in the US" Of course not It's a "World Economy"

I didn't say that ...
By: randomxnp. on 14 Apr 13, 22:18:19
I didn't say that Cloward-Piven is not silly. Socialism is clearly silly; to me religion is rather silly, though not nearly as silly as socialism. The point is that the Cloward-Piven strategy is seen by some people as a way of bringing about revolution, and some of those people want revolution. I agree that it will not bring revolution in the US, but I don't think that will stop people trying, especially if there is revolution somewhere? in the EU soon.

Actually the error ...
By: randomxnp. on 14 Apr 13, 19:47:59
Actually the error might be a total lack of increase in water vapour in the atmosphere. NASA data to 2001 show no significant change (slight increase, not significant by any reasonable statistical model) to 700 hPa? (about 3000m altitude, 10,000 ft) and a slight drop starting in the 1990s above there up to about 300 hPa (about 9000m). All models assume increase throughout this layer. Link below is a graph of raw data, not from any study. bit[dot]ly[slash]10Vyke5

"Have you heard of ...
By: TheRealArchAngel. on 14 Apr 13, 19:37:50
"Have you heard of the? Cloward-Piven strategy?" Utter silliness Governments that have collapsed or gone insolvant from Economic strain cant "gaurentee the income of the people" The US Feds are broker then the State governments from Welfare and the lost of tax revenue from the 2 cap&trade attempts Lasty,while there is a number of people willing to give up Liberty for security in the U.S. it is not a trait of the majority of rebelious by nature "Americans"..it WILL turn into a fight

"assumptions about ...
By: TheRealArchAngel. on 14 Apr 13, 19:07:13
"assumptions about feedback due to water vapour, have proved to be incorrect." Of course, because they are considering water vapour a "feed back" instead of the principle carrier of heat Lot of the "Climate Histoy"? lectures like to mention John Tyndall but often forget to mention his conclusions that it's the "second sea" of trace to 1% water vapour between the surface and cloud line that allows the "biosphere" part of the atmosphere to retain tempature independent of sun and surface temps

Have you heard of ...
By: randomxnp. on 14 Apr 13, 18:58:28
Have you heard of the Cloward-Piven strategy? It is a political strategy to take control. Many of these people have shown that power? over people is more important to them than actual economic resources.

Well the current ...
By: randomxnp. on 14 Apr 13, 18:55:08
Well the current computer models have made some predictions. Some of the predictions that are made by all models and are distinctive of core assumptions in the model, assumptions about feedback due to water vapour, have proved to be incorrect. Just to help your English (this is a? tricky one, and your English is better than my second language, so this is not criticism) - hypotheses is the plural of hypothesis.

"Stick a vehicle ...
By: TheRealArchAngel. on 14 Apr 13, 18:54:31
"Stick a vehicle emmisions testing device on your exhaust and you'll find Obama's EPA Czar's Ire in trying to tax co2 emmision in that it reads only 66ml of co2 per gallon.all of it from ethonol fermentation contamination" ANd of course The EPA Czar was challanged by the coal powerplant industry in US to charge "CO2 emmisions" taxes based on stack emmisions testing devices? instead of "calculations".( S.E.T.D. will only show nitrogen and water vapor as only"emmisions")...so EPA had to back down

"So I am going to ...
By: TheRealArchAngel. on 14 Apr 13, 18:45:51
"So I am going to do my part and fire up my 1968 pickup and burn a bunch of gas." To what end? Part of the hype is Aristitile's chemical Equilibrium's notion that all complex chemicals must break down simpler chemicals...which isn't true for combustion or Exothermic reactions Stick a vehicle emmisions testing device on your exhaust and you'll find Obama's EPA Czar's Ire in trying to? tax co2 emmision in that it reads only 66ml of co2 per gallon.all of it from ethonol fermentation contamination

"just? think of the ...
By: TheRealArchAngel. on 14 Apr 13, 18:34:28
"just? think of the possibilities." Actually it is human naature to fear change I mean look at this 3 centimeter to 20 centimeter rise in the ocean if all the ice sheets and glaciers melt (Impossibility, but the fear is there) Other then the hype of "20 to 30 feet flooding" a impossiibility as the 99% fresh water in the evaporation/percipitation cycle locked up as glaciers and ice sheets don't add up to cause that? much rise, Ice is not a "regulator of Climate" its part of heat exchange cycles

"One more way the ...
By: TheRealArchAngel. on 14 Apr 13, 18:19:03
"One more way the globalist want to control people and the world!!!! " Right...they wanted to nearly collapse the world Economy in October 2008 via the stupidity of the November 2007 US "biofuel initative" and make financially weaker governments like Spain and Greece? go almost insolvent by continuing the stupidity with a double down on US June Cap&trade attached to a back of a spending bill that caused the current world reccesion How do "ellitist" win when the taxes they live off dry up?

"Of course the ...
By: TheRealArchAngel. on 14 Apr 13, 18:09:47
"Of course the hypothesis has made testable predictions" First stepin Scientific Meyhod is Observace...they've done that Second step is to derive the Hypothises....they've done that Next step is to create a set of predictions....they've done that via computer models The step after the predictions continue to match observance is eliminate all other possibilities for results by tests and verification...so far they are still trying to get a working prediction(computer? model)

Err Isn't Climate a ...
By: TheRealArchAngel. on 14 Apr 13, 08:31:53
Err Isn't Climate a Geographical locationb determined by location on earth,elevation,and relative percipitation? The 33 year tempature/weather trends? is "Weather Variability" which also has 2 year,7 year, and 11 year cycls and determines droughts,extreme storms or such that can effect local Ecology..but not neccessarily Enviroment/Ecology is the part of what lives in the area cause of local resources plus wether and Climate allowing for Rain Forest or Desert ,Grasslands/grain belt

The Sun and Climate Change: Truth is Stranger Than Fiction
Posted by: UCDavis

Video duration: 2777 seconds
Global video hits: 100

A video introducing the physics of the Sun and its role in governing Earth's climate and the public's understanding of climate change.

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Evidence Of The Extreme Climate Change
Posted by: HawkkeyDavisChannel

Video duration: 467 seconds
Global video hits: 22725

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

HYPOCRACY EXPOSED " ...
By: Ras Pesher. on 18 Jun 13, 19:00:55
HYPOCRACY EXPOSED "you have no understanding of this at all" No I can detect hypocrisy when I see it. You (ROO) said, "Your chart has nothing to do w/absorption" which not only exposed your lack of understanding of Kirchhoff's Law but demonstrated a high level of hypocrisy in that your chart did not mention "absorption"/"absorptivity"/"e�missivity," either & covered the wrong EM frequency? range. Bungled on a grand? scale!

SWAPPING CARBON ...
By: Ras Pesher. on 18 Jun 13, 11:55:18
SWAPPING CARBON WITH CARBON "Human CO2 is quickly absorbed by nature b/c of the short few year residence time" Generally CO2 from the burning of fossil fuels is swapped out with naturally occurring CO2 and the anthropogenic carbon ends up in the carbon cycle replacing natural carbon. And the natural CO2 that replaced the human generated CO2 acts as? a greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. That is why the perturbation is so important.

SUMMER IS NOT ...
By: Ras Pesher. on 18 Jun 13, 02:39:50
SUMMER IS NOT GLOBAL WARMING It's variations in the shape of the elliptical orbit combined with axial tilt that caused the Antarctic deglacial warming. The length of summer and winter changes in line with Kepler's second law.? The length of the day is also varied by axial tilt. Antarctic deglacial warming came at the expense of cooling elsewhere. That is why it was not global warming. The fact that CO2 is a greenhouse? gas has been known since Darwin was kicking around. CO2 was the GLOBAL cause!

CO2 FOUND TO BE THE ...
By: Ras Pesher. on 18 Jun 13, 00:09:05
CO2 FOUND TO BE THE CAUSE OF GLOBAL WARMING ROO you're acting like a dinosaur that doesn't know it's extinct! Your running with "science" that never was science. Just old, tired worn out arguments that misrepresent the work of scientists. Caillon does not say that CO2 lagged GLOBAL warming. The idea that CO2 lagged Global? Warming has been proven to be a myth. ht tp: //w ww. livescience. com/19481-ice-age-carbon-dioxide-orbit. html

HOW UNUSUAL, GRAPH ...
By: Ras Pesher. on 17 Jun 13, 11:43:07
HOW UNUSUAL, GRAPH OF U.S. CATASTROPHIES DOESN'T LIST EVENTS OUTSIDE THE U.S.! "I didn't know the globe didn't have a single earthquake, volcano or tsunami in 2004" Some mothers do have 'em. You are looking? at a graph of US statistics, not the globe. Here are the global statistics: ht tp: //w ww. eco. on. ca/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Natural-Catastrophes-Worldwide2. jpg

Hahaha. There goes ...
By: RealOldOne2. on 17 Jun 13, 02:46:15
Hahaha. There goes Ras on another Gish Gallop! "In the following graph? it is quite clear that coming out of the last ice age, CO2 was the cause of the GLOBAL warming" ROTFLOL! Still denying p-r science I see! Caillon 2003- "the CO2 increase lagged Antarctic deglacial warming by 800 +/- 200 years" For incompetent doomsday climate cultists like you, LAGGED means came after. The CO2 rise came AFTER the temperature rise by ~800yrs, so it could NOT be the cause of the warming. Another Ras FAIL!

Hahaha. There goes ...
By: RealOldOne2. on 17 Jun 13, 02:45:49
Hahaha. There goes Ras on another Gish Gallop! "In the following graph it is quite clear that? coming out of the last ice age, CO2 was the cause of the GLOBAL? warming" ROTFLOL! Still denying p-r science I see! Caillon 2003- "the CO2 increase lagged Antarctic deglacial warming by 800 +/- 200 years" For incompetent doomsday climate cultists like you, LAGGED means came after. The CO2 rise came AFTER the temperature rise by ~800yrs, so it could NOT be the cause of the warming. Another Ras FAIL!

"CO2? has two ...
By: RealOldOne2. on 17 Jun 13, 02:45:39
"CO2? has two resident times in the atmosphere:1) a molecule for molecule residence time of ~10years, &2) a perturbation residence time of ~? 100 years" Wrong. Most p-r literature shows a residence time of

Hahaha. There goes ...
By: RealOldOne2. on 17 Jun 13, 02:45:38
Hahaha. There goes Ras on another Gish Gallop! "In the following graph it is quite clear that? coming out of the last ice age, CO2 was the cause of the GLOBAL warming" ROTFLOL! Still denying p-r science I see! Caillon 2003- "the CO2 increase lagged Antarctic deglacial warming by 800 +/- 200 years" For incompetent doomsday climate cultists like you,? LAGGED means came after. The CO2 rise came AFTER the temperature rise by ~800yrs, so it could NOT be the cause of the warming. Another Ras FAIL!

MAN'S HAS INCREASED ...
By: Ras Pesher. on 17 Jun 13, 01:26:24
MAN'S HAS INCREASED CO2 LEVELS BY 43% CO2 has two resident times in the atmosphere: 1) a molecule for molecule residence time of ~10years, & 2) a perturbation residence time of ~ 100 years Man's contribution to CO2 in the atmosphere has led to a perturbation increase of 43%. When it comes to global warming the perturbation increase that is important. Tracking CO2 molecule for molecule is irrelevant but for interest sake in 1950 it was 25% of the perturbation, in 2000 it fell to? 20%/perturbation.

LOCAL WARMING AINT ...
By: Ras Pesher. on 17 Jun 13, 00:13:41
LOCAL WARMING AINT GLOBAL The Antarctic warming came at the expense of cooling elsewhere. It wasn't global. It did however release CO2 locally which spread globally. In the following graph it? is quite clear that coming out of the last ice age, CO2 was the cause of the GLOBAL warming: ht tp: //w ww. rtcc. org/files/2012/04/ice-graph. jpg OldOne, sorry to burst your bubble.

FLIP FLOPPER "The? ...
By: Ras Pesher. on 16 Jun 13, 19:00:20
FLIP FLOPPER "The? sun heats the surface even more than it heats the deeper water" Whilst radiation from the Sun in the near I/R spectrum could potentially warm the surface, most of this part of the spectrum is absorbed by GHGs on the way down. So most of this potential never reaches the surface directly. Instead its absorbed in the atmosphere and becomes part of the far infrared/back radiation which you originally claimed was? NOT ABSORBED. Now you say it IS absorbed!

"CONTRADICTED"cont ...
By: RealOldOne2. on 16 Jun 13, 12:14:01
"CONTRADICTED"cont The fact that I explicitly stated: "The small heating of the micron-thin "skin" is only ~0.000000002 of the ocean's volume. Most of that heat is emitted back into the atmosphere, & the small fraction that is mixed w/the rest of the ocean is INSIGNIFICANT!" proves that I was? talking about SIGNIFICANT effects. Humans raise sea level by pissing in the ocean too, but it's insignificant & unmeasurable. Same w/'br' ocean warming. Happens but too small to measure. Another Ras FAIL!

"CONTRADICTED ...
By: RealOldOne2. on 16 Jun 13, 12:13:49
"CONTRADICTED YOURSELF" ROTFLMAO! Pathetic picking at nits there. Any 4th grader following our conversation would know, when I said "the ocean doesn't absorb radiation above 4?m wavelengths", I was talking about any significant volume of the ocean that? could appreciably add measurable OHC. As usual, you avoid admitting your errors, Gish Gallop all over the place flitting from one insignificant, irrelevant point to the next. You don't understand the science but won't admit it. Another Ras FAIL!

"Energy Imbalance ...
By: RealOldOne2. on 16 Jun 13, 12:13:47
"Energy Imbalance at the top of the trop" BZZZZ! No moving the goal posts allowed. You are not allowed to cheat, lie, deceive & misrepresent. That's all that's left in your playbook since the natural warming of the late 20th century has ended & we are transitioning into a period? of natural cooling & you have been duped & deluded into falling for the warming-by-CO2 hoax. It was politically driven from the beginning when they switched horses from global cooling to global warming. Another Ras FAIL!

""Global warming" ...
By: RealOldOne2. on 16 Jun 13, 12:13:45
""Global warming" is only a name we give to an increase in heat in the lower troposphere, oceans, ice and snow." LOL! BZZZZ! No, it's a? name given for surface temp warming. No moving the goalposts allowed, just b/c the natural warming cycle has stopped. Another Ras FAIL!

YOU HAVE JUST ...
By: Ras Pesher. on 16 Jun 13, 11:38:40
YOU HAVE JUST CONTRADICTED YOURSELF ROO said, "Unfortunate that you are so ignorant that you don't even realize that THE OCEAN DOESN'T EVEN ABSORB radiation above 4?m wavelengths" I said, "? You say, 'Back radiation ... only? penetrates microns deep' (that means that it is absorbed near the surface)" ROO said, "True, just as I said" Your flip-flop has been noted.

WARMING IN THE LAST ...
By: Ras Pesher. on 16 Jun 13, 07:13:29
WARMING IN THE LAST 15 YEARS Energy Imbalance at the top of the trop: 0.85 W/m� over 15 years => 24x10��Joules Ocean Energy Gain: 15x10��Joules Surface Temperature: Small increase. The surface warming trend over the last 60 years has averaged ~ 0.12�C/decade. That is the same order of? magnitude as the range we can get from ENSO. There are also other climate variations, so after 15 years the trend may only just start to emerge, especially since we started this 15 year period on a strong El Nino.

THROW? ANOTHER ...
By: Ras Pesher. on 16 Jun 13, 06:33:50
THROW? ANOTHER SHRIMP ON THE POLAR BARBIE "It's NOT global warming then is it" "Global warming" is only a name we give to an increase in heat in the lower troposphere, oceans, ice and snow. Generally nearly all regions have warmed but the poles will receive most of the warming as does night rather than day. You can call it the polar BBQ if you like! Knock yourself out.

YOU DON'T KNOW ...
By: Ras Pesher. on 16 Jun 13, 04:33:14
YOU DON'T KNOW KIRCHHOFF'S LAW ! "absorption, when it was really just about emissivity" So when I pointed you towards the answer to your question "1)" nearly 2 months ago, you just didn't understand: "The explanation for GW is based on fundamental laws of physics, such as: (1)Wien's Law, (2)Stefan-Boltzmann Law, (3)Conservation of Energy, (4)Lapse Rate, (5)Clausius Clapeyron,? (6)Logarithmic Response, (7)KIRCHHOFF'S LAW .." I've provided answers to 1),2)&3) but you're too stupid to understand?

"ROO FAILS ...
By: RealOldOne2. on 16 Jun 13, 03:27:13
"ROO FAILS COMPREHENSION!" Once again, you are projecting. "I was clearly talking about a glass of water" Well I was clearly talking about the ocean. Light clearly does not get transmitted below ~200m, proving that it's energy is? ABSORBED. So either you are claiming that the sun's light penetrates (gets transmitted) to the ocean bottom w/o getting absorbed, or you are denying that the sun's light contains photon energy which is converted to heat as it's absorbed . Either way, Ras FAILS again!

"BTW, your chart ...
By: RealOldOne2. on 16 Jun 13, 03:15:47
"BTW, your chart does not mention "absorption"/"absorptivity"/"e�missivity," & covers the wrong EM? frequency range!" LOL! Thanks for putting the last nail in the coffin, eliminating any doubt that that you have no understanding of this at all. The chart shows solar radiation intensity at various ocean depths. If intensity has gone to 0 at any wavelength, that means all the solar energy at that wavelength has been? ABSORBED at shallower depths! Great job exposing your ignorance! Another Ras FAIL!

LOL. Once again, ...
By: RealOldOne2. on 16 Jun 13, 03:15:16
LOL. Once again, you don't know what you are talking about. Kirchoff's law does NOT contradict anything I've said. I've said that the SURFACE of the ocean emits IR at wavelengths >4?m & the SURFACE skin absorbs IR at those same wavelengths. No contradiction there. The ocean transmits most radiation at wavelengths

Climate Change: Lines of Evidence
Posted by: nationalacademies

Video duration: 1560 seconds
Global video hits: 26649

The National Research Council is pleased to present this video that explains how scientists have arrived at the current state of knowledge about recent clima...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

At Risk: A Climate Change Forum (June 25)
Posted by: ANCalerts

Video duration: 40 seconds
Global video hits: 1

Let's discuss the future of our planet. Is government ready to face the challenges of climate change? Are we? Watch ANC PRESENTS: AT RISK: A Climate Change F...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Village Square - Climate Change and Sea Level Rise
Posted by: StPetersburgCollege

Video duration: 5401 seconds
Global video hits: 444

http://www.youtube.c om/user/StPetersburg College Climate Change and Sea Level Rise: Time for a Strategic Retreat from the Beach? Held on March 20, 2013 at the...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Climate Change - State of the Science [25c3]
Posted by: CCCen

Video duration: 3885 seconds
Global video hits: 379

Climate Change - State of the Science We are in the midst of a major global warming, as witnessed not just by temperature measurements, but also for example ...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Bill Nye: Firebrand for Science - Aims to Change the World
Posted by: TheNewYorkTimes

Video duration: 190 seconds
Global video hits: 301

In recent years, Bill Nye has emerged as a fearless voice against climate change deniers. The Science Guy has gone from taking on science lessons for childre...

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Duly agreed. ...
By: bypassthelaw. on 19 Jun 13, 03:40:34
Duly agreed. Bill's views on Global Warmin (which is real) and his Marxist views are something to be smiled upon, not jeered at. ? The world needs to become a collective community, enough of this selfish capitalistic filth. The wealth of the rich should also be shared upon the lesser of communities to give everyone a chance. We should take their money and distribute according to G-Summit and Earth Summit of Brazil.

If Bill is for the ...
By: GarySpatzScam. on 19 Jun 13, 03:35:12
If Bill is for the New World Order (one world Gov) then I'm all for it. We can sacrifice a bit of our liberties for security.. screw you Benjamin Franklin!!! This is OUR world, a? collective effort. And people need to stop considering children in families as "theirs" and start treating them as belonging to the "Community". They're the Community's Kids!!!

You have a problem ...
By: dudev. on 19 Jun 13, 02:45:17
You have a problem listening. If god is the creator, then human and apes? are brothers.

if you truly ...
By: John Rooney. on 19 Jun 13, 01:18:41
if you truly believe that your entire genetic line is doomed ?

An eye is not an ...
By: jfschaffer61. on 18 Jun 13, 23:03:19
An eye is not an eye unless it has ALL of its functioning components in place.. an ear... etc. I'm not denying that there is an apparent illusion of evolution. . Thats a givin. But you can't even consider God(because of religious misapropiations) You have maintained your blindness. I'm studying hard to figure? all this out while you have come to a conclusion. .. Which is not scientific at all

William you are ...
By: jfschaffer61. on 18 Jun 13, 22:55:05
William you are ignorant. Science has no hospitals and is no force for good. It simply reveals truth of the physical world. You speak of the the same mindless? jargon the Bill Nye the nonscience guy speaks .. Wise up

He? is so right, ...
By: william leshitski. on 18 Jun 13, 22:46:22
He? is so right, the ignorance of all religions need to stop on this planet, what we need to do is expand our minds through science and technology. Space travel, prolong our lives for space travel, become immortal beings through science. that is human kinds future. exploring the galaxies, creating colonies. create our own race of beings,. science will bring an end to poverty,hunger. science will do far more for humans, than any religion ever has.

Bill Nye is so ...
By: jfschaffer61. on 18 Jun 13, 22:33:53
Bill Nye is so foucused on his need to be? right that he doesn't see the majesty of the onevthat sustains the beating heart in his chest. He's so self righteous he makes me sick. But that's my flesh.... Science is an on going endeavor. He has reached a conclusion He will never budge from. When he stands before God he will see the utter foolishness of what he speaks. I am a scientist... He is a ..... I'm not sure.. A cultist perhaps

Ants are meant to ...
By: mikesarp. on 18 Jun 13, 20:48:03
Ants are meant to be stupid than humans but they have the perfect civilisation we? are yet to achieve. Something to think about since we supposedly have common ancestry

The fight against ...
By: gottakidtofeed. on 18 Jun 13, 20:41:12
The fight against stupidity is a tough? road, thanks for going there Bill Nye!

He created humans ...
By: mikesarp. on 18 Jun 13, 20:25:50
He created humans in His own image. He didn't create animals in His own image. Read the bible before you start making such statements. Man? and animals are not cousins.

No. But you do. Did ...
By: dudev. on 18 Jun 13, 20:23:19
No. But you do. Did your god give you a brain or not? Or is rational thought the? "Devil's work"? FYI, if god --the father--created humans and apes, then that makes humans and apes brothers. But under the framework of evolution, they are only cousins. Now that's ironic.

We are all left in ...
By: mikesarp. on 18 Jun 13, 20:08:57
We are all left in the dust, unless you are part of TPTB or the rich elite. Your knowledge is what they let you know. Its all programming. Wake up and? look closer at nature. You will see the handy work or God.

yet it still ...
By: John Rooney. on 18 Jun 13, 20:05:32
yet it still doesn't change the fact that it happened. Look argue this? all you want but the facts and data are there, if you want to live in your own fantasy world you go right ahead, you'll be left in the dust with the rest of the close minded individuals who can't see what's right in front of your face.

Stupidity is ...
By: mikesarp. on 18 Jun 13, 19:32:06
Stupidity is relative. Calling yourself the end? product of evolution of animals, that's pretty stupid.

"God gave you a ...
By: mikesarp. on 18 Jun 13, 19:30:10
"God gave you a brain and you insult him by? not using it." So you believe in God after all?

Evolution makes no ...
By: mikesarp. on 18 Jun 13, 19:28:15
Evolution makes no sense if it does not have support from abiogenesis. How could you claim we evolved from single cell organisms without proving how they came into existence? At least the bible accounts for everything, even the origin or God Himself, being that God was always there. His existence is independent? of time, since He started time. Abiogenesis is far from being anywhere near fact, and without it evolution makes no sense.

i hope science will ...
By: damian uknown. on 18 Jun 13, 19:27:55
i hope science will save us, religion won't humanity will need science to survive we are 300 years behind because of religion,?

i hope? science ...
By: damian uknown. on 18 Jun 13, 19:27:42
i hope? science will save us, religion won't humanity will need science to survive we are 300years behind because of religion,

Great asset to ...
By: Adam Aguiar. on 18 Jun 13, 18:09:54
Great asset to general science knowledge but he is? wrong here. We will be seeing much bigger and spectacular climate changes on Earth. I think the forces driving all of this change is extra earth and in fact maybe be outside of our Galagalxy

Evolution makes no ...
By: pxxner. on 18 Jun 13, 16:07:16
Evolution makes no claim as? to the origin of life. The quest for understanding the origin of life is called Abiogenesis and there is considerable evidence supporting that life from nonlife is possible. As for the morality, humans create morality. It really is as simple as that, nothing divine is required for morality.

Science rules!?
By: guero1289. on 18 Jun 13, 16:00:57
Science rules!?

Same? difference
By: guero1289. on 18 Jun 13, 15:54:57
Same? difference

I can't imagine the ...
By: noobguitar117. on 18 Jun 13, 15:39:48
I can't imagine the havoc he must have brought to Fox News. Makes me smile :) Thanks for making my childhood awesome? Bill

Society isn't dead. ...
By: dudev. on 18 Jun 13, 14:09:24
Society isn't dead. Try? leaving your house and reading a science book. God gave you a brain and you insult him by not using it.

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40

global warming Related Videos

global warming Videos

Watching: Climate Change video compilations